分析了1000个加密货币ICO之后,我学到了什么

老雅痞Published on 2022-12-21Last updated on 2022-12-21

Abstract

在本文中,我分享了我对数百个加密项目价格在特定时间表现的分析见解。这些研究结果对ICO的投资者和项目公开上市后的买家都很有意义。

在本文中,我分享了我对数百个加密项目价格在特定时间表现的分析见解。这些研究结果对ICO的投资者和项目公开上市后的买家都很有意义。

请注意,这不是一项学术研究。尽管如此,我相信这些发现对加密货币的投资者来说是有附加价值的。

话不多说,让我们开始吧!

数据集

我用于分析的数据包括2019年1月至2022年10月期间发生的983次ICO。

如下图所示,该数据集中的大部分ICO都发生在2021年和2022年。在解释本文中的数据时,这一点非常重要。

ICO价格

下图显示了ICO价格的分布——在融资过程的不同阶段,代币的销售价格。

令人惊讶的是,大多数项目的价格仅为几美分。只有不到10%的项目将价格定在1美元或以上。这与我与各种加密项目高管的谈话不谋而合——根据他们的谈话,许多项目选择如此低的价格主要是出于心理原因。事实证明,许多(没有经验的)投资者将较低的ICO价格与较高的未来增长潜力联系在一起。我们将在后面看到,这种假设是错误的。

ICO融资目标

大多数项目目标筹集高达50万美元,其中很大一部分将目标设定为100万美元或更多。从这些数据中我们还可以看到以下几点:

平均而言,2019年、2020年和2021年(在较小程度上)单个项目的平均筹资目标明显高于2022年。对此有两种解释。

由于数据集中的大多数项目来自2021年和2022年,较高的数字压低了这些年筹资目标的平均值。

2019年至2021年的融资条件好于2022年。这也与金融部门和初创企业的报告相对应,即2022年获得启动资金变得更加困难。

ICO公开上市后第一天的表现

现在让我们进入分析的主要部分。以下是数据集中的ICO在公开上市后第一天的表现。

中位数:253%

第一四分位数:74%

第三四分位数:766%

数据显示,平均而言,数据集中的加密项目在第一天出现了较大幅度的价格上涨。然而,其中的差距非常大,一些项目显示了数千或10,000 %的增长。

下面的图表直观地显示了被分析的加密货币项目中具有代表性的部分在第一天的表现。

ICO公开上市后第365天的表现

注:由于在此分析时,2022年发布的项目成立时间不到365天,因此我使用了最新的可用价格。

一年后,大多数项目的情况看起来截然不同。

中位数:-80%

第一四分位数:-93%

第三四分位数:-15%

与ICO价格相比,大多数代币已经损失了80%到90%的价值。如果以公开上市首日的价格作为参考,情况看起来会更糟。在大多数项目中,你会看到90%以上的恶化。

这种情况可以在下面的图表中看到。

你会注意到,2020年的项目表现相对较好。这是因为在公开上市一年后,这些代币正处于牛市之中。

ICO长期表现

为了更好地了解各个项目随时间的发展,我记录了四个时间点下的表现:第1天、第10天、第60天和第365天。这一点如下图所示,该图涵盖了所有ICO的代表性样本。

项目名称后面的数字是增加的百分比。在这张图中多少有些遗漏的是,在过去的一年里,许多项目都出现了负面发展。

令人惊讶的是,对于大多数新的加密项目来说,早期投资者在公开上市后的头几天就开始了大规模的销售。在某些情况下,前两周散户投资者的涌入意味着价格甚至略高,这可以从第10天的标记中看出。但在几乎所有情况下,价格在第60天就已经大幅下跌。

对给投资者的启示

基于这些见解,投资者在投资ICO或新上市项目时可以得出几个结论:

1. 在大多数情况下,对处于融资阶段的ICO的投资是值得的,因为公开上市的价格会大幅上涨——前提是交易所的可用流动性允许你在最初几天内出售你的持股。

2. 任何在公开上市后的头几天买入的人都很可能不得不接受在第一年时间里的大幅贬值。简单地说,如果你在新币上市后立即购买,你就是早期投资者的退出流动性。

3. 这一分析证实了其他报告的说法,即大多数新项目都会失败。

4. 任何计划长期持有一个新项目的人都应该密切关注比特币的长期周期。2020年发布的项目从2021年的牛市中受益匪浅,而2022年发布的计划则受到当前熊市的严重影响。

5. 融资目标大小对项目的后期表现影响最小。这意味着在融资阶段收集的大量资金并不能保证项目能够达到预期。

6. ICO价格对项目的后期表现影响很小。

7. 根据我的数据,从长期来看,试图在多个平台上筹集资金的项目表现最差。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Securitize's First Post-IPO Financial Report Bombshell: Is the 'Compliant Tokenization' Narrative Failing to Sell?

Securitize, a tokenization platform, released its first earnings report since going public in July 2026, revealing disappointing Q2 results. Revenue fell 5% year-over-year to $14.43 million, missing estimates, while the net loss widened significantly to $21.68 million. Despite achieving record tokenized assets under management of $4.3 billion and a 147% surge in platform trading volume, overall assets under administration declined by 20%. The company's stock (SECZ) dropped over 20% in after-hours trading following the report. The article highlights a key concern: Securitize's revenue declined despite substantial trading growth, suggesting either compressed fees or an unclear business model. While Securitize maintains its focus on regulatory compliance—securing key partnerships with entities like Computershare and NYSE, and obtaining an SEC investment advisor registration—its tangible progress in the new tokenized stock business has been slow. Apart from tokenizing its own stock (SECZ) upon listing, it has not launched other tokenized equities. Analysts note that SECZ's high on-chain market capitalization is misleading, as it resulted from a one-time distribution to shareholders rather than organic investor demand. The market's patience is waning as investors prioritize real business metrics like market share and user adoption over the "compliant tokenization" narrative. Securitize's market value has fallen 36% from its debut, reflecting growing concerns over its shrinking revenue and the delayed execution of its tokenized stock initiatives.

Odaily星球日报8m ago

Securitize's First Post-IPO Financial Report Bombshell: Is the 'Compliant Tokenization' Narrative Failing to Sell?

Odaily星球日报8m ago

Why Every Investor Needs to Pay Attention to the Federal Reserve

Why Every Investor Should Follow the Federal Reserve Key developments on August 12, 2026, demonstrate how crucial the Fed is. Following the CPI report that matched expectations, markets instantly repriced stocks, bonds, and currencies, adjusting the probability of a September Fed rate hike. The Federal Reserve controls the federal funds rate, the anchor for all borrowing costs. Its "dual mandate" is to maintain stable prices and maximum employment. The current policy rate is 3.50%-3.75% after a series of cuts from 2024-2025. Understanding Fed actions is vital for your portfolio: - **Rate Hikes:** Slow the economy to fight inflation. They pressure growth/tech stocks (due to higher discount rates) and lower bond prices but can initially benefit banks. - **Rate Cuts:** Stimulate the economy. They typically boost growth stocks and bond prices while lowering borrowing costs for consumers and businesses. - **Holding Steady:** Still impactful. Current restrictive policy, with positive real interest rates, continues to weigh on the economy. Market-moving signals now come more from economic data than official guidance. A key change is new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh, who has reduced forward guidance, making each data release (CPI, PCE, jobs reports, GDP) more critical for predicting Fed moves. In this environment, investors should track key reports, compare data to market expectations, and understand what is already "priced in." The focus now is on the September 15-16 FOMC meeting. The August CPI (due Sep 11) and jobs report (Sep 5) will be decisive. Ultimately, interest rates are a powerful, continuous force on all assets. Learning to interpret the data that drives Fed policy is an essential skill for navigating today's markets.

marsbit11m ago

Why Every Investor Needs to Pay Attention to the Federal Reserve

marsbit11m ago

MicroStrategy Sells BTC Without a Price Drop, Is STRC's Rebound Truly Good News?

The cryptocurrency market is currently experiencing extreme quiet, with BTC weekly trading volume at its lowest since 2023 and implied volatility hitting bottom. Liquidity is thin, as evidenced by a muted price reaction to CPI data. The market's primary issue is a lack of active participants, not just news. Options data shows traders are pricing in higher short-term downside risks. Market makers' gamma positioning suggests a critical support zone between $61,000 and $60,000; a break below could accelerate a downturn. Two developments are being interpreted bullishly: MicroStrategy (MSTR) selling a small portion of its BTC without causing a price crash, and the rebound of its preferred shares (STRC) from lows near $73 to over $95. However, an alternative bearish interpretation exists. The low liquidity means large entities cannot exit sizable positions easily. A STRK recovery towards $100 could provide the buying pressure these sellers need to finally offload BTC, making the apparent利好 (positive news) actually improve selling conditions. STRC faces a structural ceiling at $100 because MSTR has signaled it will issue new shares around that price, capping upside and inviting short sellers. While recent buybacks boosted the price, they haven't solved this core problem. If STRK cannot sustainably break $100, concerns will grow about MSTR needing to sell BTC for funding. Finally, the Bitfinex Long positions indicator, which typically moves inversely to BTC price, has become ineffective and flat-lined near multi-year lows, offering no directional signal. Large traders are not accumulating on dips as they once did.

marsbit12m ago

MicroStrategy Sells BTC Without a Price Drop, Is STRC's Rebound Truly Good News?

marsbit12m ago

Silicon Valley Tech Giants No Longer Need Ethicists

Silicon Valley tech giants are once again sidelining ethicists. Chloé Bakalar, OpenAI's dedicated AI Ethics Lead, left the company in July, a departure emblematic of a broader trend where ethics teams are being disbanded or marginalized in the race for AI dominance. Bakalar's career highlights the tensions between ethical governance and commercial speed. She first made her mark at Meta (formerly Facebook), where she pioneered "embedded ethics," developing tools like checklists to translate abstract principles like fairness and transparency into concrete engineering steps. Her framework aimed to embed ethical considerations throughout a product’s lifecycle—from initial design and data handling to user interaction and deployment. However, this approach faced significant internal resistance. At Meta, her Responsible AI team was eventually disbanded as the company prioritized rapid development, especially in the generative AI race with OpenAI. Bakalar then joined OpenAI in 2025, hoping to influence cutting-edge model development directly. Yet, as the company's sole dedicated ethicist, she reportedly struggled with limited influence and resources amidst intense commercial pressures, leading to her departure after roughly a year. Her exit is not isolated. Similar patterns have emerged across Silicon Valley, with ethics and safety teams at Twitter (post-Musk acquisition) and OpenAI's own "superalignment" team being dissolved. These departures reveal five core, unresolved tensions: 1) the fatal conflict between commercialization speed and ethical caution; 2) the role mismatch where ethicists have prestige but little real decision-making power; 3) the dilution of responsibility when ethics is decentralized as "everyone's job"; 4) the inevitable "translation loss" when complex philosophical values are reduced to quantifiable engineering metrics; and 5) the fundamental clash between academic independence and corporate secrecy. Bakalar’s trajectory suggests that embedding meaningful ethical oversight within hyper-competitive tech companies is profoundly difficult. Lasting change may require external regulatory pressure, like the EU's AI Act, or a fundamental reimagining of the ethicist's role from an internal auditor to a cross-disciplinary builder with genuine authority.

marsbit42m ago

Silicon Valley Tech Giants No Longer Need Ethicists

marsbit42m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.8k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片