Uniswap NFT上线两周，能不能打？

TokenInsightPublished on 2022-12-16Last updated on 2022-12-16

Abstract

Uniswap在 2022 年 11 月 30 日发布其 NFT 聚合器后，终于实现了其同时为 ERC-20 和 NFT 提供服务的愿景。

Uniswap NFT 上线已经两周了，现在是 Uniswap 主页上的四个选项之一。它的表现如何？我们在本文中研究了 Uniswap NFT 的交易数据，并探讨它是否会成功。

交易数据

有限的功能

缺乏吸引力的激励机制

竞争格局

写在最后

Uniswap在 2022 年 11 月 30 日发布其 NFT 聚合器后，终于实现了其同时为 ERC-20 和 NFT 提供服务的愿景。NFT 聚合器将各个市场的挂单整合到一个界面中，允许用户轻松选择最优惠的价格。（推荐阅读：《一文窥探Uniswap NFT的战略野心：收购聚合器Genie，醉翁之意不在“酒”》）

来源：Uniswap

Uniswap NFT 上线已经两周了，现在是 Uniswap 主页上的四个选项之一。它的表现如何？我们在本文中研究了 Uniswap NFT 的交易数据，并探讨它是否会成功。

交易数据

Uniswap NFT 头两个星期的交易数据算不上成功。

交易数量和用户数量都是在项目上线的前两天达到峰值。交易量有一些起伏，但发展的轨迹也依旧不容乐观。

平均而言，与第一周相比，第二周的交易数量下降了 37%，而用户数下降了 56%。以 ETH 计算的交易额下降了 26%。如果同样的趋势继续下去，Uniswap NFT 将在上线一个月后仅仅吸引到日均 17 个用户和 36 ETH 的交易量。

Uniswap NFT 业绩不佳可归因于两个因素：a）其功能有限，b）激励机制缺乏吸引力。

有限的功能

从产品的角度来看，Genie 并不是同类产品中最好的，更名为 Uniswap NFT 并没有改变这一点。

首先，聚合器的最重要的功能是提供最优惠的价格，但 Uniswap NFT 上的价格却始终高于它的竞争对手。

例如，Blur 上 BEANZ 系列的地板价为 0.83 ETH，Gem 上的地板价为 0.85 ETH，Uniswap 上的地板价却高达 0.92 ETH，相差 11%。

Blur 和 Sudoswap 作为 NFT 交易市场现在通常提供最优惠的价格，因为它们不收取手续费用，也允许用户不支付版权费用。不支持 Blur 显著影响了 Uniswap NFT 提供最优惠的价格的能力。没有人会使用与其竞争对手相似但收费高出 10% 的服务。

此外，Uniswap NFT 上的其他功能也比不上它的竞争对手们。例如，用户无法在 Uniswap NFT 上按稀有度进行搜索。Uniswap NFT 不提供分析工具，也不允许用户通过 Uniswap NFT 在各大平台挂单出售他们的 NFT。

Uniswap 并非从零开始建造其聚合器。它于 2022 年 6 月收购了Genie，并花了五个多月的时间将其集成到现有的 Uniswap 协议中。Genie 的创始人 Scott 现在担任 Uniswap 的 NFT 产品负责人。

Genie 是市场上第一个 NFT 聚合器，于 2021 年 11 月 17 日上线。上线后的 Genie 立即大受欢迎，因为它使 NFT 玩家第一次能够实现批量买卖，节省了时间和 gas 费。在 Genie 之前，NFT 买家必须为他们想要购买的每个 NFT 都完成一笔链上交易，这对一次购买多件 NFT 的买家来说是个巨大的痛点。

然而，Genie 未能利用好它的先发优势。另一款聚合器 Gem 于 2022 年 1 月 20 日上线，并迅速崛起。与 Genie 相比，Gem 更省 gas，而且新功能交付得更快。很快，每个 NFT 交易者都放弃了 Genie 而转投 Gem。OpenSea 行动迅速，在 Gem 首次发布仅三个月后宣布收购 Gem。Gem 自收购以来一直以独立身份运营，仍然是市场上首选的聚合器。

相较而言，Uniswap NFT 未能提供任何独特的东西。Foundation 是唯一由 Uniswap 独家支持的 NFT 市场，但只有很小一撮人真的使用 Foundation。如果 Uniswap NFT 不迅速创新并推出用户真正想要的功能，其表现只会在未来看起来更糟。

缺乏吸引力的激励机制

Uniswap NFT 也没有从其奖励机制中受益。

Uniswap NFT 在发布时提供了两个激励措施。首先，某些曾经使用过 Genie 用户有资格获得 300USDC的空投，如果用户同时还持有 Genie:Genesis NFT，他们的空投则增加到 1000 美元。

其次，Uniswap 在聚合器上线的前两周提供 gas 补偿计划，以鼓励人们使用该平台。具体而言，在此期间购买 NFT 的前 22,000 名用户将有资格在他们的首次交易中获得 gas 补偿。gas 补偿上限为0.01 ETH。

相比其他项目的激励机制，Uniswap 充其量只能算是平庸。例如，Blur 设计了一个全面的奖励计划，承诺空投其原生通证给用户。首先，它向所有在过去六个月内交易过 NFT 的用户发放了空投。但是用户必须在 Blur 上完成一次挂单才能领取。其次，Blur 还给自己平台的活跃用户奖励空投，同样的，这个空投需要用户在平台上完成一次出价设置才能领取。虽然 Blur 的空投也是追溯性的，但它需要当下持续的努力来领取，这样便提升了产品的使用率。而 Uniswap 的 $USDC 的空投只是追溯性的，并不能刺激当下产品的使用。

其次，gas 补偿虽然听上去不错，但它的时间太短暂了（只有两周），额度也很低（0.01 ETH，约合 12 美元）。节省的 gas 费用很容易被 Uniswap NFT 上相对较高的 NFT 价格所掩盖。

设计合适的激励机制，包括空投策略，有助于一个新的项目快速启动。但 Uniswap 对其的利用显然并不充分。（推荐阅读：《Uniswap NFT市场狂撒500万美金空投上线，为何收效甚微？》）

竞争格局

NFT 聚合器中真正的竞争对手是 Blur 和 Gem。其他项目，包括 Uniswap NFT，还都相距甚远。下图统计了自 Uniswap NFT 上线后的两周内市场上主流聚合器的数据（因为 OpenSea、X2Y2 算交易市场而不是交易聚合器，因此没有包括在内）。Blur 在所有指标上都领先，而 Gem 第二名的位置也很稳固。如前所述，Blur 占据主导地位主要还是因为它提供了最低的价格。如果 Gem 开始整合 Blur 市场上的挂单，那么观察市场会如何反应将会很有趣。

需要指出的是，NFTNerds 和 Alpha Sharks 从人均指标上来看比较突出。但它们都是高级的工具，只迎合了一个特定群体的一小撮用户。普通用户只有付费订阅才能访问所有功能。因此，将它们与其他产品进行比较不太公平。

写在最后

Uniswap 是许多寻求整合 NFT 功能的交易所之一。在 Uniswap 之前，Coinbase NFT 就失败了。不过，Coinbase 建立了一个功能齐全、独立的 NFT 市场，而 Uniswap NFT 只是一个聚合器。

建立聚合器的缺点之一是它不能直接产生收入。OpenSea 可以对所有交易收取 2.5% 的费用，但 Gem 和 Uniswap NFT 等聚合器是免费的。因此，Uniswap 只能寄希望于通过增加网站流量等间接手段从新加的 NFT 功能中获利。

更别提 Uniswap NFT 还不够好了。如果 Uniswap NFT 团队不迅速升级他们的产品，它可能很快就会发现自己将会陪伴在 Coinbase NFT 身旁，成为一家原本不错的公司出产的糟糕透顶的产品的经典案例。

Trending Cryptos

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbit7h ago

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbit7h ago

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手7h ago

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手7h ago

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit10h ago

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit10h ago

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手11h ago

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手11h ago

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit12h ago

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit12h ago

Trading

Spot

Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy UNI

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Uniswap (UNI) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Uniswap (UNI) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Uniswap (UNI)After purchasing your Uniswap (UNI), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Uniswap (UNI)Easily trade Uniswap (UNI) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

7.2k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of UNI (UNI) are presented below.