Magic Eden与Metaplex开撕，谁才是Solana上NFT版税话事人？

Odaily星球日报Published on 2022-12-11Last updated on 2022-12-11

Abstract

FTX 破产让 Solana 生态备受打击，NFT 市场也不安宁。

NFT版税之争已愈演愈烈，不仅是以太坊，关于是否强制执行 NFT 创作者版税的问题现在也蔓延到了本就问题重重的 Solana 区块链，该领域主要参与者 Metaplex 和 Magic Eden 之间长期酝酿的纷争终于曝光并延烧到了社交媒体上。

⠀

12 月 9 日，Solana 链上 NFT 标准创建者 Metaplex 在 Twitter 发文称，头部 NFT 市场 Magic Eden 正在领导一场「具有协调性的压力运动」且试图控制其创建的链上 NFT 标准。如果 Magic Eden 可能给设置代币参数和功能，那么 Solana 链上 NFT 将具有不同意其他类似代币的独特功能。作为 Solana 链上 NFT 标准的创建方，Metaplex 编写了几乎所有相关代码，这意味着他们几乎「控制」每一个 Solana 链上 NFT 的密钥。

⠀

值得一提的是，Metaplex 在推文中还提到了一个人：核心开发人员 Jordan Prince，他在 Solana Labs 工作时开发最初的 Metaplex 协议，之后离职创立了 B+J Studios 公司并在今年九月成功募集 1000 万美元资金以支持 NFT 基础设施开发——Metaplex 认为，Jordan Prince 是 Magic Eden 的同谋。

⠀

Metaplex vs. Magic Eden：「撕 * 大战」开始了

⠀

Metaplex 一直是 Solana 链上 NFT 版税征收的支持者，而 Magic Eden 则希望实施「零版税」策略，今年 10 月，Magic Eden 就宣布不再严格执行 NFT 创作者版税设定权限，以在熊市期间吸引更多用户并且避免竞争对手迅速抢走市场份额。

⠀

按照 Metaplex 在社交媒体的说法，他们在 Solana 区块链上一直扮演着创作者和艺术家「守门人」的角色，但 Magic Eden 更多地是从商业角度出发，希望将 NFT 版税标准从社区手中夺走并迫使用户接受「半生不熟」的治理计划。

⠀

⠀

Magic Eden 迅速做出反击，表示 Metaplex「诬陷」其试图控制 Solana 链上 NFT 标准，而且矛头一转，指责 Metaplex 正在用其今年九月推出的 MPLX 治理代币来变相掌握对 Solana 链上 NFT 标准的控制权，也会给标准本身带来不当影响。Magic Eden 还表示，他们已经和 Solana 链上其他建设者向 Metaplex 提出意见：「Metaplex 持有『上帝模式』密钥，他们几乎可以为所欲为，他们的目标其实是为了维护其 MPLX 代币持有者的利益。」

⠀

⠀

Metaplex 也不甘示弱，随即做出回应，声称将会发布新计划来「分散」对 Solana 链上 NFT 标准的控制权，但同时也强硬回怼 Magic Eden「不会随意安抚一个恶意行事的团体」。

⠀

Metaplex vs. Magic Eden：双方矛盾由来已久

⠀

这不是 Magic Eden 和 Metaplex 第一次就 Solana NFT 生态系统发展方向产生分歧了，只是现在双方的矛盾正以前所未有的方式蔓延到公众视野中。

⠀

早在 8 月，一位接近 Metaplex 的消息人士透露，Metaplex 发现 Magic Eden 托管用户上线 NFT 的方法存在潜在安全风险，但 Magic Eden 拒绝了 Metaplex 的帮助，也不愿意公开其源代码。据悉，Magic Eden 构建 NFT 市场的源代码其实来自于早期 Metaplex 的代码，但做了大量修改且被封闭起来不予以公开。

⠀

然而，让 Metaplex 和 Magic Eden 矛盾加剧的无疑是备受关注的二级市场 NFT 版税问题，NFT 创作者版税是一笔小额费用，通常在销售价格的 5% 到 10% 之间，由卖家通过相关市场自动支付给项目的原始创作者。在这个问题上，Magic Eden 和 Metaplex 看法相左，他们在今年 10 月宣布将在其平台上启用可选版税，允许 NFT 购买者选择全额版税、一半版税或无版税模式。

⠀

Magic Eden 做出这一举措实属无奈，过去一年，Magic Eden 一直是 Solana 上最主要的 NFT 市场，市场份额一度占据 90% 以上，但随着 Hadeswap 和 Solanart 等竞争对手推出「零版税」策略之后，Magic Eden 的市场份额快速下跌， 11 月中旬已缩水至 77% ，Yawww 和 Hadeswap 也正在一步步蚕食其「蛋糕」。

⠀

或许是因为 Magic Eden 「零版税」并没有得到 Metaplex 支持，他们决定另起炉灶， 11 月初 Magic Eden 联合创始人兼首席执行官 Jack Lu 宣布推出一种全新 Solana 链上 NFT 标准，该标准将在技术层面强制执行版税，执行此标准有望产生一种新的资产类别，可以为那些想要获得版税或新商业模式的人提供支持。上周，Magic Eden 又宣布从 12 月 2 日开始启动一项协议「Open Creator Protocol（OCP）」， 将对所有选择使用该工具的新收藏品征收版税，创作者也可以选择是否要保护版税。

⠀

就在 Magic Eden 踌躇满志的时候，Metaplex 杀了出来，「突然」宣布计划开发一种新的强制使用费 NFT 资产类别标准 MIP-1 ，该标准将于 2023 年 1 月推出。此举令 Jack Lu 异常愤怒，因为据他称，Magic Eden 的新版税工具在发布之前与 Metaplex 进行了分享，而 Metaplex 故意选择在 OCP 推出之后发布，可能会对有一些反制措施。

⠀

结语

⠀

FTX 破产让 Solana 生态备受打击，该网络以美元计价的 DeFi TVL 从 11 月 6 日的 10 亿美元下降至 2.783 亿美元，降幅高达 72.1% ；网络稳定币市值也从 39 亿美元缩水至 21 亿美元，降幅达到 46.1% 。

⠀

现在，链上 NFT 市场也变得不安宁，或许会让 Solana 生态雪上加霜。Metaplex 和 Magic Eden 最终谁能控制链上 NFT 标准？让我们拭目以待吧。

Trending Cryptos

ctr
CitreaCTR
wstusdt
wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT
apr
aPrioriAPR
ctx
Cryptex FinanceCTX
audio
AudiusAUDIO
mantra
MantraMANTRA
xvs
VenusXVS
waxl
AxelarWAXL
bill
Billions NetworkBILL
pyth
PYTH (Pyth)PYTH
rune
THORChainRUNE
velodrome
Velodrome FinanceVELODROME
brev
BrevisBREV
zrx
ZRX（0X）ZRX
cake
PancakeSwapCAKE

Related Reads

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit1h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit1h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit1h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit1h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit2h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit2h ago

Hyperliquid ETF Claim Draws Attention As HYPE Narrative Builds On X

A social media claim has brought attention to Hyperliquid (HYPE) and the growth of its related ETF products. According to a June 20 post on X by AlphaOnChain, three Hyperliquid ETFs launched in May 2026 have collectively amassed $158 million in assets under management, led by a Bitwise fund with $88 million and a 21Shares fund with $66 million. The article notes this claim is from social media and not verified by official issuer data, advising caution. Nonetheless, the report highlights that HYPE is gaining traction as a notable altcoin narrative. Its focus on on-chain perpetual trading and exchange infrastructure places it at the intersection of DeFi and derivatives, attracting traders looking for high-conviction plays beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum. The key takeaway is that while social momentum can influence short-term markets, sustainable growth for HYPE would require confirmed demand, liquidity, and continued ecosystem development.

bitcoinist3h ago

Hyperliquid ETF Claim Draws Attention As HYPE Narrative Builds On X

bitcoinist3h ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit3h ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy MPLX

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Metaplex (MPLX) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Metaplex (MPLX) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Metaplex (MPLX)After purchasing your Metaplex (MPLX), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Metaplex (MPLX)Easily trade Metaplex (MPLX) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

2.2k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy MPLX

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of MPLX (MPLX) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions