Is DeFi About To Grow At The Expense Of CeFi?

zycryptoPublished on 2022-11-24Last updated on 2022-11-24

Abstract

The crypto industry has a well-deserved reputation for changing in the blink of an eye. This month, in the space of just a couple of weeks, we’ve witnessed the centralized crypto empire unravel before our very eyes.

The crypto industry has a well-deserved reputation for changing in the blink of an eye. This month, in the space of just a couple of weeks, we’ve witnessed the centralized crypto empire unravel before our very eyes.

It began with the stunning collapse of FTX, and the shockwaves created a ripple effect that led to several other major players, notably BlockFi and perhaps Genesis and Gemini, all imploding as the crypto community rushed to get its funds out of centralized exchanges into somewhere safe.

The turmoil resulted in the prices of Bitcoin and virtually every other crypto asset declining by more than 10%. But though it may feel like doomsday within the crypto industry right now, if we take a step back, we can see that it might play out differently from what the early panic seemed to have suggested.

The one commonality of all these major crypto players is centralization. So-called centralized finance (CeFi) might look similar in appearance to decentralized finance (DeFi) but it’s actually a very different beast. Whereas DeFi is all about self-sovereignty, CeFi refers to projects – or really profit-making businesses – in the crypto space that holds authority over their user’s assets.

When you leave funds in a CeFi platform, you don’t actually control them. Instead, you’re leaving them in the hands of the people who own that platform, and they’re free to use them in any way they see fit.

The liquidity issues that caused FTX to file for bankruptcy can be attributed to its control, power and governance of its user’s assets. Centralization means users are subject to manipulation. In the alternative world of DeFi, that can’t happen because there’s no central authority running the show from behind the curtains. Asset ownership remains firmly in the hands of the users. DeFi alternatives are, therefore trustless and immune to the greed and recklessness of centralized institutions.

This key difference between CeFi and DeFi has become only too apparent in the last few days. While major tokens fell to new yearly lows as a result of the turmoil caused by FTX, there has been a surge of interest in tokens tied to DeFi platforms. According to Delphi Digital, DEX tokens have strongly outperformed CEX tokens – its DEX basket of tokens was up by +24% vs. the equivalent CEX basket, which was down by -2% since November 11th.

With centralized exchanges once again showing that they just cannot be trusted, decentralized exchanges have benefited from a strong influx of crypto users looking for safety.

Evidence of this trend can also be seen in Polkadot, a blockchain project that has long advocated the benefits of decentralization. New data from Dot Insights, an initiative that tracks the Polkadot and Kusama blockchain ecosystems, shows that Polkadot has witnessed a sharp spike in user activity recently.

For instance, the number of new Polkadot accounts has risen by more than 900% in November. At the same time, the number of active accounts has jumped by more than 300%, from around 1,100 to 4,516 at the last count. Crypto users are clearly looking for a safe haven for their funds, and there’s nothing safer than self-custody, hence the growing interest in decentralized platforms.

Polkadot is a natural destination, as its creator Gavin Wood has long been one of the most vocal proponents of decentralization and self-sovereignty of funds. While Binance’s founder Changpeng ‘CZ’ Zhao has been attacking FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried on Twitter, calling him a psychopath and a bad player, Wood simply observed that it’s not the individual in question that is the problem, but rather the whole concept of centralization that enables such individuals to prosper.

It’s too early to tell if this episode spells the end for centralized platforms in crypto, but recent trends over the last few days suggest that we’re seeing a clear and conscious shift. A lot of people needed a lot of prodding to be convinced about the merits of crypto in the first place, and now those same people are just beginning to understand the true purpose of what they’ve gotten into. With that, a much-needed departure from CeFi to the world of DeFi and true self-sovereignty is finally picking up steam.

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Second Half of U.S. Crypto Policy: The Clarity Act Aims for 60 Votes, CFTC's "One-Person Commission" Becomes Biggest Variable

In a pivotal year for US crypto policy, the "CLARITY Act" is advancing in the Senate but faces a high hurdle, needing 60 votes to pass. Key challenges include bridging partisan divides on ethics and swaying undecided Republican senators within a tight legislative calendar of only about 40 working days. The policy "second half" involves intense negotiations on a broader framework for Web3 and DeFi, including crypto tax reforms and the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act. A significant uncertainty is the understaffed CFTC, operating with four commissioner vacancies, which complicates regulatory clarity. Meanwhile, the departure of key "crypto champions"—SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce and Senator Cynthia Lummis—will impact ongoing policy efforts. Industry experts are cautiously optimistic but realistic. Sara K. Weed notes that while progress is being made, CLARITY is unlikely to pass this Congress, pushing agencies like the SEC and CFTC to provide more guidance. Sulolit Mukherjee suggests meaningful crypto tax legislation is more likely to be attached to larger must-pass bills. Rashan Colbert discusses the jurisdictional debate over prediction markets, emphasizing the need for a regulatory framework that fosters their development as financial tools rather than treating them broadly as gambling. The clock is ticking, but opportunities remain for substantive progress through continued bipartisan dialogue and pragmatic efforts.

marsbit1h ago

Second Half of U.S. Crypto Policy: The Clarity Act Aims for 60 Votes, CFTC's "One-Person Commission" Becomes Biggest Variable

marsbit1h ago

Research Report Analysis: Morgan Stanley Details SanDisk SNDK, The Truth About Cloud Data Center Pricing Power and AI Inference Benefits

Morgan Stanley raised its price target for SanDisk (SNDK) from $1100 to $1750 on June 22, maintaining an Overweight rating. The upgrade is driven by AI inference demand reshaping the NAND market, particularly for KV Cache and context window storage in cloud data centers. These cloud clients exhibit price inelasticity and sign long-term contracts, granting SanDisk significant pricing power. SanDisk's New Business Model (NBM) agreements, covering over one-third of FY27 bit shipments with 3-5 year terms and fixed price/price collar structures, are crucial. They are projected to sustain gross margins around 80% even at floor prices, providing a buffer against cyclical downturns. Morgan Stanley forecasts gross margins to surge from 30.3% in FY25 to 86.7% in FY27e. With NAND supply expected to remain tight into 2026/2027 and cloud/data centers becoming the largest end-market, SanDisk holds supply-side pricing power. The company targets 15-19% bit growth via technology transitions, not capacity expansion. Revenue is projected to grow ~6.6x from FY25 to FY27, with EPS rising from $2.74 to $14.73, driven by high-margin cloud business. Key upside catalysts include faster enterprise SSD adoption and edge AI growth. Downside risks involve slower industry growth, competitor capex increases, market share loss, and competition from Chinese players like YMTC. The investment thesis rests on AI-driven structural demand, NBM's margin protection, and sustained supply tightness. The $1750 target implies ~28x FY27e P/E.

marsbit2h ago

Research Report Analysis: Morgan Stanley Details SanDisk SNDK, The Truth About Cloud Data Center Pricing Power and AI Inference Benefits

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

433 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片