区块链能让盗版问题得到根治吗?

白话区块链Published on 2022-10-26Last updated on 2022-10-26

Abstract

盗版对内容创作者的利益损害被反复提及,但诡异的是,盗版作为一个人人皆知的“政治错误”,却俨然成为了我们日常生活中的一部分。

从十八世纪初第一部版权法诞生到现在,已经几百年过去了,但随着时代一起进步的,不仅是版权法,还有屡禁不止的盗版。

盗版对内容创作者的利益损害被反复提及,但诡异的是,盗版作为一个人人皆知的“政治错误”,却俨然成为了我们日常生活中的一部分。

为什么盗版泛滥?

盗版有两个本质问题:

一是内容版权问题——侵权容易维权难,盗版作恶成本低,即使被告知侵权,顶多删除,无法收回盗版者已经获得的收益。

二是内容分发问题——离不开中间机构,所以盗版总是有市场,即使版权意识够强,即使打击力度够大,但因为正版比盗版贵很多,因此很多人怀着“自责无奈”还是会使用盗版。

这两个问题,因为区块链浪潮的到来,有了根治的可能。

区块链:盗版死亡倒计时

区块链的不可篡改性,其实并不能完成确权这事,因为上链的内容不一定是作者本身上传的。

但是,因为区块链的公开透明,每一次盗版侵权都会变成“掩耳盗铃”,盗版的风险和代价会变高,让盗版者不敢盗版。而且,即使盗版成功,获得的收益也在区块链上一清二楚,一旦被发现,吃多少进去吐多少出来,版权的确认就可以变相解决了。

即使风险高,只要有买卖,盗版市场就会存在,为了利益,铤而走险的人不少。盗版之所以杀不尽封不完,最关键的原因是内容消费的高价格,让消费者望而却步。

中介公司的价值之一是打击盗版,但也正是中介公司让内容产品的成本提高了。环球音乐出版集团1/3的员工在全球市场专门负责版税和版权管理。这些打击盗版的成本支出,最终一定会体现在供应链的首尾两头上,内容创作者被迫减少收入,内容消费者忍痛多花钱。

区块链智能合约技术,能构建一个内容自动分发平台,由程序自动执行,不仅可以实现“没有中间商赚差价”,而且能让“你的内容你做主”,一个作家可以直接对作品定价,读者直接购买,系统自动分发,实现创作者和消费者的点对点直销,做到“创作者多赚、消费者少花钱“。

消灭盗版的更佳解决途径,不是更大力度打击盗版,而是让每一个消费者觉得“盗版不值得”。如果花小钱就能享受正版,还要冒着巨大风险使用盗版吗?

打击盗版人人有责

在区块链出现之前,每一份内容和消费者是不强相关的,买卖结束之后,内容传播/推广/举报,全凭喜好,虽然消费者被鼓励帮创作者维权,但这不是义务。实际上,消费者的二次传播、推广以及维护版权等等行为,都贡献了价值但没有任何收益。

因为这些行为的价值难以衡量,所以消费者无法获得应有的价值回馈。这些原来难以衡量价值的行为,都可以被无限细分的Token给承载起来,通过智能合约的自动执行,实现“一分有效的耕耘,一分精准的收获”。

于是,每一个为原创内容贡献的人,都能因为贡献而获得收益,Token将每一个人与正版完成捆绑,人人皆持有Token变成股东。盗版,不再是与每个消费者无关紧要的事情,而是会侵犯他们收益的事情。这样,盗版就真的变成了“人人喊打的过街老鼠”。

结语

区块链的不可篡改方便版权确认,区块链的公开透明提高盗版作恶成本,智能合约的自动分发减少中间成本,Token捆绑内容和消费者让打击盗版变成了人人有责。

区块链无法直接解决盗版,但有望通过技术手段和激励机制,让盗版逐渐退出市场。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Foundation Steps Back, Ethlabs Steps Forward: Ethereum Undergoes Its Largest Restructuring in History

On June 23rd, the Ethereum ecosystem witnessed two major shifts, signaling a significant governance realignment. First, former Ethereum Foundation researchers established Ethlabs, a new independent non-profit. Backed by major ETH holders like Bitmine and SharpLink, Ethlabs aims to address practical needs for institutional adoption, including faster settlement, native asset issuance, cross-chain transactions, and mainnet scaling. Secondly, the Ethereum Foundation announced a major restructuring, laying off 54 employees (20% of its staff) to become a leaner entity focused on protocol governance and maintenance rather than being the primary builder. This move represents a pivotal correction. Criticisms had mounted over the Foundation's perceived slowness, lack of clear strategy, and over-reliance on Vitalik Buterin's influence. Ethlabs emerges as a more execution-oriented, "industrialized" layer focused on market adoption—bridging the gap between research and real-world use. Notably, Vitalik Buterin is absent from its list of supporters, interpreted as an intentional step to avoid excessive personal endorsement and allow the organization to build independent credibility. The Ethereum Foundation's downsizing and redefinition mark a retreat from its former central coordinating role. It now aims to share the "privilege of stewarding Ethereum" with other emerging groups like Ethlabs, the Ethereum Applications Guild, and The Ethereum Economic Zone. Analysts frame this dual shift as the Foundation ensuring Ethereum remains "correct" (credibly neutral), while Ethlabs must prove it remains "effective" (competitive and attractive for capital and adoption). This addresses community "shareholder-like anxiety" about ETH's market performance. While risks exist—such as concerns over shifting from Foundation centrality to large-holder influence—the consensus is that the greater risk for Ethereum was inaction, caught between technical idealism and organizational inertia. These steps aim to create a more multi-stakeholder, execution-driven future for the network.

链捕手3h ago

Foundation Steps Back, Ethlabs Steps Forward: Ethereum Undergoes Its Largest Restructuring in History

链捕手3h ago

Second Half of U.S. Crypto Policy: The Clarity Act Aims for 60 Votes, CFTC's "One-Person Commission" Becomes Biggest Variable

In a pivotal year for US crypto policy, the "CLARITY Act" is advancing in the Senate but faces a high hurdle, needing 60 votes to pass. Key challenges include bridging partisan divides on ethics and swaying undecided Republican senators within a tight legislative calendar of only about 40 working days. The policy "second half" involves intense negotiations on a broader framework for Web3 and DeFi, including crypto tax reforms and the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act. A significant uncertainty is the understaffed CFTC, operating with four commissioner vacancies, which complicates regulatory clarity. Meanwhile, the departure of key "crypto champions"—SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce and Senator Cynthia Lummis—will impact ongoing policy efforts. Industry experts are cautiously optimistic but realistic. Sara K. Weed notes that while progress is being made, CLARITY is unlikely to pass this Congress, pushing agencies like the SEC and CFTC to provide more guidance. Sulolit Mukherjee suggests meaningful crypto tax legislation is more likely to be attached to larger must-pass bills. Rashan Colbert discusses the jurisdictional debate over prediction markets, emphasizing the need for a regulatory framework that fosters their development as financial tools rather than treating them broadly as gambling. The clock is ticking, but opportunities remain for substantive progress through continued bipartisan dialogue and pragmatic efforts.

marsbit5h ago

Second Half of U.S. Crypto Policy: The Clarity Act Aims for 60 Votes, CFTC's "One-Person Commission" Becomes Biggest Variable

marsbit5h ago

Research Report Analysis: Morgan Stanley Details SanDisk SNDK, The Truth About Cloud Data Center Pricing Power and AI Inference Benefits

Morgan Stanley raised its price target for SanDisk (SNDK) from $1100 to $1750 on June 22, maintaining an Overweight rating. The upgrade is driven by AI inference demand reshaping the NAND market, particularly for KV Cache and context window storage in cloud data centers. These cloud clients exhibit price inelasticity and sign long-term contracts, granting SanDisk significant pricing power. SanDisk's New Business Model (NBM) agreements, covering over one-third of FY27 bit shipments with 3-5 year terms and fixed price/price collar structures, are crucial. They are projected to sustain gross margins around 80% even at floor prices, providing a buffer against cyclical downturns. Morgan Stanley forecasts gross margins to surge from 30.3% in FY25 to 86.7% in FY27e. With NAND supply expected to remain tight into 2026/2027 and cloud/data centers becoming the largest end-market, SanDisk holds supply-side pricing power. The company targets 15-19% bit growth via technology transitions, not capacity expansion. Revenue is projected to grow ~6.6x from FY25 to FY27, with EPS rising from $2.74 to $14.73, driven by high-margin cloud business. Key upside catalysts include faster enterprise SSD adoption and edge AI growth. Downside risks involve slower industry growth, competitor capex increases, market share loss, and competition from Chinese players like YMTC. The investment thesis rests on AI-driven structural demand, NBM's margin protection, and sustained supply tightness. The $1750 target implies ~28x FY27e P/E.

marsbit6h ago

Research Report Analysis: Morgan Stanley Details SanDisk SNDK, The Truth About Cloud Data Center Pricing Power and AI Inference Benefits

marsbit6h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片