15个指标速览:2022年至今,DeFi现状如何?

DeFi之道Published on 2022-10-10Last updated on 2022-10-10

Abstract

通过总价值锁定、开发者活动、DEX 交易量、收益率等 15 个衡量指标,了解 DeFi 现状。

通过总价值锁定、开发者活动、DEX 交易量、收益率等 15 个衡量指标,了解 DeFi 现状。

那么 2022 年 DeFi 的现状如何?

这里有 15 个需要了解的指标。

1. 总价值锁定

在撰写本文时,556 亿美元被锁定在 DeFi 智能合约中。

这一数字比 2021 年 12 月 3 日的历史高点 $1820 亿美元下降了 69%。

Maker 的 TVL 主导地位为 13.98%,与 2020 年早期 DeFi 夏季期间 50% 以上的主导地位相比要低得多。

https://defillama.com/

注意:DefiLlama 进行的 TVL 计算不包括在协议中质押的治理代币、所谓的二池 LP 代币、借贷市场上的借入资产、流动质押资产以及来自其他协议的重复计算 TVL。

如果包括上述指标,DeFi TVL 将为 927 亿美元。

2. DeFi 代币价格(年初至今)

DeFi Pulse 指数 (DPI) 跟踪整个市场主要去中心化金融资产的表现。

以美元计算,今年为止,DPI 下降了 67.8%,表现比 ETH 差 5%。

在主要的 DeFi 代币中,CRV 跌幅最大,达到 85%。

虽然以美元计价显着下跌,但 LDO、UNI、SNX、CAKE 和 LINK 的持有者表现会好于仅持有 ETH。

3. 区块链开发者活动

每个链上新的 GitHub 存储库的数据显示,开发人员仍在构建。

来源:https://leodatavinci-blockdevmonitor-1--chain-activity-dashboard-rbz4 n5.streamlitapp.com/‌

存储库是代码库存储在 GitHub 上的地方。

根据跟踪 87,116 个存储库和 98,960 名开发人员的数据,以太坊和 Solana 的活跃度最高,Polygon 位居第三。

BNB Chain 和 Cosmos 的开发活动稳定,但与三个领导者区块链相比,开发量要少得多。

当涉及到每个链的代码提交(跟踪代码库的更改)时,情况看起来更糟。

来源:https://leodatavinci-blockdevmonitor-1--chain-activity-dashboard-rbz4 n5.streamlitapp.com/‌

所有区块链的代码更改都显着下降,但 Solana 似乎比以太坊有更多的活动。

最后,每条链的新开发者数据也不是很乐观。

来源:https://leodatavinci-blockdevmonitor-1--chain-activity-dashboard-rbz4 n5.streamlitapp.com/‌

有趣的是,在过去的一个月里,加入 Solana 和 Polygon 的开发者比加入以太坊生态系统的开发者多。

4.Smart Money 持有情况

Nansen 上的聪明的钱(Smart Money)数据是指以被认为经验丰富、消息灵通或「知情」的方式进行交易或投资的加密货币实体。

https://pro.nansen.ai/smart-money/holdings‌

在过去 30 天的时间里,我们观察到 Smart Money 正在将资金转移到 Compound、Aave 和 wBTC。他们还在积累 MATIC、UNI、SRM、CHZ、KNC 和 Shiba Inu 的 BONE(期待 Shiba 在 L2 上推出)。

5. 每周 DEX 交易量

DEX 的每周交易量一直在下降,但仍保持在 80 亿美元。

来源:https://dune.com/hagaetc/dex-metrics‌

按 7 天交易量排名前 5 位的 DEX:

Uniswap 54 亿美元

Pancakeswap 13 亿美元(数据未包含在此沙丘表中,因为它取自 DefiLlama)

Curve 9.745 亿美元

Dodo 7.31 亿美元

Balancer 6.01 亿美元

Sushiswap 1.7 亿美元

Dodo 的大部分交易量来自稳定币对。

6. DEX 转 CEX 现货交易量

中心化交易所主导去中心化交易对手。

该比率在 2022 年 2 月达到了约 25% 的历史新高,但已降至 12% 左右。

资料来源:@TheBlock__,数据 @congecko

记住在 CEX 上进行交易是多么便宜,这个比率还不错!

7. 稳定币的收益

高产的日子早已一去不复返了。

大多数稳定币贷方在 Compound、Curve、Uniswap 或 Aave 上的收益在 0.1% 到 1.5% 之间。

考虑到风险回报率,Convex FRAX-USDC 2.45% 或 FRAX-3 CRV 3.19% 可能是最佳选择。

资料来源:https://pro.nansen.ai/smart-money/holdings‌

然而,只有 Tron 的 USDD 储户可以获得可观的收益。

但请在存入 USDD 之前对 USDD 进行「做你自己的研究(DYOR)」,因为 USDD 是中心化发行的,发行 / 兑换政策不透明。

8. 链上稳定币比例

这个比率显示了稳定币与每条链存放的 DeFi TVL 的对比。Tron 是稳定币的区块链。

来源:https://xangle.io/en/analytics/CHAINS/tvl‌

波场上稳定币的市值是链上整个 DeFi TVL 的 4 倍。

9. 质押的 ETH 数量

总共有 1410 万个 ETH(占 ETH 总供应量的 11.7%)被质押,价值 194 亿美元。

来源:https://dune.com/arch1111/eth-staking-dashboard‌

按市场份额排名前 5 位的储户:

Lido 29.9%

Coinbase 14.5%

Kraken 8.2%

币安 6.5%

http://Staked.us2.9%

流动质押占所有 ETH 质押的 33.4%。Lido 占主导地位,但 RocketPool 的份额最近有所增长,达到所有 ETH 质押的 1.95%。

10. 收入最高的项目 /dApp

代币终端根据累计收入跟踪加密项目。

来源:https://tokenterminal.com/terminal/metrics/protocol-revenue‌

以太坊以 90 天 1.931 亿美元的收入明显领先。其次是:

OpenSea 3500 万美元

dYdX 2220 万美元

PancakeSwap 1660 万美元

Synthetix 1380 万美元

ENS 1250 万美元

有趣的是,Solana 的低交易费用也意味着低收入。

11、收入分配

该 DefiLlama 表显示了进入财政部或持有人的协议产生的费用。

来源:https://defillama.com/fees‌

虽然某些协议会产生大量费用,但实际收入却很低。

例如,Lido 在过去 24 小时内产生了 950,435 美元,但其中只有 10%(95,044 美元)分配给了代币持有者或财政部。

以太坊再次成为明显的领导者,每天有 180 万美元流向质押者。

12. 按财政部规模划分的 DeFi 协议

财政部(Treasury)是链上持有的协议资金(包括未分配的治理代币)的美元价值。

来源:https://tokenterminal.com/terminal/metrics/treasury‌

Uniswap 坐拥 28 亿美元的财政部资产!以太坊名称服务(ENS)也出人意料地在熊市中处于有利地位,其财政部规模为 12 亿美元。

更高的资金允许项目雇用更多的人,建立新的功能和扩大业务。

13. CeFi 和 DeFi 诈骗、黑客攻击和漏洞利用造成的损失金额

根据 Defi Yield App 的数据,由于诈骗、黑客攻击、跑路或其他攻击,总共损失了 600 亿美元。

来源:https://defiyield.App/rekt-database‌

仅 Terra 就失去了 $400 亿美元。

2022 年其他主要的 DeFi 黑客攻击事件及损失金额:

Ronin 网络——6.25 亿美元

Wormhole——3.26 亿美元

Nomad 桥——1.9 亿美元

Beanstalk——1.81 亿美元

Wintermute——1.62 亿美元

14. 区块链资金流失

更重要的是,DeFi Yield App 数据显示区块链流失了大量资金。

BSC 在 DeFi 夏日因黑客攻击和捐款跑路事件频发而臭名昭著。几个月来,以太坊上损失了更多资金,但在 10 月,BSC 又回到了「领导者」的位置。

来源:https://defiyield.App/rekt-database‌

15. 黑客攻击类型

根据 Chainalysis 的一份报告,在 2022 年前 3 个月,DeFi 协议占所有被盗加密货币的 97%。

资料来源:https://go.chainalysis.com/2022-crypto-crime-report.HTML‌

好消息?

闪电贷攻击在 2022 年几乎消失。现在大多数黑客攻击都是由于安全漏洞或代码漏洞造成的。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

If It's Not a Clear Yes, It's a No: A Nine-Year Retrospective by a VC Who Survived Four Cycles

**"Invest Only When Certain": A Nine-Year Retrospective from a VC Across Four Cycles** IOSG founder Jocy shares hard-earned lessons from nine years and over a hundred investments in Web3. The core challenge isn't identifying successful founders, but understanding why talented founders with solid ideas still fail. Through building a "failed founder database," IOSG identified six recurring failure patterns. **Founder Trait Red Flags:** 1. **Emotionally Unstable:** Founders who react defensively to criticism or publicly lash out under pressure (e.g., 80% drawdowns) often fail. Resilience is key. 2. **Lacking Hunger / Having a Fallback:** Founders with significant safety nets (family wealth, cushy fallback jobs) may lack the "do-or-die" commitment needed to survive crypto's brutal cycles. 3. **Unchecked Ego:** Includes "polished execution machines" who excel in known frameworks but struggle when paradigms shift, and "professor-types" who are technically brilliant but resistant to commercial feedback or coaching. **Project Structure Red Flags:** 4. **Token-First, Not Product-First:** Treating the token solely as a fundraising tool with no real utility or connection to product value is a major warning sign. The project should have value even if the token goes to zero. 5. **No Day-1 Exit Thesis:** Founders must have a clear, staged capital strategy from the start, understanding what each funding round needs to prove to unlock the next. "Exit before entry" is crucial. 6. **No Full-Cycle Experience:** Founders who haven't lived through a complete crypto bull/bear cycle (e.g., 2018, 2022) often underestimate their vulnerability. IOSG limits initial checks for such teams to $250k, sizing for risk. **The Positive Flipside: Desirable Founder Traits** The ideal candidate exhibits: obsessive problem-depth, being a second-time founder with a non-consensus vision, strong communication skills with *controlled* ego, relentless perseverance, and a global perspective with agency and taste (increasingly vital in the AI era). **Three Survival Tips for Founders:** 1. **Cash Flow Over Narrative:** Real revenue is what sustains projects, not vanity metrics. 2. **Tokens Are a Liability:** Avoid issuing a token unless absolutely necessary. The hidden costs (market making, liquidity, compliance) are immense, often a multi-million-dollar burden. 3. **Respect Liquidity:** Sell during peaks to build treasury, buy back to support the protocol during troughs. Be realistic about valuations and your ability to deliver for the next round. The final principle is simple yet paramount: **"If it's a borderline 'yes' or 'no,' don't invest."** In an industry that reinvents itself every few years, the discipline to consistently say "no" is the ultimate secret to longevity.

Foresight News17m ago

If It's Not a Clear Yes, It's a No: A Nine-Year Retrospective by a VC Who Survived Four Cycles

Foresight News17m ago

SemiAnalysis Deep Dive into CXMT: $50 Billion Revenue, An IPO Amidst a Supercycle

SemiAnalysis' in-depth report on ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT) details its rapid rise as China's largest upcoming semiconductor IPO. Founded in 2016 by Zhu Yiming, CXMT built its DRAM foundation on acquired patents and talent from the bankrupt German firm Qimonda. It achieved its first annual profit in 2025 after nearly a decade of significant capital support, primarily from patient Hefei municipal investors who fostered a local supply chain. The company is now capitalizing on a strong DRAM supercycle. Its revenue soared from ~$3.3B in 2024 to ~$8.6B in 2025, with Q1 2026 alone reaching ~$7.3B. SemiAnalysis projects full-year 2026 revenue could exceed $50B, driven by soaring ASPs rather than massive market share gains. While CXMT is closing the capacity gap with Micron, its product mix remains heavily focused on commodity DDR/LPDDR, which currently offers higher margins than its nascent HBM business. CXMT faces significant challenges in HBM, struggling with yield and stability for HBM3 8-Hi stacks while lagging behind the big three (Samsung, SK Hynix, Micron) in advanced nodes. However, strategic national priorities for AI self-sufficiency may push it to accelerate HBM capacity. Its complex IPO structure reveals heavy state-backed ownership and voting control over its fabs, with Alibaba appearing as both a key cloud customer and a minority shareholder. The IPO aims to raise ~$4.1B, primarily to strengthen its core DRAM manufacturing base.

marsbit37m ago

SemiAnalysis Deep Dive into CXMT: $50 Billion Revenue, An IPO Amidst a Supercycle

marsbit37m ago

From Corning to Ciena: The 10x Opportunity in the AI Optical Communication Chain

The transition from copper to optical communication in AI data centers is creating significant investment opportunities beyond just chipmakers. The entire photonics supply chain, from glass and fiber to connectors and test equipment, is critical. Corning, a key fiber supplier, has locked in multi-billion dollar, multi-year contracts with major cloud providers (Meta, Amazon, Google, Microsoft, OpenAI, NVIDIA), demonstrating pricing power and scale. Its profit growth is outpacing revenue growth. In the interconnect layer, Amphenol benefits from high growth in AI data centers, driven by strategic acquisitions and operational efficiency, while Credo Technology acts as a bridge between copper and optical solutions, though with high customer concentration risk. At the systems level, Ciena enables higher data capacity on existing fiber lines, with a strong backlog and cloud customer adoption. Further upstream, AXT is a bottleneck supplier of key indium phosphide wafers for lasers but faces geopolitical supply chain risks. VEO Solutions provides essential testing equipment for the entire photonics industry. A new pure-play photonics ETF (FOTO) offers a consolidated investment approach. The core thesis is that the physical limits of copper are driving an inevitable shift to optical technologies, with wealth flowing to essential, often overlooked, suppliers across the photonics value chain.

marsbit49m ago

From Corning to Ciena: The 10x Opportunity in the AI Optical Communication Chain

marsbit49m ago

Collector Crypt's DAU Is Only 800, Yet It's Already One of Crypto's Most Profitable Projects?

"Collector Crypt: A Highly Profitable Crypto Project with Only 800 Daily Active Users?" Collector Crypt (CARDS) is a crypto project tokenizing physical graded trading cards (primarily Pokémon) on Solana, achieving significant real-world profitability and growth. According to a Maelstrom Fund analysis, it generated approximately $53M in annualized profit in May, with a June run-rate nearing $109M, against a $550M FDV. Its core revenue driver is a digital pack-opening 'Gacha' system. The platform bulk-buys cards at a 5-15% discount. Users can open digital packs and choose to keep cards or sell them back to the platform at a 7-15% discount to market price. Most users sell back common cards, creating an efficient model: users get packs with a ~2% positive expected value, while Collector Crypt captures ~4.5% profit. The project aims to disrupt the inefficient $22.2B GMV (Q1 2026) eBay trading card market, which charges sellers 16-20% in total fees. Collector Crypt offers 2% fees, instant settlement, insured custody, and one-click trading. Beyond Gacha, future revenue streams include secondary market trading fees, infrastructure partnerships, and an eBay "snipe" tool. It holds ~$23M in card inventory and ~$10M in cash, and has already begun token buybacks. With a total supply of 2B tokens, effective circulation post-2027 unlocks is estimated at ~1.3B. Trading primarily on DEXs has so far limited large institutional entry. The project is expanding into sports cards and attracting Web2 users. Maelstrom Fund's price target is $4 by summer's end, positioning Collector Crypt at the forefront of migrating collectibles on-chain.

Foresight News1h ago

Collector Crypt's DAU Is Only 800, Yet It's Already One of Crypto's Most Profitable Projects?

Foresight News1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片