$660M in Ethereum leaves exchanges – Yet ETH’s bottom remains unclear!

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-13Last updated on 2026-02-13

Abstract

Ethereum exchange balances have seen significant outflows, with $660 million worth of ETH withdrawn recently, indicating accumulation by long-term holders. Despite this, ETH's price bottom remains uncertain. Key metrics show persistent bearish pressure: negative ETF netflows for three months, deeply negative funding rates suggesting extreme short positioning, and declining Open Interest. While a short squeeze is possible, current conditions suggest the market downturn may not be over. Notably, Bitmine Immersion Technologies continued accumulating ETH aggressively, though broader market sentiment remains cautious. Overall, holder conviction is strong, but a sustained bottom may take time to form.

The Ethereum [ETH] exchange balance continued to dwindle, showing smart market participants were accumulating the altcoin. Since the 11th of February, 100k ETH has been removed from exchanges, AMBCrypto reported.

Crypto analyst and trader Ali Martinez showed that 330,000k ETH, worth over $660 million, were withdrawn from exchanges. This reinforced the holder accumulation idea.

The Ethereum validator entry queue has a 71-day waiting period. Nearly 4.1 million ETH was in the deposit waiting queue, an all-time high.

Together, these data points showed long-term conviction from holders. This conviction is not enough to prop Ethereum prices up. Long-term investors can look to buy at these price levels, but the selling pressure might not be exhausted yet.

Ethereum capitulation is not over

In a post on X, the crypto intelligence platform Glassnode observed that the 30-day moving average of spot ETF netflows for both Bitcoin [BTC] and Ethereum has been negative for the past three months. The Open Interest has also fallen significantly.

This was an extended period of negative average flows and highlighted the bearish pressure in the market. Demand has not yet come in, a warning for those looking to buy what feels like a bear market bottom.

There could be more pain ahead.

The ETH Funding Rate has been deeply negative for much of the past two weeks. Santiment pointed out in a post on X that this wave of short positioning was the most extreme it has been since August 2024.

The deeply negative Funding Rate shows that most of the market is positioned bearishly. While this reflects strong conviction on the downside, it also raises the chances of a sharp short squeeze if sentiment shifts.

Digital asset treasuries continued to hold on to the ETH, but only one company was aggressively adding more. Bitmine Immersion Technologies [BMNR] has bought 820k ETH since mid-November.

The adverse market conditions in recent weeks did not halt their buying. AMBCrypto reported that the company added 180k ETH to its holdings in the past 30 days.

This does not guarantee that a market bottom is close. Buyers should beware that bear market bottoms take months to form. Generally, a sharp price drop followed by a V-recovery is not how bear markets end.


Final Thoughts

  • The ETH exodus from exchanges and the long validator deposit queue reflected long-term holder conviction.
  • BMNR was the only DAT to continue buying ETH, while falling funding rates and OI reflected a deep bearish market bias.

Related Questions

QHow much Ethereum (ETH) has been withdrawn from exchanges recently according to the article?

A330,000 ETH, worth over $660 million, has been withdrawn from exchanges.

QWhat does the current 71-day waiting period for the Ethereum validator entry queue indicate?

AIt indicates an all-time high demand, with nearly 4.1 million ETH in the deposit waiting queue, showing strong long-term conviction from holders.

QAccording to Glassnode, what has been the trend for Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETF netflows over the past three months?

AThe 30-day moving average of spot ETF netflows for both Bitcoin and Ethereum has been negative for the past three months, highlighting extended bearish pressure.

QWhat does a deeply negative ETH Funding Rate suggest about market positioning, and what potential event does it raise the chances for?

AA deeply negative Funding Rate suggests that most of the market is positioned bearishly. It raises the chances of a sharp short squeeze if market sentiment suddenly shifts.

QWhich company has been aggressively accumulating Ethereum (ETH) despite recent adverse market conditions, and how much have they bought?

ABitmine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) has been aggressively accumulating ETH, buying 820k ETH since mid-November, including 180k ETH in the past 30 days.

Related Reads

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Summary: This article explores the perceived "death spiral" risk between MicroStrategy (MSTR), its Bitcoin holdings, and its perpetual preferred stock (STRC), drawing comparisons to the LUNA-UST collapse. While both systems feature price anchors, high yields for holders, and potential feedback loops, their core mechanisms differ fundamentally. The MSTR-STRC structure relies on continuous financing to sustain its high dividend payouts, primarily through stock ATM offerings. A negative feedback cycle could occur: falling MSTR stock price makes raising equity capital harder, increasing pressure to sell Bitcoin, which undermines STRC confidence and further depresses MSTR. However, unlike LUNA-UST's automated, direct linkage, the MSTR-STRC loop is weaker and has brakes: STRC dividends can be deferred or rates lowered, and STRC holders have a $100/share liquidation preference in bankruptcy, providing a price floor. The company's sustainability hinges on its ability to continue financing. Its current ~$900 million USD reserves cover only about 6.3 months of its ~$1.71 billion annual interest/dividend burden. The next six months are critical, aligning with both the potential bottom in Bitcoin's four-year cycle and the depletion timeline of its reserves. While a LUNA-style catastrophic collapse is deemed highly unlikely due to structural differences, the key question is whether MicroStrategy can navigate this period through healthy deleveraging to restart its capital engine.

Foresight News18m ago

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Foresight News18m ago

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

MicroStrategy's Debt Risk: A Turning Point in the "Never Sell" Strategy As of June 3, 2026, MicroStrategy holds 843,706 bitcoins (valued at ~$53.1B) but faces significant financial obligations. Its capital structure includes $6.75B in convertible notes and $15.48B in perpetual preferred stock (led by the $8.5B STRC series), creating an annual payout burden of ~$1.71B. With software revenue at only ~$500M, interest and dividend obligations far exceed operating income. A critical shift occurred in late May 2026 when the company sold 32 bitcoins for ~$2.5M to cover dividends, breaking CEO Michael Saylor's long-standing "never sell" pledge. This symbolic move triggered a sharp decline in both Bitcoin's price and MSTR stock, reflecting market fears about cash flow sustainability. The core of the strain is the STRC perpetual preferred stock, designed as a "permanent loan" with no maturity date but requiring high monthly dividends (currently 11.5%). Its business model relies on a three-part cycle: issuing new STRC shares, using proceeds to buy more Bitcoin and fund a USD reserve, and using that reserve to pay dividends. This cycle depends on continuous investor demand for STRC and Bitcoin's price appreciation. Analysis shows Bitcoin needs to appreciate at least 2.3% annually to cover the $1.71B in yearly obligations at current holdings. With Bitcoin price down ~22% from March 2026 highs, this pressure has intensified. The company's $900M USD reserve can only cover about 7 months of payments if STRC issuance stalls. Key risks are not immediate bankruptcy or forced Bitcoin liquidation (as BTC is not collateral), but rather: 1) The erosion of MSTR's premium to its Bitcoin holdings (mNAV), which would cripple its ability to raise cheap capital; 2) A vicious cycle where stagnant Bitcoin prices reduce STRC demand, draining the USD reserve and forcing BTC sales, further depressing prices. The period from February 2027 to September 2028 is a crucial test, with over $5.9B in convertible notes facing put options or maturity. In essence, MicroStrategy has evolved from a simple Bitcoin holder into a complex financial entity acting like a "private Bitcoin bank," leveraging its BTC holdings to create layered financial products. Its survival depends on maintaining Bitcoin's price trend, its stock premium, and market appetite for its preferred shares. The recent token sale marks not a betrayal of its Bitcoin thesis, but an admission that the leveraged strategy must eventually be paid for.

marsbit29m ago

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

marsbit29m ago

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

Anthropic has published an article titled "When AI builds itself," discussing the emerging concept of "recursive self-improvement," where AI begins to actively participate in designing, training, testing, and optimizing its own subsequent versions. The company presents internal data showing that by May 2026, over 80% of code merged into its codebase was written by Claude, its AI model. Claude's capabilities have expanded to handling complex, open-ended engineering tasks, achieving a 76% success rate in such areas, and even contributing to research processes, such as optimizing code performance and conducting AI safety experiments. Anthropic outlines an evolution from human-driven development to AI-assisted workflows, culminating in the current stage where AI agents can autonomously write, run, and delegate code. The company cautions that the path toward a "closed loop," where AI continuously improves itself, is becoming visible. It calls for coordinated global mechanisms to potentially slow or pause frontier AI development to allow safety research and societal structures to catch up. However, the timing of this warning coincides with Anthropic's preparations for an IPO, framing the narrative not just as a safety concern but also as a demonstration of Claude's advanced capabilities and its integral role in accelerating Anthropic's own R&D—creating a potential "flywheel" effect for competitive advantage. This contrasts with OpenAI's recent, more policy-oriented discussion of the same risks, highlighting the competitive dynamics in the AI industry as companies position themselves in both the technological and regulatory landscape.

marsbit1h ago

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片