ENS掘金潮：盘点靠域名致富的8位Smart Money

FPublished on 2022-09-23Last updated on 2022-09-23

Abstract

近几个月以来，ENS 域名持续升温，公司名称域名、数字域名、名字或姓氏、Emoji 等一波接一波的域名热度，让 ENS 一度跃居 NFT 系列 24 小时交易量榜一。

近几个月以来，ENS 域名持续升温，公司名称域名、数字域名、名字或姓氏、Emoji 等一波接一波的域名热度，让 ENS 一度跃居 NFT 系列 24 小时交易量榜一，过去一个月成交量仅次于 BAYC，排行第二位，达到超 1.3 万 ETH。

Foresight News 根据 Nansen 数据以及 ENS.Vision 列出并分析在 ENS 域名中已实现利润前 8 大地址的获利方式（已过滤清洗交易），以及持有的域名类别以及其他 NFT 系列等数据。分析发现，有地址仅靠一两个域名就能实现巨额利润；部分地址通过早期注册数字域名，并在近期以远高于注册价上百倍的价格获利；少数地址通过在二级市场上翻转价格，获利了结；也有地址通过监测过期域名抢注有潜力的域名。

来源：Nansen（如下分析已剔除一条数据）

已实现利润排行榜 No.1：通过三位数字域名获利 650 ETH

根据 Nansen 数据统计，按 ETH 本位计算，812.eth（推特账号为@GammaPure）是已实现利润最多的地址，达到 646 ETH，利润率超过 6000%。

来源：Nansen，注：已实现利润（Total Profit）=收入 - 花费支出，收入为在扣除市场费用之前卖家获得的金额

812.eth 地址从去年 11 月份开始注册近 60 个域名，绝大多数为三位数字域名和三位字母域名，主要通过出售三位数字域名获利，从 5 个月之前开始共售出 37 个三位数字域名，近三周出售的 9 个三位数字域名的售价均在 30 ETH 到 43 ETH 之间。

来源：Nansen

截止撰稿时，@GammaPure 持有 21 个域名，其中有 8 个为三位数字域名，12 个为三字母域名，目前三位数字域名的地板价为 37 ETH。

No.2：仅通过 000.eth 一个域名跃居榜二

在已实现收益排行榜中位列第二的是 kimjonghyung.eth，看域名应该是韩国人。kimjonghyung.eth 仅通过 000.eth 一个域名跃居榜二，000.eth 成交价达到 300 ETH，已实现利润为 297 ETH，利润率达到逾 100 倍。该地址当前仅持有 kimjonghyung.eth 一个域名。

来源：Nansen

No.3：通过三位数字域名实现 36 倍利润率

和榜一类似，815.eth 地址也是在 10 个月前注册了二十多个三位数字域名，并从 4 月份到 7 月份之间几乎抛售完毕，获得约 198 ETH 收入，利润率超过 40 倍。目前该地址三位数字域名仅有 815.eth 一个。

来源：Nansen

No.4：单靠 sumsung.eth 和 starbucks.eth 两个域名实现 110 ETH 收入

bbn.eth 的盈利方式与前面三位完全不同，其靠 sumsung.eth 和 starbucks.eth 两个域名实现 110 ETH 的收入，其余通过出售字母组合、单词和几个五位和六位数字域名获利。

bbn.eth 在 ENS 上共花费 55 ETH，收入和利润分别为 194 ETH 和 138 ETH，利润率相较不高，约为 331%。bbn.eth 当前持有 1304 个域名，主要通过注册得来，还有一部分通过二级市场购买，目前已售出购买和注册域名数量的 12%。bbn.eth 购买或注册的字母域名也很值得我们去借鉴。

来源：Nansen

No.5：通过三位数字和四位数字域名实现 125 ETH 利润

418.eth 在 ENS 上共花费 21 ETH，收入 146 ETH，也主要通过三位数字域名和四位数字域名获利，目前其数字域名仅剩 418.eth 和 948.eth 两个。

与前面几大 ENS 域名持有者相比，418.eth 还持有更多种类的 NFT，包括 mfers、Dooplicator、Meebits、Azuki、Doodles、MAYC，在 NFT 上的总收入为 314 ETH，总花费为 450 ETH。

来源：Nansen

No.6：仅靠 ensmaxisnft.eth 实现 112 ETH 收入

在已实现利润榜排行第六的地址仅通过 ensmaxisnft.eth 获得榜六地位，该域名在 7 月份以 111.69 ETH 成交。

No.7：靠 ❤️🔥.eth 实现 100 ETH 收入

113.eth 在 ENS 上的已实现总利润有 94 ETH，主要得益于 Emoji 域名 ❤️🔥.eth 100 ETH 成交价格。113.eth 当前持有 79 个域名，主要为单词和字母组合域名，还有几个 Emoji 域名，其持有的 113.eth 在 9 个月之前以 0.11111 ETH 的价格购入。

113.eth 也是一位 NFT Degen，在 CloneX、CryptoToadz、Archetype｜Art Blocks Curated、Loot、Murakami.Flowers Seed、Murakami.Flowers Official、CryptoPunks、CyberKongz VX、Doodles 等 NFT 系列中均进行过交易活动，目前在 NFT 领域的总收入为 2530 ETH，总支出为 2570 ETH。

来源：Nansen

No.8：最大一笔销售为 003.eth，成交价 83.5 ETH

158.eth 在 ENS 中获得了 148 ETH 收入，最大一笔销售为 003.eth（成交价 83.5 ETH），不过支出也比较多（56 ETH），在二级市场购买了 fantom.eth、tnt.eth、hobby.eth、remain.eth、wish.eth、5555.eth 等域名，还以 6.42 ETH 溢价注册了 sand.eth 域名。158.eth 当前已售出购买和注册域名数量的 2.35%。

来源：Nansen

目前，158.eth 地址共持有 325 个域名，包括 788.eth、158.eth、186.eth、188.eth 等数字域名，以及单词、单词组合、字母组合等域名。

Trending Cryptos

ctr
CitreaCTR
wstusdt
wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT
apr
aPrioriAPR
ctx
Cryptex FinanceCTX
audio
AudiusAUDIO
mantra
MantraMANTRA
xvs
VenusXVS
waxl
AxelarWAXL
bill
Billions NetworkBILL
pyth
PYTH (Pyth)PYTH
rune
THORChainRUNE
brev
BrevisBREV
zrx
ZRX（0X）ZRX
cake
PancakeSwapCAKE
jst
JUSTJST

Related Reads

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbit3h ago

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbit3h ago

South Korea Targets 40 Unregistered Crypto Operators in Regulatory Crackdown

South Korea's Financial Intelligence Unit has referred around 40 unregistered virtual asset service providers to the police as part of a regulatory crackdown. Under local law, all crypto exchanges must obtain ISMS certification and FIU registration before operating, yet only 28 entities are currently registered. The FIU identified methods used by offshore platforms to attract Korean users, including advertising on local messaging apps and using private money changers to convert stablecoins. Officials stressed that unregistered platforms are not protected by Korean law. This action aligns with South Korea's push for stricter global crypto compliance through FATF measures. FIU Director Lee Hyung-joo recently urged FATF members to remove transaction thresholds for the "Travel Rule," as South Korea plans to mandate identity checks for all crypto transactions starting in August, expanding from the current 1 million won (≈$730) minimum. Regulatory enforcement has intensified in 2026, with authorities pursuing criminal cases against market manipulation schemes and enhancing cooperation with financial institutions to curb cross-border illegal transactions.

TheNewsCrypto4h ago

South Korea Targets 40 Unregistered Crypto Operators in Regulatory Crackdown

TheNewsCrypto4h ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手4h ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions