新晋“聪明钱”DeFi DAO们都在买啥?

火星财经Published on 2022-03-11Last updated on 2022-03-18

Abstract

他们正在疯狂“扫货”FXS、ANGLE、TOKE。

资产


在加密领域,“smart money”不一定是对冲基金或资产管理公司,也可能是 DAO。
这些拥有巨额资金的加密原生实体,有着世界上最聪明的加密人才为他们工作,管理财富。我们也开始注意到,他们是最早跑着入场“扫货”潜力代币的资金源头。

  • 他们以 0.42 美元的价格开始购买 CRV。现在超过了 2 美元。(+ 376%)
  • 他们以 3 美元的价格购买 CVX。现在超过了 16 美元。(+ 426%)

更酷的是,任何人都可以通过查看治理论坛或深入研究链上数据来“偷窥” DAO 的好货推荐。
那么 DAO 接下来会入手什么?
本文将带领大家,深挖 “smart money” 的百宝袋~
DAO 们都在忙着买啥?
DeFi 内部有一种新型的市场参与者。
这并不是指被大肆宣传的 TradFi 机构。相反,这些越来越有影响力的实体都是加密原生的,完全活跃在链上,拥有运营经验和对 DeFi 的洞察力。
这股新兴力量就是 DAO。 
DaoFi 指的是作为 DeFi 用户和投资者出现的 DaoFi,DaoFi 是一类 DeFi 投资者,也是某些代币的最早资金来源。
将 DAO 视为 “smart money” 是有道理的。它们是由世界上一些最聪明的人管理的、拥有大量资金的非本土实体,汇聚了高水平的专业知识。
DAO 作为 “smart money” 的一个经典例子是 CRV 和 CVX 战争。
从 2021 年第二季度开始,像 Yearn Finance、StakeDAO 和 Convex Finance 等协议都在竞相积累和锁定 CRV 代币。这些锁定的代币以 veCRV 的形式存在,当在 Curve 上提供流动性时,持有者有权获得更高的奖励,并有权投票决定 CRV 排放的方向。

资产

来源:DAOCVX.com
Convex 很快赢得了这场“护城河或特洛伊马”之战,囤积了大量的 CRV。然后目标转移到 CVX,因为持有者有权对Convex 持有的 CRV 进行微治理。
CVX 现在被 20 个 DAO 代币库入手。
众所周知,这些战争是由 DAO 发起的,但很少有人讨论它们的成本基础。

资产


从上表中我们可以看到,DAO 开始以远低于当前交易价格的价格囤积 CRV 和 CVX。尽管这两种资产已从 2022 年 1 月的峰值水平下降了 50% 以上,但仍出现了上述涨幅。有趣的是,这些举措是在“光天化日”之下进行的,任何人都可以在治理论坛、Twitter,当然还有链上实时看到。
这些 DAO 的操作很容易被复制。
尽管样本量很小,但我们可以得出:DAO 的购买是投资者的买入信号。
这引出了一些问题:

  • 除了 CRV 和 CVX,DAO 还“扫货”了哪些代币?
  • 它们这样做的原因是什么?
  • 会有更多的 DAO 追随早期采用者的脚步吗?

让我们一起在 DAO 的持仓中寻找答案吧。
DAO 持仓一览
我们将分析 DeFi DAO 的 10 个不同的代币库。
该列表无法囊括所有 DAO,因为以太坊上有数百个非常聪明和有才华的贡献者。这 10 个是不同的组合的代表,我们将从它们的规模、它们对获得各种治理代币的最终兴趣以及它们这样做的动机进行“拆包”。
下表中列出的资产不包括 ETH、BTC、稳定币、流动性代币和原生代币等大众化代币资产(持有超过 2 万美元的资产)。这些资产是通过几种不同的方式获得的,无论是通过公开市场购买、挖矿奖励、代币交易,还是种子轮配置。
这十个 DAO 被分成三个主要类别:

  • 服务提供商:这些 DAO 正在积累治理代币,以便为用户提高其产品的质量,例如提高收益。符合此描述的 DAO 是 Convex Finance、StakeDAO 和 BadgerDAO。
  • 储备资产发行者:这些协议正在发行某种储备资产,无论是盯住法币的,还是浮动汇率的。这些 DAO 正在囤积各种代币,用于作为质押品、微治理权和/或为其发行的代币直接提供流动性。被选中的 DAO 属于这一类别,包括 Frax Finance、Olympus DAO、Tribe DAO 和 Alchemix Finance。
  • 治理 DAO:这些 DAO 正在囤积代币,目的是在不同的重要战略协议中积累治理能力和影响力。这些包括[Redacted] Cartel,Lobis和Congruent Finance。
资产

正如我们所看到的,在我们的列表上的 10 个 DAO 中拥有 26 个独特的资产,每个 DAO 在其代币库中至少拥有两个非本地治理代币。
每个 DAO 持有的代币的平均数量是 5.5,而中间值是 4。持有代币数量最多的两个 DAO 是 [Redacted] Cartel,Tribe DAO,分别持有 12 和 11 个。

资产

将数据按资产细分,我们可以毫不意外地看到,最常见的资产是 CVX,它被 6 个 DAO 所持有,有 5 个 DAO 持有 CRV。这三类 DAO 仅持有四项资产,而它们是其中的两项。
再往下看,排在第四到六的是 FXS、TOKE 和 ANGLE。代币由储备资产和治理 DAO 持有,而 FXS 和 ANGLE 则由储备资产和治理 DAO 和服务提供商持有。
三种最常见的持有资产
现在我们已经知道了 DAO 样本组中最常见的代币,让我们对其中的一些代币进行更详细的研究,理解为什么这些资产成为 DAO 的“扫货”目标以及它们的战略重要性的原因。
我们将关注除 CRV 和 CVX 之外最广泛持有的三种资产:FXS、ANGLE 和 TOKE。
1. Frax Finance(FXS)

  • 持有该资产的 DAO 数量:4
  • 持有该资产的 DAO:Convex Finance,Olympus DAO,[Redacted] Cartel,Congruent Finance
  • 持有该资产的 DAO 类型:服务提供商、储备资产、治理

Frax Finance 是一家稳定币发行者,其 FXS 代币作为铸币税,产生费用,为持有者提供提高的奖励,并管理协议。像 CRV 和 CVX 一样,FXS 可以锁定 veFXS,这让持有者有权在任何去中心化交易所对不同 FRAX 对的排放进行投票。
DAO “扫货”动机预测:
FXS 代币的效用很可能促使人们在三种 DAO 中的积累量。像 Convex 这样的服务提供商希望锁定 FXS,为储户提供尽可能高的收益率,储备资产发行人可能有兴趣锁定 FXS,以推动基于 FRAX 的交易对的流动性,而治理 DAO 可以利用代币通过投票销售为其代币持有人产生现金流。
2. Angle Protocol(ANGLE)

  • 持有该资产的 DAO 数量:4
  • 持有该资产的 DAO:Stake DAO,Tribe DAO,Redacted Cartel,Lobis
  • 持有该资产的 DAO 类型:服务提供商、储备资产、治理

Angle 是一种稳定币协议,目前正在发行 agEUR,agEUR 与欧元挂钩。ANGLE 代币在协议中扮演着关键角色,如果通过流动性挖掘奖励获得这些代币,可能会鼓励 DAO 购买或持有代币。
和 FXS 一样,当 ANGLE 被锁定为 veANGLE 时,它会收取协议费用,让持有者有权增加排放,还可以用来投票决定轨值权重。与 Frax 一样,任何交易所的任何 agEUR 对都可以设置计价。
DAO “扫货”动机预测:
尽管 agEUR 的吸引力还没有达到 FRAX 的水平,但其 1.29 亿美元的市值仅为 FRAX 的 4.4%。如果采用 ANGLE 的数量增加,这三种类型的 DAO 对 ANGLE 的需求很有可能会增加。
3. Tokemak(TOKE)

  • 持有该资产的 DAO 数量:4
  • 持有该资产的 DAO:Olympus DAO,Tribe DAO,Redacted Cartel,Lobis
  • 持有该资产的 DAO 类型:储备资产、治理

Tokemak 是一个去中心化做市协议。协议的原生代币(TOKE)在协议中被用作向不同的代币和交易所分配和直接流动性的手段。
TOKE 持有人将其资产投资于一个特定的代币式反应堆,以 TOKE 排放的形式赚取收益,同时还可以在代币反应器由于重大的短期损失事件而变得担保不足的情况下充当协议后盾。
DAO “扫货”动机预测:
与 FXS 和 ANGLE 一样,TOKE 很可能同时受到储备资产和治理 DAO 的需求,因为它有控制流动性流动的能力。储备资产 DAO 可能希望囤积代币,以增加其发行的代币的流动性,而治理 DAO 可以将其持有的权利出售给对建立代币反应器或为其代币定向更多流动性感兴趣的出价者。
潜在的 DAO 未来目标资产
我们已经讨论了最广泛持有的资产,让我们来回顾一下列表上的一些资产,这些资产将来可能会成为越来越多 DAO 的目标。
1. Redacted Cartel(BRTFLY)

  • 持有该资产的DAO数量:1
  • 持有该资产的DAO:Redacted Cartel
  • 持有该资产的 DAO 类型:储备资产

DAO 的一个潜在目标资产是 BRTFLY,即 Redacted Cartel 的治理代币。作为Olympus DAO的分叉,Redacted 旨在积累跨各种战略上重要协议的治理能力。Redacted 拥有价值超过 4600 万美元的资产,以目前的市场价格,他们最大的持仓是 CRV、CVX、OHM、FXS 和 TOKE。
BRTFLY 目前使用的是与其父 DAO 类似的 rebase 模型,但很快将转向双代币模型。这些新代币 rlBRTFLY(锁定收益的 BRTFLY)和 glBRTFLY(锁定治理的 BRTFLY)将分别分割从贿赂中获得的现金流和代币库资产的微治理权。
DAO “扫货”动机预测:
DAO 开始积累 BRTFLY 的主要原因是为了获得 glBRTFLY 所拥有的微治理权限。由于在本文中提到的许多具有战略重要性的资产中持有越来越大的份额,glBRTFLY 可能成为寻求获得持有这些代币带来的好处的 DAO 中流行的微治理代币。
我们已经开始看到 DAO 对 BRTFLY 感兴趣,Olympus 最近提议将 BRTFLY 加入其战略资产白名单。
2. Index Coop(INDEX)

  • 持有该资产的 DAO 数量:1
  • 持有该资产的 DAO:Tribe DAO
  • 持有该资产的 DAO 类型:储备资产

Index Coop 是一家去中心化资产管理公司,负责创建 GMI、DPI、MVI 等主题指数以及 ETH 2x-FLI 等杠杆产品。虽然 INDEX 在 INDEX Coop DAO 本身中被用于治理,就像 glBRTFLY 一样,代币的持有者被授予对 INDEX Coop 产品中持有的资产的微治理权利。
虽然该功能目前只对 DPI 有效,但理论上它可以应用于 Coop 权限下的所有类别。
DAO “扫货”动机预测:
像 glBRTFLY 一样,DAO 可能对囤积 INDEX 感兴趣的主要原因是现在和将来都在代币权限范围内的广泛的微治理权利。
我们已经看到 Tribe DAO 利用了 INDEX 的微治理能力。DAO 持有 100000 指数(按当前价格计算约为 46.3 万美元),他们用这些指数帮助他们的稳定币 FEI 在 Aave 上上线。考虑到 FEI 由 TVL 在 DeFi 最大的货币市场上市所带来的效用和价值,其它 DAO 也会效仿,这并非不可能。
3. Balancer (BAL)

  • 持有该资产的 DAO 数量:1
  • 持有该资产的 DAO:Tribe DAO
  • 持有该资产的 DAO 类型:储备资产

Balancer 是一个去中心化的交易所,可以创建高度可定制的 AMM(自动做市商)矿池,由 BAL 代币管理。该协议计划对 BAL 代币经济进行全面改革,实现 ve 模型。与 Curve 一样,BAL 持有者将能够锁定他们的代币长达一年,可以获得 DEX 产生的交易费用的一部分,以及对不同矿池的排放进行投票的权利。
DAO “扫货”动机预测:
与 Curve 一样,BAL 潜在的大规模囤积背后的驱动力是控制未来排放的权利,即给定矿池的流动性。这可能会推动服务提供商、储备资产发行方和治理 DAO 之间对代币的需求。
总结
DAO 是 DeFi 的 smart money,它们在市场中十分活跃。正如我们所看到的,这些 DeFi 原生实体所持有和囤积的远不止 CRV,它们还将目光投向了其它具有战略重要性的资产。
最广泛持有的代币的一个共同特征是它们拥有有价值的治理权,可以通过直接持有代币获得,比如 FXS 和 ANGLE;或者通过微治理获得,比如 CVX、glBRTFLY 和 INDEX。此外,在许多情况下,这些资产所拥有的令人垂涎的权利是通过代币排放引导流动性流动的能力,而流动性是 DeFi 最有价值的资源。
我们总说要跟着聪明钱走,还有比 DeFi DAO 更聪明的钱吗?

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbit19m ago

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbit19m ago

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbit27m ago

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbit27m ago

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbit50m ago

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbit50m ago

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbit54m ago

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbit54m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

How to Buy CRV

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Curve DAO Token (CRV) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Curve DAO Token (CRV) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Curve DAO Token (CRV)After purchasing your Curve DAO Token (CRV), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Curve DAO Token (CRV)Easily trade Curve DAO Token (CRV) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

5.4k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy CRV

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of CRV (CRV) are presented below.

活动图片