Кто-то заплатил $60 000 (36 ETH) за создание первого NFT на Ethereum после слияния0 (36 ETH) за создание первого NFT на Ethereum после слияния

Block-chain 24Published on 2022-09-15Last updated on 2022-09-15

Abstract

Кто-то заплатил колоссальные 36 ETH, чтобы войти в историю, создав самый первый NFT на Ethereum после его перехода на Proof-of-Stake.

Сеть Ethereum претерпела крупнейшее обновление в истории, перейдя на алгоритм консенсуса Proof-of-Stake.

Сразу после этого пользователи находят хитрые способы отметить это событие и стать частью истории.

В этом конкретном случае пользователь потратил колоссальные 36 ETH на сумму около 60 000 долларов США по текущему курсу, чтобы отчеканить самые первые в истории невзаимозаменяемые токены в сети Ethereum на основе PoS.

Вот как выглядит NFT:

Отчеканенное с высотой блока 15537394, само изображение представляет собой лицо панды и называется «Переход».

Есть определенная ирония в том факте, что кто-то заплатил так много за создание NFT, но также важно отметить, что само по себе слияние мало что делает для снижения платы за газ в сети Ethereum.

Это одно из самых популярных заблуждений об этом событии.

Слияние изменило общий алгоритм консенсуса и не увеличивает пропускную способность сети, поэтому оно не приведет к значительному снижению платы за газ.

Однако существует несколько решений масштабирования, которые необходимо развернуть на более позднем этапе для решения этой конкретной задачи.

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手44m ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手44m ago

a16z: In the AI Era, Company Competition for Talent Starts with Job Title Naming

The article discusses how companies in the AI era are competing for talent through strategic "title arbitrage," or the renaming of key roles to reflect and attract new, high-value capabilities. It uses Palantir's creation of the "Forward-Deployed Engineer" (FDE) as a prime example. This title reframed client-facing technical work from a peripheral "implementation" role into a core, high-status engineering function. The move was strategic, allowing Palantir to attract talent that blended technical skill with business acumen and to dominate the market's perception of this capability. The piece argues that job titles are an organizational language that signals the value and authority of certain work. Effective new titles, like "Data Scientist" or "Site Reliability Engineer," emerge when a role's strategic importance genuinely outgrows its old name. Conversely, mere title inflation without substantive change is ineffective. For AI companies, particularly in B2B, this is a crucial strategy. AI transformation creates new high-leverage roles (e.g., "Legal Engineer," "GTM Engineer") that combine domain expertise with technical automation. By naming these roles, a company can help clients internally legitimize these change-makers. This, in turn, builds market mindshare, associating the company with the new capability. In conclusion, as AI blurs the lines between product and service, the ability to accurately name and organize the critical, client-adjacent work that defines product learning will be a key competitive advantage. The first to define this new organizational language plants a flag in the market's mind.

marsbit2h ago

a16z: In the AI Era, Company Competition for Talent Starts with Job Title Naming

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片