Ali Martinez Waits for Cardano Level Indicating an Upward Reversal

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-19Last updated on 2026-08-19

Abstract

Cryptocurrency Cardano (ADA) has triggered a new bullish signal after reaching the $0.17 downside target identified by analyst Ali Martínez. Martínez noted a buy signal from the daily TD Sequential indicator, which often appears after a prolonged decline and suggests selling pressure may be exhausting. With ADA hitting the $0.17 level, the analyst anticipates a potential short-term rebound towards $0.20, representing a roughly 15% gain from current levels. The $0.20 level is technically significant as a previous resistance zone and a key psychological barrier for bulls. A move above $0.18 would strengthen recovery chances, potentially opening the path toward $0.22. However, failure to hold the $0.17 support could invalidate the bullish outlook and lead to deeper price declines. At the time of reporting, ADA was trading at $0.17, up 2.2% over 24 hours but still down 1.5% on the weekly chart. It remains below its key 50-day and 200-day Simple Moving Averages, indicating the broader bearish trend persists. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) at 44.29 suggests neutral momentum, with selling pressure easing but no clear signal for a strong bullish reversal yet.

Cardano ($ADA) cryptocurrency has issued a new bullish signal, reaching the downside target of $0.17 set by Ali Martinez. The analyst expected this to trigger a short-term bounce towards the $0.20 level.

In a social media post on August 18, Martinez pointed to a buy signal on the daily TD Sequential indicator. This situation arose after a prolonged decline from recent highs around $0.20 and is often viewed by traders as a sign that selling pressure may be ending.

According to Martinez's analysis, after dropping to the $0.17 level, Cardano's price completed the formation of a TD Sequential '9' buy setup on the daily timeframe. The analyst noted that $ADA has already reached the previously defined target of $0.170 and is now poised for a potential recovery.

Following the latest buy signal, Martinez is targeting a return to $0.20, which would represent a gain of approximately 15% from the current price zone.

The $0.20 level also holds technical significance, as it acted as a key resistance zone during Cardano's recent rally. It also remains a psychologically important barrier for bulls.

Statistically, buy signals from the TD Sequential indicator have been used to identify trend exhaustion and potential reversal points after extended declines.

Previous buy signals for $ADA generated by this indicator were followed by short-term recovery rallies. However, overall market conditions remain the determining factor.

A move above $0.18 would strengthen the chances of a recovery and open the path for a retest of the $0.20 level. A break above this barrier would allow targeting the $0.22 area, where analysts previously identified the next major resistance zone.

However, a failure to hold the $0.17 support zone would invalidate the bullish outlook and subject $ADA to deeper price declines.

At the time of publication, $ADA was trading at $0.17, up approximately 2.2% over the last 24 hours. Weekly losses remain at 1.5%.

$ADA is trading below its 50-day simple moving average (SMA) at $0.1751 and significantly below its 200-day SMA at $0.2259, indicating the persistence of a bearish trend.

The cryptocurrency's 14-day relative strength index (RSI) at 44.29 indicates neutral momentum, suggesting weakening selling pressure without a clear signal for a bullish reversal.

end-content

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat new bullish signal did the cryptocurrency Cardano (ADA) give, according to analyst Ali Martinez?

ACardano (ADA) gave a new bullish signal by reaching the downside target of $0.17 set by Ali Martinez, which triggered a TD Sequential 'buy' setup on the daily timeframe.

QWhat price target does Ali Martinez aim for following the latest buy signal for Cardano?

AFollowing the latest buy signal, Ali Martinez is targeting a return to the $0.20 price level, which would represent a gain of approximately 15% from the current price zone.

QWhat is the technical and psychological significance of the $0.20 level for Cardano?

AThe $0.20 level is technically significant as it acted as a key resistance zone during Cardano's recent rally and remains a psychologically important barrier for the bulls.

QWhat condition must be met for Cardano to strengthen the chances of a recovery and open the path to retest $0.20?

AA move above $0.18 would strengthen the chances of a recovery and open the path for a retest of the $0.20 level.

QAccording to the article, what would cancel the bullish forecast for Cardano and expose it to deeper price declines?

AThe inability to hold the $0.17 support zone would cancel the bullish forecast and expose Cardano (ADA) to deeper price declines.

Related Reads

Jameson Lopp's BIP-110 Postmortem: Bitcoin Is Driven by Game Theory, Not Morality

Jameson Lopp's analysis concludes that BIP-110, a proposal to restrict arbitrary data (like inscriptions) on Bitcoin, failed due to economic and technical realities, not moral arguments. The proposal, championed by Luke Dashjr and others, aimed to "cleanse" the chain but never reached its 55% miner activation threshold. Upon its forced signaling deadline in August, only the OCEAN pool (with ~1% hash rate) supported it, creating a short-lived fork that quickly died as miners faced unredeemable block rewards. Lopp's earlier predictions about its economic infeasibility were proven correct. Technically, BIP-110 was flawed; workarounds to embed data compliant with its rules were demonstrated almost immediately, proving it couldn't achieve its stated goal. The debate often devolved into moralistic rhetoric, with supporters accusing opponents of supporting child exploitation material—a tactic Lopp criticizes as ineffective for building consensus. Lopp argues Bitcoin is driven by incentives and game theory, not morality. Past forks like Bitcoin Cash promised economic benefits, while BIP-110 offered only restrictions and reduced miner fees, gaining no substantial support from major economic players. He predicts the "puritans" behind the failed fork will continue complaining but their new chain will remain insignificant. The episode reaffirms that attempting to censor data on a permissionless, anti-censorship network like Bitcoin is a futile battle.

marsbit6m ago

Jameson Lopp's BIP-110 Postmortem: Bitcoin Is Driven by Game Theory, Not Morality

marsbit6m ago

Tokenization Scale Soars to $4.3 Billion, But Why Did Securitize Incur a $5.5 Million Loss?

Securitize's first quarterly report post-IPO reveals a paradox: while its tokenized assets under management hit a record $4.3 billion (up 16% YoY) and platform trading volume surged 147% to $5.3 billion, total revenue fell 5% to $14.4 million. Tokenization revenue specifically dropped ~12% to $7.8 million, leading to an adjusted EBITDA loss of $5.5 million. CFO Francisco Flores explained that most trading volume is not yet monetized, with the majority of tokenization revenue still coming from one-time projects like new protocol integrations. In contrast, asset servicing revenue, a more recurring stream, grew slightly to $6.6 million. The company has lowered its full-year revenue guidance to $70-$80 million from an initial projection of $110 million. Industry experts note this highlights a structural challenge for the tokenization sector. Scaling assets on-chain doesn't automatically scale a profitable business model. Current implementations often rely on costly, customized projects for each new asset or jurisdiction. The future, they argue, lies in building standardized infrastructure that generates recurring "infrastructure revenue" from post-issuance activities like compliance, distributions, and secondary trading—similar to enterprise software. Analysts caution against misinterpreting high trading volumes as indicative of a mature fee-based model, as Securitize's broad volume metric includes many non-monetized actions. The key test for the industry is whether adding billions in new assets can generate sustainable revenue without constant new custom projects.

marsbit8m ago

Tokenization Scale Soars to $4.3 Billion, But Why Did Securitize Incur a $5.5 Million Loss?

marsbit8m ago

The Five Paradoxes of Artificial Intelligence

**Five Paradoxes of Artificial Intelligence** Artificial intelligence (AI) is an era filled with paradoxes, which we navigate as we advance. **1. The Prediction Paradox** AI experts, from pioneers like Marvin Minsky to contemporary figures like Geoffrey Hinton and Demis Hassabis, have a history of inaccurate forecasts regarding AI's capabilities and timelines, such as achieving human-level machine intelligence or surpassing radiologists. Predictions about Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) vary wildly between optimistic entrepreneurs and skeptical academics, highlighting the inherent unpredictability of technological futures. **2. The Employment Quantification Paradox** Despite numerous studies from institutions like the OECD, IMF, and McKinsey attempting to quantify AI's impact on jobs, estimates of affected employment range from 0.4% to 67%, revealing vast inconsistencies. This paradox arises because isolating AI's effect from other economic, social, and technological factors is virtually impossible, and forecasts depend on static assumptions about a dynamically evolving technology. **3. The Productivity Paradox** While AI is a transformative General Purpose Technology, significant productivity growth has not yet materialized in major economies like the EU and has only matched historical averages in the US. This disconnect between rapid innovation and slow productivity gains, reminiscent of the "Solow Paradox" from the computer age, is often explained by time lags. History shows it takes decades for such technologies to diffuse and trigger complementary innovations that boost productivity. **4. The Data Value Paradox** Data is hailed as the "new oil" and critical for AI, yet its economic value is paradoxical. Its worth is realized only in use, not in straightforward trade. Despite policy emphasis and initiatives for data asset recognition on corporate balance sheets in China, the monetized value remains negligible—accounting for only about 0.06% of major telecom operators' total assets—highlighting the gap between perceived utility and financial valuation. **5. The Industrial Revolution Paradox** For decades, nearly every major new technology, from the internet and nanotechnology to blockchain and now AI, has been proclaimed as the driver of a "Fourth Industrial Revolution." This constant reassignment suggests prior labels were premature. True industrial revolutions are typically identified in hindsight, not in real-time. Furthermore, the coexistence of such a proclaimed transformative revolution with ongoing economic crises would be historically anomalous. Whether AI truly defines a new industrial revolution remains a narrative for the future to decide.

marsbit11m ago

The Five Paradoxes of Artificial Intelligence

marsbit11m ago

Experts Warn of Mass Crypto Hacks Using AI Agents

Experts warn that AI agents could dramatically lower the cost and scale of attacks against cryptocurrency holders. Speaking at the Wyoming Blockchain Symposium, industry figures noted that automation allows malicious actors to simultaneously search for vulnerabilities in wallets, passwords, and networks across a vast number of potential victims. Ryan Kirkly, co-founder and CEO of Global Settlement Network, criticized the industry for often viewing autonomous agents only as beneficial tools while underestimating their offensive potential. Data from TRM Labs shows the crypto industry experienced a record 207 hacks in the first half of 2026, causing $972 million in losses, with the number doubling from the same period in 2025. Vice President of Technical Operations at Web3 Foundation, Bill Labun, agreed that the efficiency of autonomous systems also benefits attackers. While defenders like the Ethereum Foundation are using AI agents for security audits, the need for human verification remains high due to false positives. A major concern is granting AI agents direct access to financial tools and personal data. New services like MetaMask's Agent Wallet, which allows AI to manage assets within set limits, introduce risks such as prompt injection attacks. Panelists also highlighted risks from metadata leakage, which can compromise privacy even on private networks, and the unresolved issue of legal liability for an AI agent's autonomous and potentially irreversible actions. Lack of user trust, due to AI's tendency to "hallucinate" or generate incorrect information, was cited as a key barrier to widespread adoption.

cryptonews.ru12m ago

Experts Warn of Mass Crypto Hacks Using AI Agents

cryptonews.ru12m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ADA (ADA) are presented below.

活动图片