Harga Bitcoin Turun ke $62.470 karena Penjual Uji Kembali Level Support $63.000

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-14Last updated on 2026-08-14

Abstract

Harga Bitcoin turun ke level terendah $62.470 pada hari Jumat, karena penjual kembali menguji level dukungan kunci di $63.000. Setelah sempat terlihat terkonsolidasi di sekitar $63.400, tekanan jual meningkat, mendorong harga ke titik terendah harian tersebut sebelum pulih sedikit di atas $63.000. Volatilitas ini memicu likuidasi signifikan untuk posisi long (beli) berleveraj, dengan total likuidasi di seluruh pasar kripto mencapai $166.5 juta, didominasi oleh posisi long. Sentimen pasar juga dibebani oleh arus keluar bersih dari dana ETF spot Bitcoin AS sebesar lebih dari $131 juta, menandakan potensi penarikan dana institusional. Faktor tambahan berasal dari usulan penyedia indeks MSCI mengenai kriteria baru untuk "perusahaan non-operasional," yang berpotensi mengecualikan perusahaan seperti MicroStrategy dan Metaplanet dari indeks globalnya. MicroStrategy menanggapi dengan menentang usulan tersebut, menyatakan bahwa aset digital adalah aset yang sah dan keputusan MSCI bertentangan dengan regulator dan pasar. Konsultasi publik MSCI berlangsung hingga 30 September, dengan keputusan akhir pada 16 Oktober. Jika disetujui, pengecualian yang dimulai November dapat memicu penjualan institusional berkepanjangan, mengganggu adopsi Bitcoin di sektor korporat dan prospek kenaikan harga di akhir tahun.

Pada hari Jumat, bitcoin turun di bawah level $63.000 untuk hari kedua berturut-turut, dengan penurunan yang meningkat pada awal sesi perdagangan.

Awalnya tampaknya mata uang kripto ini terkonsolidasi di sekitar $63.400 beberapa jam setelah turun ke $62.912 pada hari Kamis. Namun, aksi jual yang dimulai tak lama setelah tengah malam menarik harga hingga $62.670, sebelum pulih dan diperdagangkan sedikit di bawah $62.800.

Tak lama setelah pukul 08:00 Waktu Standar Timur (EST), bitcoin kembali mulai menurun, mencapai titik terendah harian di $62.470. Pemulihan berikutnya membantunya kembali ke level $63.000. Per pukul 13:20 EST, mata uang kripto ini diperdagangkan sedikit di atas $63.000, hampir tidak berubah dalam 24 jam sebelumnya.

Dinamika harga yang stabil mempertahankan kapitalisasi pasar bitcoin di bawah $1,27 triliun, dengan kerugian selama tujuh hari sebesar 2,6%. Setelah awal bulan yang kuat, harga bitcoin sekarang hampir tidak berubah seiring paruh bulan Agustus tercapai.

Di pasar derivatif, volatilitas menyebabkan likuidasi signifikan terhadap posisi long yang terleverase. Menurut data Coinglass, dari posisi bitcoin terleverase senilai $32 juta yang dilikuidasi dalam 24 jam, $26 juta berasal dari posisi long — sekitar $8 juta lebih sedikit dari hari Kamis. Di pasar kripto secara keseluruhan, likuidasi posisi long mencapai $94 juta, sedangkan likuidasi posisi short mencapai $72,5 juta.

Performa bitcoin yang kurang menggembirakan semakin terdampak oleh data dana ETF spot, yang menunjukkan arus keluar dana melebihi $131 juta. Kamis menjadi hari kedua berturut-turut — dan ketiga dalam seminggu — di mana ETF mengalami penebusan bersih. Arus keluar yang konsisten ini menunjukkan bahwa investor institusional mungkin sedang mundur, bertentangan dengan tanda-tanda kebangkitan minat yang terlihat pekan lalu.

Faktor tambahan yang memperburuk sentimen pasar adalah laporan bahwa penyedia indeks MSCI telah mengusulkan kriteria seleksi baru untuk "perusahaan non-operasional" dalam indeks pasar investasi global mereka. Meskipun sistem ini tidak secara langsung menargetkan mata uang kripto, ia mengevaluasi apakah aset operasional utama perusahaan membentuk lebih dari 50% dari total asetnya.

Respon Strategy Terhadap Proposal MSCI

Pengamat pasar mencatat bahwa perusahaan-perusahaan yang secara aktif menggunakan aset digital sebagai cadangan kas, termasuk Strategy dan Metaplanet, tidak memenuhi kriteria yang diusulkan dan dapat dikeluarkan dari indeks dalam rebalancing mendatang. Jika sebelumnya dimasukkan dalam indeks saham utama memungkinkan dana indeks pasif dan ETF otomatis membeli saham perusahaan-perusahaan ini, pengeluaran mereka dapat memicu penjualan terpaksa oleh investor institusional.

Menanggapi hal ini, Strategy menerbitkan pernyataan di X yang dengan tegas menentang proposal ini:

"Aset digital adalah aset. Penyedia indeks harus mengukur pasar, bukan memutuskan aset apa yang boleh dimiliki perusahaan. Proposal MSCI menempatkan perusahaan tidak selaras dengan posisi regulator, pasar, dan klien mereka sendiri. Bitcoin tidak membutuhkan MSCI. Begitu juga Strategy," pernyataan perusahaan itu.

Konsultasi publik MSCI akan berlangsung hingga 30 September, dengan keputusan akhir direncanakan pada 16 Oktober. Jika disetujui, pengeluaran dari indeks akan dimulai pada November — jadwal seperti itu dapat memicu penjualan institusional yang berkepanjangan dan menghancurkan jembatan penting untuk adopsi bitcoin di sektor korporat, pada dasarnya memperburuk prospek kenaikan bitcoin menjelang akhir tahun.

end-content

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QBerapa kali harga Bitcoin jatuh di bawah level $63.000 pada hari Jumat, menurut artikel tersebut?

APada hari Jumat, harga Bitcoin turun di bawah level $63.000 untuk hari kedua berturut-turut.

QBerapa nilai penarikan dana dari spot Bitcoin ETF yang disebutkan dalam artikel?

ANilai penarikan dana dari spot Bitcoin ETF melebihi $131 juta.

QApa dampak dari volatilitas harga Bitcoin di pasar derivatif, menurut data Coinglass?

AVolatilitas menyebabkan likuidasi besar-besaran pada posisi long yang digerakkan oleh leverage, dengan likuidasi posisi long Bitcoin sebesar $26 juta dalam 24 jam.

QApa kriteria baru yang diusulkan oleh penyedia indeks MSCI dan bagaimana hal ini dapat memengaruhi perusahaan seperti Strategy?

AMSCI mengusulkan kriteria baru untuk 'perusahaan non-operasional' yang mengevaluasi apakah aset operasional utama mewakili lebih dari 50% dari total aset perusahaan. Perusahaan seperti Strategy yang menggunakan aset digital sebagai cadangan mungkin tidak memenuhi kriteria ini dan dapat dikeluarkan dari indeks.

QTanggapan apa yang diberikan Strategy terhadap usulan MSCI, dan kapan keputusan final dari MSCI akan diumumkan?

AStrategy menentang keras usulan tersebut, menyatakan bahwa aset digital adalah aset yang sah dan penyedia indeks seharusnya mengukur pasar, bukan menentukan aset apa yang boleh dimiliki perusahaan. Konsultasi publik MSCI berlangsung hingga 30 September, dengan keputusan final direncanakan pada 16 Oktober.

Related Reads

Did DeepSeek Intentionally Make an Unfriendly Agent?

DeepSeek is shifting its strategy from being a low-cost model provider to building a foundational ecosystem for AI agents. This pivot is marked by two recent moves: increasing the price of its flagship V4 Pro model and launching the DeepSeek Harness agent framework. Previously, DeepSeek's success was built on creating powerful, affordable models and open-sourcing them to drive adoption. Now, the focus is moving "beyond the model" to the runtime environment where agents operate. Harness is key to this new approach. Unlike integrated agent products from competitors, Harness deconstructs the agent stack—separating the model, tools, skills, workflows, and UI into modular, replaceable components. Its core innovation is the Cordis kernel, which enables dynamic loading, unloading, and management of plugins, allowing agents to modify their own capabilities during execution. Significantly, Harness does not lock users into DeepSeek's models; it allows integration with third-party models. This suggests DeepSeek's ambition is not to control the model layer but to establish the standard runtime environment for future agents—akin to an operating system for the agent era. The V4 Pro price increase aligns with this shift: the model transitions from a loss-leading acquisition tool to a core revenue engine within a broader ecosystem. Harness is currently complex and developer-focused, prioritizing ecosystem builders over end-users. Its success will be measured not by immediate user numbers, but by the plugins, agents, and platforms built upon it. DeepSeek's long-term bet is that controlling the agent runtime will be more valuable than merely providing the underlying models, potentially redefining how AI agents are created and evolved.

marsbit34m ago

Did DeepSeek Intentionally Make an Unfriendly Agent?

marsbit34m ago

Metrics Ventures Market Observation: Talk is Cheap

This monthly market analysis extends its timeline to incorporate critical July comments from the Fed Chair, noting that bond markets have already priced in perceived policy shortcomings. The report observes a growing divergence: equity markets, after some deleveraging, continue a "trust-based" rally, while bond and currency markets signal persistent distrust. Precious metals bottoming suggests a central bank consensus that the era of "competitive currency devaluation" is ending, with verbal interventions losing power. Looking forward to Q3-Q4, the analysis remains bullish on supply-constrained global resources like copper and power, as well as gold, which prices ongoing monetary失信. It argues that digital assets are unlikely to see major outperformance until excess liquidity is released and AI growth rates are fully priced. Key market views include: 1. Commodities like gold remain primary liquidity absorbers over Bitcoin, with recent consolidation seen as healthy. 2. The bull trend for RMB-denominated assets (e.g., STAR 50 Index) is firmly established. 3. Key resource country indices and currencies are near inflection points, with spot copper already at new highs. The report suggests resource equities, particularly in China's market, are at the end of their consolidation phase, offering attractive valuations with embedded optionality on rising metal prices. It highlights the predictive significance of recent US-Japan FX interventions and Treasury-Fed dynamics, suggesting a shift towards less communication and data management to maintain stability. A long position in resource assets is presented as a positive expected-value strategy over a multi-year horizon.

marsbit2h ago

Metrics Ventures Market Observation: Talk is Cheap

marsbit2h ago

The Value, Growth, and Risks of Prediction Markets

The article discusses the explosive growth and complex nature of prediction markets in the United States, focusing on their value, risks, and regulatory challenges. Key drivers include sports betting, which fueled a 1795% year-over-year trading volume increase in Q2 2026, with platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket dominating. These markets offer significant potential as superior hedging tools for businesses and more efficient price discovery mechanisms than traditional polls or derivatives for events like Fed rate decisions, elections, or GPU prices. They also serve as customer acquisition channels for platforms like Robinhood. However, major challenges persist. A central conflict exists between federal regulators (CFTC), which classify event contracts as derivatives under its jurisdiction, and state authorities, which view sports-related contracts as illegal gambling, leading to numerous lawsuits. There is significant consumer protection risk: data shows most retail users lose money to professional traders, platforms market high-risk products like parlays, and protections (e.g., age limits, addiction help) are weaker than in state-regulated sports betting. The "self-certification" process allows rapid contract launches but creates regulatory uncertainty. The author argues prediction markets are fundamentally "better markets" but currently fail to provide adequate consumer safeguards. Proposals include integrating protection mechanisms (cooling-off periods, position limits), aligning risk warnings with product risks, creating paths from speculation to long-term investing, and applying specific consumer protections and taxes to sports contracts. The piece concludes by urging stakeholders to address these issues before a potential regulatory backlash undermines the markets' legitimate utility.

marsbit2h ago

The Value, Growth, and Risks of Prediction Markets

marsbit2h ago

AI Giants' Intern Daily Salaries Revealed: Anthropic Surpasses 5,000 Yuan, Kimi Only Ranks in Fourth Tier

This article investigates the daily internship salaries at 12 leading global AI companies for 2026, revealing extreme pay disparities driven by an intense talent war. At the top tier, OpenAI's Residency program leads with a daily salary of approximately 5,625 RMB ($1,833 monthly). Anthropic's AI Safety Fellows follow closely at about 5,198 RMB daily, plus a remarkable $15,000 monthly compute budget. Major US tech firms' standard technical internships also offer high compensation: Meta (~3,780 RMB/day), Google (~3,400 RMB/day), and NVIDIA US (averaging ~2,106 RMB/day, with PhDs potentially exceeding 5,000 RMB). Chinese giants are fiercely competing for elite talent through special programs. ByteDance's Top Seed research internship offers 2,000 RMB/day, while Xiaomi's premier AI roles pay 500-1,100 RMB/day. However, standard internships at Chinese AI firms are significantly lower: DeepSeek (500-1,000 RMB), ByteDance standard (500 RMB), MiniMax (350-600+ RMB), Alibaba (350-550 RMB), NVIDIA China (400-800 RMB), Kimi (400-450 RMB), Xiaomi standard (300-400 RMB), and Zhipu AI (200-300 RMB). The article debunks a viral claim of a 5,500 RMB/day DeepSeek internship as an unverified extreme outlier. Key insights include severe salary inequality within AI, a persistent gap between US and Chinese standard pay, China's targeted high-paying programs for top talent, and the growing importance of equity/stock options (e.g., at Zhipu, MiniMax, Kimi) alongside cash compensation. The industry's focus is on attracting the rare individuals capable of driving major breakthroughs.

Odaily星球日报3h ago

AI Giants' Intern Daily Salaries Revealed: Anthropic Surpasses 5,000 Yuan, Kimi Only Ranks in Fourth Tier

Odaily星球日报3h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.9k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片