微策略再次出售比特币以支持其股票

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-03Last updated on 2026-08-03

Abstract

迈克尔·塞勒(Michael Saylor)的公司MicroStrategy近期出售了1,638枚比特币,这是该公司今年以来规模第二大的减持。本次出售均价为63,957美元,总计套现约1.047亿美元。所获资金主要用于支付其优先股STRC的股息以及回购该优先股。 出售后,MicroStrategy仍持有842,138枚比特币。与此同时,公司还通过增发MSTR股票筹集了2.906亿美元,使其美元储备增加至40亿美元。公司此举旨在支持其优先股STRC的价格(近期交易价格低于100美元的目标价),并确保有充足流动性支付股息。 分析指出,此次出售更像是针对性的资产负债表调整,而非储备耗尽。但若STRC长期折价交易,可能影响公司通过发行新股融资的能力,未来或需依赖更多比特币出售来维持股息支付和股价。市场将密切关注STRC与MSTR的后续表现,以评估该融资策略的有效性。

迈克尔·塞勒(Michael Saylor)的微策略公司(MicroStrategy)出售了1,638个比特币——这是今年年初以来的第二大额出售。所得资金用于支付STRC优先股的股息,并从市场上回购这些股票。

根据提交给美国证券交易委员会(SEC)的8-K表格,比特币在7月27日至8月2日期间以每枚63,957美元的平均价格出售。交易总额为1.047亿美元。其中5240万美元用于向STRC持有者支付股息,另外5230万美元用于回购优先股本身。

出售后,公司仍持有842,138个BTC,其总购买成本估计为635亿美元。

美元储备增至40亿美元

除了出售比特币,微策略还通过发行MSTR股票筹集了2.906亿美元。其中2.5亿美元用于补充美元储备,使其达到40亿美元;2890万美元用于回购STRC股票;1170万美元保留在公司账面上。

塞勒在社交媒体X上发文称,公司已斥资8120万美元回购STRC股票,并将美元流动性储备延长了57天——现在储备足以维持2.3年。

根据雅虎财经的数据,8月3日的盘前交易中,STRC优先股交易价格为89.40美元,比100美元的目标价低10.6%。同日,MSTR股票在盘前交易中也下跌了0.9%,交易所数据显示。

公司为何采用这种方案

STRC是微策略为比特币购买融资的工具之一。该证券交易价格低于面值,限制了公司通过发行STRC筹集资金的能力。此外,这可能促使微策略进一步提高股息率,以保持买方兴趣,并支撑证券价格接近目标水平。

早些时候,6月24日,CryptoQuant首席执行官Ki Young Ju表示,在公司股息保障倍数从七年缩减至14个月后,微策略应该暂停购买比特币并补充现金储备。

在6月29日提交的8-K表格中,微策略提出了一项新的资本战略,允许出售比特币为股息融资,将STRC的年股息率提高到12%,并报告称当时的美元储备已增至25.5亿美元。

出售1,638个比特币是微策略一年来第二大储备削减——公司同时保留了超过84.2万枚的主要积累规模。与此同时,公司的美元储备在增长,并且STRC的回购仍在继续,这反映出试图将优先股价格维持在接近面值的水平。

STRC和MSTR在未来几周的动态将表明,通过出售部分比特币储备为股息融资的方案效果如何。

AI观点

从宏观经济分析角度看,这种情况与微策略mNAV乘数低于1的时刻相呼应——分析师此前已将其与2022年波动性飙升之前的动态相提并论。文章未涉及的一个技术层面是STRC对市场愿意以高于面值价格购买该证券的依赖:如果折价持续,公司将不得不依赖于发行新的MSTR股票或进一步出售比特币,而不仅仅是提高股息率。分析师Willy Woo提出的门槛值得特别关注:根据他的计算,只有在股票市值大幅且持续下跌的情况下,微策略才需要被迫出售比特币。目前这项交易看起来更像是一次有针对性的资产负债表调整,而不是储备耗尽的迹象。

问题在于:市场能容忍STRC相对面值的折价多久,才会影响公司筹集新资金的能力?

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

Q公司Strategy为何要出售比特币?

A公司Strategy出售比特币是为了筹集资金,用于支付其优先股STRC的股息,并从市场上回购同种优先股。此举是其资本策略的一部分,旨在支持其优先股的价格并维持融资能力。

QStrategy本次出售了多少比特币?出售价格和总金额是多少?

AStrategy本次出售了1,638枚比特币。这些比特币在7月27日至8月2日期间以平均每枚63,957美元的价格出售,总交易金额为1.047亿美元。

Q出售部分比特币后,Strategy目前还持有多少比特币?其成本估值是多少?

A出售部分比特币后,Strategy仍然持有842,138枚比特币。公司购买这些比特币的总成本估计为63.5亿美元。

Q除了出售比特币,Strategy还通过什么方式增加了美元储备?

A除了出售比特币,Strategy还通过发行其普通股MSTR筹集了2.906亿美元资金。其中2.5亿美元用于充实其美元储备,使得该储备总额达到了4亿美元。

Q文章中提到,CryptoQuant的负责人Ki Young Ju之前给Strategy提出了什么建议?

ACryptoQuant的负责人Ki Young Ju之前曾建议,在公司的股息保障倍数从七年下降到14个月后,Strategy应该暂停购买比特币,并补充其现金储备。

Related Reads

On the Eve of Circle's Earnings Report, Wall Street Shows Major Divergence in CRCL Valuation

On the eve of Circle (CRCL) releasing its quarterly earnings report, Wall Street analysts are deeply divided over the company's valuation. Morgan Stanley downgraded Circle from "Equal Weight" to "Underweight," slashing its price target from $106 to $38. Analyst James Faucette argues the market overestimates the growth potential of Circle's core USDC stablecoin, noting its circulation hasn't increased since Q3 2025 and new use cases beyond remittances and card spending are limited. He warns that slowing USDC growth could pressure the crucial "reserve income" and shift revenue toward lower-margin transaction fees. In stark contrast, TD Cowen initiated coverage with a "Buy" rating and an $82 price target. Analyst Bryan Bergin believes the market underestimates Circle's potential to evolve from a stablecoin issuer into a broader digital financial infrastructure platform. He forecasts a ~31% annual growth rate for USDC through 2030 and expects faster growth in fee-based revenue from services like payments, RWA tokenization, and its Arc network. A key external factor adding uncertainty is the stalled progress of the CLARITY Act in the US Senate, whose delay could dampen institutional adoption expectations for stablecoins. The core disagreement lies in whether Circle's future hinges on USDC circulation growth or a successful platform-based transformation. The upcoming earnings report is keenly awaited for insights into reserve income trends and the progress of newer business verticals.

marsbit6m ago

On the Eve of Circle's Earnings Report, Wall Street Shows Major Divergence in CRCL Valuation

marsbit6m ago

Hong Kong Stock Market in July: Super IPOs Coexist with Wave of Breakings, Hard Tech Still the Main Theme

The Hong Kong IPO market in July presented a "two-tiered" scenario characterized by both a mega-IPO and a significant wave of new stock listings falling below their issue price ("breaking issue"). The highlight was Zhongji Innolight's (stock code: 03308.HK) listing on July 30, which raised approximately HK$53.41 billion. This marked the largest IPO on the Hong Kong exchange in nearly seven years since Alibaba's secondary listing. A prominent trend was the continued dominance of A+H listings, with companies like Luxshare (02475.HK) and others contributing significantly to the total monthly fundraising of around HK$116 billion. In stark contrast, the market saw a sharp rise in "broken issues." Out of 17 new listings for the month, 7 broke issue on their debut, with the rate climbing to 47% by month-end. Factors contributing to this included an intense concentration of listings (15 in one week), profit-taking by investors, and a market reassessment of valuations, particularly for companies with unclear commercial prospects. Despite the sell-off, hard tech remained the core theme, accounting for over 70% of July's listings. Key sectors were semiconductors and AI/autonomous driving. However, market enthusiasm became highly selective, with extreme over-subscription for certain niche players while others were heavily sold off. This signals a shift from speculative fervor towards a more value-driven assessment. Looking ahead, recent listing reforms by the Hong Kong Exchanges are expected to attract more tech firms. With a large pipeline of over 350 companies awaiting listing, including potential large offerings like SHEIN, the market is poised for continued activity. Analysts view July's correction not as a downturn but as a healthy valuation reset, emphasizing the need for investors to carefully discern company fundamentals.

marsbit8m ago

Hong Kong Stock Market in July: Super IPOs Coexist with Wave of Breakings, Hard Tech Still the Main Theme

marsbit8m ago

Wall Street Shows Sharp Divergence in CRCL Valuation on the Eve of Circle's Earnings Report

On the eve of its earnings report on August 5th, significant divergence emerged on Wall Street regarding the valuation of Circle (CRCL). Morgan Stanley downgraded Circle from "Equal Weight" to "Underweight," slashing its target price from $106 to $38. Analyst James Faucette argues that the market has overestimated the growth potential of USDC, noting stagnant circulation since Q3 2025 and a lack of major new use cases beyond remittances and card spending. He warns that slower USDC growth could pressure Circle's core "reserve income" and shift its revenue mix toward lower-margin transaction fees, making current valuations excessive. In contrast, TD Cowen initiated coverage with a "Buy" rating and an $82 target price. Analyst Bryan Bergin believes the market underestimates Circle's potential to evolve from a stablecoin issuer into a broader digital financial infrastructure platform. He focuses on future services like payments, asset management, RWA tokenization, and blockchain infrastructure, forecasting a ~31% CAGR for USDC circulation through 2030 and faster growth in fee-based revenues. A key external variable is the delayed progress of the CLARITY Act, whose uncertainty may pressure market sentiment by slowing regulatory clarity for stablecoins. Ultimately, the split centers on whether Circle's value hinges on USDC growth or its platform transformation. The upcoming earnings report will be scrutinized for details on reserve income, payment services, and RWA initiatives.

Odaily星球日报11m ago

Wall Street Shows Sharp Divergence in CRCL Valuation on the Eve of Circle's Earnings Report

Odaily星球日报11m ago

July Security Report: Total Losses Approximately $97 Million, Cross-Chain Bridge Attacks Concentrated with Over $35 Million

In July 2026, the cryptocurrency sector suffered total losses of approximately $97 million, with hacker attacks and contract vulnerabilities accounting for about $94 million. A significant trend was the shift in attack vectors from smart contract code to off-chain infrastructure, signature key leaks, and governance manipulation. Major incidents included: * **Ostium ($23.75M loss):** An attacker gained access to its off-chain price oracle signing system, manipulated BTC prices, and drained funds. * **AFX Trade Bridge ($24.15M loss):** The private validator key for its cross-chain bridge was compromised, allowing unauthorized withdrawals. * **BonkDAO ($20M loss):** An attacker acquired enough tokens to pass a malicious governance proposal and drain the treasury, exploiting low voting thresholds. * **Bonzo Lend ($9.05M loss):** A third-party oracle provider's signature verification was exploited to inject manipulated token prices. * **Verus Bridge ($7.55M loss):** A repeat attack exploiting the same unpatched bridge vulnerability. * **B2 Network ($3.86M loss):** An attacker seized the upgrade authority for a staking contract. Cross-chain bridges remained a prime target, with concentrated attacks causing over $35 million in losses. Phishing scams resulted in roughly $3 million in losses, employing sophisticated methods like fake mobile apps and physical counterfeit letters targeting Ledger users. Key takeaways are the acceleration of attacks on off-chain infrastructure, the persistent vulnerability of cross-chain bridges, and the rising prominence of governance-layer exploits. Recommendations include enhancing off-chain key management with multi-sig security, implementing stricter governance controls, and increasing user vigilance against phishing.

marsbit46m ago

July Security Report: Total Losses Approximately $97 Million, Cross-Chain Bridge Attacks Concentrated with Over $35 Million

marsbit46m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.4k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片