CASHCAT Anjlok 32% Saat Paus Uang Kripto Mencairkan $2,85 Juta – Bisakah $0,10 Bertahan?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-07-15Last updated on 2026-07-15

Abstract

Cash Cat (CASHCAT), aset kripto yang ramai diperbincangkan, merosot tajam 32% menjadi sekitar $0,12 setelah mencapai rekor tertinggi $0,23 pada 14 Juli. Tekanan jual meningkat setelah seorang "paus" menguangkan keuntungan besar. Trader tersebut menjual 16,3 juta CASHCAT senilai $2,85 juta, yang awalnya hanya dibeli seharga $3.000, menandakan memudarnya sentimen spekulatif. Tekanan pasar semakin intens dengan likuidasi posisi long mencapai $2,14 juta. Volume jual di pasar perpetual (65,57 juta) juga melampaui volume beli (45 juta), dengan pembelian bersih negatif sekitar -100 juta, menunjukkan dominasi aksi jual dan ketakutan trader terhadap kerugian lebih lanjut. Dengan tekanan jual yang agresif, CASHCAT berisiko mengalami penurunan lebih dalam. Untuk mencegah penurunan lebih lanjut, memecoin ini perlu mempertahankan level support $0,10. Jika level tersebut tidak bertahan, harga berpotensi melanjutkan penurunan menuju $0,08. Pemulihan hanya mungkin terjadi jika CASHCAT berhasil kembali ke level $0,20.

Cash Cat [CASHCAT] telah menjadi salah satu aset kripto yang paling banyak dibicarakan dalam seminggu terakhir. Di tengah kehebohan pasar yang ekstrem, memecoin ini melonjak ke rekor tertinggi sepanjang masa $0,23 pada tanggal 14 Juli.

Sejak itu, memecoin ini mengalami tekanan penurunan yang ekstrem seiring dengan turunnya harga. Pada saat penulisan, CASHCAT diperdagangkan di sekitar $0,12, setelah mengalami penurunan sebesar 32% pada grafik harian. Dengan penurunan harga yang terus berlanjut, investor berpenghasilan tinggi yang bergegas mengakumulasi lebih awal telah berubah menjadi bearish dan mulai mencairkan aset mereka.

Pedagang CASHCAT Jual $2,8 Juta dalam Token

Ketika demam CASHCAT melanda pasar, para pedagang, terutama paus, mengerahkan modal yang signifikan untuk mengakumulasi token ini. Namun, momentum ini perlahan-lahan memudar di tengah penurunan harga, dan para pedagang ini telah mulai mencairkan aset mereka.

Sumber: Lookonchain

Menurut Lookonchain, seorang pedagang mencairkan $2,85 juta dari CASHCAT, mengamankan keuntungan 952×. Pedagang tersebut hanya menghabiskan $3.000 untuk membeli 16,3 juta CASHCAT, kemudian menjual seluruh jumlahnya seharga 1.527 ETH senilai $2,85 juta.

Dengan mengunci keuntungan ini, paus tersebut menandakan memudarnya spekulasi pasar, karena pencairan besar sering kali menandakan sentimen yang menurun. Karena itu, bahkan para spekulan pun menjadi skeptis dan kini memperkirakan pasar akan terus menurun.

Tekanan Pasar Mengintensifkan

Selain keluarnya paus, peserta pasar CASHCAT menghadapi tekanan yang ekstrem. Sebelumnya, para pedagang terlalu bullish dan membuka posisi leverage, mengincar tren naik yang berkelanjutan.

Namun, seiring memecoin terus menurun, penurunan harga ini memicu gelombang likuidasi posisi long. Menurut data CoinGlass, posisi long senilai $2,14 juta lenyap, menandakan kekuatan tren penurunan.

Sumber: CoinGlass

Seperti yang diduga, risiko likuidasi yang meningkat ini memicu kepanikan di kalangan pedagang, mendorong mereka untuk menutup posisi mereka. Misalnya, memecoin mencatat volume Jual Perps sebesar 65,57 juta dibandingkan dengan volume beli 45 juta.

Sumber: Coinalyze

Pada saat yang sama, pembelian bersih altcoin ini tetap negatif sekitar -100 juta, dengan delta -20,49 juta. Pembelian perps negatif menunjukkan bahwa lebih banyak pedagang menutup perdagangan mereka, takut kerugian lebih lanjut.

Apa Langkah Selanjutnya untuk Memecoin Ini?

Selain itu, CASHCAT saat ini berada di bawah tekanan ekstrem, dengan sebagian besar peserta pasar menjual secara agresif. Dalam kondisi pasar seperti ini, memecoin ini berisiko mengalami penurunan lebih lanjut.

Oleh karena itu, jika para pedagang terus menutup posisi mereka, CASHOUT kemungkinan akan menembus support $0,1 dan turun menuju $0,08. Untuk menghindari slippage lebih lanjut, memecoin ini perlu merebut kembali $0,2, yang secara efektif akan menghapus semua bear di pasar.


Ringkasan Akhir

  • Seorang pedagang menjual 16,3 juta CASHCAT senilai $2,85 juta setelah berinvestasi $3 ribu.
  • Cashcat turun 32% ke posisi terendah $0,11 di tengah tekanan bearish yang intens.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QApa yang menyebabkan penurunan harga CASHCAT sebesar 32%?

APenurunan harga CASHCAT sebesar 32% disebabkan oleh tekanan jual yang ekstrem di pasar, termasuk aksi whale yang mencairkan token senilai $2,85 juta, serta likuidasi posisi long yang mencapai $2,14 juta yang memicu kepanikan di kalangan trader.

QBerapa keuntungan yang diperoleh trader (whale) dari penjualan CASHCAT?

ATrader (whale) tersebut memperoleh keuntungan sebesar 952x dari investasi awalnya. Ia menghabiskan $3.000 untuk membeli 16,3 juta CASHCAT dan menjual seluruhnya senilai 1.527 ETH yang setara dengan $2,85 juta.

QApa yang ditunjukkan oleh volume jual perpetual (Perps Sell) yang lebih tinggi daripada volume beli untuk CASHCAT?

AVolume jual perpetual (Perps Sell) CASHCAT sebesar 65,57 juta yang lebih tinggi daripada volume beli 45 juta menunjukkan bahwa lebih banyak trader yang menutup atau membuka posisi jual, mencerminkan sentimen bearish dan ketakutan akan kerugian lebih lanjut di pasar.

QLevel support penting apa yang disebutkan untuk CASHCAT, dan risiko apa jika level itu terlewati?

ALevel support penting yang disebutkan adalah $0,10. Jika level ini tidak dapat dipertahankan dan terlewati, dikhawatirkan harga CASHCAT dapat terus turun menuju level $0,08.

QApa kondisi yang diperlukan agar CASHCAT bisa membalikkan tren bearish menurut artikel?

AMenurut artikel, untuk membalikkan tren bearish dan menghapus tekanan jual, CASHCAT perlu berhasil menguat dan mereklaim level harga $0,20.

Related Reads

UNI Doubles in Two Months Against the Trend: A 5-Year-Overdue Value Realization

Amidst a generally stagnant crypto market in June and July, UNI, the governance token of Uniswap, saw a significant surge, nearly doubling in price from around $2.3 to $4.6. This rally represents a delayed but significant value reassessment, triggered by the practical implementation of its long-debated "fee switch" mechanism. The key turning point was the on-chain execution of the UNIfication proposal in December 2025. It activated a protocol fee on select pools, directed Unichain sequencer revenue (net of costs) to a communal treasury, executed a one-time burn of 100 million UNI, and established a system where all protocol revenue flows into a "TokenJar" contract. This treasury has a single exit: purchasing and permanently burning UNI via a "Firepit" contract. Initially, the market reacted tepidly as the generated revenue and corresponding burn rate were modest. The narrative shifted dramatically in July 2025 with two major developments. First, the launch of Robinhood Chain, tailored for tokenized stocks, rapidly became a primary source of volume and fees for Uniswap, at one point contributing nearly half of its weekly fees. Second, governance votes successfully expanded the fee mechanism to v4 pools and initiated a temperature check for fees on Robinhood Chain. The activation of v4 fees caused the protocol's daily revenue earmarked for UNI burns to nearly triple. The core of UNI's recent price action is the transition from a pure governance token to a cash-flow asset with a permanent, protocol-funded buyer. Its effectiveness is amplified by UNI's mature and widely distributed supply, with no major impending unlocks to dilute the impact of the buybacks. The sustainability of this rally now hinges on whether the transaction volume, particularly on Robinhood Chain, persists after its initial gas subsidies expire, determining if this is a genuine value realization or a subsidy-fueled spike.

marsbit27m ago

UNI Doubles in Two Months Against the Trend: A 5-Year-Overdue Value Realization

marsbit27m ago

Breaking: Google Earth Urgently Pulls Back Nano Banana 2 Image Generation Feature!

Google Earth's newly launched "Create image" feature, powered by the Nano Banana 2 AI image generation model, was abruptly withdrawn shortly after its release due to being "played" by users. The feature allowed users to generate and overlay AI-created visuals directly onto real-world satellite and 3D maps in Google Earth. The tool enabled creative applications like historical recreations (e.g., visualizing ancient Pompeii), generating informational graphics for landmarks, and envisioning architectural projects or futuristic cityscapes on real terrain. It operated under "geospatial grounding," meaning the AI respected the underlying geography, topography, and perspective of the chosen map view. The model also integrated with Gemini to retrieve relevant factual information. However, upon release, users quickly tested its limits. A prominent example involved reimagining Philadelphia's historic Independence Hall as a post-apocalyptic ruin overrun by "happy" zombies, evil clowns, and giant alien mechs. This highlighted both the feature's playful potential and its risks regarding the generation of inappropriate or misleading content on realistic maps, leading to its swift temporary removal. Google stated it would re-release the feature after implementing "enhanced guardrails." Analysts note this move strategically leverages Google's vast proprietary geospatial data, positioning its AI not just for artistic generation but for spatially accurate world visualization—a unique advantage in the competitive AI image generation landscape.

marsbit2h ago

Breaking: Google Earth Urgently Pulls Back Nano Banana 2 Image Generation Feature!

marsbit2h ago

Altman Admits: Overestimated AI Snatching Jobs! Huang Renxun: The Unemployment Narrative Is Completely Backwards

Sam Altman has revised his earlier predictions about AI rapidly replacing jobs, admitting he overestimated the speed at which AI would eliminate entry-level white-collar roles. Speaking on the "Invest Like the Best" podcast, he stated that people do not truly want an AI CEO, as accountability and human connection remain critical. He found that individuals prefer interacting with people who can be held responsible for decisions. Similarly, NVIDIA's Jensen Huang argued that the narrative of AI destroying jobs is misguided. He distinguishes between tasks and jobs, noting that while AI can automate specific tasks, entire jobs—encompassing communication, judgment, coordination, and accountability—are not eliminated. He cited examples like radiologists and software engineers, where demand for these roles has increased as AI handles repetitive tasks, allowing for business expansion and the creation of more positions. Data from a University of Maryland and LinkUp study supports this, showing that U.S. job postings for new graduates have actually risen, countering the fear of vanishing entry-level roles. However, a significant shift is occurring: the traditional entry-level tasks that help newcomers gain experience are being automated, making initial career access more challenging. The key insight is that as AI takes over standardized tasks, the enduring value of human work shifts toward areas of responsibility, trust-building, and final decision-making—aspects that AI cannot replicate. The real "moat" for professionals lies in these irreplaceable human elements.

marsbit2h ago

Altman Admits: Overestimated AI Snatching Jobs! Huang Renxun: The Unemployment Narrative Is Completely Backwards

marsbit2h ago

Weekly Editor's Picks (0725-0731)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0725-0731) provides a curated selection of deep analysis, filtering out market noise. Key themes from this week include: **Macro & Policy:** The Federal Reserve's upcoming meeting is marked by high uncertainty, balancing cooling inflation data against persistent price pressures. Meanwhile, the U.S. crypto regulatory Clarity Act faces critical political hurdles, with its 2026 passage probability seen as low. **Investing & Crypto:** Analysis suggests long-term crypto success depends on conviction through volatile cycles, focusing on assets like Bitcoin and core smart contract platforms. A trend noted is the increasing similarity between global equity markets (especially tech) and crypto, driven by narrative and leverage. Several major crypto protocols show strong revenue growth, but this isn't always translating to token price appreciation due to sell pressure and structural factors. **AI & Semiconductors:** Nvidia's rising credit default swap rates signal market concern over AI infrastructure financing risks. The storage sector experienced volatility as markets began pricing in potential 2027 oversupply. Despite a record profitable quarter, SK Hynix's results were deemed "below expectations," reflecting heightened investor demands for future growth visibility. **Markets & DeFi:** TradeXYZ demonstrated remarkable accuracy in pre-market pricing for a major A股 listing. The token ONDO saw gains, linked to its growing role in the on-chain tokenized stock ecosystem. **Ethereum:** Post-Pectra upgrade, a major structural shift is underway as Lido begins migrating millions of ETH to new validator architectures designed for capital efficiency. **Also Highlighted:** Butian's bullish stock market move; OpenAI's Altman promising major advances; Samsung and SK Hynix securing large AI chip deals; Apple reaching a $5T market cap; and ongoing discussions around exchange security following Poolin's bankruptcy case.

marsbit2h ago

Weekly Editor's Picks (0725-0731)

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is TRUMP CAT

Trump Cat Family, $Trump Cat: An Unraveled Mystery Introduction In the constantly evolving landscape of crypto projects and web3 innovations, a curious phenomenon has emerged—one that appears to straddle the line between cryptocurrency and internet meme culture. This is the enigmatic “Trump Cat Family”, also referred to as “$Trump Cat”. Though it might arouse curiosity among crypto enthusiasts, the reality appears far removed from the standard definition of a crypto project. This article aims to explore the concept of Trump Cat Family, bringing to light the context surrounding it and clarifying its status in the crypto realm. What is Trump Cat Family, $Trump Cat? At first glance, one might think that “Trump Cat Family” refers to a legitimate cryptocurrency or web3 project. However, upon deeper investigation, it becomes evident that the term lacks the trappings of a traditional crypto venture. Instead, “Trump Cat” seems to be predominantly associated with the viral meme culture that surged following controversial statements made by former U.S. President Donald Trump regarding Haitian immigrants. The media coverage sparked a myriad of memes, humorous interpretations, and a wave of social commentary. These memes depict various forms of satire centred on Trump's dialogue, often utilising cats in comedic and sometimes absurd scenarios. Rather than a structured project aimed at addressing technological advancements or financial transactions, the “Trump Cat Family” concept exists predominantly in the realm of internet humour. Who is the Creator of Trump Cat Family, $Trump Cat? In the investigation of who stands behind the “Trump Cat Family,” it becomes apparent that there exists no identifiable creator or founding figure. The phenomenon seems to have originated from collective internet expression, rather than from a singular visionary with a defined project goal. This anonymity further emphasises its status as a meme rather than a structured initiative akin to most known crypto projects. Who are the Investors of Trump Cat Family, $Trump Cat? Given that “Trump Cat Family” does not conform to the characteristics of a reputable crypto project, the question of investment becomes moot. There have been no established foundations or organisations expressing support for a project by this name. Instead, what exists are individual contributors to meme culture—hobbyists, artists, and social media users who collectively populate the internet with their interpretations and humour surrounding the term “Trump Cat.” This organic growth within digital human communication reflects more of a social commentary than a financial investment landscape. How Does Trump Cat Family, $Trump Cat Work? If one seeks to establish how “Trump Cat Family” operates, the answer is vastly different from what might be expected of standard crypto projects. There are no operational mechanisms, technological innovations, or unique features inherent to this phenomenon. Instead, it exists through viral spread online, relying upon social media platforms for proliferation. The “how” lies in the realm of culture and communication—its essence derived from the dynamics of social interaction rather than from established crypto protocols or blockchain functionalities. What makes “Trump Cat” unique, if anything, is the way it dramatizes a political dialogue through humour. People utilise engaging visuals, inside jokes, and inventive storytelling to convey sentiments regarding political figures and societal issues. The power of memes transcends traditional communication, encapsulating complex thoughts in a form that resonates widely, yet remains elusive in terms of quantifiable success or structured goals. Timeline of Trump Cat Family, $Trump Cat September 2024: The discourse surrounding Donald Trump's comments about Haitian immigrants allegedly consuming pets gains traction online, leading to a blossoming of memes and parodic interpretations across various platforms. Continuing Impact: Following this period, the “Trump Cat” phenomenon sees continued life as social media users leverage humour to address, critique, or simply celebrate the absurdity of political conversations and events. It is essential to note that as “Trump Cat Family” lacks the formal structure of a traditional project, the timeline consists primarily of anecdotal observation rather than remarkable milestones commonly found in recognised crypto ventures. Key Points Meme Culture: Rather than a structured crypto initiative, “Trump Cat” aligns more with the evolving landscape of internet memes. Origin of the Term: The genesis of “Trump Cat” relates directly to commentary on President Trump's remarks about Haitian immigrants, sparking widespread humorous representation. Absence of a Project Framework: The term fails to align with any defined project objectives, creators, or investors, marking it as a novel cultural experience rather than a crypto project. Conclusion In summary, the investigation into “Trump Cat Family, $Trump Cat” reveals a phenomenon entrenched in internet meme culture rather than a recognised project within the cryptocurrency or web3 sectors. The virality surrounding the term is birthed from collective user engagement, reflective of modern digital discourse rather than a formalised initiative with structure or strategic foresight. For all the curiosity it may invoke among those seeking the next big crypto project, “Trump Cat Family” serves as a testament to humanity's creativity, humour, and often absurd relationship with politics in the digital age.

306 Total ViewsPublished 2025.01.22Updated 2025.01.22

What is TRUMP CAT

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of CAT (CAT) are presented below.

活动图片