为付分红卖掉32枚BTC:Strategy打破「永不卖出」誓言

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-02Last updated on 2026-07-23

Abstract

6月1日,Strategy向SEC提交文件,披露在5月底出售了32枚比特币,套现约250万美元,用于支付优先股分红。此举打破了其自2020年以来“永不卖出”的公开立场。尽管出售量仅占其84.3万枚总持仓的0.004%,且公司5月仍在净买入超过2.5万枚比特币,但事件释放了关键信号:迫于分红压力,卖出已成为其资本管理的潜在工具。 Strategy近年发行了多系列优先股,年息在8%至11.5%之间,已累计支付分红超6.93亿美元。公司为支付义务设立的现金储备在六个月内从22.5亿美元消耗至9亿美元。CEO此前已在财报会中暗示可能“有纪律地出售比特币”。 此次出售恰逢市场疲软,比特币跌破7.2万美元,且多家持有比特币的上市公司在Q1出现集体减持潮。例如,MARA、Riot等公司合计抛售超1.9万枚比特币。一些公司甚至直接放弃了比特币财库模式。 该事件还引发了预测市场Polymarket上关于“Strategy是否在5月31日前卖币”的巨额争议,交易额超1亿美元,暴露了其仲裁机制的中心化问题。 分析师认为,此次小规模出售财务影响甚微,但意义重大。它表明,在融资环境收紧、固定支出压力下,即便最大的比特币囤积者也可能被迫打开出售的“工具箱”,若现金储备持续消耗,未来减持规模可能扩大。

原文作者:ChandlerZ,Foresight News

6 月 1 日,Strategy 向 SEC 提交 8-K 文件,披露在 5 月 26 日至 31 日期间出售 32 枚比特币,均价 77135 美元,总计约 250 万美元。出售后公司仍持有 843,706 枚 BTC,总成本 638.7 亿美元,均价 75699 美元。

32 枚占总持仓的 0.004%,250 万美元相当于 Strategy 在过去 12 个月里平均一天半的买入量。从财务角度看,这笔交易几乎没有意义。但它打破的东西比它兑现的金额大得多,自 2020 年 8 月首次买入比特币以来,Strategy 只卖过一次,2022 年 12 月出售 704 枚 BTC 套现 1180 万美元,均价 16,776 美元,目的是制造税务亏损(tax-loss harvesting),两天后用更低的价格买回了 810 枚。那次卖出本质上是一个税务操作,不是真正的减持。

但这次不同,250 万美元被明确标注为用于支付优先股分红,Strategy 没有打算买回来。

分红账单开始到期

Strategy 从 2025 年初开始密集发行优先股,STRK 年息 8%、STRF 年息 10%、STRD 年息 10%、STRC 年息 11.5%,四个系列叠在一起,公司截至目前已累计支付超过 6.93 亿美元分红。

这些优先股的逻辑是,投资者把钱交给 Strategy,Strategy 拿去买比特币,然后用现金储备和运营收入支付固定利率的分红。比特币涨了,mNAV 溢价扩大,Strategy 可以继续发新股融资滚动下去。比特币跌了或横盘了,分红义务不会消失,但融资窗口会收窄。

微策略的比特币增持节奏

2025 年 12 月,Strategy 设立了一个 22.5 亿美元的现金储备,专门用于覆盖分红和债务偿付,按当时的节奏可以撑大约 30 个月。但到 2026 年 5 月 31 日,这个储备已经降到 9 亿美元,六个月消耗了 13.5 亿美元。

Q1 财报电话会上,Strategy CEO Phong Le 第一次在公开场合把「有纪律地出售比特币(disciplined sale of bitcoin)」列为资本管理工具之一。当时没有多少人注意到这句话,现在回看,它是这次 32 枚 BTC 出售的预告。

Saylor 在 2025 年 2 月 2 日发过一条「Never sell your bitcoin」的推文,这条推文在 8-K 披露后被大量转发。他本人在事后发帖只谈了 STRC 的产品定位,说 Strategy 的目标是让 STRC 成为世界上最好的信用工具,完全绕开了卖币话题。

MSTR 股价当日下跌约 6%,Mizuho 维持买入评级,但将目标价从 320 美元下调至 265 美元。多数分析师认为 250 万美元的出售在财务上不构成实质影响,但这一事件的核心意义在于信号层面打开了一个口子,如果现金储备继续消耗,分红义务不变,未来的卖出规模可能不会停在 32 枚。

Polymarket 上一场 1 亿美元的文字游戏

Strategy 的卖出时间同时引爆了 Polymarket 上的一个预测市场。

这个市场的问题是,Strategy 是否会在 5 月 31 日前出售比特币?目前累计交易量超过 1.11 亿美元。8-K 文件显示交易发生在 5 月 26 日至 31 日,文件本身记录的时间截点是「2026 年 5 月 31 日美东时间下午 4:00」。但 8-K 在 6 月 1 日才提交给 SEC,公众在截止日期过后才知道这件事。

买 Yes 的人说,交易发生在截止日前,8-K 白纸黑字写着 5 月 31 日;买 No 的人说,截止日前没有任何公开信息证明卖出发生了,按规则应该判 No。两次 No 提案被挑战后,争议升级到 UMA 的代币投票仲裁。

Polymarket 随后在页面添加了一行说明,表示「来自 MSTR、链上数据或可靠报告的共识均未证实 Strategy 在市场规定的时间范围内出售了比特币。在市场规定时间范围之外获得的确认信息不符合要求」。

这场争议的背后是 Polymarket 仲裁机制更深层的问题,《华尔街日报》5 月的一项调查发现,在 Polymarket 的大多数争议市场中,超过 半数 UMA 投票权集中在 10 个最大钱包手里,约 60% 的活跃投票者能关联到 Polymarket 账户,大约每五个争议中就有一个存在投票者同时持有被裁决合约仓位的情况。2026 年至今,Polymarket 已经产生了超过 1150 个争议市场,超过 2025 年全年总数。

不只是 Strategy 在卖,比特币跌下 7.2 万美元

Strategy 的 8-K 披露叠加了一个本就偏弱的市场环境,比特币在 6 月 1 日跌破 72,000 美元,触及 4 月 13 日以来最低水平。CoinShares 数据显示,上周数字资产投资产品净流出 16.7 亿美元,是 2026 年第二大单周流出。5 月整月比特币现货 ETF 净流出 23 亿美元,是今年最大的月度净流出。数字资产管理规模已降至约 1410 亿美元,为年初以来的低点。

Strategy 卖了 32 枚,但它不是第一家动手的比特币财库公司。Q1 数据显示,卖出已经成为一种集体行为。MARA Holdings 在 3 月 4 日至 25 日期间出售 15133 枚 BTC,套现约 11 亿美元,大部分用于回购 2030 年和 2031 年到期的可转债。Riot Platforms 同期卖出 3778 枚,套现 2.895 亿美元,持仓从 19223 枚降到 15680 枚,缩水 18%。David Bailey 的 Nakamoto Holdings 3 月卖出 284 枚,占其持仓约 5%。Empery Digital 4 月卖了 370 枚偿还贷款。Genius Group 清仓了最后 84 枚,偿还 850 万美元债务。

仅 MARA、Riot 和 Nakamoto 三家在 Q1 合计抛售超过 1.9 万枚 BTC。CryptoQuant 的链上数据显示,3 月底比特币的表观需求降至负 63000 枚,这一表观需求(衡量总需求相对于新产出变化的指标)降至负值,意味着市场出现深度收缩,整体卖压明显强于买盘。

甚至有些公司不只是卖币,而是直接放弃了财库模式。Forum Markets(原名 ETHZilla)年初清掉了价值约 1.14 亿美元的 ETH,转向代币化业务。VivoPower 原本计划建立 XRP 财库,2 月直接转型做数据中心和 AI 基础设施,连带处置了全部 XRP 持仓。

5 月 28 日,法国半导体公司 Sequans Communications 证实,已通过出售所持比特币,全额清偿旗下可转换债券,同时还计划逐步变现剩余的 658 枚比特币。该公司比特币持仓峰值一度达到 3234 枚。

Sequans 此前曾对外宣称,要累计持有 3000 枚以上比特币作为长期储备资产。可所谓的 「长期」,最终还不到一年。公司股票(代码 SQNS)年内跌幅已达 77%,近五年累计跌幅更是高达 97%。

比特币财库公司的商业模式在 2025 年下半年的上涨周期中被验证,币价上涨推高 mNAV 溢价,公司趁溢价发新股或可转债融资买币,买币进一步推高币价和溢价,形成正循环。去年 10 月市场见顶后,这个飞轮反转了。币价下跌压缩溢价,融资窗口收窄,分红和债务偿付义务不会因为币价下跌而减少,卖币成了最直接的流动性来源。Bitwise 统计,截至 Q1 末上市公司合计持有约 115 万枚 BTC,占总供应量 5.47%。这个体量本身就构成了一种风险,如果多家财库公司在同一时间窗口被迫减持,它们既是比特币的最大买家,也可能变成最集中的卖压来源。

目前仍在买入的公司已经很少,Strive 5 月累计买入约 1944 枚 BTC,花了约 1.5 亿美元,Metaplanet 4 月初买入 5075 枚。Strategy 自己 5 月也还在买,当月累计买入超过 2.5 万枚 BTC,价值超过 20 亿美元。

一边花 20 亿买入,一边拿 250 万出来付分红,这个比例说明 Strategy 目前还远没有到流动性危机的地步。但 32 枚的信号意义在于,即便是最大的屯币者,也开始承认卖出是工具箱里的一个选项了。

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QStrategy(微策略)在2026年5月出售了多少枚比特币,用于什么目的?

AStrategy(微策略)在2026年5月26日至31日期间出售了32枚比特币,总计约250万美元,目的是用于支付优先股分红。

Q根据文章,除了Strategy,还有哪些公司在2026年第一季度出售了大量比特币?

A根据文章,在2026年第一季度,有多家公司出售了大量比特币,包括:MARA Holdings出售了15,133枚BTC,Riot Platforms出售了3,778枚BTC,Nakamoto Holdings出售了284枚BTC。仅这三家公司合计抛售就超过1.9万枚BTC。

QStrategy公司CEO关于出售比特币的言论是什么?

A在Q1财报电话会上,Strategy公司CEO Phong Le首次在公开场合将“有纪律地出售比特币(disciplined sale of bitcoin)”列为资本管理工具之一,这被视为后续出售行为的预告。

QPolymarket上关于Strategy出售比特币的预测市场争议焦点是什么?

APolymarket上的争议焦点在于裁决时间点。预测市场的问题是“Strategy是否会在5月31日前出售比特币?”。交易发生在5月31日前,但公众在截止日(5月31日)结束后才通过6月1日提交的8-K文件得知此事。一方认为交易在截止日前发生应判“Yes”,另一方认为在截止日前无公开信息证实应判“No”。

Q文章指出比特币财库公司的商业模式存在什么风险?

A文章指出,比特币财库公司的商业模式风险在于其依赖于币价上涨形成的正循环(币价上涨推高公司估值和融资能力,公司融资继续买入推高币价)。当币价下跌或横盘时,融资窗口会收窄,但分红和债务偿付的现金义务不会减少,这可能导致公司被迫出售比特币获取流动性。如果多家财库公司同时被迫减持,它们可能从最大买家变成集中的卖压来源。

Related Reads

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbitYesterday 08:36

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbitYesterday 08:36

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbitYesterday 08:28

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbitYesterday 08:28

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbitYesterday 08:06

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbitYesterday 08:06

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbitYesterday 08:01

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbitYesterday 08:01

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

996 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片