美伊停火下,比特币反弹还是反转?

Foresight NewsPublished on 2026-04-08Last updated on 2026-06-21

Abstract

停火声明让空头爆仓 3.5 亿美元,但周线和月线不会因为一条推文立即翻多。

撰文:Sanqing,Foresight News

北京时间 4 月 8 日清晨,美国总统特朗普在 Truth Social 上宣布,同意暂停对伊朗的轰炸行动两周,条件是伊朗「完全、立即、安全地开放」霍尔木兹海峡。伊朗外长阿拉格齐随后发表声明,宣布若美方停止攻击,伊朗武装力量将停止防御行动,两周内协调开放海峡通行。

声明距此前设定的晚 8 点最后期限仅剩约 90 分钟,而几小时前他还警告「整个文明将在今晚死去」。

市场反应剧烈。WTI 原油从盘中高点 117.63 美元急坠至 96 美元附近,半小时内跌超 9%。标普 500 期货夜盘飙升逾 1.6%,纳指期货涨 1.8%,道指期货跳涨 725 点。BTC 在过去 24 小时内最高触及 72772 美元,日线报收约 71924 美元,日内涨幅约 4.47%。CoinAnk 数据显示,24 小时全网合约爆仓 4.95 亿美元,其中空单占 3.46 亿美元,空头被集中清算。

停火不是和平,市场在交易「不会更糟」

这是六周以来中东战事最明确的降级信号,但将其定义为和平仍为时过早。

巴基斯坦总理谢里夫作为中间人促成了这次突破,双方预计本周五在伊斯兰堡面对面谈判。但伊朗在声明中刻意保留了模糊空间,「在技术条件允许的前提下」,协调海峡通行,并未承诺无条件全面开放。而以色列虽已同意停火,但此前几小时仍对伊朗铁路和桥梁发动了打击。

市场定价的并非和平到来,仅是最坏情况被暂时排除。

油价崩跌是最直接的证据。WTI 从战争期间最高 117 美元回落至 96 美元附近,一举跌破 100 美元心理关口,但仍远高于战前水平。这意味着交易者认为海峡有望部分恢复通航,但完全恢复仍需数月。交易者认为海峡有望部分恢复通航,但美国能源信息署(EIA)警告中东产油量要到年底才能接近冲突前水平。

风险资产集体反弹的逻辑与此一致,尾部风险消退,但基本面约束仍在。

摩根士丹利入场,ETF 资金面出现转折

美东时间 4 月 8 日,摩根士丹利现货比特币 ETF(MSBT)在 NYSE Arca 预计正式上市交易,这是首只由美国大型银行发行的现货 BTC ETF。该产品年费仅 0.14%,低于贝莱德 IBIT 的 0.25%,也低于灰度 GBTC 的 0.15%,为目前市场上费率最低的比特币 ETF。

MSBT 上线恰逢停火消息引发的风险偏好回升,而此前 4 月 6 日 ,美国现货 BTC ETF 单日净流入 4.71 亿美元,为 2 月 2 日以来最大单日流入,贝莱德贡献 1.81 亿,富达贡献 1.47 亿。

但摩根士丹利 ETF 的实际冲击力可能有限。但 IBIT 累计净流入已超 630 亿美元,投资者格局基本定型。过去五个月 ETF 整体净流出超 50 亿,费率竞争能否转化为增量资金,仍取决于停火能否真正落地。

恐惧与贪婪指数已从上月的 17(极度恐惧)回升至今日的 47(中性),上周还是 32(恐惧)。情绪正在快速脱离底部,市场不再恐慌。

日线突破上轨,但中长期仍在水下

BTC 自 2 月初以来被压缩在 65000 至 73000 美元的箱体内震荡。日线布林带显示,价格已突破上轨,RSI 升至 59.86,短期进入强势区间。但周线级别上,价格仍远低于 20 周均线,周线 RSI 仅 39.70,中期趋势偏弱。月线同样承压,当前价格距均线有 25% 以上的差距。

日线突破上轨而周线、月线仍在中轨下方,这种多周期背离意味着短线动能充沛,但能否向更长周期传导,取决于后续量能和基本面配合。

ETH 表现相对更强,月线涨幅约 7%,日线 RSI 达到 61.61,价格已突破布林带上轨,ETH/BTC 汇率回升,其短期动能甚至优于 BTC。但周线 RSI 仅 41.66,距离周均线仍有 10% 以上的差距。

链上数据传递出矛盾信号。Glassnode 此前报告显示,现货 CVD 已从负值翻转为正值,亏损卖压明显减少。但 30 日链上表观需求仍为负 63000 BTC,巨鲸(持有 1000-10000 BTC)从一年前净增持 20 万枚转为净减持 18.8 万枚,是有记录以来最激进的派发周期之一。

机构在接住抛盘,但散户和中大型持有者仍在撤退。这个结构决定了反弹的天花板。

两周窗口期,决定的不只是油价

停火消息为市场争取到了一个极为短暂的喘息期。本周五伊斯兰堡和谈的结果、霍尔木兹海峡实际通航恢复的速度、以及即将公布的美国 3 月 CPI 数据(周五 20:30,市场预期从 2.4% 升至 3.4%),将共同决定这轮反弹能否从技术性修复升级为趋势反转。

如果两周内谈判破裂,油价重返 110 美元以上,通胀预期再度飙升,美联储降息窗口进一步关闭,那么 BTC 跌破箱体下沿、滑向 58330 美元(61.8% 斐波那契回撤位)的风险将急剧上升。

反过来,如果海峡真正恢复通航、油价回落至 90 美元以下,叠加 Morgan Stanley ETF 带来的增量叙事,75000 美元将是多头必须拿下的第一道关卡。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit6m ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit6m ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit1h ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit1h ago

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit1h ago

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

410 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片