Binance y CZ logran victoria legal al rechazar un tribunal las reclamaciones vinculadas a 64 ataques terroristas

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-03-07Last updated on 2026-03-07

Abstract

Binance y su fundador, Changpeng Zhao (CZ), obtuvieron una victoria legal tras la decisión de un tribunal estadounidense de desestimar todas las reclamaciones sobre transacciones de criptomonedas supuestamente vinculadas a 64 ataques terroristas entre 2017 y 2024. El tribunal dictaminó que los demandantes no lograron probar que Binance apoyara conscientemente los ataques. El caso involucraba a 535 demandantes, víctimas y familiares, que alegaban que la exchange facilitó transacciones de grupos como Al-Qaeda y Hamas. Sin embargo, el juez determinó que la relación se limitaba a cuentas que utilizaron la plataforma, sin evidencia de colaboración intencionada. Binance declaró su oposición al terrorismo y afirmó que los demandantes explotaban su caso previo de lavado de dinero para respaldar la demanda. Tras el fallo, Binance afirmó en X que las acusaciones carecían de mérito, mientras que CZ destacó que no hay motivos para que un exchange colabore con terroristas, ya que no generan ingresos por comisiones.

El exchange Binance y su fundador, Changpeng Zhao (CZ), obtuvieron una victoria legal después de que un tribunal estadounidense desestimara todas las reclamaciones sobre transacciones de criptomonedas supuestamente vinculadas a 64 ataques terroristas a nivel mundial entre 2017 y 2024. El tribunal dictaminó que los demandantes no lograron demostrar que Binance apoyara deliberadamente los ataques.

Según un informe de Reuters del 6 de marzo, la jueza del Distrito de EE. UU. Jeannette Vargas resolvió el caso, que involucra a 535 demandantes, víctimas y familiares de ataques terroristas, quienes afirmaron que el exchange facilitó transacciones vinculadas a múltiples grupos terroristas internacionales, incluidos Al-Qaeda, Hamas, Hezbollah, el Estado Islámico, Kataib Hezbollah y la Yihad Islámica Palestina, entre estas organizaciones.

A pesar de todas estas afirmaciones, el tribunal declaró que la relación alegada entre Binance y estas organizaciones se limitaba a cuentas que realizaron transacciones utilizando la plataforma del exchange, lo que muestra una relación independiente en contraste con cualquier colaboración intencional.

Con eso, la jueza Vargas declaró que los demandantes pueden modificar y volver a presentar el caso con alegaciones más convincentes. Pero los abogados de los demandantes no respondieron de inmediato. Mientras que Binance declaró en documentos judiciales que se opone firmemente al terrorismo y sostuvo que los demandantes estaban explotando la litigación de 2023 de Binance por violaciones de lucha contra el lavado de dinero como justificación para reforzar su demanda por terrorismo. Ya que ese caso de 2023 involucró una multa de 4.320 millones de dólares por violar las leyes de AML y sanciones de EE. UU., no por apoyar el terrorismo.

Binance y Zhao responden a la decisión del tribunal

Después de que se conociera el fallo, el exchange Binance escribió en X: "Nos complace ver que el tribunal en este caso desestimó correctamente estas reclamaciones sin mérito. Binance se toma el cumplimiento en serio y no tiene tolerancia para los actores malintencionados en su plataforma".

Además, Zhao de Binance compartió sus comentarios en X republicando la declaración de su abogada Teresa Goody Guillén y escribió: "Las noticias falsas son temporales. La verdad siempre llega con el tiempo".

Zhao añadió que no hay motivo para que ningún exchange de criptomonedas centralizado se involucre con grupos terroristas, señalando que dichos actores no operan activamente y, por lo tanto, no generan ingresos por comisiones para los exchanges. También dijo que los depósitos seguidos de retiros inmediatos no generarían ingresos.

EtiquetasBinanceCZ

Related Questions

Q¿Qué decisión tomó el tribunal de EE.UU. respecto a Binance y las acusaciones de transacciones vinculadas a ataques terroristas?

AEl tribunal de EE.UU. desestimó todas las acusaciones sobre transacciones de criptomonedas supuestamente vinculadas a 64 ataques terroristas, alegando que los demandantes no probaron que Binance apoyara conscientemente los ataques.

Q¿Qué grupos terroristas fueron mencionados en la demanda contra Binance?

ALos grupos terroristas mencionados incluyeron Al-Qaeda, Hamas, Hezbollah, el Estado Islámico, Kataib Hezbollah y la Yihad Islámica Palestina, entre otros.

Q¿Qué argumentó el juez sobre la relación entre Binance y las organizaciones terroristas?

AEl juez Vargas determinó que la relación alegada se limitaba a cuentas que realizaron transacciones en la plataforma, mostrando una relación independiente en lugar de una colaboración intencional.

Q¿Cómo respondió Binance al fallo del tribunal en la plataforma X?

ABinance expresó su satisfacción por la desestimación de las acusaciones, afirmando que toma la compliance en serio y no tolera actores malintencionados en su plataforma.

Q¿Qué comentario adicional hizo Changpeng Zhao (CZ) sobre la noticia?

ACZ declaró que 'las noticias falsas son temporales, la verdad siempre llega con el tiempo', y argumentó que no hay motivo para que un exchange de criptomonedas colabore con grupos terroristas, ya que no generan ingresos por fees.

Related Reads

M&A Deals in the Crypto Market Are Unusually Active

Title: M&A Activity in Crypto Market Becomes Unusually Active A rare signal is emerging in the crypto primary market: mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are nearing half of all financing deals. According to RootData, this month, M&A cases in the crypto industry reached 10, while financing rounds numbered only 14, meaning M&A accounts for approximately 42% of primary market transactions—the highest level in history. This does not signal a sudden industry boom. Instead, the rapid rise in M&A share primarily reflects the continued downturn in the financing market. Since November 2024, monthly crypto M&A deals have remained between 10-20, while financing deals have plummeted from around 100 to about 50, possibly hitting a new low this month. For project teams, this means the traditional path of relying on narratives, token expectations, and ecosystem subsidies to maintain valuations is narrowing. For leading companies, it presents a rare window to acquire teams, licenses, technology, liquidity, and market access at lower prices, with less competition and stronger bargaining power. Key active buyers include Coinbase, Kraken, Ripple, MoonPay, Polymarket, Kaiko, Sol Strategies, GSR, Keyrock, Jupiter, Paxos, and Ondo Finance. Their M&A logic is consistent: acquiring key capabilities at lower costs during the industry downturn. This is driven by more attractive valuations, reduced time and trial-and-error costs, the acquisition of licenses and compliance resources, and the integration of industry upstream and downstream segments. Current M&A focuses are concentrated in four areas: trading infrastructure (e.g., Coinbase acquiring Deribit, Kraken acquiring NinjaTrader), payments and stablecoins (e.g., MoonPay, Ripple expanding payment networks), compliance licenses, and asset issuance/distribution (e.g., acquisitions related to RWA and token issuance platforms like Coinbase's purchases of Liquifi and Echo). The rise in M&A is altering the primary market's exit logic. It provides an alternative path to the token-dependent model, encouraging teams to build tangible products, revenue, and strategic value that can be integrated. This could inject confidence into the market, showing that asset buyers and exit possibilities still exist, albeit with a stricter focus on real utility. However, this trend also indicates the crypto industry is becoming more centralized. As asset issuance, trading, market-making, custody, payments, and data gradually consolidate in the hands of a few major players, the industry's initial emphasis on openness and anti-monopoly is being reshaped by commercial realities. Coupled with rising compliance barriers, this signals the end of the low-barrier era for crypto entrepreneurship.

链捕手14m ago

M&A Deals in the Crypto Market Are Unusually Active

链捕手14m ago

M&A Deals Are Exceptionally Active in the Crypto Market

Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) activity in the cryptocurrency primary market has reached a historic high, accounting for approximately 42% of total deals in the current month, nearly matching the number of financing rounds. This shift does not signal a new boom cycle but rather reflects a severe contraction in the venture capital funding environment. As financing dwindles, established industry giants—including major exchanges, payment firms, and infrastructure providers—are seizing the opportunity to acquire strategic assets at lower valuations. Key drivers behind the surge in M&A include depressed project valuations, the need to quickly acquire talent and technology to capture short market windows, the pursuit of crucial regulatory licenses, and the strategic expansion into adjacent business verticals such as derivatives, payments, stablecoins, and real-world asset (RWA) issuance. Major acquisitions, like Coinbase's purchase of Deribit and Kraken's acquisition of NinjaTrader, exemplify the push to expand into high-margin areas like derivatives and multi-asset trading. This trend is reshaping the industry's exit landscape, offering an alternative to token-based exits and incentivizing startups to build tangible products and revenue streams with inherent strategic value for acquisition. However, it also points toward increasing centralization, as critical functions—trading, custody, payments, compliance—become concentrated within a few large, well-capitalized platforms, potentially raising barriers to entry for new ventures.

marsbit15m ago

M&A Deals Are Exceptionally Active in the Crypto Market

marsbit15m ago

Solana Privacy Ecosystem Panorama: A Complete Privacy Stack from Compute to AI

**Title: The Solana Privacy Ecosystem: A Full-Stack View from Compute to AI** **Summary:** This article provides a comprehensive overview of the emerging privacy landscape on the Solana blockchain, characterizing it as still in early development. It identifies two primary verticals—Neobanks and Private DeFi—as key drivers, while noting gaps in tooling and user experience. The discussion centers on two main approaches to private computation: Arcium, which utilizes Multi-Party Computation (MPC) networks (Multi-Party eXecution Environments) to process encrypted data with final settlement on Solana; and Magic Block, which leverages Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) via its Private Ephemeral Rollup (PER). Both enable confidential applications like dark pools and private DeFi with minimal code changes. Building on this infrastructure, projects are creating privacy-focused applications. Umbra, built on Arcium, offers Encrypted Token Accounts (ETAs) for private balances, transfers, and selective disclosure for compliance. Other wallets like Privacy Cash and Hush provide mixer-like functionality for SOL. For private trading, encifherio uses TEEs to encrypt swap details routed through Jupiter, while VanishTrade and Darklake focus on shielding transaction intent and liquidity routing, with Darklake introducing a "blind slippage pool" to prevent front-running. Further applications include private prediction markets (e.g., Melee Markets using Arcium's encrypted order books) and private AI. Loyal exemplifies the latter, using both Magic Block and Arcium to enable decentralized AI agents that store user data, conversations, and transactions confidentially on-chain. The article concludes by framing privacy not as a single technology but as an evolving "ultimate privacy stack," with experts like Helius's Mert envisioning a future combination of Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) and Zero-Knowledge proofs (ZK). Helius Privacy itself is developing a ZK-based UTXO privacy layer for Solana.

Foresight News21m ago

Solana Privacy Ecosystem Panorama: A Complete Privacy Stack from Compute to AI

Foresight News21m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy WIN

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing WINkLink (WIN) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy WINkLink (WIN) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your WINkLink (WIN)After purchasing your WINkLink (WIN), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade WINkLink (WIN)Easily trade WINkLink (WIN) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

5.2k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy WIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of WIN (WIN) are presented below.

活动图片