Uniswap's 80% gains in July are in danger with UNI price painting a classic bearish pattern

CointelegraphPublished on 2022-07-30Last updated on 2022-07-30

Abstract

Uniswap price risks falling 50% from its current levels due to a bearish reversal setup.

Uniswap (UNI) looks ready to post its best monthly performance in more than a year as it rallied approximately 80% in July, but signs of an extended pullback in the near term are emerging.

Uniswap price nearly doubles in July

UNI's price is having one of its best months ever, reaching nearly $9 on July 30 versus nearly $5 at the beginning of the month, best returns since January 2021's 250% price rally.

UNI/USD monthly price chart. Source: TradingView

Merge FOMO an UNI "fee switch" proposal

Uniswap's gains primarily surfaced due to similar upside moves in a broader crypto market. But they turned out to be relatively massive due to an ongoing euphoria surrounding "the Merge."

Notably, the Ethereum blockchain's potential transition from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake in September has triggered a buying hysteria among related toke.

Additionally, UNI may also have been drawing its gains from a so-called "fee switch" proposal.

Specifically, community governance system that oversees Uniswap has been discussing whether or not they should grant UNI holders the right to earn 0.5% commission from Uniswap's 3% trading fees while rewarding the rest for liquidity providers.

UNI "rising wedge" still in play

From a technical's perspective, UNI is now heading lower after testing $20 as its interim resistance.

It now eyes an extended pullback toward the upper trendline of its prevailing "rising wedge" pattern—around $8.

However, its price would risk falling even further if it lands back inside the pattern's trading range, defined by two ascending, converging trendlines.

UNI/USD daily price chart featuring 'rising wedge' breakdown. Source: TradingView

That is primarily because rising wedges are bearish reversal patterns.

They resolve after the price breaks below their lower trendlines. Meanwhile, their profit target are typically at length equal to the maximum distance between their upper and lower trendlineswhen measured from the breakdown point.

In other wordsUNI's price could fall toward $4.50 by September, down 50% from today's price if the pattern plays out.

Conversely, a bounce back at or ahead of testing the rising wedge's upper trendline could have UNI retest $10 as its interim resistance. In doing so, it could eye an extended upside move toward the $11.50-$17 range.

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Gate Research Institute: ETF Outflows Suppress Risk Appetite, Two-Way System Navigates Weak Market

Gate Institute Research Report: May 2026 Crypto Market Review & Strategy Analysis In May 2026, the crypto market shifted from an early-month rally to a mid-month correction, concluding with low-volatility consolidation. BTC, ETH, and SOL peaked in early May before declining. The primary market dynamic was a divergence between weakening spot ETF inflows and persistently high leverage-driven perpetual trading volume. A dual-direction moving average cluster breakout strategy outperformed, returning +2.11% for an equally-weighted BTC/ETH/SOL portfolio. This contrasted with a -6.09% return for buy-and-hold and -3.65% for a long-only version of the strategy. Profits were primarily generated from short positions on ETH and SOL during the mid-to-late May downtrend, demonstrating the month's suitability for two-way trend trading. Market structure evolved in three phases: an initial surge (May 1-6), a failure and reversal (starting May 7), and low-volatility compression (May 22 onward). While stablecoin supply remained stable, significant outflows from mainstream BTC and ETH ETFs created selling pressure. Concurrently, high correlation with the S&P 500 (~0.6) and stronger performance from AI equities like Nvidia highlighted crypto's position as a high-beta risk asset within a broader risk-budget framework, lacking independent momentum. The successful strategy employed a 4-hour chart system using a cluster of six moving averages (EMA6,12,24 & SMA6,12,24). A breakout signal was triggered after the cluster width compressed below 2.2%. Trades were managed with a 2.5% fixed stop-loss, a 3:1 Risk/Reward (7.5%) take-profit, and an EMA12-based exit rule to control losses from false breakouts. The strategy's low win rate but high payoff from a few large trend moves was effective in May's conditions. The report concludes that for June, a disciplined, bidirectional approach remains superior to subjective directional bets. The framework should adapt signal weighting based on BTC's position relative to key EMAs, ETF flow trends, and the relative strength of the Nasdaq, prioritizing risk management and trend preservation.

marsbit19m ago

Gate Research Institute: ETF Outflows Suppress Risk Appetite, Two-Way System Navigates Weak Market

marsbit19m ago

Anthropic CEO's Latest Interview: On Technological Explosion, Safety Red Lines, and the Civilization Contract

Interview with Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei covers the intense pressures and ethical dilemmas of leading AI development. He describes the experience as "exponential growth," feeling constant acceleration akin to relativistic time dilation. The discussion delves into his departure from OpenAI, rooted in a fundamental loss of trust and divergent values rather than mere technical disagreements. Amodei emphasizes Anthropic's enterprise-focused business model, arguing it aligns better with safety and responsible deployment than consumer-facing, ad-driven models. He addresses critical issues like AI's impact on employment, advocating for proactive macroeconomic policies and a shift towards "doing more with the same resources" to avoid widespread job displacement. On safety and governance, he details Anthropic's cautious approach, including delaying the release of the powerful "Mythos" model due to its advanced cyber capabilities. He stresses the need for "human-in-the-loop" principles in military applications, setting red lines against autonomous weapons and mass surveillance. Amodei calls for industry collaboration among trustworthy actors to establish standards and advocates for a balanced regulatory framework with checks and balances, such as Anthropic's Long-term Benefit Trust, rather than corporate or government monopoly over the technology. He expresses geopolitical concerns, particularly regarding China, and a belief that AI should bolster liberal democracies. While acknowledging a non-zero risk of civilizational catastrophe from advanced AI, he asserts Anthropic's actions are aimed at significantly reducing that probability. The interview concludes with Amodei arguing that trust must be earned through concrete actions, like sacrificing commercial gain for safety, to distinguish Anthropic in a Silicon Valley landscape he criticizes for eroded public trust.

marsbit22m ago

Anthropic CEO's Latest Interview: On Technological Explosion, Safety Red Lines, and the Civilization Contract

marsbit22m ago

The Brutal Truth Behind CARDS' $535M FDV: Only $43M in Net Revenue and Halved Profit Margins

The article titled "The Brutal Truth Behind CARDS' $535 Million FDV: Only $43 Million Net Revenue, Profit Margins Halved" provides a critical analysis of Collector Crypt (CC), a platform combining physical collectible cards with NFTs in a gacha-style system. Key findings include: * CC has generated $635 million in total user deposits. However, 90.6% ($576 million) is instantly returned to users via automatic card buybacks, resulting in only $43 million in net platform revenue (6.7% retention). * Activity is highly concentrated among dozens of high-frequency wallets, with an average of only ~420 daily active players. * There is minimal secondary market activity for the cards (under $5 million total), indicating the platform functions more as a gambling casino than a collector's marketplace. eBay sales as a percentage of gacha volume have declined for six consecutive quarters. * Despite a tripling in transaction volume, net profit margins have been halved from 11.2% to 5.8% as activity shifts to higher-priced card packs with lower margins. * Value captured by the CARDS token is minimal: only $140,000 (from burns and recent buybacks), representing just 3.4% of CC's cumulative net revenue. In contrast, wallets linked to operational infrastructure have off-ramped $45.7 million in USDC. * The token's ~$535 million Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV) represents a 7.3x multiple of annualized net revenue. Only 20.5% of the token supply is floating, with 72% allocated to insiders and locked until November 2027. The conclusion is that CC has found product-market fit as a high-speed gambling platform for a niche user base, not as a growing collector economy. The token currently captures a negligible share of the platform's revenue.

Foresight News47m ago

The Brutal Truth Behind CARDS' $535M FDV: Only $43M in Net Revenue and Halved Profit Margins

Foresight News47m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片