Decentraland joins GameFi rebound – MANA’s move to $0.20 depends on…

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-19Last updated on 2026-01-19

Abstract

Decentraland (MANA) broke past the $0.15 resistance on January 17th, riding a GameFi rebound led by assets like Axie Infinity. However, Bitcoin’s recent pullback triggered a market-wide selloff, causing MANA to retreat. On-chain metrics suggest weak bullish conviction: a spike in dormant coin circulation and falling mean coin age indicate distribution and selling by long-term holders. While exchange outflows are a positive sign, the sharp drop in Open Interest and negative MVRV show short-term traders are taking profits. Although not overheated, MANA faces strong selling pressure. A rally toward $0.20 is possible, but traders should take profits near resistance levels like $0.17 and $0.19.

Decentraland [MANA] made strong gains on Saturday, the 17th of January.

Over the past ten days, the local resistance zone at $0.15 had been contested, but bulls made a clean breakout past this level on Saturday.

The GameFi sector made strong gains in recent days, with Axie Infinity [AXS] leading the charge. This momentum has stalled over the past 48 hours, but it could rekindle later this week.

The Bitcoin [BTC] pullback in recent hours of trading has dragged MANA prices lower. The move triggered $864 million in liquidations across the market within the past 24 hours.

If it were solely a liquidity hunt, the chances of a recovery would be better. This could set up MANA and select altcoins up for a good bounce.

Assessing the strength of Decentraland bulls

Coinalyze data showed that the Open Interest, which had increased by nearly 50% over the weekend, had suffered a 10% drop in the past few hours.

The Dormant Circulation saw a sizeable spike on Sunday, the 18th of January. It was accompanied by a rapid price drop. Generally, increased Dormant Circulation implies older coins were being moved onchain for selling.

Additionally, the 30-day MVRV, which had reached 10.3% on the 13th of January, was at -4.7% at the time of writing. This suggested short-term holders were, on average, facing losses once again.

The Mean Coin Age has also fallen over the past week. The lack of accumulation, flurry of dormant token movement, and short-term holders taking profits were indicative of a lack of long-term market conviction.

The Spot Volume Bubble Map indicated that the market wasn’t overheated. Previously, the end of 2024 and the 2021 cycle top had marked overheated conditions, which led to a long-term downtrend.

The Exchange Netflow metric showed sizeable MANA outflows in the past two days. It was a slightly encouraging sign, but investors would want to see sustained outflows in the coming weeks.

Overall, Decentraland onchain metrics showed that the threat from profit-taking was considerable.

A rally toward $0.20 and $0.25 were possible, but traders and investors should keep their expectations reasonable.

Traders, especially, should be focused on taking profits when the altcoin challenges nearby resistance zones, such as $0.17 and $0.19.


Final Thoughts

  • The spike in dormant circulation the previous day, combined with the falling mean coin age over the past week, indicated MANA distribution.
  • MANA was not overheated, showed the spot volume map, and there was space for further gains, but bullish market conviction was lacking.

Related Questions

QWhat was the key resistance level that Decentraland (MANA) broke through on Saturday, January 17th?

AThe key resistance level that MANA broke through was $0.15.

QWhich GameFi project was highlighted as leading the sector's recent strong gains?

AAxie Infinity (AXS) was highlighted as leading the GameFi sector's recent strong gains.

QWhat on-chain metric saw a sizeable spike on January 18th, indicating older coins were likely being sold?

AThe Dormant Circulation metric saw a sizeable spike, indicating older coins were being moved on-chain for selling.

QAccording to the article, what is the significance of the Exchange Netflow metric showing outflows for MANA?

AIt is a slightly encouraging sign, as outflows can suggest investors are moving tokens off exchanges, potentially for holding, but sustained outflows are needed for greater confidence.

QWhat two price levels does the article suggest traders should focus on for taking profits?

AThe article suggests traders should focus on taking profits at the nearby resistance zones of $0.17 and $0.19.

Related Reads

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

U.S. Federal Reserve officials who previously advocated for rate cuts, including Governor Christopher Waller, have recently shifted their stance, with many now not ruling out the possibility of future rate hikes. This sets a challenging stage for new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's first policy meeting. Appointed by President Trump based on his dovish views, Warsh now faces a committee where the debate has pivoted from "when to cut" to "whether to hike," driven by persistent inflation above 3%, a strong labor market, and supply-side pressures from AI infrastructure demands and geopolitical tensions. Key figures illustrate the shift. Governor Waller, once concerned about employment, now says data has pushed him toward considering rate increases. Even moderate voices like Governor Lisa Cook, while expecting inflation to ease, have indicated readiness to hike if it fails to do so. Long-time hawks such as regional Fed presidents Beth Hammack, Lorie Logan, and Neel Kashkari have grown more vocal, arguing that the real policy rate is effectively falling and that action may soon be needed. The upcoming Fed meeting is expected to keep rates steady but will likely remove the "easing bias" from its statement, signaling a neutral stance between cuts and hikes. The quarterly "dot plot" is anticipated to show most officials projecting no cuts this year, with some potentially indicating hikes. Chair Warsh, a critic of the Fed's reliance on forward guidance like the dot plot, must navigate communicating this pivot using tools he has questioned, all while steering policy in a direction counter to the preferences of the president who appointed him. The consensus suggests the Fed's next move could well be a rate increase.

marsbit31m ago

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

marsbit31m ago

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

The article analyzes the three leading Chinese optical module companies, collectively nicknamed "Yi Zhong Tian": Xinyisheng, Zhongji Innolight, and TFC Optical Communication. It evaluates their "cost-performance" not by current stock price, but through three lenses: PEG ratio (growth vs. valuation), earnings quality, and premium/discount for certainty. Xinyisheng shows the most attractive PEG ratio and high profitability, but its valuation reflects discounts for risks like high customer concentration and reliance on overseas markets. Zhongji Innolight, the most expensive, commands a premium for its market leadership, dominant share in key products like 800G/1.6T modules, and higher earnings certainty, though it faces geopolitical risks. TFC Optical, as an upstream component supplier ("water seller"), has the highest gross margin and bets on the long-term CPO/NPO architecture trend, but trades at a high valuation with more stable, less explosive growth. The core argument is that while these companies dominate module assembly, the true profit pool and technological moat lie upstream in laser and switch chips, currently controlled by U.S. firms like Lumentum and Coherent. The long-term "cost-performance" for these Chinese leaders hinges on whether the domestic industry, exemplified by companies like Yuanjie Technology, can successfully move up the value chain into high-power laser chips. Otherwise, their high growth may remain confined to the lower-margin assembly segment.

marsbit41m ago

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

marsbit41m ago

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

The crypto market is in a period of significant debate, with leading institutions offering differing views on whether a bottom has been reached. Three prominent firms have published detailed analyses: * **Galaxy Digital** argues Bitcoin has **not yet bottomed**. Their analysis of 13 historical indicators across six dimensions (valuation, profit-taking, miner pressure, etc.) shows only four are fully met. They project a potential bottom range between $30k and $54k. * **NYDIG** states a bottom is **possible but not likely**. While metrics are close to historic bear market extremes, they note the absence of a classic panic-selling event. They also suggest increased institutional adoption may have structurally altered the market cycle, potentially leading to a shallower downturn. * **Standard Chartered Bank** asserts the **bottom has already occurred** at around $59k. They cite two key factors: potential US-Iran diplomatic progress and the anticipated SpaceX IPO, which they believe absorbed capital and caused ETF selling pressure that is now subsiding. They forecast a year-end price target of $100k. Despite the surface-level disagreement, the reports share critical common ground more valuable for long-term investors: 1. All three believe the market bottom will form **within this year**. 2. All agree the current price is **closer to the bottom than to previous highs**. 3. All maintain a **bullish long-term outlook** for Bitcoin and a new cycle. The core takeaway is that while the exact bottom price ($40k, $50k, or $60k) is debated, the consensus is that a bottom is imminent. For long-term holders, the primary focus should not be pinpointing the absolute low, but on the future potential for prices to reach $100k, $200k, or higher. The fundamental thesis for Bitcoin—sovereign debt accumulation, inflation, declining trust in centralized institutions, global digitization, and improved accessibility—remains intact and is arguably strengthening. The overall landscape is viewed as more favorable than in previous crypto winters.

marsbit52m ago

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

marsbit52m ago

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

China's Photonics Industry: Bottlenecks and Breakthroughs In the global AI race, computing chips dominate the narrative, but the underlying bottleneck increasingly defining the scale of AI clusters is light—or more specifically, optical connectivity. Optical modules, which translate electrical signals to light and vice versa, are crucial for connecting thousands of GPUs in AI data centers, preventing data congestion and ensuring efficient model training. High-speed modules (800G, 1.6T) are now standard, with performance hinging on advanced DSP (Digital Signal Processor) chips. This is where a critical dependency lies. Two US giants—Marvell and Broadcom—collectively dominate over 90% of the high-end DSP chip market. Chinese optical module leaders like Zhongji Innolight and Eoptolink rely on these chips to manufacture modules for overseas AI customers, primarily in North America. While this creates a supply chain vulnerability, complete decoupling is difficult. Marvell derives over half its revenue from Greater China, and the US firms depend on Chinese partners for chip packaging and optical components. The risk from laser chips (e.g., from Lumentum), another key component, is considered more manageable due to multiple global suppliers and faster progress in domestic alternatives from companies like YOFC and Accelink. To mitigate risks, China's industry is pursuing a multi-pronged strategy: diversifying supply chains and locking in long-term orders; fostering a domestic market ecosystem to adopt homegrown DSPs from firms like Huawei HiSilicon and CETC; accelerating R&D in high-speed DSPs and advanced packaging; and investing in next-gen technologies like silicon photonics and Co-Packaged Optics (CPO) to reduce reliance on discrete DSPs. The ultimate solution lies not in short-term博弈 but in persistent advancement of domestic high-end chip R&D and manufacturing. While challenges remain in performance, certification, and ecosystem building, China's vast domestic market and manufacturing base provide a crucial buffer, buying time for the industry to achieve greater technological independence.

marsbit1h ago

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy MANA

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Decentraland (MANA) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Decentraland (MANA) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Decentraland (MANA)After purchasing your Decentraland (MANA), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Decentraland (MANA)Easily trade Decentraland (MANA) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

3.9k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy MANA

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of MANA (MANA) are presented below.

活动图片