2 Days, 20x: A Quick Look at the Automated Market Making Mechanism of the New Gem Snowball

深潮Published on 2025-12-22Last updated on 2025-12-22

Abstract

Snowball, a new meme token launched on pump.fun on December 18, gained significant traction in the English-speaking crypto community by introducing an automated market-making mechanism designed to create a self-sustaining "snowball effect." Unlike typical meme coins where creators take a fee (usually 0.5%-1%) from each transaction, Snowball redirects 100% of this fee to an on-chain bot. This bot uses accumulated funds to buy back tokens, add liquidity to the pool, and burn a small portion of tokens periodically. The goal is to create continuous buy pressure and improve trading depth, theoretically allowing the token to grow organically through increased trading activity. Within four days, Snowball reached a $10 million market cap with over 7,000 holders and relatively decentralized ownership. However, the mechanism relies heavily on sustained trading volume to fuel the buyback bot. In a cold market with low on-chain activity, this "flywheel" could reverse if new buyers diminish. While the structure reduces developer exit risk, it doesn’t eliminate other meme coin dangers like large holder dumps or narrative fatigue. Similar projects like FIREBALL are emerging, indicating interest in "mechanism-driven memes," but past examples like OlympusDAO and Safemoon show that mechanisms alone don’t guarantee long-term value. Snowball remains primarily a meme experiment—interesting, but high-risk.

The crypto market in December is as cold as the weather.

On-chain transactions have been dormant for a long time, and new narratives are hard to come by. Just look at the drama and gossip in the Chinese CT (Crypto Twitter) space these past few days, and you'll know hardly anyone is playing in this market anymore.

But the English-speaking community has been discussing something new.

A meme coin called Snowball launched on pump.fun on December 18th. In four days, its market cap surged to $10 million and is still hitting new highs; yet it's barely mentioned in Chinese circles.

In the current environment, devoid of new narratives and where even memes are considered unplayable, this is one of the few things that catches the eye and shows some localized wealth effect.

And the name Snowball itself tells the story it wants to convey:

A mechanism that allows the token to "roll and grow larger by itself."

Turning Transaction Fees into Buy Pressure, Rolling the Snowball for Market Making

To understand what Snowball is doing, you first need to know how tokens on pump.fun typically make money.

On pump.fun, anyone can create a token in minutes. The token creator can set a "creator fee," essentially taking a cut of every transaction into their own wallet, usually between 0.5% and 1%.

This money could theoretically be used for community building or marketing, but in practice, most Devs choose to: accumulate enough and then run.

This is part of the typical life cycle of a shitcoin. Launch, pump, harvest fees, rug. Investors aren't betting on the token itself, but on the developer's conscience.

Snowball's approach is to not take this creator fee money.

To be precise, 100% of the creator fees do not go into anyone's wallet but are automatically transferred to an on-chain market-making bot.

This bot performs three actions at regular intervals:

First, it uses the accumulated funds to buy tokens on the market, creating buy-side support;

Second, it adds the bought tokens and the corresponding SOL to the liquidity pool, improving trading depth;

Third, it burns 0.1% of the tokens with each operation, creating deflation.

Additionally, the percentage taken as the creator fee is not fixed; it fluctuates between 0.05% and 0.95% based on market cap.

It takes a higher percentage when the market cap is low, allowing the bot to accumulate ammunition faster; it reduces the fee when the market cap is high, decreasing transaction friction.

In one sentence, the logic of this mechanism is: every time you trade, a portion of the money automatically becomes buy pressure and liquidity, instead of going into the developer's pocket.

Therefore, it's easy to understand this snowball effect:

Transactions generate fees → Fees become buy pressure → Buy pressure pushes the price up → Higher price attracts more transactions → More fees... theoretically, it can roll on its own.

On-Chain Data Situation

Now that we've covered the mechanism, let's look at the on-chain data.

Snowball launched on December 18th, so it's been four days now. Its market cap grew from zero to $10 million, with a 24-hour trading volume exceeding $11 million.

For a shitcoin on pump.fun, these results mean it's already one of the longer-lasting ones in the current environment.

In terms of token distribution, there are currently 7,270 holder addresses. The top ten holders combined hold about 20% of the total supply, with the largest single holder holding 4.65%.

(Data source: surf.ai)

There's no address holding 20-30% of the supply; the distribution is relatively decentralized.

Regarding trading data, there have been over 58,000 cumulative transactions since launch, with 33,000 buys and 24,000 sells. The total buy volume is $4.4 million, and sell volume is $4.3 million, resulting in a net inflow of about $100,000. Buying and selling are basically balanced, with no one-sided selling pressure.

The liquidity pool holds about $380,000, half in tokens and half in SOL. For a market cap of this size, the depth isn't very thick, and large orders would still experience significant slippage.

Another notable point is that Bybit Alpha announced listing the token less than 96 hours after launch, which to some extent confirms the short-term hype.

Perpetual Motion Meets a Cold Market

Looking around, you can see the English community's discussion about Snowball mainly focuses on the mechanism itself. Supporters' logic is straightforward:

This is the first meme coin that locks 100% of the creator fees into the protocol; developers can't take the money and run, making it structurally safer than other shitcoins, at least.

The Dev is also playing into this narrative. The developer wallet, market-making bot wallet, and transaction logs are all public, emphasizing "verifiable on-chain."

@bschizojew labels himself as "on-chain schizophrenia, 4chan special forces, first-generation meme coin veteran," radiating a self-deprecating degen vibe that really appeals to the crypto-native community.

But a safe mechanism and making money are two different things.

The snowball effect relies on the premise that there is sufficient trading volume to continuously generate fees to feed the bot for buybacks. More trades mean more ammunition for the bot, stronger buy pressure, higher prices, attracting more people to trade...

This is the ideal state for any meme coin's so-called buyback flywheel to spin up in a bull market.

The problem is, the flywheel needs external momentum to start.

What is the current crypto market environment? On-chain activity is sluggish, overall meme coin hype is down, and there's simply less capital willing to chase shitcoins. In this context, if new buy pressure doesn't keep up and trading volume shrinks, the fees the bot receives will become less and less, buyback strength weakens, price support falters, and trading willingness declines further.

The flywheel can spin forward, but it can also spin in reverse.

A more realistic problem is that the mechanism solves only one risk point—"developers taking money and running"—but meme coins face far more risks than that.

Whales dumping, insufficient liquidity, narratives going out of style—if any of these happen, 100% fee buybacks can only do so much.

Everyone is tired of being rugged. As one Chinese crypto brother aptly summarized:

Play if you want, but don't get in over your head.

More Than One Snowball Rolling

Snowball isn't the only project telling this automated market-making story.

Within the pump.fun ecosystem, a token called FIREBALL is doing something similar: automatic buybacks and burns, packaged as a protocol other tokens can plug into. But its market cap is much smaller than Snowball's.

This shows the market is currently responsive to the direction of "mechanism-based meme coins."

The traditional玩法 (playbook) of shilling, pumping, and community hype is finding it harder to attract capital. Using mechanism design to tell a "structurally safe" story might be one of meme coins' latest tricks.

That said, artificially creating a specific mechanism isn't a new玩法 (play) either.

OlympusDAO's (3,3) in 2021 was the most classic case, packaging a staking mechanism with game theory, telling the story "if everyone holds, we all profit together." It reached a peak market cap of several billion dollars. The ending, as everyone knows, was a death spiral, dropping over 90%.

Even earlier, there was Safemoon's玩法 of "taxing every transaction and distributing it to holders," also a narrative of mechanism innovation, which ended with the SEC suing and the founders charged with fraud.

A mechanism can be a great narrative hook, capable of gathering capital and attention in the short term, but the mechanism itself does not create value.

When external capital stops flowing in, even the most精巧 (ingenious) flywheel will stop.

Finally, let's recap what this little gem is actually doing:

Turning the meme coin's creator fees into an "automated market-making bot." The mechanism itself isn't complicated, and the problem it solves is very clear: preventing developers from directly taking the money and running.

Developers not being able to rug doesn't mean you'll make money.

If after reading this you find the mechanism interesting and want to participate, remember one thing: it is first and foremost a meme coin, and only secondly an experiment with a new mechanism.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the core mechanism that makes Snowball different from typical meme coins on pump.fun?

ASnowball's core mechanism is that 100% of the creator fees from each transaction are automatically sent to an on-chain market-making bot instead of going to the developer's wallet. This bot uses the accumulated funds to buy back tokens, add liquidity to the pool, and burn a small portion of tokens, creating a self-sustaining 'snowball effect' of buying pressure and liquidity growth.

QHow does the 'snowball effect' theoretically work in this token's economic model?

AThe 'snowball effect' works through a feedback loop: transactions generate fees → fees are used by the bot to buy tokens and add liquidity → buying pressure pushes the price higher → higher prices attract more traders and transactions → which generates more fees for the bot to continue the cycle.

QWhat are some of the risks or limitations of Snowball's automatic market-making mechanism?

AThe mechanism relies on sustained trading volume to generate fees for the bot. If new buyers dry up and trading volume decreases, the bot's buying power weakens, potentially leading to a downward spiral. It also doesn't protect against other risks like large holders dumping, liquidity issues, or narrative fatigue.

QHow does the creator fee percentage in Snowball adjust, and why?

AThe creator fee percentage in Snowball fluctuates between 0.05% and 0.95% based on market capitalization. It charges a higher percentage when the market cap is low to allow the bot to accumulate funds faster, and a lower percentage when the market cap is high to reduce transaction friction for traders.

QWhat precedent exists in crypto for 'mechanism-driven' tokens like Snowball, and what were their outcomes?

APrecedents include OlympusDAO's (3,3) staking mechanism, which collapsed after reaching a multi-billion dollar valuation, and Safemoon's transaction tax redistribution model, which ended with fraud charges from the SEC. These show that while mechanisms can drive short-term hype, they don't create inherent value and often fail when external capital stops flowing in.

Related Reads

Arthur Hayes Ten Thousand Words Interview: ETH to $30,000; FLOP Will Surpass ETH

Arthur Hayes Interview Summary: In a wide-ranging interview, Arthur Hayes discusses macroeconomic drivers for crypto, bullish predictions for ETH and BTC, and details his new project, Flop Network. On Macroeconomics & Market Outlook: Hayes argues that unsustainable US debt and potential Yield Curve Control (YCC) will drive massive liquidity into hard assets like Bitcoin. He views recent Treasury bond回购 operations as a key signal, comparing the current environment to the 2008 financial crisis that birthed Bitcoin. He predicts Bitcoin will break its all-time high, reaching around $126,000 by year-end, and could soar to $500,000 if the Fed removes limits on its FEMA repo facility. On Ethereum & Altcoins: Hayes is particularly bullish on ETH, calling it his top large-cap altcoin pick. He believes it will significantly outperform in this cycle, potentially reaching $20,000-$30,000, as it hasn't yet broken its 2021 high unlike other major assets. He values ETH for its established developer community and Lindy effect. On Regulation: He dismisses the US Clarity Act as irrelevant for crypto's core value proposition, stating that macroeconomic liquidity, not regulation, is the primary driver. On Flop Network: Hayes unveils his new project, Flop Network, designed to be a native currency for the AI Agent economy. The core thesis is that AI Agents need a货币 that can be directly converted into compute power (measured in FLOPs - Floating Point Operations). The network will use a "Proof of Useful Inference" consensus where miners earn FLOP tokens for processing AI推理 tasks. It will also provide decentralized storage for AI memory/context. The token will be distributed via a massive airdrop (targeting 20% of the 10-year supply) to early testnet participants and users, with no VC预售 or public sale. Mainnet is slated for Q1 2025. Hayes believes FLOP has a "binary" outcome: it could become the base money for the AI economy and rival Bitcoin, or it could fail.

Odaily星球日报20m ago

Arthur Hayes Ten Thousand Words Interview: ETH to $30,000; FLOP Will Surpass ETH

Odaily星球日报20m ago

Goldman Sachs Research Report Analysis: Samsung Electronics' Shareholder Returns Fall Short of Expectations, FCF Expansion Supports Valuation Recovery

Gold Sachs research report analysis indicates Samsung Electronics' announced shareholder return pool for 2026 (projected 90-110 trillion KRW) fell short of market expectations for a larger one-time payout. However, Goldman emphasizes that sustained Free Cash Flow (FCF) expansion and a stable, phased return mechanism are the true drivers for valuation repair, not a single event. The report maintains a Buy rating on Samsung ordinary shares with a 740,000 KRW target price, implying 74% upside. Samsung plans a ~30 trillion KRW dividend in Q3 2024, with the remaining returns from the 2026 pool executed post-January 2027 earnings via dividends and share buybacks/cancellations. Goldman estimates 2024-2026 cumulative FCF at ~270 trillion KRW. Assuming a 50% return ratio, total shareholder returns would be ~135 trillion KRW. After accounting for 2024-2025 payouts, the 2026 return is estimated near 106 trillion KRW, at the high end of guidance. While Samsung's short-term return scale lags peers like SK Hynix, its future return capacity is underpinned by robust FCF growth from memory and HBM businesses. Goldman forecasts FCF will significantly rise in 2027-2028, potentially boosting annual return pools to 179 trillion and 232 trillion KRW respectively under the existing policy, potentially matching or exceeding peers. Samsung's current valuation (1.7x P/B for 2027) is seen as attractive given high ROE projections (40%-50%). The core thesis is that Samsung's shareholder return story represents a structural improvement based on durable cash flow generation, not a one-time event.

marsbit26m ago

Goldman Sachs Research Report Analysis: Samsung Electronics' Shareholder Returns Fall Short of Expectations, FCF Expansion Supports Valuation Recovery

marsbit26m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Learn Quick Buy Tokens

HTX Quick Buy/Sell is a form of transaction between fiat money and cryptos, where you don't have to manually choose a buyer or seller.

4.4k Total ViewsPublished 2023.08.15Updated 2024.02.18

Learn Quick Buy Tokens

How to Buy QUICK

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Quickswap (QUICK) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Quickswap (QUICK) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Quickswap (QUICK)After purchasing your Quickswap (QUICK), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Quickswap (QUICK)Easily trade Quickswap (QUICK) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

4.3k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy QUICK

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of QUICK (QUICK) are presented below.

活动图片