以太坊的真实价值到底是多少?八大模型算出4800美元,但华尔街可能不这么想

marsbitPublished on 2025-11-30Last updated on 2025-11-30

在当前情绪极度恐慌的二级市场,以太坊的估值成为了多方争论的焦点。

根据CryptoQuant首席执行官Ki Young Ju的研究,12种常用估值模型中有9种表明ETH被低估,综合公允价值为4836美元,比当前价格高出58%以上。 然而,一片看涨声中,被认为最可靠的收益收益率估值模型却显示ETH被高估57%以上,合理价格仅应在1296美元左右。这种巨大的分歧揭示了区块链网络估值这一难题。

多数派观点:九种估值模型的一致看涨

以太坊

在众多以太坊估值方法中,梅特卡夫定律模型给出了最乐观的预测,显示ETH公允价值高达9534美元,相当于被低估200%以上。

梅特卡夫定律认为网络价值与用户数的平方成正比,这一理论已被学术研究人员对比特币和以太坊进行了实证验证。 

链上资产估值模型则将以太坊视为一个巨大的资产结算层,该模型将ETH的公允价值定为4918美元。该方法考虑了以太坊上所有资产,包括稳定币、ERC-20代币、NFT、现实世界代币化资产和桥接资产,其核心假设是以太坊要保证网络安全,其市值应匹配所有在其上结算的资产价值。 

Layer-2框架估值模型则重点关注以太坊生态系统的发展,该模型通过计算以太坊Layer-2扩容网络生态系统中的总锁定价值,预测ETH价格为4633美元,意味着ETH被低估约52%。这一数据反映了L2解决方案的爆发式增长——截至2025年11月,L2日交易量已突破1380万笔,年增长高达253%。


异见者:收益收益率模型的警示

以太坊

根据收益收益率估值模型,ETH 被高估了。来源:ETHval

在多数模型呈现看涨前景的同时,收益收益率估值模型却显示ETH被高估57%以上,该模型指出ETH的合理价格应在1296美元左右。 

这一模型受到将加密货币评估为另类资产类别的传统金融分析师青睐,其核心是将以太坊视为一种收益型债券进行估值。

计算方法是以太坊的年收入除以质押收益率得出总市值。 收益收益率模型的高估信号背后,反映的是以太坊网络收入的根本性问题。随着手续费降至历史最低点,以及竞争网络吸收部分市场份额,以太坊的基本面收入能力确实受到了挑战。


模型可靠性之争:为什么收益收益率模型被认为最可靠?

在估值模型领域,可靠性分为三个等级。

在Hashed的评估体系中,收益收益率模型是唯一被标记为“高可靠性”的估值方法,而其他多数方法则被归类为中等或低可靠性。 

这种可靠性分级的依据在于,收益收益率模型是传统金融领域最为熟悉的估值方式,已被广泛应用于各类生息资产的评估。一位机构分析师解释:“当你向传统金融世界介绍以太坊估值时,他们最容易理解的就是这种模型——它将ETH视为一种产生现金流的资产,而不是单纯依赖投机价值。” 然而,这种“可靠性”也可能成为双刃剑。

区块链分析平台CryptoQuant指出:“这些模型是由学术界和传统金融界值得信赖的专家构建的”,12个模型中有8个的可靠性评分至少为两级。但这并不意味着它们能完美捕捉以太坊这样的新兴资产类别的全部价值。


理论与现实的差距:传统估值模型遭遇区块链挑战

收益收益率模型与梅特卡夫定律之间的巨大差异,凸显了不同估值哲学的根本分歧。传统估值方法在应对去中心化网络时显得力有不逮。 

以市销率估值模型为例,该模型将以太坊的手续费收入类比为公司营收,采用25倍这一成长型科技股的估值水平进行计算,结果得出1285美元的“合理价格”,较当前价格有57.5%的下跌空间。

问题在于,这种模型完全忽略了网络效应带来的外部性价值。 

同样,现金流折现法也存在严重缺陷。

Hashed尝试将以太坊的质押奖励视为收入,通过现金流折现法计算当前价值,但即便使用其公式,计算结果也显示ETH当前价格被高估。 

这些传统模型的局限在于,它们试图将以太坊这一去中心化网络塞进传统公司金融的估值框架,却忽略了区块链网络特有的代谢规律和价值创造方式。


市场实际表现:资金流向揭示的真相以太坊

ETH一年来的综合公允价值。数据来源:ETHval

尽管估值模型存在分歧,但市场资金的实际流向却提供了一种现实检验。

精明的投资者似乎正在用真金白银进行投票。 

数据显示,过去三个月,持有超1万枚ETH的地址新增21个,而交易所ETH储备量却下降8%。这种“提币沉淀”的现象,与早期比特币鲸鱼在现货ETF通过前的囤积行为如出一辙,暗示大资金正在默默积累仓位。 

机构方面,部分对冲基金正在构建“多ETH空Altcoin”的对冲策略,将以太坊当作加密世界的“防御性资产”来配置。这种策略表明,在机构眼中,以太坊已经与其它山寨币产生了本质区别,其风险收益特征更接近比特币这样的“蓝筹”加密资产。 

以太坊

ETF资金流入数据也支持这一观点。自2025年7月中旬以来,现货以太坊ETF每天吸引超过26万个ETH,相当于超过10亿美元直接流入市场。这种持续的买盘不仅提供了价格支撑,更意味着以太坊正在进入传统金融的资产配置视野。


未来展望:估值分歧下的投资逻辑

对于投资者而言,当前估值模型的分歧既带来挑战,也创造机会。关键在于理解不同模型背后的假设条件及适用环境。 

梅特卡夫定律等看涨模型的有效性,建立在网络效应持续强化的前提上。

目前,以太坊日活跃地址数约为97万个,如果这一数字能增至130万(接近历史高位的9成),根据梅特卡夫定律,ETH价格可能达到8058美元。而实现这一目标的关键驱动力可能来自L2的普及、新应用场景的出现以及机构采纳的提升。 

看跌的收益收益率模型则提醒投资者关注风险因素:如果网络收入持续下滑,质押收益率难以维持,那么当前的价格确实存在高估。这种情况下,投资者需要密切关注以太坊手续费趋势、竞争对手分流效应以及网络升级对经济模型的影响。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

Following the withdrawal of Aave and a sharp drop in its Total Value Locked (TVL), the valuation of the high-performance DeFi blockchain MegaETH faces scrutiny. Once a highly anticipated project with a fully diluted valuation (FDV) reaching around $2 billion, MegaETH saw its TVL plummet from a May peak of $245 million to just over $30 million in July, a roughly 70% decline. Its native token, MEGA, currently trades around $0.048 with a market cap of approximately $54 million and an FDV of about $480 million. The report identifies a core vulnerability: MegaETH's TVL was heavily dependent on a single protocol, Aave V3, which at its peak contributed around 90% of the chain's TVL. A significant portion of this capital is attributed to leveraged yield-farming strategies involving stablecoins like USDe. When the profitability of these strategies diminished, capital rapidly exited, exposing the lack of diversified, sustainable activity. Three key mismatches between MegaETH's valuation and its fundamentals are highlighted: 1. **Valuation vs. Real Usage:** With an FDV of ~$4.8B but only ~$1M in annualized protocol revenue and ~2,600 daily active addresses, the valuation appears disconnected from current economic activity. 2. **Token Narrative vs. Ecosystem Reality:** Despite its DeFi narrative, nearly 80% of the chain's recent protocol revenue comes from a trading card game, Monster, not from core DeFi applications like Aave. The chain's native stablecoin, USDM, also shows low trading volume and a declining market cap. 3. **Short-Term Hype vs. Long-Term Delivery:** Initial hype from token generation, blue-chip integrations, and influencer support has faded. Major protocols like Uniswap now hold minimal TVL on the chain, indicating that early capital was largely transient and driven by incentives rather than organic demand. The situation reflects a broader market trend where investors are becoming less tolerant of valuations based on inflated TVL and narrative, demanding clearer evidence of sustainable transactions, revenue, and ecosystem development. While MEGA's price may experience short-term rebounds from market sentiment, a fundamental re-rating likely depends on the team's ability to convert its remaining resources into tangible, user-retaining applications and genuine ecosystem growth.

链捕手55m ago

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

链捕手55m ago

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: China's AI Models at an Inflection Point China's open-source/open-weight large language models (LLMs) have reached performance parity with top global proprietary models, according to a Goldman Sachs report. This is driven by architectural innovations and higher parameter efficiency, allowing Chinese models to achieve comparable capabilities at 2%-10% the parameter size and significantly lower cost. The market is evolving into a two-tiered structure: a high-end segment (e.g., GLM5.2, Qwen3.7 Max) with premium pricing and a low-end, price-sensitive segment for global SMEs and individual users. Key points: * **Cost & Performance:** Innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) enable high performance with smaller models. Projects like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained on domestic hardware, highlight progress in tech self-sufficiency. * **Open-Source Strategy:** Most Chinese players use open-source/open-weight models for flexibility and ecosystem growth. However, Goldman notes this may underreport actual deployment and revenue. A shift toward "open-weight + community license" models with revenue sharing (e.g., MiniMax) could improve monetization. * **Market Shift & Global Expansion:** Enterprise AI adoption is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI-first." International expansion, especially in non-US markets, is a major growth driver. Chinese models are increasingly available on global platforms like AWS Bedrock and Microsoft Copilot. * **Competitive Landscape:** Using a framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies **Zhipu AI and DeepSeek** as the strongest in foundational text models, and **ByteDance** as the leader in multimodal/video generation. The report maintains Buy ratings on MiniMax and Kuaishou. * **Market Growth:** China's AI model API and subscription revenue is projected to grow from an estimated ¥35 billion in 2026 to ¥879 billion by 2030.

marsbit1h ago

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

marsbit1h ago

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry? China's AI large model sector is at a historic inflection point. Goldman Sachs argues that the intelligence of Chinese open-source/open-weight models is approaching top global proprietary models. Rapid adoption by domestic enterprises and global SMEs is creating a data flywheel effect that will further drive model iteration. The evolution is summarized as moving from "DeepSeek's cost-efficiency moment last year to GLM's model-intelligence moment this year." Chinese models achieve near-state-of-the-art performance at significantly lower cost, primarily due to architectural innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) and higher parameter efficiency. Models like DeepSeek V4 Pro (1.6T params), GLM5.2 (0.7T), and MiniMax M3 (0.4T) are much smaller than global leaders. Recent advancements in coding capability are attributed to better data curation and RLHF. Landmarks like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained fully on domestic AI chips, demonstrate progress in hardware stack independence. The market is forming a "two-tiered structure." The high-end tier (e.g., GLM5.2, Alibaba's Qwen3.7 Max) prices around $1 per million tokens, about 10-25% of US top models, with estimated inference gross margins of 10-20%. The low-end tier (priced as low as $0.06-$0.2 per million tokens) targets price-sensitive global SMEs and individuals. MiniMax derives 60-70% of revenue overseas. Goldman forecasts China's AI model API/subscription revenue to grow from an estimated RMB 35bn in 2026 to RMB 879bn by 2030. Most Chinese players adopt open-source/open-weight strategies for deployment flexibility and community feedback, though this limits monetization as deployments on third-party platforms (e.g., Alibaba Cloud) may not generate direct revenue. A shift towards "open-weight + community license" models with revenue-sharing agreements (like MiniMax's approach) could improve unit economics. International expansion, particularly in non-US markets, is the key growth driver. The global enterprise AI paradigm is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI prioritization." Chinese models are already hosted on major global platforms like AWS Bedrock and are under consideration for integration into Microsoft Copilot. Using a competitive framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies the strongest players: In foundational text models, Zhipu AI (initiated coverage) and DeepSeek lead. In multimodal/video generation, ByteDance's Seed is the frontrunner, with Kuaishou's Kling and MiniMax's Hailuo also well-positioned. Goldman maintains a Buy rating on MiniMax, citing its attractive valuation.

链捕手1h ago

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片