Grayscale calls Solana ‘crypto’s financial bazaar’ – Is SOL really a long-term favorite?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-10-19Last updated on 2025-10-20

Key Takeaways

Why is Solana positioned for long-term growth?

As Grayscale mentioned, Solana’s strong on-chain fundamentals create the “necessary” conditions for its future growth.

Are institutions taking notice?

Nine public companies versus BNB Chain’s two companies signal growing institutional confidence in Solana’s network and tooling.


Grayscale called Solana [SOL] “crypto’s financial bazaar” in its report.

The report highlights everything from network fees and operational scalability to on-chain apps, and a strong on-chain economy, concluding that SOL’s fundamentals create the “necessary” conditions for future growth. 

In essence, Grayscale positions Solana as a top blockchain in the evolving Web3 landscape. With that in mind, could this report spotlight SOL’s relative undervaluation and attract renewed institutional interest?

Breaking down Grayscale’s Solana insights

The report kicked off by showing SOL’s dominance across multiple sectors.

First up: Smart contract platforms. Solana sits alongside Ethereum [ETH], BNB Chain [BSC], and others in this space, but it stands out across all four key metrics, showing that user activity is still strongest on its network.

Why does this matter? Smart contract platforms are a core measure of a blockchain’s capabilities. Solana’s lead here signals that developers are using its tools to build applications and drive on-chain activity.

Solana

Source: Research.Grayscale

In short, it’s a reflection of Solana’s superior infrastructure.

Supporting this, the report points out that Solana’s average transaction fee ($0.02), with a block time (0.4s), is lower than both ETH and BSC, which explains its lead in smart contract execution and on-chain activity.

In fact, Solana recently generated $3.41 million in 24-hour app revenue, outperforming the combined revenue of both ETH and BSC. Given this momentum, could Grayscale’s report signal a key inflection point for SOL?

SOL draws institutional eyes as undervaluation persists

Grayscale’s report clearly underscores Solana’s undervaluation.

Compared to other Layer-1s, SOL’s market cap doesn’t fully capture the strength of its network fundamentals.

On-chain metrics show Solana outperforming BNB Chain, yet its market cap remains roughly 1.5x smaller.

And yet, institutions are starting to show their preference. 

Nine public companies hold 2.5% of SOL’s supply, compared to just two companies holding 0.44% of BNB’s supply, signaling growing confidence in Solana’s developer tooling and ecosystem.

Sol

Source: CoinGecko

In short, the report puts this reality into perspective. 

Even though Solana has lagged in speculative price growth, its strong on-chain fundamentals reinforce Grayscale’s bullish view on SOL, driving institutional investment, even as the token’s price trails some peers.

In this context, the nine public holdings today may also be just the start of a broader wave of institutional adoption across the network, making Solana’s potential to surpass its rivals a long-term possibility.

Share

Related Reads

Sitting on a Trillion-Dollar Market, Why Hasn't Real Estate Tokenization Taken Off?

For years, real estate tokenization has been hailed as a breakthrough technology poised to democratize property investment. In theory, it promises fractional ownership of premium assets, rapid transactions, and enhanced liquidity. Yet, in practice, it has failed to gain traction, accounting for less than 0.1% of the global real estate market. The core issue is not a lack of tokens, but the absence of a robust legal, operational, and compliant framework that grants them credibility as financial instruments. The industry initially erred by prioritizing technology over investor needs, creating products with unclear ownership and unreliable liquidity. Key infrastructure remains missing: legally sound ownership structures, compliant transfer mechanisms, professional servicing, and interoperability with traditional finance. This regulatory ambiguity and operational complexity deter institutional investors, who already have access to established, well-governed investment channels. A mature model would feature low minimum investments in institutional-grade assets, transparent rental income distribution, and genuine liquidity through regulated secondary markets. While regulatory progress in regions like the UAE and growth in other tokenized asset sectors (like treasuries) are positive signs, the focus must shift from issuing tokens to building foundational systems. The investment proposition of tokenized real estate is not to create new returns, but to improve access, efficiency, and liquidity for existing income-generating properties. For mainstream adoption, the sector must demonstrate tangible economic advantages over traditional models, not just technical novelty. The next phase depends on proving scalable, compliant operations with auditable track records. The barrier is no longer technology, but infrastructure and regulation. The vision remains unfulfilled until this gap is bridged.

marsbit3m ago

Sitting on a Trillion-Dollar Market, Why Hasn't Real Estate Tokenization Taken Off?

marsbit3m ago

Large Language Models Ace All Exams, Yet Move Farther from AGI: What Does This Paper Reveal?

The article discusses the ongoing challenge of defining and achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). It notes that industry leaders have set vague, often profit- or time-based benchmarks for AGI, while the concept itself lacks a consensus definition—a situation the article compares to a "Rorschach test." It highlights a recent 2025 paper by researcher Michael Timothy Bennett, who proposes a new, measurable definition. Bennett frames AGI not as mimicking human performance on tests, which current large language models (LLMs) have already mastered, but as an "artificial scientist." A true AGI, according to this view, should be able to widely and efficiently adapt to new environments and tasks within real-world constraints (like computational and energy limits), focusing on the *discovery of new knowledge* rather than the replication of existing data. The author contrasts this with the current dominant approach of "scale-maxing"—massively scaling up data, parameters, and compute. While powerful, this method leads to models that fail on out-of-distribution problems and lack core intelligent abilities: they are passive learners, cannot reason causally, and cannot actively experiment or balance exploration with exploitation. The article argues that Bennett's framework offers a crucial shift. It makes AGI a quantifiable engineering problem and proposes new evaluation "adaptation benchmarks" that test an AI's ability to actively learn in novel scenarios. The conclusion is that achieving AGI will require a fundamental reset—a fusion of multiple methodologies beyond simple scaling, moving AI from mimicking patterns to embodying the scientific spirit of inquiry and discovery.

marsbit1h ago

Large Language Models Ace All Exams, Yet Move Farther from AGI: What Does This Paper Reveal?

marsbit1h ago

Pope Issues First AI Encyclical: 40,000 Words, 10 Key Points, Clarifying AI Anxiety

Pope Leo XIV's historic encyclical "Magnifica Humanitas," released in May 2026, marks the Catholic Church's first major document addressing artificial intelligence. The 40,000-word text moves beyond theological abstraction to confront practical AI anxieties affecting society. It argues that AI is no longer a mere tool but an embedded environment influencing daily decisions in areas like employment, healthcare, justice, and information, often without users' awareness. The encyclical presents ten core concerns. It highlights that the central issue isn't just regulation, but who holds the underlying *power*—control over data, compute, and platforms—often concentrated in private entities. It warns that even developers cannot fully explain AI systems, creating accountability gaps. While AI can simulate human interaction and creativity, it cautions against treating it as a moral agent capable of bearing true responsibility or forming genuine relationships. Key risks identified include AI's role in opaque decision-making for jobs or welfare, the amplification of persuasive disinformation, and the potential for education to focus on tool use over critical thinking. The document stresses that work has value beyond efficiency, and AI should enhance human capabilities, not merely replace roles. It firmly states that irreversible decisions, especially involving life and death, must remain under human judgment. Ultimately, the encyclical frames AI's challenge as anthropological, not just technological. As AI simulates uniquely human capacities like judgment and creation, it forces a re-examination of what makes human action meaningful: our capacity for responsibility, vulnerability, and bearing real consequences. The Pope concludes that technology is never neutral; its development and deployment are shaped by human values and choices, making an inclusive, ethically grounded dialogue essential for its future.

marsbit1h ago

Pope Issues First AI Encyclical: 40,000 Words, 10 Key Points, Clarifying AI Anxiety

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片