Ethereum tests $4.4K as whales spark ‘danger zone’ ETH sell-off!

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-10-07Last updated on 2025-10-08

Key Takeaways 

Why are whales selling Ethereum?

A single whale offloaded 45,000 ETH worth $208 million, signaling growing caution around $4,800 resistance.

What’s next for ETH price action?

If $4,430 support breaks, ETH could drop 12% toward $3,860, though weak ADX hints at limited downside momentum.


Ethereum [ETH] traders are on alert as whale activity stirs fresh volatility across the market.

A major holder has offloaded tens of thousands of ETH in recent days, coinciding with a sharp price pullback from a key resistance zone.

With technical charts flashing early warning signals and on-chain data showing weakening network activity, AMBCrypto breaks down whether this could mark the start of a deeper correction.

Whale offloads $70 million on Bitfinex

According to SpotOnChain, a large ETH whale dumped 15,000 ETH worth $70.15 million on Bitfinex.

Moreover, the same whale had sold 30,000 ETH worth $138.40 million over the past two days at an average price of $4,612.

Source: SpotOnChain

The average selling price was $4,612, and despite the sell pressure, the whale still holds 70,785 ETH, worth $332.4 million across four wallets.

This activity coincided with ETH’s 5% intraday drop, as the asset struggled to sustain momentum above the $4,860 resistance zone.

At press time, ETH traded at $4,490, down 4.7% over 24 hours, with a 26.6% rise in trading volume to $57.16 billion, according to CoinMarketCap.

Rising volume amid falling prices showed increased sell-side participation, often seen in corrective phases.

Bearish pattern forms near key resistance for ETH

According to the TradingView daily chart, ETH formed a strong bearish engulfing candlestick pattern near the key resistance level of $4,860.

In addition, the altcoin hovered near $4,430, a level that acted as short-term support over the past week.

Ethereum (ETH) price action

Source: TradingView

If this floor breaks, technical setups indicate a potential 12% correction toward $3,860, though failure to break support could trigger range-bound movement or a short-term relief bounce.

The Average Directional Index (ADX) stood at 21, as of writing, below the 25 trend-strength threshold, showing weak directional momentum.

Meanwhile, the Supertrend indicator remained green, suggesting the broader uptrend remained intact despite near-term volatility.

Ethereum network activity declines

Adding to the bearish outlook, CryptoQuant data revealed that Ethereum’s Active Addresses fell sharply over the past 24 hours.

At the time of writing, the metric dropped from 460,449 to 403,093, indicating weakening adoption and engagement, which could accelerate price declines.

Ethereum Active Addresses

Source: CryptoQuant

Traders turn defensive

Analyst Ali Martinez highlighted on X (formerly Twitter) that ETH’s $4,000–$4,800 range has historically acted as a “danger zone,” triggering multiple corrections since 2021.

Expert Ethereum Prediction

Source: X/Ali_chart

The expert noted that each time ETH neared this price range, it triggered a correction—something that could recur if the $4,430 support level fails to hold.

It’s not just analysts expressing caution; traders are also bracing for downside, as short positions have surged.

According to CoinGlass data, ETH’s key liquidation levels are $4,407 on the lower end and $4,553.30 on the upper end.

ETH Exchange Liquidation Map

Source: CoinGlass

At these levels, traders held $581.3 million in long positions and $1.31 billion in shorts, reflecting a clear bearish bias and strong pressure to drive prices lower.

Share

Related Reads

Morning Post | Michael Saylor Releases Bitcoin Tracker Info; Aave Publishes Kelp rsETH Bridge Attack Post-Incident Investigation; Gravity Bridge Announces Service Suspension Following Attack

ChainCatcher Daily Summary - June 1, 2026 In regulatory news, the U.S. OCC granted preliminary conditional approval for Laser Digital to establish a federally regulated trust bank. In Vietnam, a draft law amendment proposes allowing SMEs to use digital and virtual assets as loan collateral. Hong Kong's SFC chairman reported that trading volume on the city's 12 licensed virtual asset platforms grew nearly 300% YoY in Q1 2026. Notable incidents include the Cosmos ecosystem cross-chain bridge Gravity Bridge pausing services after an attack. Aave published a post-mortem on the April 18th Kelp rsETH bridge attack, attributing it to a third-party bridge infrastructure vulnerability via an RPC poisoning attack, not the Aave protocol itself. In market developments, MicroStrategy's Michael Saylor hinted at a potential upcoming Bitcoin purchase announcement. Fed Governor Waller commented that widespread stablecoin adoption could amplify the impact of U.S. monetary policy. Meanwhile, sentiment analysis from Santiment indicates a record-high Bitcoin long/short ratio of 2.23, potentially signaling a short-term price correction, while Ethereum shows signs of FUD among commentators. In legal matters, the SEC sued the founder of Privvy Investments for an alleged $12.3 million crypto AI trading bot scam. In China, a Qingdao man was sentenced to 10 years and 9 months for stealing 107 BTC by obtaining a victim's wallet seed phrase. Top trending meme tokens on ETH, Solana, and Base networks for the past 24 hours are also listed.

链捕手38m ago

Morning Post | Michael Saylor Releases Bitcoin Tracker Info; Aave Publishes Kelp rsETH Bridge Attack Post-Incident Investigation; Gravity Bridge Announces Service Suspension Following Attack

链捕手38m ago

Alibaba 'Stocks Up', ByteDance 'Trains'

"In late May, two closely timed events in China's AI industry clearly revealed the divergent strategic approaches of two tech giants: Alibaba and ByteDance. Alibaba is aggressively integrating AI into its existing commercial ecosystem, prioritizing immediate monetization. Its Qwen App now fully integrates with Taobao, leveraging the platform's 4-billion-item database for AI-powered shopping features like virtual try-on and price comparison. Internally, Alibaba has reorganized to incentivize AI-driven business growth, notably through the 'Agentic Commerce Trust Protocol' to enable AI-agent transactions. Financially, it emphasizes ROI, with CEO Daniel Wu stating every AI chip purchased is generating revenue. Alibaba's strategy bets that foundational AI model capabilities won't be leapfrogged in the next five years, allowing its 'AI-as-a-utility' approach to succeed. In stark contrast, ByteDance's Seed division focuses on pushing the frontiers of AGI with a long-term, research-oriented mindset. Its video generation model, Seedance 2.0, topped international benchmarks. The division, led by researchers Wu Yonghui and product head Zhu Wenjia, is tasked with 'exploring the upper limits of intelligence,' even considering open-sourcing its models—a rare move among Chinese firms. ByteDance is investing heavily, with reports of its 2026 capital expenditure plan being nearly triple that of 2024, funded by its substantial private profits. This allows it to pursue projects like an 8-month research paper questioning if video models are true 'world models,' devoid of immediate commercial pressure. The core divergence is less about corporate philosophy and more about structural constraints. As a publicly traded company, Alibaba is bound to quarterly financial expectations, forcing a pragmatic, revenue-focused AI integration. As a private entity, ByteDance has the luxury to fund long-term, high-risk foundational research without answering to public markets. The article concludes that the true determinant of a Chinese company's AI path is its IPO status, suggesting that if ByteDance were public, or if Alibaba were private, their strategies might well be reversed."

marsbit2h ago

Alibaba 'Stocks Up', ByteDance 'Trains'

marsbit2h ago

Why More AI Agents Does Not Equal Higher Productivity?

Editor's Note: As AI Agents become cheaper and easier to use, a new constraint emerges: the cost isn't in launching more Agents, but in the human attention required to manage, judge, and integrate their outputs. This hidden cost is called the "orchestration tax." The article argues that a developer's cognitive bandwidth is the key bottleneck—a serial, non-parallelizable resource akin to a Global Interpreter Lock (GIL). While many Agents can run concurrently, their results ultimately require human judgment for review, conflict resolution, and final integration. Therefore, more Agents don't automatically mean higher productivity; they can simply create longer queues, lead to cognitive fatigue, and create the illusion of busyness without real output. The core solution is to design workflows around this scarce human attention. Key strategies include: scaling the number of Agents to match review capacity (not UI capacity), categorizing tasks (delegating independent ones, keeping complex judgment-heavy ones serial), batch reviewing results to minimize context-switching costs, automating verifiable checks to reserve human judgment for critical decisions, and protecting focused, uninterrupted thinking time. Ultimately, the critical skill is not launching many Agents, but architecting systems that respect the fundamental limit of human attention. Unpaid "orchestration tax" accumulates as both technical and cognitive debt, undermining system understanding and quality. True productivity comes from thoughtfully managing the single-threaded resource—your focus.

marsbit3h ago

Why More AI Agents Does Not Equal Higher Productivity?

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片