Ethereum can rally to $5,900 in October – but ONLY IF…

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-10-05Last updated on 2025-10-06

Key Takeaways

Is Ethereum in a bullish or bearish trend?

The higher-timeframe trend is bullish, but the $4.7k region could act as a supply zone in the coming days, so traders should be cautious.

How high can ETH go in October?

The $5.3k and $5.9k levels were feasible price targets for October, especially if the past week’s bullish momentum can continue.


Ethereum [ETH] rallied 9% last week, retesting the $4.1k level as support.

Strong onchain flows and a supply squeeze are thought to be some of the leading factors powering the rally. With that, we observed renewed institutional demand, reflected in long-term bullish conviction.

The rising Total Value Locked (TVL) underlined Ethereum’s importance in the DeFi landscape. Meanwhile, a government shutdown might spur equities and crypto to rally in the coming days.

Ethereum price prediction bullish, but…

Ethereum 1-week Chart

Source: ETH/USDT on TradingView

On the weekly chart, the price action of ETH was encouraging.

It had formed a supply zone at the $4.1k level (orange), which had been unable to surpass from March 2024 till August 2025. In recent weeks, ETH has converted this zone into a demand area.

ETH’s breakout to a new all-time high at $4,953 strengthened bullish conviction. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) stood at 63.30, confirming momentum remained in favor of buyers.

However, the OBV flashed a warning sign.

It has been unable to form a new high compared to March 2024, even though the price has climbed past $4.1k. This suggested some weakness from buyers.

In short, the inference is that Ethereum prices might struggle to climb to $5k or beyond unless buying volume grows further.

Bears eye $4.5K zone, but buyers still hold the edge

Ethereum 1-day chart

Source: ETH/USDT on TradingView

On the daily timeframe, the drop below $4,060 (marked in yellow above) on the 25th of September represented a change in market structure.

At press time, the $4,460-$4,720 area was a bearish order block that could reject ETH bulls.

Given the bullish structure on the weekly timeframe, swing traders should not rush to sell ETH at the $4,500 supply zone on the higher timeframe chart.

Instead, they can wait for a move past $4.7k, or a retracement to $3.5k, to look to go long.

The $3.9k level was another strong support that could help keep the Ethereum sellers at bay. Beyond $5,000, the $5.4k and $5.9k would be the next bullish price targets based on Fibonacci extension levels.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion

Share

Related Reads

Interpreting Investment Opportunities in the Age of Great Navigation, Invesco Great Wall Fund Releases '2026 Report on Chinese Enterprises Going Global'

Invesco Great Wall Fund has released its "2026 China Corporate Globalization Report," titled "The 'Great Navigation Era' of Chinese Enterprises." The report analyzes the new trends and investment opportunities as Chinese companies expand globally, moving from simple product exports to comprehensive overseas operations involving services, branding, and local production. Driven by factors like trade friction, the pursuit of higher profit margins abroad, and policy support, globalization is becoming essential for Chinese companies. The report outlines an evolution: from early product export ("Globalization 1.0") to the current "Globalization 2.0," characterized by overseas capacity, capital goods investment, consumer brand expansion, and service exports. Chinese firms' competitive advantages are highlighted, including a vast engineer talent pool, low-cost and robust infrastructure, and complete industrial clusters. Specific sectors with significant出海 potential are identified: * **Capital Goods** (e.g., engineering machinery, power equipment): Benefiting from global demand, especially in Belt & Road markets and the AI-driven power grid upgrade cycle. * **Consumer Brands**: Transitioning from cost to brand advantage, leveraging供应链 efficiency. * **Technology & Innovation**: Including AI applications, optical modules within global tech supply chains, and new energy vehicles focusing on local production. * **Pharmaceuticals**: Chinese biotech firms are becoming preferred partners for global pharma, with potential for breakthrough drugs in areas like oncology and weight loss. The report concludes that corporate globalization represents a sustained, core theme for China's capital markets, though companies must navigate challenges like geopolitics and localization.

marsbit2m ago

Interpreting Investment Opportunities in the Age of Great Navigation, Invesco Great Wall Fund Releases '2026 Report on Chinese Enterprises Going Global'

marsbit2m ago

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

On the night of February 9th, GitHub suffered a major outage caused by a simple configuration change—reducing a cache refresh interval from 12 to 2 hours—that triggered a cascade of failures. This was not an isolated event, but part of a broader pattern. In early 2026, GitHub experienced at least 8 major incidents, failing to meet its promised 99.9% availability. These outages stemmed from structural issues: explosive growth in load, tight service coupling, and insufficient protection against abnormal traffic. This unprecedented load is driven by AI Agents. In 2025, GitHub handled ~1 billion commits. By 2026, weekly commits reached 275 million, projecting to ~14 billion for the year—a 14x increase. AI tools like Claude Code now contribute 4.5% of all public repository commits, with weekly submissions surging 25x in just three months. AI-generated pull requests jumped from 4 million to 17 million per month in half a year. Unlike human developers, AI Agents work continuously, generating commits at a scale that overwhelms infrastructure designed for human rhythms. The surge also shattered GitHub's business model. Copilot's flat-rate pricing, based on assisting human developers, became unsustainable as Agentic AI sessions consumed resources worth hundreds of dollars for a few dollars in fees. In response, GitHub imposed usage limits and, by June 1st, shifted to a pay-per-use "AI Credits" system. Facing this new reality, GitHub realized a 10x scaling plan was insufficient. It announced a need to *redesign* its architecture for 30x current scale—decoupling services, adding fault isolation, and improving change management to prevent cascading failures. Other platforms like Stripe and AWS are facing similar challenges with AI Agents. Fundamentally, GitHub is transitioning from a human collaboration platform to an "exhaust pipe" for automated AI workflows. Its detailed post-mortem reports aim to maintain trust during this turbulent rebuild. The February outage was not just a technical glitch, but a signal of the software industry's entry into a new, AI-driven era.

marsbit42m ago

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

marsbit42m ago

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

Facing massive paper losses exceeding $90 billion each amidst a sharp market downturn, "Digital Asset Treasury" (DAT) giants Strategy and Bitmine find themselves in a precarious position, but with different underlying risks. Strategy, heavily invested in Bitcoin (BTC), faces significant financial strain. Its strategy relies heavily on debt, including convertible notes and preferred stock (STRC) requiring substantial dividend payments. With its cash reserves dwindling and BTC offering no staking yield for cash flow, Strategy's high leverage makes it vulnerable. A continued price decline could force asset sales to meet obligations, potentially creating a negative feedback loop. Its market value has already fallen sharply. In contrast, Bitmine, an Ethereum (ETH) holder, appears on firmer financial ground. It primarily funds its purchases through equity offerings (like ATM programs), avoiding debt pressure. It also generates income by staking a large portion of its ETH holdings. While not immune to market drops and shareholder dilution concerns, Bitmine maintains more flexibility, recently announcing a new preferred share offering to raise further capital. The core divergence lies in their financing: Bitmine uses equity (investor money), while Strategy uses debt (borrowed money). Consequently, Bitmine currently faces less immediate liquidity pressure than Strategy, which must navigate the dual challenge of servicing debt/dividends and a declining core asset (BTC) price.

marsbit49m ago

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

marsbit49m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片