Prop AMMs引爆聚合器全面开战,Solana将成最大输家!

比推Published on 2025-09-30Last updated on 2025-09-30

来源:Oxresearch

作者:Carlos、 Luke Leasure

编译及整理:BitpushNews


近日的市场整体仍处于区间震荡,但在近期低点附近显示出韧性。尽管BTC和ETH ETF表现疲软,REX-Osprey SSK SOL ETF在《1933年证券法》框架下的SOL ETF预计于十月中旬获批前,持续获得资产管理规模增长。

image.png

就ETF资金流而言,上周是自三月份抛售以来整体表现最差的一周。BTC ETF出现约9亿美元净流出,ETH ETF则为8亿美元。ETF资金流向持续与主流币种价格走势同步,进一步印证了“资金驱动型市场”的论断。

image.png

相比之下,尽管上周市场普遍下跌,SOL ETF却创下自推出以来最强劲的单周净流入记录,达5900万美元。这已是SOL ETF连续第五周实现净流入。未来几周内《1933年证券法》框架下SOL ETF的获批预期,很可能加速这一势头。我们重申观点:获批的SOL ETF有望吸引数倍于当前REX-Osprey SSK产品的资产管理规模。

image.png

虽然我们对SOL ETF获批后的资金流入持建设性态度,但Solana多项网络基本面趋势仍不乐观。

DEX交易量、协议收入(REV)和应用收入持续低迷。

此外,Solana在网络收入市场份额正持续被Hyperliquid和BNB蚕食。ETF的新增资金或将继续支撑SOL价格表现,但链上数据显示实际活动正持续转向其他生态。

Prop AMMs、聚合器大战与Solana协议收入:三者关联何在?

我们曾经探讨Prop AMMs如何改变Solana的市场结构。本文将聚焦其持续主导地位,以及两个密切关联却未被充分讨论的动态:聚合器战争与Solana协议收入的急剧下滑。

首先看主导地位的巩固。HumidiFi在过去数周已稳居Prop AMMs交易量榜首,目前占据链上SOL-稳定币交易量的近50%。上周其更包办Solana DEX总交易量的35%,超越OrcaRaydium和Meteora等所有传统AMM。

image.png

今年9月将成为历史性转折点——Prop AMMs(HumidiFi、SolFi等)月交易量将首次超越传统AMMs(Orca、Raydium等)。回顾2024年10月SolFi上线时,所有Prop AMMs合计仅占链上总交易量的7%。而本月仅HumidiFi单一平台就贡献了DEX总交易量的28%。

image.png

转谈另一维度,几周前FastLane的Thogard发表文章,认为SVM是Prop AMMs的次优执行环境,并断言其在Monad链上会有更好发展。其核心论点为:

1. “在SVM中,聚合器需通过模拟所有可能性选择最佳Prop AMM……但等到交易执行时,该Prop AMM可能已非最优选择”

2. “在SVM中,任何Prop AMM都可强制使交易回滚,迫使聚合器维护白名单,这既削弱竞争又延长整合周期”

我曾撰文驳斥该观点,指出其忽略了关键事实:Prop AMMs在Solana的激增同时引发了聚合器领域的竞争升级。

为何这点至关重要?

需知Prop AMMs不提供公开前端界面,这意味着其绝大部分流量依赖DEX聚合器导入。

Thogard的第二个论点基于错误前提——Jupiter具有垄断地位:“据业内朋友透露,其Prop AMM上架Jupiter需耗时逾三月,且过程充满政治博弈。”

尽管Jupiter目前占据聚合器流量主导,但绝非缺乏竞争。若Jupiter整合新Prop AMMs速度过慢,DFlow、Titan等竞争者将迅速接入其合约,从而为用户提供更优价格执行。由于聚合器用户忠诚度完全由价格驱动,Jupiter的“政治博弈”实则面临订单流失风险。

下图显示,自八月下旬以来DFlow与Titan交易量激增,过去两周日均合计交易量约15亿美元。值得注意的是Titan在9月18日公开上线后流量暴增,其团队宣称自有算法在87%的情况下提供优于竞品的定价。若要坚持“竞争不足”论,需要所有聚合器共谋维持相同的Prop AMMs整合策略,但现实恰恰相反——聚合器实际有强烈动机快速整合新交易路径以维持或提升路由胜率。

image.png

至此我们仅剩最后一个待反驳论点:模拟与执行间的理论延迟。

对此,DFlow于上周四推出JIT路由(实时路由)解决方案,使聚合器能在链上执行过程中动态重新优化交易。当交易路径包含Prop AMMs环节时,DFlow链上程序会在执行该环节前实时校验报价。若检测到价格较初始报价发生显著偏移(表明原路径已非最优),路由系统将在同一笔交易内自动将交易重新导向当前最佳场所。此举有望降低用户实际滑点并提升交易成功率。值得强调的是,这印证了Solana原生团队会针对SVM的理论局限创新解决方案,为用户提供最优体验与价格执行。

下图展示了SOL-稳定币交易对中经聚合器流向Prop AMMs的交易量占比。可见DFlow将98%的SOL-稳定币交易量导向Prop AMMs,而Jupiter该比例为80%。这种差异或许能部分解释为何在SOL-USD交易对(尤其是大额交易)中,DFlow的执行质量优于Jupiter。

image.png

Prop AMMs的崛起是当前Solana生态最引人注目的现象,其全面影响仍有待观察。例如上周SOL-稳定币交易量占链上DEX总交易量的74%,此为四年来首见!

与此同时, meme币交易量断崖式下跌,上周市场份额仅剩10%,创下去年12月以来新低。

image.png

这种市场结构转变对Solana协议收入产生连锁影响。上周Solana仅产生910万美元协议收入,创下去年9月美国大选前以来的最低单周记录。尽管不能将所有趋势完全归因于Prop AMMs,但它们确实扮演了重要角色。未来数月值得关注Prop AMMs的持续演进,以及其对Solana生态产生的二阶效应(聚合器演变、交易量构成、协议收入等)。


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

比推 TG 交流群:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

比推 TG 订阅: https://t.me/bitpush

说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点,不构成投资建议

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Upbit is Anxious: A Hasty Counterattack Aimed at Regaining Stablecoin Market Share

Title: Upbit's Rushed Counterattack to Reclaim Stablecoin Market Share Facing a dramatic shift in South Korea's stablecoin market, leading exchange Upbit launched a promotional campaign from July 26 to August 9, waiving the 0.05% trading fee for stablecoins paired with the Korean Won (KRW) and rapidly listing new stablecoins like RLUSD and USDG. This move is a direct response to its plummeting market share in this sector. Historically a duopoly with Bithumb, the market has been reshaped since October 2025 when Coinone permanently removed fees for USDC trading. By June 2026, Coinone led with 34.8% of stablecoin volume, followed by Bithumb (31.1%) and Upbit (30.1%). This contrasts sharply with the overall crypto market, where Upbit commands 60%. The data shows stablecoin demand is highly sensitive to fees, as users primarily buy them to transfer capital overseas for derivatives trading or forex arbitrage. South Korean exchanges have seen a net outflow of stablecoins for 18 consecutive months, totaling approximately 14.9 trillion KRW, underscoring their role as a cross-border capital conduit. Upbit's limited-time promotion initially boosted its daily stablecoin volume by 162%, but the surge was almost entirely in USDT (98.1% of volume). The newly listed stablecoins saw negligible, fleeting interest. Furthermore, the promotional effect quickly waned in the second week, with volume dropping 33% on weekdays. A concurrent weakening of the KRW also contributed to the trading spike, independent of the fee waiver. The analysis suggests that once the promotion ends, Upbit is unlikely to retain its temporary gains unless it matches Coinone's permanent zero-fee policy, forcing a choice between market share and fee revenue. Upbit's strategic push may be less about immediate profit and more about preparing for future regulatory shifts. With South Korea's *Digital Asset Basic Act* on the horizon, which will regulate KRW-backed stablecoins, and following Dunamu's (Upbit's parent) integration into Naver Financial to build a payment ecosystem, securing a dominant position in the dollar stablecoin distribution channel holds long-term strategic value. However, potential regulatory conflicts could prevent Upbit from listing a future Naver-issued KRW stablecoin, making the current fight for dollar stablecoin flow even more critical.

marsbit8h ago

Upbit is Anxious: A Hasty Counterattack Aimed at Regaining Stablecoin Market Share

marsbit8h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片