Bankless:“写、读、证”,解读以太坊全新隐私路线图

coinvoicePublished on 2025-09-17Last updated on 2025-09-17

来源:Bankless

作者:William M. Peaster

编译及整理:BitpushNews

如果以太坊无法解决隐私问题,它就有可能在大规模应用时成为“监控基础设施”。

这正是新近更名为“以太坊隐私管家”(Privacy Stewards of Ethereum, PSE)的团队正在正面应对的挑战。他们发布了一份全新的路线图和聚焦明确的任务。

研究人员们正在从探索密码学实验,转向将隐私解决方案付诸实践。他们刚刚发布了一份新的工作路线图。

这份路线图围绕三个主要方向展开:

  • 隐私写入(Private writes) → 让链上隐私操作(如转账、DeFi、投票等)变得像公开操作一样简单。
  • 隐私读取(Private reads) → 在以太坊上进行身份验证或查询时,防止元数据泄露。
  • 隐私证明(Private proving) → 让零知识证明在移动设备上运行更便宜、更简单。

随着PSE深入研究这些方向,他们计划维持一个“问题雷达”来绘制隐私漏洞图,一个“执行地图”来决定在哪里构建、合作或仅是监控,以及一种“公开沟通”的文化,以保持以太坊社区的参与。

此外,该团队已经有一系列正在启动或持续支持的计划。这些计划包括:

  • Plasma Fold(写入) — 一个使用“零知识折叠”进行扩展的实验性二层(Layer 2)设计。PSE计划为该架构添加隐私转账功能。
  • Kohaku(写入) — 一个钱包概念验证。它的构建旨在通过隐私池(privacy pools)原生支持隐私发送。
  • 隐私治理(写入) — PSE计划发布一份“2025年隐私投票现状”报告,并继续与 Aragon 和其他隐私投票协议合作。
  • 保密DeFi(写入) — PSE打算与以太坊基金会的EcoDev企业组合作,成立一个机构隐私工作组(IPTF)。
  • 网络隐私(读取) — PSE计划组建一个隐私RPC工作组,在钱包中支持 Oblivious RAM(匿名随机存取存储器)解决方案,试验 mixnet 风格的交易路由等等。
  • 隐私身份(证明) — 该团队正在进行各种努力,围绕保护隐私的凭证标准、模块化 zk-snark 钱包以及不可关联的凭证撤销等。
  • 客户端证明(证明) — 该团队还在研究能够直接在移动设备上运行并为新型隐私应用提供支持的高效证明系统。

通过改进隐私,以太坊可以证明公链既可以透明,又能保护其用户。

现在,PSE已经成为一个成熟的隐私中心,致力于将这一愿景变为现实,同时不试图垄断任何东西。这正是以太坊基金会独具优势的、中立的协调者角色。

最终,一个可以保障数万亿美元资产、却暴露每一笔交易细节的网络是不完整的。通过在写入、读取和证明方面实现隐私,以太坊才能继续作为“价值互联网”的可信基础。

幸运的是,这份新路线图表明,以太坊基金会正在加倍努力,并将隐私视为一个核心问题来对待。为此,我们为之喝彩。


声明:本内容为作者独立观点,不代表 CoinVoice 立场,且不构成投资建议,请谨慎对待,如需报道或加入交流群,请联系微信:VOICE-V。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

South Korean Retail Investors 'Move from Seoul to Wall Street': Buying SK Hynix ADR, Betting on Triple-Leverage ETF

A surge of Korean retail investors is shifting funds from the volatile Seoul market to Wall Street, intensifying their bets on the AI theme through unconventional and high-risk instruments. Data shows Korean investors were net buyers of about $4.5 billion in US stocks in July, nearing a yearly peak. A notable trend is their purchase of approximately $840 million worth of SK Hynix American Depositary Receipts (ADRs), despite a significant 10% premium over the company's domestic shares, leading analysts to label the move as speculative and irrational. Simultaneously, Korean traders are heavily favoring leveraged ETFs. The triple-leveraged semiconductor ETF SOXL was the most-bought US product in July, with leveraged products occupying four of the top ten spots. Experts note that this shift in geography does not represent a diversification of risk; instead, investors are merely expressing the same concentrated bet on AI hardware through different, often riskier, US-listed vehicles. Analysts warn that while this capital inflow is unlikely to systemically impact the vast US institutional market, it risks creating localized distortions and amplifying volatility, particularly in the targeted sectors and instruments. The move follows a sharp correction in the Korean market, where high leverage in semiconductor stocks and related ETFs had previously led to significant losses, prompting this search for alternative avenues to chase the AI narrative.

marsbit22m ago

South Korean Retail Investors 'Move from Seoul to Wall Street': Buying SK Hynix ADR, Betting on Triple-Leverage ETF

marsbit22m ago

Bithumb's First Half Report: Net Loss Exceeds $76 Million, Where Did the Profits Go?

**Title: Bithumb H1 2026 Report: Net Loss Exceeds $76M – Where Did the Profits Go?** Despite a headline net loss of approximately 108.7 billion KRW (~$76.44 million) for the first half of 2026, a detailed breakdown reveals Bithumb's core exchange business remained profitable. The significant loss was primarily driven by two major non-operating items: substantial losses on the disposal and valuation of the company's own cryptocurrency holdings (net loss ~$48.21 million) and a sharp increase in litigation provisions (~$25.93 million), largely linked to a regulatory fine. Operating revenue fell 48.7% year-on-year to ~$119 million, almost entirely from transaction fees, as market activity cooled. While the company drastically cut marketing and subsidy expenses by ~70% to protect margins, more rigid costs like payment processing and salaries declined only modestly. This highlights the vulnerability of its highly fee-dependent revenue model in a down market. Total assets decreased by ~$584 million, but this was largely attributable to an ~86% drop in client KRW deposits. The market value of client crypto assets under custody also fell (~32.7%), partly influenced by declining cryptocurrency prices rather than solely client withdrawals. In summary, the report indicates underlying exchange profitability was eroded by significant crypto asset losses and mounting regulatory/legal costs, against a backdrop of declining trading revenue. Future focus should be on revenue recovery, managing crypto-related损益, and the ongoing impact of regulatory challenges.

marsbit42m ago

Bithumb's First Half Report: Net Loss Exceeds $76 Million, Where Did the Profits Go?

marsbit42m ago

BitMart's Final 9 Days: A True Exchange Crisis Is Never About Shutting Down

BitMart's Final 9 Days: A True Exchange Crisis Is Not About Shutting Down On August 17, 2026, with just 9 days until BitMart's scheduled cessation of trading, the focus shifted from the platform's orderly closure to serious questions about user withdrawals, platform solvency, employee payments, and reserve transparency. Stakeholders, claiming to represent users and staff, publicly demanded asset/liability disclosures, explanations for withdrawal delays, a user repayment plan, and an independent audit, setting an August 19 deadline. While BitMart CEO Sheldon Lee denied allegations of insolvency or wrongdoing, the controversy highlighted a core vulnerability of centralized exchanges (CEXs). When an exchange announces its shutdown, normal user behavior changes dramatically, triggering a mass withdrawal event—the ultimate stress test for its liquidity and custodial integrity. The key question becomes not whether the platform has assets, but whether it holds sufficient *liquid* assets to cover all user liabilities on demand. The article argues that the trust placed in CEXs is based on the convenience they provide, abstracting users from direct control of their private keys. This trust is rarely questioned during normal operations but becomes critically exposed during a wind-down. The situation underscores the limitations of simple Proof of Reserves, which shows "what we have" but not the crucial "what we owe." True financial credibility requires transparent, auditable data on assets, liabilities, and segregated user funds. BitMart's situation reflects a broader, often overlooked issue in the crypto industry: while there is extensive focus on growth mechanisms for exchanges, there is little discussion or established protocol for a safe and transparent "exit mechanism." The final measure of an exchange's integrity, the article concludes, is not its user count or trading volume during a bull market, but its ability to ensure every last user can successfully withdraw their assets when the doors are closing. The outcome will be determined not by statements, but by whether the final user's funds securely leave the platform.

marsbit1h ago

BitMart's Final 9 Days: A True Exchange Crisis Is Never About Shutting Down

marsbit1h ago

Don't Speculate on 100x Coins, Just Bet on 'Cash Cows': Which Projects Are Worth Dollar-Cost Averaging in the Bear Market?

In a bearish crypto market, finding sustainable investments is more prudent than chasing speculative meme coins. This article analyzes projects generating consistent revenue, highlighting them as potential "cash cows" for long-term dollar-cost averaging (DCA). The top performers are "picks-and-shovels" plays. **Pump.fun**, a Solana-based meme coin launchpad, leads with $415.3M in monthly revenue, profiting from a 1.25% fee on token transactions. Despite market volatility, it has averaged tens of millions in monthly income in 2024. Perpetual DEX **Hyperliquid** stands out as a "bear market star," accumulating ~$352M in revenue over seven months. Its model funnels ~99% of fees into buying back and permanently burning its HYPE token. Established giants are also adapting. **Uniswap**, after enabling its fee switch, now earns protocol revenue (e.g., $5.6M recently), which is used to buy back and burn UNI, giving the token direct value accrual. Similarly, oracle provider **Chainlink** generates stable monthly revenue (~$4.57M recently) from its essential data, cross-chain, and automation services. Its new Payment Abstraction feature automatically converts service fees into LINK, accruing value in its treasury. The core thesis is clear: in a downturn, focus on projects with proven, resilient business models—those acting as essential infrastructure or capturing consistent transaction fees—rather than speculative narratives.

marsbit1h ago

Don't Speculate on 100x Coins, Just Bet on 'Cash Cows': Which Projects Are Worth Dollar-Cost Averaging in the Bear Market?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片