卡尔达诺(ADA)在阻力位下方盘整——势头正在增强吗

金色财经Published on 2025-09-04Last updated on 2025-09-04

文章来源:公众号佩佩梭哈

图片

卡尔达诺价格从0.9650美元区域开始新一轮下跌。ADA目前正在盘整,并在0.880美元和0.8980美元附近面临阻力。

  • ADA 价格开始跌破 0.920 美元支撑区。

  • 价格低于 0.90 美元和 100 小时简单移动平均线。

  • ADA/USD 对的小时图上,形成了一个关键的收缩三角形,阻力位在 0.8720 美元(数据来源于 Kraken)。

  • 如果突破 0.880 美元的阻力区,该货币对可能开始新一轮上涨。

卡尔达诺价格有望突破上行

卡尔达诺在稳步上涨后,在 0.9650 美元附近遭遇抛售,并开始像比特币和以太坊一样进行下行修正。ADA 跌破 0.920 美元和 0.900 美元的支撑位。

空头甚至将价格推低至 0.880 美元以下。价格在 0.830 美元形成低点,目前正在巩固跌幅。价格略微上涨,突破了近期下跌(从 0.9641 美元的波动高点跌至 0.830 美元的低点)的 23.6% 斐波那契回撤位。

卡尔达诺价格目前低于0.90美元和100小时简单移动平均线。ADA/USD货币对的小时图上,一个关键的收缩三角形正在形成,阻力位在0.8720美元。

上行方面,价格可能在 0.8720 美元附近面临阻力。首个阻力位在 0.880 美元附近。下一个关键阻力位可能是 0.8980 美元,或近期从 0.9641 美元波动高点跌至 0.830 美元低点的 50% 斐波那契回撤位。

卡尔达诺价格

如果收盘价突破0.8980美元的阻力位,价格可能开启强劲反弹。在这种情况下,价格可能上涨至0.9320美元区域。如果继续上涨,短期内可能跌向0.9650美元。

ADA 再次下滑?

如果卡尔达诺价格未能突破0.8980美元的阻力位,则可能开启新一轮下跌。下行方向的直接支撑位在0.850美元附近。

下一个主要支撑位在0.830美元附近。若跌破0.830美元,则可能开启下探0.8120美元的大门。下一个主要支撑位在0.80美元附近,多头可能在此出现。

技术指标

每小时 MACD – ADA/USD 的 MACD 在看跌区域失去动力。

每小时 RSI(相对强弱指数)——ADA/USD 的 RSI 目前低于 50 水平。

主要支撑位 - 0.8500 美元和 0.8300 美元。

主要阻力位 - 0.8800 美元和 0.8980 美元。

Related Reads

Bankless Co-founder: Why I Sold All My ETH

Author David Hoffman, founder of Bankless, explains his decision to sell all his ETH, despite being a prominent figure in the Ethereum ecosystem. He clarifies that his move is not a bearish take on Ethereum itself, which he remains highly optimistic about as a network. His core argument is that the "ETH is money" thesis, which he helped popularize, has largely played out. Hoffman argues that ETH has achieved the market valuation it deserves based on Ethereum's current success and competitive position. He details several reasons for this view. First, the path for ETH to become global money required nearly flawless execution and sustained dominance across Ethereum's entire technical and social stack—a coordination challenge he now believes had a narrower window for success than anticipated. Second, market data shows a strong correlation between L1 chain activity/fees and the price of its native asset; Ethereum's fee dominance has been challenged by competitors like Solana. Third, the "strong version" of crypto (decentralized, native crypto economies) that ETH's monetary thesis relied upon has struggled to maintain a positive mainstream narrative and stable adoption beyond a brief period. Finally, Ethereum's architecture as a "giver"—providing secure block space and tokenization capabilities at cost to L2s and applications—means it doesn't capture premium value directly. Its rollup-centric roadmap further directs most profits to L2s and applications ("fat app theory"). In conclusion, Hoffman believes the opportunity for ETH to be revalued significantly upward as money has diminished. He sold not because ETH will fail, but because its monetary thesis has matured, and he seeks to allocate capital to other opportunities he finds more compelling.

链捕手2h ago

Bankless Co-founder: Why I Sold All My ETH

链捕手2h ago

From Issuer to Infrastructure Owner: Circle's Arc Strategy and the Fatal Gap in the GENIUS Act

Circle raised $222 million for its proprietary Layer-1 blockchain, Arc, positioning itself not just as a stablecoin issuer but as the owner of the settlement infrastructure USDC relies on. This move, backed by investors like BlackRock and Apollo, highlights a significant structural conflict unaddressed by the GENIUS Act of 2025. While the act focuses on stablecoin reserves and issuer oversight, it remains silent on the market structure implications of an issuer controlling the underlying network—a scenario akin to a currency issuer also owning the payment rails. Traditionally, financial regulations separate issuers from settlement infrastructure to ensure neutrality. With Arc, Circle gains control over transaction ordering, fees, and network rules, potentially favoring USDC over competitors. The article argues that this creates a permanent structural temptation, even if no abuse occurs. The solution lies in applying established market infrastructure principles: mandating neutral transaction ordering, transparent fee schedules, and governance separated from Circle’s commercial interests. The current pre-mainnet phase offers a critical window for regulators to establish these rules before Arc becomes entrenched. Once operational, enforcing changes would be costly and disruptive. The core question remains: should a regulated stablecoin issuer be allowed to own the settlement network its competitors must use? The GENIUS Act doesn’t answer this, but Circle’s Arc strategy makes it urgent.

marsbit2h ago

From Issuer to Infrastructure Owner: Circle's Arc Strategy and the Fatal Gap in the GENIUS Act

marsbit2h ago

What Are the Key Variables Determining the AI Bull Market?

Title: What Determines the AI Bull Market? Key Variables Revealed Despite rising oil prices above $100/barrel, persistent inflation, and fragile Fed rate cut expectations—a traditionally hostile environment for high-valuation tech stocks—the AI sector continues to drive the market to new highs. According to analysts, the current AI boom is in a phase of "rational fervor": while bubbles exist, they are not yet out of control. The crucial shift is the emergence of Agentic AI, which is evolving from an assisting tool (Copilot) to an autonomous execution tool (Autopilot), creating a clearer commercial path from investment to revenue. This shift accelerates Token consumption and inference computing demand while boosting revenue forecasts for leading firms. The market is now rewarding capital expenditure as it transforms from a burden into a competitive moat, supporting hardware chains like GPUs, optical modules, and storage. However, valuations have already priced in growth expectations for 2027-2028. The forward P/E ratio for the "Magnificent Seven" tech giants is about 35x, compared to 25x for the rest of the S&P 500. This premium implies AI adoption must occur 5 to 8 times faster than past technological revolutions—a scenario with little room for error. The sustainability of the AI bull market hinges on three key variables: 1. **Short-term liquidity shocks**: Risks include sustained high oil prices, resurgent inflation, rising interest rates, and potential unwinding of the yen carry trade. The critical question is whether the upward revision speed of Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) can outpace the rise in interest rates. 2. **Mid-term industry realization**: Can the actual pace of AI adoption and commercialization match the current lofty valuations? Historically, general-purpose technology revolutions follow a non-linear path with periods of acceleration and deceleration. 3. **Long-term structural constraints**: These include energy and power grid limitations, employment displacement and consumer purchasing power, social acceptance and potential backlash, and potential hardware technology breakthroughs that could disrupt current supply chains. While the long-term prospects for AI remain optimistic with potential for significant productivity gains, the stock market's pricing depends not just on the vision but on the actual speed of realization amid these growing constraints. The direction is clear, but the pace of execution will determine whether the bubble remains controlled or spirals out of control.

marsbit2h ago

What Are the Key Variables Determining the AI Bull Market?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ADA (ADA) are presented below.

活动图片