卡尔达诺(ADA)回调空头会再次将其推低吗

金色财经Published on 2025-09-03Last updated on 2025-09-03

文章来源:公众号佩佩梭哈

图片

卡尔达诺价格从1.020美元区域开始下行修正。ADA目前显示出一些看跌迹象,可能跌向0.80美元。

  • ADA 价格在 0.920 美元支撑位下方开始下行修正。

  • 价格低于 0.90 美元和 100 小时简单移动平均线。

  • ADA/USD 对的小时图上,形成一条关键的看跌趋势线,阻力位在 0.940 美元(数据来源于 Kraken)。

  • 如果该货币对跌破 0.80 美元区域,则可能扩大跌幅。

卡尔达诺价格下跌

卡尔达诺在稳步上涨之后,在 1.00 美元上方遭遇卖家,并开始像比特币和以太坊一样再度下跌。ADA 交易价格跌破 0.950 美元和 0.920 美元的支撑位。

价格跌破了 0.90 美元的支撑位。空头将价格推低至 0.7650 美元低点至 1.020 美元高点的上行趋势的 50% 斐波那契回撤位以下。ADA/USD 货币对的小时图上也形成了一条关键的看跌趋势线,阻力位位于 0.940 美元。

卡尔达诺价格目前低于0.90美元和100小时简单移动平均线。上行方面,价格可能在0.880美元附近遭遇阻力。

卡尔达诺价格

第一个阻力位在0.8920美元附近。下一个关键阻力位可能是0.940美元。如果收盘价突破0.940美元的阻力位和趋势线,价格可能会开始强劲反弹。在这种情况下,价格可能会上涨至1.00美元区域。如果继续上涨,短期内可能将价格推向1.050美元。

ADA 损失更多?

如果卡尔达诺价格未能突破0.940美元的阻力位,则可能开启新一轮下跌。下行方向的直接支撑位在0.840美元附近。

下一个主要支撑位在 0.8250 美元附近,以及从 0.7650 美元波动低点到 1.020 美元高点的上行走势的 76.4% 斐波那契回撤位。跌破 0.8250 美元可能开启测试 0.80 美元的大门。下一个主要支撑位在 0.780 美元附近,多头可能在此出现。

技术指标

每小时 MACD – ADA/USD 的 MACD 在看跌区域内获得动力。

每小时 RSI(相对强弱指数)——ADA/USD 的 RSI 目前低于 50 水平。

主要支撑位 - 0.8400 美元和 0.8250 美元。

主要阻力位 - 0.9200 美元和 0.9400 美元。

Related Reads

Agentized OS: It's Not About AI, It's About the Foundation

The Agentic OS: Beyond AI, It's About the Foundational Stack In 2026, major operating systems like Android, iOS, HarmonyOS, and Windows are entering the "Agentic" era, integrating proactive AI assistants deeply into the system layer. However, the real competition lies not in the flashy AI features showcased at events, but in the three-layer foundational stack that enables them: the system-level AI Runtime, proprietary/controllable chips, and the on-device/cloud model matrix. The AI Runtime acts as the central scheduler, managing model inference, resource allocation, and exposing capabilities to apps. Controllable chips (e.g., Apple Silicon, Google Tensor, Huawei Kirin) are crucial for deep hardware-software co-optimization, determining the efficiency and experience limits of on-device Agents. The on-device/cloud model matrix provides the "intelligence," with proprietary, chip-optimized small models (like Gemini Nano, Apple's ~3B model) handling daily tasks locally for low latency, privacy, and reliability, while cloud models tackle complex requests. Deep synergy between these three layers enables key Agent differentiators: ultra-low latency and power efficiency, genuine "on-device first" privacy, access to system-level personal context across apps, and reliable performance as a system service even offline. OS vendors with strong integration across this stack (like Apple, Google, and Huawei) build a deeper moat. Beyond this core stack, long-term competitiveness depends on variables like structured App integration (e.g., App Intents/AppFunctions) for reliable multi-step workflows, and robust privacy frameworks that build user trust. This shift towards Agentic OS extends beyond phones and PCs to IoT, cars, and XR glasses via existing multi-device ecosystems. The race is won not in a keynote, but through generations of meticulously co-developed chips, models, and system software.

marsbit20m ago

Agentized OS: It's Not About AI, It's About the Foundation

marsbit20m ago

Why Sam Altman's 'Water and Electricity Theory' Sparks Copyright Controversy

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's recent statement that "intelligence will become a utility like electricity or water" has sparked significant controversy, primarily around copyright issues and the nature of AI development. While positioning AI as a utility serves as a compelling narrative for infrastructure investors, critics argue the analogy is flawed in three key areas. First, there's a fundamental "property gap." Traditional utilities like water and power create new, physical infrastructure from scratch. In contrast, major AI models are trained by reorganizing vast amounts of existing human-created content—books, articles, code, etc.—often scraped from the web without explicit permission or compensation to creators. This "free acquisition, paid resale" model is seen by many as ethically problematic. Second, there's a "pricing gap." True public utilities are typically regulated to ensure universal service with non-discriminatory, cost-plus pricing. AI's token-based pricing, however, involves significant price discrimination (e.g., output tokens costing much more than input tokens) and is designed for revenue maximization, not equitable access. Third, a "governance gap" exists. Utilities operate under public oversight, while AI pricing and development are currently controlled by a few private companies. Furthermore, the industry's own shift toward buying licensed training data (e.g., deals with Reddit or news publishers) undermines its previous legal reliance on "fair use" for freely scraped data. In conclusion, while AI is indeed becoming a foundational technology, calling it a public utility remains contentious. The title requires not just scale and a pay-per-use model, but also credible solutions for data provenance, equitable pricing, and public governance.

marsbit36m ago

Why Sam Altman's 'Water and Electricity Theory' Sparks Copyright Controversy

marsbit36m ago

From ZEC's Surge to Vitalik's Support: Will the Privacy Narrative Resurface?

From ZEC's surge to Vitalik's endorsement, is privacy making a comeback? The recent rally in ZEC has refocused attention on the crypto privacy sector. This resurgence stems from a growing market realization: while blockchain transparency builds trust, full exposure of user balances, trading strategies, and risk positions can become a vulnerability, especially for large traders and institutions on platforms like Hyperliquid. The privacy landscape has evolved beyond classic anonymity coins like ZEC, XMR, and DASH. It now encompasses privacy infrastructure projects such as Railgun (bringing privacy to DeFi) and Aztec (a privacy-focused L2), as well as newer entrants like Genius Terminal, SilentSwap, and 0xBow that emphasize transaction privacy while attempting to balance compliance. Industry trends confirm privacy is becoming integrated, not a niche feature. Perp DEX Aster has introduced a "Shield Mode," and Vitalik has discussed the need for native privacy at the Ethereum protocol level, including proposals like EIP-8182 for standardized private transfers. In conclusion, this revival is more than a simple sector rotation. It reflects a critical reassessment of transparency's limits. As on-chain finance matures, the challenge is finding a sustainable balance between necessary transparency for trust and essential privacy for protecting assets and strategies, making privacy a potential cornerstone of next-generation infrastructure.

marsbit46m ago

From ZEC's Surge to Vitalik's Support: Will the Privacy Narrative Resurface?

marsbit46m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ADA (ADA) are presented below.

活动图片