美联储主席大热人选沃勒:以太坊和稳定币是支付发展的下一步,机构应该采用

深潮Published on 2025-08-30Last updated on 2025-09-01

下一任美联储主席热门人选沃勒公开表达对数字资产(尤其是以太坊和稳定币)的乐观态度,敦促金融机构接受加密货币作为支付发展的自然下一步。

撰文:许超

来源:华尔街见闻

下一任美联储主席大热人选、美联储理事沃勒发表重要讲话,公开表达对数字资产(尤其是以太坊和稳定币)的乐观态度,称 GENIUS 法案进展积极。外界认为这为稳定币和以太坊等数字资产的机构采用提供了重要政策支撑。

当地时间本周四,美联储理事沃勒在 2025 年怀俄明州区块链研讨会上发表讲话。

沃勒称赞以太坊和稳定币是支付技术发展的自然下一步,称智能合约、代币化和分布式账本在日常使用中不会带来风险,敦促金融机构接受加密货币作为支付发展的自然下一步。

在监管方面,沃勒称 GENIUS 法案是「很好的开始」,并承诺将在推进过程中逐步解决存在的问题。

沃勒主张将以太坊和稳定币作为基础金融基础设施的立场与 2025 年通过的关键监管法案形成呼应。这一表态被市场解读为对加密货币重估的积极信号。

GENIUS 法案要求稳定币发行商持有 1:1 的高质量流动资产储备,而 CLARITY 法案则明确了数字商品的监管框架,为机构投资者消除了监管不确定性。

监管框架推动机构信心

GENIUS 法案于 2025 年 7 月生效,建立了美国首个稳定币联邦监管框架。

该法案要求稳定币发行商持有美国国债和现金等高质量流动资产作为 1:1 储备,并明确了 OCC 和 FDIC 等银行监管机构的监督职责。

为了配合 GENIUS 法案,众议院于 2025 年 7 月通过的 CLARITY 法案,进一步明确了 SEC 和 CFTC 的管辖边界。

该法案将比特币和以太坊等非稳定币资产归类为 CFTC 监管的「数字商品」,为资产管理公司和机构投资者消除了监管模糊性。

这一双重立法框架为机构采用创造了有利环境,推动了基于以太坊的代币化资产和 ETF 的快速增长。

监管明确性直接促进了机构对以太坊和稳定币的投资。

截至 2025 年第三季度,以太坊 ETF 资产管理规模达 276 亿美元,流入资金超过比特币 ETF。贝莱德的 ETHA ETF 在推出十天内就吸引了 100 亿美元资产管理规模。

企业资金也重新配置至以太坊领域,超过 64 家公司向质押和代币化现实世界资产投资 101 亿美元。

贝莱德的 BUIDL 平台和富兰克林邓普顿的 Progmat 等平台正利用以太坊基础设施提供资产分权所有权,将传统金融与区块链可编程性相结合。

以太坊的技术升级进一步增强了对机构投资者的吸引力。在以太坊完成 Pectra 和 Dencun 两次升级之后,以太坊的 gas 费(交易手续费)降低了 90%。

手续费下降直接降低了在以太坊上运行去中心化金融(DeFi)应用的成本,吸引了更多机构资金进入。DeFi 总锁仓价值(TVL)达到 2230 亿美元,巨额资金被投入到借贷、质押、流动性池等去中心化金融产品中。

以太坊在稳定币生态中的主导地位更加稳固,在以太坊上发行和流通的稳定币占据了全球市场 50% 的份额。

Related Reads

Morning News | Coinbase Partners with Standard Chartered to Expand Multi-Currency Fiat Channels; Sharplink and Forward to be Included in Russell Indices; JPMorgan May Issue Stablecoin in the Future

Daily Crypto Recap: Key Developments Institutional adoption continues: Coinbase partners with Standard Chartered to expand multi-currency fiat rails for institutions via Coinbase Prime, supporting AUD, SGD, CAD, CHF, EUR, and GBP. Meanwhile, Sharplink and Forward Industries, companies holding significant ETH and SOL reserves respectively, are set to be included in the Russell indexes, providing indirect crypto exposure to traditional index investors. Regulatory and compliance moves are in focus. Hong Kong's monetary authority announced new measures for investment accounts of mainland Chinese investors, including retroactive document checks to January 2023. Prediction market Polymarket is considering implementing KYC requirements to address sanctions and legal risks. Major financial players signal deeper involvement. JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon suggested the bank might issue a stablecoin in the future. Concurrently, Falcon Finance and Anchorage Digital launched fUSD, a compliant, institution-focused stablecoin. Market sentiment presents a mixed picture. Bitmine's Tom Lee predicts an incoming crypto "supercycle," driven by Wall Street tokenization and AI agents, with Ethereum as a key beneficiary. However, a prominent trader cautions that the current period of investor losses may not be long enough to confirm a bear market bottom, and TD Cowen analysts note diminished chances for U.S. crypto market structure legislation this year due to a worsening political climate. Other notable news includes a16z crypto's observation that most tokenized assets are merely "digitized" and not actively used in DeFi, South Korea's crypto trading volume falling to about 8% of KOSPI's, and the Chinese Supreme Court stating it will research judicial rules for virtual currency cases.

链捕手1h ago

Morning News | Coinbase Partners with Standard Chartered to Expand Multi-Currency Fiat Channels; Sharplink and Forward to be Included in Russell Indices; JPMorgan May Issue Stablecoin in the Future

链捕手1h ago

Sitting on a Trillion-Dollar Market, Why Hasn't Real Estate Tokenization Taken Off?

For years, real estate tokenization has been hailed as a breakthrough technology poised to democratize property investment. In theory, it promises fractional ownership of premium assets, rapid transactions, and enhanced liquidity. Yet, in practice, it has failed to gain traction, accounting for less than 0.1% of the global real estate market. The core issue is not a lack of tokens, but the absence of a robust legal, operational, and compliant framework that grants them credibility as financial instruments. The industry initially erred by prioritizing technology over investor needs, creating products with unclear ownership and unreliable liquidity. Key infrastructure remains missing: legally sound ownership structures, compliant transfer mechanisms, professional servicing, and interoperability with traditional finance. This regulatory ambiguity and operational complexity deter institutional investors, who already have access to established, well-governed investment channels. A mature model would feature low minimum investments in institutional-grade assets, transparent rental income distribution, and genuine liquidity through regulated secondary markets. While regulatory progress in regions like the UAE and growth in other tokenized asset sectors (like treasuries) are positive signs, the focus must shift from issuing tokens to building foundational systems. The investment proposition of tokenized real estate is not to create new returns, but to improve access, efficiency, and liquidity for existing income-generating properties. For mainstream adoption, the sector must demonstrate tangible economic advantages over traditional models, not just technical novelty. The next phase depends on proving scalable, compliant operations with auditable track records. The barrier is no longer technology, but infrastructure and regulation. The vision remains unfulfilled until this gap is bridged.

marsbit1h ago

Sitting on a Trillion-Dollar Market, Why Hasn't Real Estate Tokenization Taken Off?

marsbit1h ago

Large Language Models Ace All Exams, Yet Move Farther from AGI: What Does This Paper Reveal?

The article discusses the ongoing challenge of defining and achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). It notes that industry leaders have set vague, often profit- or time-based benchmarks for AGI, while the concept itself lacks a consensus definition—a situation the article compares to a "Rorschach test." It highlights a recent 2025 paper by researcher Michael Timothy Bennett, who proposes a new, measurable definition. Bennett frames AGI not as mimicking human performance on tests, which current large language models (LLMs) have already mastered, but as an "artificial scientist." A true AGI, according to this view, should be able to widely and efficiently adapt to new environments and tasks within real-world constraints (like computational and energy limits), focusing on the *discovery of new knowledge* rather than the replication of existing data. The author contrasts this with the current dominant approach of "scale-maxing"—massively scaling up data, parameters, and compute. While powerful, this method leads to models that fail on out-of-distribution problems and lack core intelligent abilities: they are passive learners, cannot reason causally, and cannot actively experiment or balance exploration with exploitation. The article argues that Bennett's framework offers a crucial shift. It makes AGI a quantifiable engineering problem and proposes new evaluation "adaptation benchmarks" that test an AI's ability to actively learn in novel scenarios. The conclusion is that achieving AGI will require a fundamental reset—a fusion of multiple methodologies beyond simple scaling, moving AI from mimicking patterns to embodying the scientific spirit of inquiry and discovery.

marsbit2h ago

Large Language Models Ace All Exams, Yet Move Farther from AGI: What Does This Paper Reveal?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片