Ethereum’s battle: Whale selling vs. shark buying – Who will win?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-08-19Last updated on 2025-08-19

Key Takeaways

Ethereum’s rising price follows a decline in active addresses. However, overall market activity suggests that a sharp fall is less likely, keeping the market between a neutral and bullish phase.


Ethereum [ETH] has made several bullish attempts in the past week, with the asset rallying close to its all-time high of $4,891.

The bullish momentum, however, has struggled to hold, as the asset continues to push lower, forming new lows, with a press-time value of $4,225.

Notably, AMBCrypto’s research shows that despite the declining price, there remains a high chance ETH bulls could retake control of the market and push for a continued rally.

Whales retreat, but sharks scoop up 4.4M ETH

Recent analysis of Alphractal reveals that whales are backing out as they sell their ETH holdings.

Whales are typically the largest holders of the asset, and their share of supply has been declining as they sell—a clear signal of selling pressure.

Ethereum holding by account size.Ethereum holding by account size.

Source: Alphractal

Historically, ETH’s correlation with Bitcoin showed that when whales sold Bitcoin, another group—sharks—accumulated the asset, which often sparked rallies.

These sharks hold between 10,000 and 100,000 ETH, and in this case they have been accumulating as whales step aside.

In the past five months, beginning in April, this group of investors has scooped up 4.4 million ETH from the market.

While sharks continue to accumulate, AMBCrypto also noted another trend in the market pointing toward bullishness. According to CryptoQuant, the Total Staked Ethereum has been steadily rising.

Eth Total Value StakedEth Total Value Staked

Source: CryptoQuant

A rise in staked assets signals a bullish sentiment in the market, as more investors commit to a long-term perspective. At present, the staked ETH supply has surged to 36 million ETH.

Rising reserves on exchanges spark caution

There has also been a rise in ETH reserves across crypto exchanges. At the time of writing, the amount of ETH on exchanges had reached 18.4 million.

The movement of assets into exchanges typically hints at looming selling pressure, since tokens are easier to liquidate once deposited on exchanges through spot trading.

Eth Spot Average Order Size chart.Eth Spot Average Order Size chart.

Source: CryptoQuant

However, analysis of spot trading activity shows that order sizes have remained normal based on Spot Average Order Size, suggesting there has not been a spike in either selling or buying for now.

Still, the dynamics of the market appear to tilt in favor of the bulls, particularly with the increase in staking activity.

Active address surge strengthens ETH’s bullish case

Analysis of Ethereum addresses—both senders and receivers—shows a steady rise.

A look at active address movement alongside ETH’s price, as seen in the chart, reveals that overall increases in activity have historically correlated with ETH price surges.

Eth Active Addresses chart.Eth Active Addresses chart.

Source: CryptoQuant

At present, addresses have seen a sharp spike in activity. If this upward trend continues, ETH’s price is likely to follow the same trajectory, supporting the case for a bullish recovery.

Share

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Opinion: AI Bubble Bursts, Bitcoin and Other Risky Assets Are the First to Be Impacted

BIS Warns AI Investment Boom Could Trigger Market Stress, Impacting Bitcoin First The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) warns that a potential bursting of the "AI bubble" could tighten liquidity and severely impact risk assets like Bitcoin in the near term. Major tech firms are projected to spend over $1 trillion on AI infrastructure in 2025-2026. The BIS cautions that if returns fail to meet expectations, a sudden withdrawal of financing could turn this investment boom into a prolonged bust, creating ripple effects across financial markets. While AI holds long-term economic promise, the current scale and speed of investment, coupled with intense competition and physical bottlenecks (e.g., semiconductors, power grids), mirror historical bubbles. The report highlights that the AI funding web—spanning corporate debt, private credit, and complex vendor agreements—makes systemic risks harder to see. A disappointment in AI adoption could transmit stress through this chain, widening credit spreads and pressuring weaker borrowers. For Bitcoin, the initial reaction to such a market shock would likely be defensive. As liquidity tightens, investors typically sell liquid assets first, and Bitcoin often trades in line with other risk assets during portfolio de-risking. Recent correlations, like Bitcoin's drop following a sharp decline in South Korea's stock market, support this view. However, the longer-term outcome for Bitcoin depends on the policy response. If an AI-driven credit crunch forces central banks to inject liquidity and ease policy eventually, it could reignite Bitcoin's narrative as a hedge against monetary debasement. Yet, traders betting on this outcome may first have to endure significant market volatility and potential price declines.

marsbit40m ago

Opinion: AI Bubble Bursts, Bitcoin and Other Risky Assets Are the First to Be Impacted

marsbit40m ago

South Korea Reaps Riches, America Turns Hostile

The US has filed a collective antitrust lawsuit in California against Samsung, SK Hynix, and US-based Micron, alleging they colluded to create a "RAMpocalypse" by slashing traditional DRAM production and raising prices 700% over four years amid the AI boom. This lawsuit targets the heart of the AI supply chain: High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), critical for Nvidia's GPUs. Currently, SK Hynix (57%), Samsung (22%), and Micron (21%) dominate global HBM production. The case highlights a deeper US concern: in the AI era, South Korea, through its HBM dominance, is capturing an estimated 35% of global AI profits, second only to the US (49%). SK Hynix's operating profit margin recently hit a record 72%. In response to the lawsuit, South Korea announced a massive $800 trillion won investment to build four new chip plants, doubling down on its strategic position. Analysts see the lawsuit not merely as a consumer price issue but as strategic pressure. It aims to support Micron's US manufacturing expansion (subsidized by the CHIPS Act) and secure America's share of AI profits by bringing more HBM production onshore. However, South Korea's rapid execution and massive cash flow from current HBM sales give it a significant speed advantage over US build-out timelines. The conflict underscores a fundamental shift: AI infrastructure like GPUs and HBM is becoming a new form of strategic national resource, akin to oil. While Nvidia and Korean memory giants are interdependent, the struggle over profit distribution and industrial sovereignty in this new landscape is just beginning. This lawsuit may be the first major skirmish in the AI resource wars.

marsbit53m ago

South Korea Reaps Riches, America Turns Hostile

marsbit53m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片