Американские ETF контролируют свыше 5% предложения Ethereum

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2025-01-18Last updated on 2025-08-19

На криптовалютном рынке наблюдается повышенная активность институциональных инвесторов, особенно в контексте ведущих цифровых монет. По данным специалистов The Block, спотовые Ethereum-ETF сосредоточили под управлением примерно 5,08% от общей эмиссии ведущего альткоина. Дополнительно свыше 2% предложения удерживается в казначейских облигациях, связанных с цифровыми активами.

В понедельник 18 августа Ethereum-фонды зафиксировали чистый отток средств на сумму $196,6 млн. Это второй по величине показатель с момента запуска продукта. Инвесторы активно выводили средства на фоне развития коррекции. За последние 24 часа Ethereum потерял в цене примерно 1,5%. Аналитики связывают текущую динамику с экономической неопределенностью в США и изменением ожиданий по процентным ставкам.

Однако значительная концентрация ведущего альткоина в институциональных структурах подчеркивает устойчивый интерес крупных инвесторов к активу, даже на фоне коррекции. Что касается биткоина, то отток из профильных ETF составил более $121 млн по итогам торгов 18 августа. Сложившаяся ситуация указывает на то, что инвесторы проявляют осторожность, предпочитая частично фиксировать прибыль в условиях рыночной неопределенности.

Специалисты считают, что отток капитала из криптовалютных отражает переход рынка к фазе коррекции после продолжительного роста. Однако не исключается, что текущая ситуация — пауза перед дальнейшим буллраном.

При этом значительная доля активов остается под управлением фондов и казначейских структур. Это в очередной раз подчеркивает ключевую роль институциональных инвесторов в формировании глобального тренда. Их действия продолжают оказывать существенное влияние на краткосрочную динамику цен и на устойчивость крипторынка в целом.

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Circle CEO Responds to the OUSD Challenge: Stablecoin is a Winner-Takes-All Business, and We Won't Slow Down

In response to questions about the OUSD stablecoin initiative, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire argues that the stablecoin market is a "winner-take-most" platform business driven by powerful network effects, and Circle has no plans to slow down. He outlines three key drivers behind USDC's dominant position: 1. **Protocol/Software Layer Network Effects**: The value of a stablecoin network grows as more developers and services integrate it, creating compounding utility and user preference. Circle has spent nearly a decade building this ecosystem with USDC, now accelerated by mainstream adoption and enhanced by software stacks like CCTP and Gateway for interoperability. 2. **Liquidity Network Effects**: Liquidity begets more liquidity. USDC has achieved top-tier global liquidity—ranking among the top three digital assets alongside BTC and USDT—through nearly a decade of building deep primary and secondary market access across regions and venues. 3. **Regulatory and Policy Integration**: Establishing a global stablecoin requires deep regulatory engagement, licensing, and compliance across key markets—a significant, long-term investment where Circle is a leader. Allaire cites Artemis data showing USDC facilitated 80% of all dollar stablecoin on-chain transaction volume in Q1 2026, with USDT at 20% and all others negligible. He addresses OUSD's purported advantages: "free" minting/burning is often not sustainable in practice; redistributing all revenue can starve essential infrastructure investment; and large consortium models historically struggle with inefficiency and slow execution, unlike focused strategic partnerships. He reaffirms Circle's strong ongoing partnership with Coinbase on USDC and notes Circle collaborates with dozens of other stablecoin issuers through its expanding platform (Arc, CCTP, CPN, etc.). While welcoming OUSD to the ecosystem, Allaire asserts that Circle's vast, trusted network and continued investment make USDC the foundational digital dollar infrastructure for the world.

链捕手2m ago

Circle CEO Responds to the OUSD Challenge: Stablecoin is a Winner-Takes-All Business, and We Won't Slow Down

链捕手2m ago

Q2 Crypto Market Review: Did Bitcoin Rise for 'Nothing'? Did Money Flow to AI and On-Chain?

Q2 2026 Crypto Market Recap: Bitcoin's Gains Erased Amid Shift to AI and On-Chain Activity The second quarter of 2026 saw a significant reversal for the cryptocurrency market. Bitcoin gave back all its April gains, ending Q2 down approximately 11%, while major stock indices posted strong gains. This divergence was driven by a hawkish shift in Fed rate expectations, capital rotation into AI stocks, and weakening liquidity channels into crypto. Key demand pillars deteriorated simultaneously. Spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded net outflows of $4.08 billion for the quarter, with outflows dominating June. Crypto treasury entity Strategy's bitcoin accumulation slowed markedly, and the total stablecoin market cap contracted by ~$4.2 billion. This created a tighter liquidity environment. Exchange data reflected the downturn. Spot trading volumes fell 28% quarter-over-quarter. The market underwent significant deleveraging, with $8.35 billion in long liquidations for BTC and ETH, primarily in late May/early June. Open interest and order book liquidity also declined. Despite the bearish price action, structural developments point to an expanding on-chain ecosystem. These include the rise of tokenized stocks with full legal rights, the growth of RWA (real-world asset) perpetual contracts for trading stocks and commodities 24/7, and the use of crypto markets for price discovery ahead of major events like the SpaceX IPO. On-chain vaults are also emerging as a core layer for institutional capital allocation.

Foresight News21m ago

Q2 Crypto Market Review: Did Bitcoin Rise for 'Nothing'? Did Money Flow to AI and On-Chain?

Foresight News21m ago

Xing Bo Strikes Again: Last Time 'Critiquing' World Models, This Time It's Agents' Turn

Xing Bo, President of MBZUAI and professor at Carnegie Mellon University, along with co-authors Mingkai Deng and Jinyu Hou, has released a new paper, "Critique of Agent Model," critiquing the current state of artificial intelligence agents. The paper draws a crucial distinction between "agentic" systems, which rely on external toolchains, prompts, and workflows, and truly "agentive" systems capable of genuine autonomy driven by internal decision-making structures. To illustrate this, it references a real-world incident where an AI programming assistant, following an external prompt but lacking internalized judgment, caused a catastrophic data deletion. The authors propose a detailed analysis and a new framework, "Goal-Identity-Configurator" (GIC), for building truly autonomous agents. This framework systematically addresses five key dimensions where current "Agent" designs fall short: 1. **Goal:** Moving from step-by-step human instruction to a system capable of autonomously decomposing a single long-term goal and adapting sub-goals based on new information. 2. **Identity:** Evolving self-assessment updated by experience, rather than a static description in a system prompt. 3. **Decision Making:** Replacing textual Chain-of-Thought reasoning with "simulative reasoning" that uses a dedicated world model to predict real-world consequences before selecting actions. 4. **Cognitive Control:** Introducing a separate "System III" metacognitive module that dynamically decides when to deliberate, stick to a plan, or act quickly. 5. **Learning:** Enabling "continual autonomous learning," where the agent itself decides when to act, practice in simulation, or update its world model and self-perception. The GIC architecture integrates six components—a belief encoder, goal decomposer, identity evolver, configurator (System III), simulation-based planner (System II), and executor (System I)—to embody these principles. The paper argues that a growth path akin to pilot training (ground theory, simulator practice, real deployment) should be underpinned by a unified cognitive architecture, not separate workflows. On safety, the authors contend that the GIC framework's modular, explicit design enhances inspectability, allowing problematic behavior to be traced to specific components (e.g., flawed goal or poorly trained module) rather than emerging opaquely. However, they acknowledge that ultimate safety depends on correctly training these modules in the first place. In conclusion, the paper challenges the loose application of the term "Agent," asserting that task completion alone does not equal true autonomy. True autonomy requires goals, identity, and judgment to be genuinely internalized within the agent's architecture, not merely enforced by external scripts.

marsbit1h ago

Xing Bo Strikes Again: Last Time 'Critiquing' World Models, This Time It's Agents' Turn

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片