文坛 Alt 季?- 加密货币总市值创历史新高,而 Altcoins 却落在后面

marsbitPublished on 2025-08-11Last updated on 2025-08-11

新高彰显了比特币的主导地位,而另类币正在等待时机。

根据 CoinMarketCap的数据,加密货币市场达到了一个新的里程碑,其总市值攀升至前所未有的 4.06 万亿美元。在过去 24 小时总市值增长 1.8% 的推动下,总市值超过了之前的峰值 4.04 万亿美元。同期,交易量飙升至 1,800 亿美元,凸显了整个数字资产领域重新燃起的热情。

加密货币总市值

虽然这一成就标志着市场从早些时候的低点强劲反弹,但备受期待的 "另类币季节 "尚未到来。

比特币的主导地位依然不可动摇

比特币仍是当前涨势中的领头羊,占比高达 59.8%。7 月 14 日,BTC 美元创下了 123,000 美元的历史新高,此后一直在 117k-122k 美元的区间内交易。加密货币的强劲表现推动了市场的大部分上涨走势,巩固了其作为情绪和流动性主要驱动力的地位。

加密货币总市值

历史上,在比特币快速上涨的时期之后都会出现另类币季节。随着比特币的稳定,投资者的关注点往往会转向其他数字资产,从而引发另类币行业的广泛反弹。然而,这种轮换尚未发生,这表明本轮周期发生了一些变化。

为什么另类币季节尚未到来

另类币季节是指另类加密货币在多个指标上表现优于比特币的时期。其典型特征是替代币的主导地位不断上升,价格涨幅快于比特币,投资者热情高涨,从而推动了高交易量。2021 年 5 月,前 100 种替代币的总市值达到了比特币的 130%,大大超过了目前的水平。这是此类现象的最新主要实例。

有几个因素可以解释为什么另类币尚未与比特币的涨势同步。本轮周期与以往周期的主要不同之处在于:ETF 的推出、上市公司(如 迈克尔-赛勒’的Strategy)的大量购买,甚至民族国家的积累,都对比特币产生了推动作用。

这些发展吸引了大量机构和散户资本投向比特币,巩固了比特币的主导地位。

与此同时,大部分链上活动和零售业的兴奋点都集中在梅姆币上,梅姆币占据了头条新闻和交易量的主导地位。pump.funletsBONK.fun等平台帮助将注意力和资金从传统的另类币上引开,减缓了它们的发展势头。因此,过去周期中出现的基础广泛的另类币反弹尚未实现。

根据CoinGecko最近的分析,另类币季节可能会在多个阶段展开。目前的阶段可能反映了他们所描述的第二阶段,即比特币的暴涨吸引了大量资金,随后人们越来越关注精选的高市值另类币,而不是整个另类币市场。

在这种情况下,以太坊、Solana 和其他大市值 Layer-1 代币等另类币可能会领跑,然后势头才会向下传导到较小的项目。这种轮动的时机和广度取决于市场情绪、比特币价格的稳定性以及引人注目的特定行业催化剂的出现。

关注转变的信号

尽管另类币没有反弹,但有迹象表明情况可能会发生变化。最近几天,比特币的主导地位出现了小幅下降,这在历史上是资本转向另类币的先兆。索拉纳等网络活动的增加,再加上去中心化应用的使用率不断提高,可能会催化下一阶段的市场。

投资者经常将以太坊相对于比特币的价格作为早期指标进行监控。以太坊的强劲表现往往先于其他币种市场的广泛涨势。同样,顶级另类币交易量的增加和中盘资产的强劲表现可能预示着另类币交易季的开始。

另一种可能是,另类币季节可能永远不会以与过去周期相同的方式展开。比特币当前运行的驱动因素,如 ETF 批准、公司财务和民族国家的积累,已经改变了市场结构。随着比特币在投机活动和投资者关注中占据主导地位,曾经推动替代币广泛上涨的条件可能已经被永久性地改变了。

未来几个月的展望

破纪录的总市值彰显了当前涨势的强劲以及比特币作为市场锚定的作用。然而,对于替代币爱好者来说,可能需要耐心等待。如果历史模式重演,在周期的下一阶段,资本可能会转向另类资产,从而引发期待已久的另类币季节。

目前,比特币是焦点。它的持续表现可能将决定未来任何另类币激增的时间和幅度。

Related Reads

Three Years Later: Looking Back on My 2023 Predictions for ChatGPT

Looking Back After Three Years: Revisiting My 2023 Predictions on ChatGPT In March 2023, shortly after ChatGPT's debut and before GPT-4's release, I made over twenty predictions about AI's future based on limited information and intuition. Now, in May 2026, I revisited those forecasts using an AI-driven analysis with 41 Opus 4.8 agents to cross-reference them with the latest data. The assessment used symbols: ✅ Correct, 🟢 Mostly Correct, 🟡 Partially Correct, ❌ Incorrect. Overall, the directional judgments held up well, with only one major factual error regarding GPT-4's rumored parameter size (incorrectly cited as 100T). However, nuances and degrees of accuracy revealed more. **What Was Largely Correct:** Predictions about mechanisms and directions proved accurate. The rise of RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) as the standard architecture for combating AI hallucination was confirmed, as was the transformative potential of LUI (Language User Interface) in creating a new industry layer atop GUIs. The emergence of "robot networks" (agent-to-agent communication protocols) and China's rapid catch-up in developing capable large models (closing the performance gap with top models to ~2.7%) were also on point. The analysis affirmed that LLMs lack consciousness and that the Turing Test merely measures perceived intelligence. **What Was Off Target:** Errors often involved specific numbers, over-optimistic timelines, or misjudged distributions. The prediction that value would primarily accrue to the application layer was half-right but missed NVIDIA's dominance as the profitable infrastructure layer. Forecasts about AI circumventing copyright issues and fostering a "global common ground" by averaging human viewpoints were incorrect; instead, major copyright settlements occurred and AI personalization is increasing. Estimates for model training costs ("$5-10 billion cap") were significantly off, underestimating frontier costs and overestimating replication costs. The notion that LLMs could never do complex math without tools was disproven by later models winning IMO gold. **Key Patterns from the Review:** 1. **Direction over precision:** Judgments about mechanisms and trends were more reliable than specific numbers or definitive statements. 2. **Timing bias:** There was a tendency to overestimate short-term speed but underestimate long-term magnitude and transformation. 3. **The distribution blind spot:** Aggregate-level correctness often masked uneven impacts (e.g., on young professionals' employment). 4. **The value of qualifiers:** Predictions framed with caution (e.g., "reportedly," "for now," "prototype in 2-3 years") aged better. 5. **Some debates continue:** Issues like the nature of "emergent abilities" or machine consciousness remain unresolved. This three-year review highlights that while seeing the big picture is crucial, humility regarding specifics, timelines, and disparate impacts is essential for future forecasting.

链捕手1h ago

Three Years Later: Looking Back on My 2023 Predictions for ChatGPT

链捕手1h ago

AI Bubble Warning: AI Investments Are Negative Returns for Most Tech Giants

The article issues a stark warning about a potential AI investment bubble. It notes that while the AI boom shares similarities with the TMT bubble of the late 1990s, its scale is vastly larger, currently driving 93% of U.S. GDP growth. Major hyperscale cloud providers like Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Oracle are planning to invest trillions in AI data centers over the coming years. However, calculations based on analyst projections for 2025-2030 reveal a concerning math problem: expected capital expenditure growth far outpaces projected revenue growth. Even under an extremely optimistic scenario of zero costs, the implied return on investment for most of these tech giants (except Amazon) is deeply negative. This suggests that the current trajectory could lead to one of history's largest shareholder value destruction events. The piece outlines two potential escapes: AI generating vastly more revenue than currently anticipated—a near-impossible task—or a significant cutback in the planned investment splurge. The latter scenario could trigger a domino effect, severely impacting the entire tech supply chain (from Nvidia to TSMC), potentially pushing the U.S. economy into recession, and causing a major stock market downturn. The author suggests upcoming high-profile IPOs by companies like OpenAI and Anthropic might represent a transfer of risk from early investors to public market participants. While the peak of the hype cycle might sustain investment through 2026, the fundamental financial dilemma remains unresolved, setting the stage for a potential market correction in 2027 or 2028, similar to the years following Alan Greenspan's "irrational exuberance" warning.

marsbit2h ago

AI Bubble Warning: AI Investments Are Negative Returns for Most Tech Giants

marsbit2h ago

From Tokens to Machine Labor: AI is Shifting from Tool to "Worker"

The article "From Token to Machine Labor: AI is Evolving from Tool to 'Worker'" argues that the business model for AI is shifting beyond simply selling computational resources (tokens, GPU hours) or model access. Instead, a new "machine labor market" is emerging, where the core economic transaction is the purchase of economically useful work directly performed by software. The central thesis is that AI pricing will evolve through four stages: 1) raw tokens, 2) standardized LLM capabilities (e.g., text generation), 3) industry-specific labor markets (e.g., legal review, radiology), and finally 4) a programmable results market where tasks like resolving a support ticket are bid on and priced based on outcome. In this future, buyers will care less about *which* model or GPU completes a task and more about whether the work meets specified standards for accuracy, latency, and cost. This transition reframes the impact of AI on human labor. Rather than simple replacement, it suggests a re-coordination where machines handle standardized, verifiable work, freeing humans for roles involving oversight, context management, responsibility, and final judgment. In some cases, this "last 1%" of human input becomes more valuable as it enables the other 99% to be automated. Furthermore, as AI reduces the cost of work, demand may expand, creating larger markets (e.g., 24/7 customer service) rather than just cheaper versions of existing ones. The article concludes that while infrastructure (GPUs, models, tokens) remains crucial upstream, the market is converging on a simpler, tradeable unit: machine labor that can be defined, measured, priced, and procured based on contractible specifications.

marsbit2h ago

From Tokens to Machine Labor: AI is Shifting from Tool to "Worker"

marsbit2h ago

Xiaomi MiMo's 99% Price Cut is Not Marketing! Luo Fuli Posts on X to Refute Critics

The price of Xiaomi's MiMo-V2.5 series API has been permanently reduced by up to 99%, specifically for the "Input (Cache Hit)" cost, which covers users re-reading historical context in long conversations. MiMo's head, Luo Fuli, published a detailed technical blog to clarify that this drastic price cut stems from genuine engineering breakthroughs, not a marketing stunt or a simple price war. The core of the achievement lies in six key engineering optimizations. First, the model architecture adopts a Hybrid Sliding Window Attention (SWA), reducing the memory footprint (KVCache) to 1/7th of a traditional model. Second, a dual-pool memory management system actually utilizes these savings, allowing a single GPU to handle over 5 times more concurrent users. Third, an upgraded prefix caching mechanism achieves a cache hit rate of 93-95% for repeated reads, meaning most such requests bypass GPU computation entirely. Fourth, a self-developed distributed cache (GCache) utilizes idle SSD space on existing GPU servers, eliminating additional storage costs. Fifth, an intelligent scheduling system (LLM-Router) efficiently routes requests to maximize cache reuse and performance. Sixth, Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) accelerates the model's text generation ("output") side. Together, these systemic optimizations dramatically lower the real computational cost per request, enabling the 99% price reduction for cached inputs while reportedly maintaining positive gross margins. Luo Fuli's disclosure aims to shift the narrative from "price war" to a demonstration of substantive AI engineering progress.

marsbit4h ago

Xiaomi MiMo's 99% Price Cut is Not Marketing! Luo Fuli Posts on X to Refute Critics

marsbit4h ago

$26 Billion: An 'All-Chinese Team' Backs the World's Highest-Valued AI Programming Company

Cognition AI, the company behind the AI programmer "Devin," has raised over $1 billion in new funding at a valuation of $26 billion, just eight months after reaching a $10.2 billion valuation. The round was led by Lux Capital, General Catalyst, and 8VC. Founded by three young Chinese entrepreneurs with strong competitive programming backgrounds, Cognition initially gained fame with Devin, marketed as the world's first AI software engineer capable of handling tasks from start to finish. While its early demos were impressive, real-world usage revealed reliability and cost-effectiveness issues, leading to a significant price cut for Devin in 2025. A pivotal moment came when Cognition acquired the assets of AI IDE company Windsurf after a failed acquisition by OpenAI. This move gave Cognition a crucial developer-facing tool, allowing it to pursue a two-pronged strategy: Devin for autonomous task execution and Windsurf for integrated, collaborative coding within an IDE. This shift helped the company move away from the controversial "AI replacement" narrative towards a model of augmenting human engineers, particularly for repetitive or maintenance tasks. This strategic pivot is backed by strong commercial metrics. The company reports a 10x increase in enterprise usage this year, with an annual revenue run-rate of $492 million and a 50% month-over-month growth in enterprise Devin usage over the past six months. Its client list now includes major corporations like Goldman Sachs and Mercedes-Benz, as well as government agencies like NASA and the U.S. Army. Investors are betting on Cognition becoming a foundational piece of next-generation software engineering infrastructure, positioning it at the center of a hybrid future where AI agents and human developers work in tandem.

marsbit4h ago

$26 Billion: An 'All-Chinese Team' Backs the World's Highest-Valued AI Programming Company

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy ALT

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing AltLayer (ALT) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy AltLayer (ALT) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your AltLayer (ALT)After purchasing your AltLayer (ALT), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade AltLayer (ALT)Easily trade AltLayer (ALT) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

4.4k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2025.03.21

How to Buy ALT

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ALT (ALT) are presented below.

活动图片