加密早报:美国债务总额首次突破 37 万亿美元,本周 APT、ARB、AVAX 等代币将迎来大额解锁

深潮Published on 2025-08-10Last updated on 2025-08-11

Trump 家族支持的World Liberty Financial拟筹建 15 亿美元加密资产公司。

作者:深潮 TechFlow

昨日市场动态

The Kobeissi Letter:美国债务总额首次突破 37 万亿美元

据 The Kobeissi Letter 披露,今日美国债务总额历史上首次正式突破 37 万亿美元,这使得自 7 月 4 日特朗普签署「美丽大法案」并提高债务上限以来,美国债务总额再度增加了 7800 亿美元,这相当于平均每天增加 220 亿美元。

仅上周,美国政府就通过 10 次出售操作抛出 7240 亿美元国债,美国债务危机比以往任何时候都更加严重。

Trump 家族支持的World Liberty Financial拟筹建15亿美元加密资产公司

据彭博社报道,World Liberty Financial正计划成立一家公开公司,用于持有其WLFI代币。知情人士透露,该项目目标募资约15亿美元,目前正与科技及加密货币行业的机构投资者进行磋商。该公司将加入数字资产财库公司阵营。

BlackRock 明确表态暂无计划推出XRP和SOL ETF

据The Block报道,全球最大资产管理公司BlackRock于8月9日明确表示,目前没有计划申请发行XRP或SOL ETF。此声明出现在Ripple与美国证券交易委员会(SEC)长达数年的诉讼终结之后。

尽管市场此前预期Ripple诉讼案的结束可能刺激大型机构申请XRP ETF,但BlackRock发言人向媒体确认将继续专注于现有的比特币和以太坊ETF业务。目前,包括ProShares、21Shares等多家机构已向SEC提交了XRP ETF申请。

香港金管局回应部分找换店仍“无牌”兑换泰达币:MSO牌照不在“任许提供者”范围

据财新网报道,在香港金钟、尖沙咀多家经营加密币业务的找换店走访发现,部分找换店已暂停USDT、USDC与法币的兑换,一些找换店甚至已闭店;但有一些找换店虽然不再“明码标价”为用户兑换有关稳定币,仍可私下询价交易。

香港金管局回应表示,制定《稳定币条例》的主要目的,是透过监管法币稳定币的发行和销售(即条例下的“要约提供”),以保障稳定币的持有人。香港找换店一般持有的是香港海关发出的金钱服务经营者(MSO)牌照,这类牌照不在“任许提供者”范围内。虚拟资产场外交易机构目前不属于《稳定币条例》下的“任许提供者”,因此不能向零售或专业投资者要约提供稳定币,且不论该稳定币是否受监管。个别虚拟资产场外交易机构的业务是否涉及要约提供稳定币,需视乎实际业务安排及情况而定,不能一概而论。

以太坊联创:资金管理公司或将在一年内推动 ETH 市值超越 BTC

以太坊联合创始人兼 Consensys 首席执行官 Joe Lubin 表示,“资金管理公司或将在一年内推动 ETH 市值超越 BTC。”

Bitwise高管:美国常春藤联盟正全力押注BTC,或将带来更多资金流入

针对哈佛大学和布朗大学披露持有BTC ETF仓位,Bitwise高级投资策略负责人Juan Leon在X平台发文表示,美国常春藤联盟正在全力押注BTC,哈佛大学和布朗大学的捐赠总额超过600亿美元,随着这两所高校增加加密货币配置,可能会带来更多资金流入。此外,作为美国头部大学机构,对加密货币的采用也释放了明确信号,让其他高校捐赠基金开始效仿采用同样的投资策略。

AI初创公司Periodic Labs 获2亿美元融资,a16z领投

据Techinasia报道,由前OpenAI研究副总裁Liam Fedus和前DeepMind研究科学家Ekin Dogus Cubuk创立的Periodic Labs完成2亿美元融资,投后估值达10亿美元。该公司专注于利用人工智能技术进行新材料研究与发现。本轮融资由Andreessen Horowitz领投,OpenAI预计也将参与。

Michael Saylor 再次发布比特币 Tracker 信息,或将于下周增持比特币

Strategy 执行主席 Michael Saylor 在 X 平台再次发布比特币 Tracker 相关信息,他写道:“如果您不停止购买比特币,您就不会停止赚钱。”

根据此前规律,Strategy 总是在相关消息发布之后的第二天披露增持比特币信息。

本周APT、ARB、AVAX等代币将迎来大额解锁

据Token Unlocks数据显示,APT、ARB、AVAX等代币将于下周迎来大额解锁,其中:

Aptos(APT)将于北京时间8月12日上午8点解锁约1131万枚代币,与现流通量的比例为2.20%,价值约5210万美元;

Arbitrum(ARB)将于北京时间8月16日晚上9点解锁约9265万枚代币,与现流通量的比例为2.04%,价值约4324万美元;

Avalanche(AVAX)将于北京时间8月15日上午8点解锁约167万枚代币,与现流通量的比例为0.51%,价值约3920万美元;

Sei(SEI)将于北京时间8月15日晚上8点解锁约5556万枚代币,与现流通量的比例为1.21%,价值约1790万美元;

Solayer(LAYER)将于北京时间8月11日晚上10点解锁约2702万枚代币,与现流通量的比例为9.51%,价值约1700万美元;

Starknet(STRK)将于北京时间8月15日上午8点解锁约1.27亿枚代币,与现流通量的比例为5.98%,价值约1680万美元;

io.net(IO)将于北京时间8月11日晚上8点解锁约1329万枚代币,与现流通量的比例为6.51%,价值约830万美元;

peaq(PEAQ)将于北京时间8月12日上午8点解锁约8484万枚代币,与现流通量的比例为7.03%,价值约560万美元;

BounceBit(BB)将于北京时间8月11日上午8点解锁约4290万枚代币,与现流通量的比例为6.36%,价值约540万美元。

行情动态

推荐阅读

@特朗普,华尔街大佬阿克曼如何用推特“遥控”白宫?

本文详细探讨了华尔街大佬比尔·阿克曼如何通过推特影响特朗普的政策决策,包括关税政策的转向及其他政商关系的变化。阿克曼利用社交媒体成功地在公开场合推动自己的政治和商业利益,展示了一个全新的政商互动模式。

对话华尔街神算子 Tom Lee:Bitmine 的股票拥有极高流动性,ETH 年底 1.5 万美金是合理价格

本文深入探讨了以太坊(ETH)作为宏观投资机会的潜力,重点介绍了以太坊储备公司 Bitmine 的战略目标、市场动态以及其对华尔街的影响。文章还分析了以太坊的价格趋势、与比特币的比较,以及其在区块链金融化和人工智能领域的角色。

链上巨无霸战争:谁将控制价值流向,成为 Web3 行业新寡头?

本文深入分析了聚合器在Web3和DeFi领域中的作用与发展策略,重点探讨了Jupiter和Hyperliquid两大平台在流动性管理、用户关系控制以及扩展策略上的差异。文章还详细阐述了聚合器的层级模型、飞轮效应以及并购对扩展市场覆盖的重要性。

Web3 项目如何在小红书整体投放?

本文讨论了Web3项目在小红书投放时,建议广泛投放腰部及以下的小众KOL,而非仅关注头部达人,以提升投放效果。小红书投放需结合财经类和股票交易市场达人,以找到与Web3用户重合度高的增量人群。

在币圈赚钱的人,未必会交易

本文探讨了在加密货币领域找到个人优势的重要性,以及如何通过专注和技能叠加在行业中脱颖而出。文章强调,不必局限于交易,而是要认清自己的天赋,并通过行动和学习不断提升价值。

Related Reads

Three Years Later: Looking Back at My Predictions About ChatGPT in 2023

Three Years Later: Revisiting My 2023 Predictions on ChatGPT In March 2023, shortly after ChatGPT's launch, I made 20 predictions about its future. Now, in mid-2026, I've used AI agents to fact-check each one against the latest data. Overall, most major directional forecasts were correct, with only one outright error (incorrectly stating GPT-4 had 100 trillion parameters). Key successes included predicting that RAG and retrieval architectures would become the standard for handling knowledge and hallucinations, that natural language interfaces (LUI) would create a massive new industry layer beyond the models themselves, and that China would develop viable large language models, significantly closing the performance gap with Western counterparts within about three years. Predictions about the absence of mass unemployment, the rise of a new "robot network" for agent communication, and ChatGPT not possessing consciousness also held true in their core arguments. However, the "devil was in the details." Errors frequently involved specific numbers, timelines, or overlooking distributional effects. I tended to overestimate the speed of adoption (e.g., for agent networks) while underestimating the ultimate scale of capabilities or costs (e.g., AI winning IMO gold without tools, or the extreme capital required for frontier models). Other misjudgments included: underestimating how AI would reinforce, not dissolve, information filter bubbles; incorrectly assuming AI-generated content would easily circumvent copyright (it has instead triggered record-breaking settlements); and misidentifying where value would be captured (it accrued overwhelmingly to the compute layer, like Nvidia, not just the application or model layers). Key lessons from reviewing these predictions are: 1) Directional and mechanistic insights are far more reliable than precise numbers or absolute statements. 2) There's a consistent bias to overestimate short-term speed but underestimate long-term magnitude. 3) Errors often lie in missing distributional impacts within a generally correct aggregate trend. 4) Predictions phrased with nuance and caveats aged the best. 5) Some fundamental debates (e.g., on machine consciousness or the ultimate value chain) remain unresolved even after three years. This exercise is less about scoring the past and more about establishing rules for clearer thinking about the next three years of AI.

marsbit1h ago

Three Years Later: Looking Back at My Predictions About ChatGPT in 2023

marsbit1h ago

Three Years Later: Looking Back on My 2023 Predictions for ChatGPT

Looking Back After Three Years: Revisiting My 2023 Predictions on ChatGPT In March 2023, shortly after ChatGPT's debut and before GPT-4's release, I made over twenty predictions about AI's future based on limited information and intuition. Now, in May 2026, I revisited those forecasts using an AI-driven analysis with 41 Opus 4.8 agents to cross-reference them with the latest data. The assessment used symbols: ✅ Correct, 🟢 Mostly Correct, 🟡 Partially Correct, ❌ Incorrect. Overall, the directional judgments held up well, with only one major factual error regarding GPT-4's rumored parameter size (incorrectly cited as 100T). However, nuances and degrees of accuracy revealed more. **What Was Largely Correct:** Predictions about mechanisms and directions proved accurate. The rise of RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) as the standard architecture for combating AI hallucination was confirmed, as was the transformative potential of LUI (Language User Interface) in creating a new industry layer atop GUIs. The emergence of "robot networks" (agent-to-agent communication protocols) and China's rapid catch-up in developing capable large models (closing the performance gap with top models to ~2.7%) were also on point. The analysis affirmed that LLMs lack consciousness and that the Turing Test merely measures perceived intelligence. **What Was Off Target:** Errors often involved specific numbers, over-optimistic timelines, or misjudged distributions. The prediction that value would primarily accrue to the application layer was half-right but missed NVIDIA's dominance as the profitable infrastructure layer. Forecasts about AI circumventing copyright issues and fostering a "global common ground" by averaging human viewpoints were incorrect; instead, major copyright settlements occurred and AI personalization is increasing. Estimates for model training costs ("$5-10 billion cap") were significantly off, underestimating frontier costs and overestimating replication costs. The notion that LLMs could never do complex math without tools was disproven by later models winning IMO gold. **Key Patterns from the Review:** 1. **Direction over precision:** Judgments about mechanisms and trends were more reliable than specific numbers or definitive statements. 2. **Timing bias:** There was a tendency to overestimate short-term speed but underestimate long-term magnitude and transformation. 3. **The distribution blind spot:** Aggregate-level correctness often masked uneven impacts (e.g., on young professionals' employment). 4. **The value of qualifiers:** Predictions framed with caution (e.g., "reportedly," "for now," "prototype in 2-3 years") aged better. 5. **Some debates continue:** Issues like the nature of "emergent abilities" or machine consciousness remain unresolved. This three-year review highlights that while seeing the big picture is crucial, humility regarding specifics, timelines, and disparate impacts is essential for future forecasting.

链捕手4h ago

Three Years Later: Looking Back on My 2023 Predictions for ChatGPT

链捕手4h ago

AI Bubble Warning: AI Investments Are Negative Returns for Most Tech Giants

The article issues a stark warning about a potential AI investment bubble. It notes that while the AI boom shares similarities with the TMT bubble of the late 1990s, its scale is vastly larger, currently driving 93% of U.S. GDP growth. Major hyperscale cloud providers like Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Oracle are planning to invest trillions in AI data centers over the coming years. However, calculations based on analyst projections for 2025-2030 reveal a concerning math problem: expected capital expenditure growth far outpaces projected revenue growth. Even under an extremely optimistic scenario of zero costs, the implied return on investment for most of these tech giants (except Amazon) is deeply negative. This suggests that the current trajectory could lead to one of history's largest shareholder value destruction events. The piece outlines two potential escapes: AI generating vastly more revenue than currently anticipated—a near-impossible task—or a significant cutback in the planned investment splurge. The latter scenario could trigger a domino effect, severely impacting the entire tech supply chain (from Nvidia to TSMC), potentially pushing the U.S. economy into recession, and causing a major stock market downturn. The author suggests upcoming high-profile IPOs by companies like OpenAI and Anthropic might represent a transfer of risk from early investors to public market participants. While the peak of the hype cycle might sustain investment through 2026, the fundamental financial dilemma remains unresolved, setting the stage for a potential market correction in 2027 or 2028, similar to the years following Alan Greenspan's "irrational exuberance" warning.

marsbit5h ago

AI Bubble Warning: AI Investments Are Negative Returns for Most Tech Giants

marsbit5h ago

From Tokens to Machine Labor: AI is Shifting from Tool to "Worker"

The article "From Token to Machine Labor: AI is Evolving from Tool to 'Worker'" argues that the business model for AI is shifting beyond simply selling computational resources (tokens, GPU hours) or model access. Instead, a new "machine labor market" is emerging, where the core economic transaction is the purchase of economically useful work directly performed by software. The central thesis is that AI pricing will evolve through four stages: 1) raw tokens, 2) standardized LLM capabilities (e.g., text generation), 3) industry-specific labor markets (e.g., legal review, radiology), and finally 4) a programmable results market where tasks like resolving a support ticket are bid on and priced based on outcome. In this future, buyers will care less about *which* model or GPU completes a task and more about whether the work meets specified standards for accuracy, latency, and cost. This transition reframes the impact of AI on human labor. Rather than simple replacement, it suggests a re-coordination where machines handle standardized, verifiable work, freeing humans for roles involving oversight, context management, responsibility, and final judgment. In some cases, this "last 1%" of human input becomes more valuable as it enables the other 99% to be automated. Furthermore, as AI reduces the cost of work, demand may expand, creating larger markets (e.g., 24/7 customer service) rather than just cheaper versions of existing ones. The article concludes that while infrastructure (GPUs, models, tokens) remains crucial upstream, the market is converging on a simpler, tradeable unit: machine labor that can be defined, measured, priced, and procured based on contractible specifications.

marsbit5h ago

From Tokens to Machine Labor: AI is Shifting from Tool to "Worker"

marsbit5h ago

Xiaomi MiMo's 99% Price Cut is Not Marketing! Luo Fuli Posts on X to Refute Critics

The price of Xiaomi's MiMo-V2.5 series API has been permanently reduced by up to 99%, specifically for the "Input (Cache Hit)" cost, which covers users re-reading historical context in long conversations. MiMo's head, Luo Fuli, published a detailed technical blog to clarify that this drastic price cut stems from genuine engineering breakthroughs, not a marketing stunt or a simple price war. The core of the achievement lies in six key engineering optimizations. First, the model architecture adopts a Hybrid Sliding Window Attention (SWA), reducing the memory footprint (KVCache) to 1/7th of a traditional model. Second, a dual-pool memory management system actually utilizes these savings, allowing a single GPU to handle over 5 times more concurrent users. Third, an upgraded prefix caching mechanism achieves a cache hit rate of 93-95% for repeated reads, meaning most such requests bypass GPU computation entirely. Fourth, a self-developed distributed cache (GCache) utilizes idle SSD space on existing GPU servers, eliminating additional storage costs. Fifth, an intelligent scheduling system (LLM-Router) efficiently routes requests to maximize cache reuse and performance. Sixth, Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) accelerates the model's text generation ("output") side. Together, these systemic optimizations dramatically lower the real computational cost per request, enabling the 99% price reduction for cached inputs while reportedly maintaining positive gross margins. Luo Fuli's disclosure aims to shift the narrative from "price war" to a demonstration of substantive AI engineering progress.

marsbit7h ago

Xiaomi MiMo's 99% Price Cut is Not Marketing! Luo Fuli Posts on X to Refute Critics

marsbit7h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy ARB

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Arbitrum (ARB) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Arbitrum (ARB) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Arbitrum (ARB)After purchasing your Arbitrum (ARB), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Arbitrum (ARB)Easily trade Arbitrum (ARB) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

5.5k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2025.03.21

How to Buy ARB

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ARB (ARB) are presented below.

活动图片