以太坊已“蓄势待发”,第一步先重回3800美元

Cointelegraph中文Published on 2025-07-30Last updated on 2025-07-30

Abstract

ETH持续表现强劲,未平仓合约创新高,网络活跃度攀升,多头预计即将迎来上行突破。

要点摘要:

以太坊未平仓合约自6月22日以来翻倍,创下580亿美元新高。

网络活跃度高、稳定币供应创新高,显示强劲需求。

交易者预计ETH突破4000美元后将创历史新高。

以太币价格在周二亚洲早盘一度跌至3700美元后,重新回升至3800美元。市场分析师指出多项关键数据,认为“ETH已蓄势待发”,有望刷新历史新高。

以太坊未平仓合约创历史新高

以太坊期货未平仓合约(OI)在周二达到580亿美元的历史新高。这显示市场参与度提升,新的资金正流入ETH期货市场。

该合约总额自6月22日以来已翻倍,过去两天增长10%。作为对比,三个月前的4月29日,OI为207.5亿美元,当时价格约1800美元。此外,2024年12月以太坊在4000美元附近交易时,ETH期货未平仓合约仅为315亿美元。

这一指标刚刚创新高,显示杠杆ETH头寸需求持续增长。

加密货币交易员Merlijn The Trader表示:“未平仓合约刚创新高,价格持续走高,杠杆正在累积。”他补充道:“分析师认为此次突破动能强劲,或为重要信号。”

Glassnode于周二在X发文指出,ETH未平仓合约占比也已“升至近40%”,为两年多以来最高。

网络活跃度“创新高”

根据Nansen数据,以太坊网络活跃度持续上升,过去30天活跃地址数增长7.2%。同期,月度交易笔数增长16%,达到4330万笔。

DefiLlama数据显示,以太坊去中心化交易所(DEX)周交易量达226亿美元,创下四个月新高。协议收入达8980万美元,创六个月新高。

稳定币供应也在周二达到历史新高1325亿美元,显示流动性和需求提升。

知名分析师Elja表示,以太坊网络活跃度已创新高。

“分析师认为,以太坊网络活跃度创新高,或将推动ETH价格创历史新高。”

分析师预计以太坊将迎来“延续性上涨”

据Cointelegraph Markets Pro和TradingView数据显示,ETH当前交易价格约为3,800美元,过去七天上涨了6%。

正如Cointelegraph报道所述,突破4,000美元是ETH上涨潜力的关键,并为可能冲击历史新高创造了条件。

“$ETH正在缓慢接近本周期高点。”Daan Crypto Trades在其发布于X平台的最新以太坊分析中指出。

该交易员所指的是4,000美元阻力位,自2024年2月以来,该阻力位多次令价格受阻。

Daan Crypto Trades进一步表示,由于本轮上涨已相当突然,因此ETH若能在该水平下方盘整,将更为“健康”。

“这样一来,后续上涨空间会更大。但无论如何,需密切关注4,000-4,100美元区间。”

据市场分析机构Bitcoinsensus表示,ETH“已准备好向上爆发”,当前走势展现出突破多年趋势线的强劲动能。

他们补充称:“如果动能充足,本轮突破有望在本周期后续阶段推动以太坊价格大幅上行。”

Related Reads

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Bitcoin prices declined 13% this week, reversing the recent rebound and signaling a likely transition into the later stages of a bear market. Key on-chain metrics deteriorated, with the short-term holder cost basis falling below the Realized Price—a pattern last seen in early 2022, characteristic of bear market maturity. The rally to ~$82k proved to be a bear market bounce, as evidenced by the 90-day realized profit/loss ratio failing to sustain above the bullish threshold of 2. Daily realized losses surged to $1.35B, including significant selling from long-term holders who accumulated near cycle tops, indicating ongoing supply redistribution. Price was rejected almost precisely at the aggregate US spot ETF cost basis of ~$83k, turning that level into resistance and leaving the average ETF investor underwater again. Spot market selling pressure intensified, with the 7-day volume delta turning significantly negative to its weakest level since February. While a major long liquidation event cleared over $400M in leverage, spot demand has not yet stepped in to absorb the resulting supply. Options markets continue pricing in higher future volatility (elevated volatility risk premium) and maintain a skew toward put options, reflecting persistent demand for downside protection, though not yet panic. Overall, market structure remains fragile. Sustained recovery likely requires a reclaim of the ETF cost basis, a shift back to positive spot demand, and a slowdown in realized loss-taking. Until then, the market risks further downside or extended consolidation within the broader bear trend.

Foresight News5m ago

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Foresight News5m ago

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Summary: This article explores the perceived "death spiral" risk between MicroStrategy (MSTR), its Bitcoin holdings, and its perpetual preferred stock (STRC), drawing comparisons to the LUNA-UST collapse. While both systems feature price anchors, high yields for holders, and potential feedback loops, their core mechanisms differ fundamentally. The MSTR-STRC structure relies on continuous financing to sustain its high dividend payouts, primarily through stock ATM offerings. A negative feedback cycle could occur: falling MSTR stock price makes raising equity capital harder, increasing pressure to sell Bitcoin, which undermines STRC confidence and further depresses MSTR. However, unlike LUNA-UST's automated, direct linkage, the MSTR-STRC loop is weaker and has brakes: STRC dividends can be deferred or rates lowered, and STRC holders have a $100/share liquidation preference in bankruptcy, providing a price floor. The company's sustainability hinges on its ability to continue financing. Its current ~$900 million USD reserves cover only about 6.3 months of its ~$1.71 billion annual interest/dividend burden. The next six months are critical, aligning with both the potential bottom in Bitcoin's four-year cycle and the depletion timeline of its reserves. While a LUNA-style catastrophic collapse is deemed highly unlikely due to structural differences, the key question is whether MicroStrategy can navigate this period through healthy deleveraging to restart its capital engine.

Foresight News23m ago

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Foresight News23m ago

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

MicroStrategy's Debt Risk: A Turning Point in the "Never Sell" Strategy As of June 3, 2026, MicroStrategy holds 843,706 bitcoins (valued at ~$53.1B) but faces significant financial obligations. Its capital structure includes $6.75B in convertible notes and $15.48B in perpetual preferred stock (led by the $8.5B STRC series), creating an annual payout burden of ~$1.71B. With software revenue at only ~$500M, interest and dividend obligations far exceed operating income. A critical shift occurred in late May 2026 when the company sold 32 bitcoins for ~$2.5M to cover dividends, breaking CEO Michael Saylor's long-standing "never sell" pledge. This symbolic move triggered a sharp decline in both Bitcoin's price and MSTR stock, reflecting market fears about cash flow sustainability. The core of the strain is the STRC perpetual preferred stock, designed as a "permanent loan" with no maturity date but requiring high monthly dividends (currently 11.5%). Its business model relies on a three-part cycle: issuing new STRC shares, using proceeds to buy more Bitcoin and fund a USD reserve, and using that reserve to pay dividends. This cycle depends on continuous investor demand for STRC and Bitcoin's price appreciation. Analysis shows Bitcoin needs to appreciate at least 2.3% annually to cover the $1.71B in yearly obligations at current holdings. With Bitcoin price down ~22% from March 2026 highs, this pressure has intensified. The company's $900M USD reserve can only cover about 7 months of payments if STRC issuance stalls. Key risks are not immediate bankruptcy or forced Bitcoin liquidation (as BTC is not collateral), but rather: 1) The erosion of MSTR's premium to its Bitcoin holdings (mNAV), which would cripple its ability to raise cheap capital; 2) A vicious cycle where stagnant Bitcoin prices reduce STRC demand, draining the USD reserve and forcing BTC sales, further depressing prices. The period from February 2027 to September 2028 is a crucial test, with over $5.9B in convertible notes facing put options or maturity. In essence, MicroStrategy has evolved from a simple Bitcoin holder into a complex financial entity acting like a "private Bitcoin bank," leveraging its BTC holdings to create layered financial products. Its survival depends on maintaining Bitcoin's price trend, its stock premium, and market appetite for its preferred shares. The recent token sale marks not a betrayal of its Bitcoin thesis, but an admission that the leveraged strategy must eventually be paid for.

marsbit34m ago

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

marsbit34m ago

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

Anthropic has published an article titled "When AI builds itself," discussing the emerging concept of "recursive self-improvement," where AI begins to actively participate in designing, training, testing, and optimizing its own subsequent versions. The company presents internal data showing that by May 2026, over 80% of code merged into its codebase was written by Claude, its AI model. Claude's capabilities have expanded to handling complex, open-ended engineering tasks, achieving a 76% success rate in such areas, and even contributing to research processes, such as optimizing code performance and conducting AI safety experiments. Anthropic outlines an evolution from human-driven development to AI-assisted workflows, culminating in the current stage where AI agents can autonomously write, run, and delegate code. The company cautions that the path toward a "closed loop," where AI continuously improves itself, is becoming visible. It calls for coordinated global mechanisms to potentially slow or pause frontier AI development to allow safety research and societal structures to catch up. However, the timing of this warning coincides with Anthropic's preparations for an IPO, framing the narrative not just as a safety concern but also as a demonstration of Claude's advanced capabilities and its integral role in accelerating Anthropic's own R&D—creating a potential "flywheel" effect for competitive advantage. This contrasts with OpenAI's recent, more policy-oriented discussion of the same risks, highlighting the competitive dynamics in the AI industry as companies position themselves in both the technological and regulatory landscape.

marsbit1h ago

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片