谁主加密沉浮?比特币8年霸主史再临

比推Published on 2025-07-28Last updated on 2025-07-28

作者:Coingecko

编译:Felix, PANews

原标题:纵览比特币市占率 12 年历史演变


该研究考察了 2013 年 4 月 29 日至 2025 年 7 月 22 日期间比特币的单日市占率,数据来源于 CoinGecko。

比特币市占率多年来是如何演变的?

从 2013 年到 2025 年的这 12 年间,比特币在加密市场的市占率波动幅度较大,在历史最低点 31.1% 和早期的最高点 99.1% 之间起伏。在此期间,比特币的日市占率有三分之二的时间都保持在 50.0% 或更高。换言之,在这 12 年中,比特币在加密市场占据主导地位的时间长达 8 年之久。

从年度来看,比特币的日均市占率连续五年下降,从 2013 年的 93.3%降至 2018 年的 44.6%。2019 年市占率反弹至 60.2%,2020 年为 62.7%,随后在 2021 年又降至 47.6%,2022 年为 39.3%。

自 2023 年以来,比特币的市占率再次稳步上升,2023 年的年平均值为 45.6%,2024 年为 51.9%,2025 年至今为 59.3%。这意味着 2025 年比特币的市占率目前徘徊在 12 年的日均值 62.5%左右。

比特币市占率目前徘徊在 12 年平均值 62.5% 附近

纵览比特币市占率12年历史演变

统计日期:2013 年 4 月 29 日至 2025 年 7 月 22 日

比特币市占率的关键水平

自 2016 年 2 月以来,比特币的市占率一直远低于 90%。这反映了 2017 年 ICO 热潮和首次山寨币牛市之后加密市场走向成熟的转折点,当时主流山寨币的数量增加,其市值也有所增长。

同样,在 2021 年 1 月 3 日勉强录得 70.7%之后,比特币的市占率有所下降,并一直在 70% 以下。这意味着在过去 12 年中,比特币的日均市占率只有三分之一的时间达到 70% 或更高。比特币的市占率是否会再次突破 70.0%这一门槛,还有待观察。

值得注意的是,在 2025 年 4 月 7 日,比特币的市占率上升至 60.5%,这是四年多来首次突破 60% 的门槛。比特币市占率上次超过这一门槛是在 2021 年 3 月 15 日,当时达到了 60.6%。在过去 12 年中,比特币的市占率低于 60.0% 的时间超过一半。

比特币市占率发展历史(2013 – 2025 年)

2013 年至 2025 年比特币市占率的年度平均值、最低值和最高值如下。

纵览比特币市占率12年历史演变

2013 年至 2016 年:比特币垄断加密市场

2013 年至 2016 年期间,比特币在加密市场占据市占率,其日均市占率在每年的 82.6% 至 93.3% 之间。在这一新兴时期,尽管比特币价格有所回调,且美国首次针对当时的比特币交易所 Mt. Gox 采取了重大监管行动,但比特币在加密领域的市占率仍于 2013 年 5 月 29 日达到了 99.1% 的峰值。

尽管比特币在加密市场中占据着绝大多数份额,但在此期间,比特币的市占率经历了三次最大的波动:

  • 2014 年 3 月 29 日,比特币的市占率较前一日下降了 10.9 个百分点,从 89.6%降至 78.7%。这发生在 Mt. Gox 崩溃之后,可归因于加密总市值的大幅上涨随后又得到修正。

  • 2015 年 1 月 15 日,比特币的市占率急剧下降了 16.2 个百分点,从 80.2%降至 64.0%。这一骤跌是由比特币价格从前一天的 221 美元跌至 172 美元所驱动,其标志着 Bitstamp 中心化交易所遭黑客攻击后的熊市底部。

  • 2015 年 1 月 16 日,比特币的市占率回升至 80.7%,较前一日上升了 16.7 个百分点,而比特币价格也回升至 211 美元。

2017 年至 2018 年:ICO 和山寨币盖过比特币的光芒

在接下来的两年里,比特币的市占率进一步下降,在 2017 年由 ICO 推动的山寨币牛市和 2018 年的熊市期间,比特币的市占率跌至新低,远低于 80% 和 70% 的门槛。2017 年 5 月 16 日,比特币首次低于 50%,达到 48.5%。值得注意的是,2018 年 1 月 16 日,比特币的市占率创下 31.1% 的历史新低,比特币价格从 14,412 美元暴跌至 11,724 美元。

在过去的 12 年里,比特币的市占率在 2017 年波动最大,年初时为 87.2%,到 6 月 19 日时缩减了一半多,降至 37.6%。在下半年,比特币的市占率曾短暂上升,随后又跌至 37.5% 的年度低点,之后在 12 月 7 日反弹至 66%,最终在年底收于 38.9%。

另一方面,2018 年比特币的市占率总体呈上升趋势,从年初的 37.4% 增长至年末的 52%。

2019 年至 2020 年:第三次减半之际比特币重新占据主导地位

2019 年和 2020 年,比特币重新夺回了加密市场的主导地位,其占比维持在 48.8% 至 72.5% 之间。这一时期比特币重新占据主导地位是由多种因素共同作用的结果:主要是对 2020 年 5 月第三次比特币减半的预期,以及在 ICO 热潮之后投资者重新回归优质资产,早期机构将比特币视为“数字黄金”的兴趣,还有比特币在 2020 年“ DeFi 之夏”中作为入金窗口的作用。

2021 年至 2022 年:山寨币重新彰显影响力

在 2021 年的牛市和 2022 年因疫情引发的崩盘期间,比特币的市占率持续下降了 30.9 个百分点,从 69.5%降至 38.6%。在这两年间,随着山寨币逐渐站稳脚跟并开始在加密市场发挥更大影响力,比特币的市占率不断下降。

在此期间,每 10 天中有 8 天,比特币在加密市场中所占份额低于 50%。也就是说,在 730 天中,有 624 天比特币的市占率低于 50.0%。

具体来说,在 2021 年,尽管比特币的价格从 29022 美元上涨至历史新高,并在年底收于 47192 美元,涨幅达 62.6%,但比特币的市占率仍从年初的 69.5% 下降到年底的 38.2%。相比之下,在同一时期,整个加密市场的总市值表现优于比特币,从 7764 亿美元飙升至 2.3 万亿美元,涨幅达 200.6%。

2022 年,比特币的市占率从 37.9% 开始,以 38.6% 结束,因为比特币价格下跌 64.2%,与整个加密市场 64.1% 的跌幅一致。换言之,比特币本身直接受到了 Terra-Luna 和 FTX 崩盘的影响,投资者纷纷转向法定货币以降低风险。

2023 年至 2025 年:比特币走向主流

在过去的三年里,比特币的市占率稳步上升,从 2023 年初的 38.4% 增长到 2025 年至今的 58.5%。比特币市占率的回升反映了加密市场的结构性转变,得益于 2024 年 1 月美国现货比特币 ETF 的获批以及 FTX 崩溃后监管环境的日益清晰,比特币获得了主流认可和机构采用。

值得注意的是,比特币的市占率变得越来越稳定,其变化幅度较小,在 -1.2 个百分点到 +1.6 个百分点之间。相比之下,在 2013 年至 2016 年期间,比特币的市占率波动范围为 -16.2 个百分点到 +16.7 个百分点;而在 2017 年至 2022 年期间,其波动范围为 -8.8 个百分点到 +7.0 个百分点。

说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点,不构成投资建议

Related Reads

U.S. Government Bans Foreign Nationals from Using Fable 5, Anthropic Issues Rebuttal

U.S. Government Bans Foreign Access to Fable 5, Anthropic Issues Rebuttal On June 12th, the U.S. government ordered AI company Anthropic to immediately suspend all foreign access—including foreign nationals within the U.S. and Anthropic's own foreign employees—to its newly released Fable 5 and Mythos 5 AI models, citing national security concerns. This forced Anthropic to temporarily disable access to both models for all users globally, as it cannot technically differentiate user nationality at scale. The models, released just three days prior, represent Anthropic's highest public capability tier. Fable 5 is the first publicly available model from the advanced "Mythos" family, while Mythos 5 is a less-restricted version for approved cybersecurity and critical infrastructure partners. The government's directive was reportedly triggered by claims from another company that it could "jailbreak" Mythos 5, raising alarm within the Trump administration. Anthropic, in a detailed public statement, strongly challenged this rationale. The company argues the demonstrated "jailbreak" is a narrow, non-generalized technique that merely involves identifying minor, known software vulnerabilities—a capability common to other publicly available models like OpenAI's GPT-5.5 and routinely used by cybersecurity defenders. Anthropic stated it has complied with the order but disagrees with the government's standard, warning that applying it industry-wide would halt all new frontier model deployments. The company criticized the lack of a transparent, fact-based legal process and expressed confidence the situation stems from a misunderstanding. It is working to restore access and will release more technical details within 24 hours. Other Anthropic models remain unaffected.

链捕手10m ago

U.S. Government Bans Foreign Nationals from Using Fable 5, Anthropic Issues Rebuttal

链捕手10m ago

The Revelation from the Raydium Theft Incident: New DeFi Vulnerabilities Lurking in Forgotten Old Contracts

**Raydium Exploit Reveals DeFi's Hidden Risk: Forgotten "Zombie" Contracts** A recent attack on Raydium's deprecated V3 AMM pools resulted in a loss of approximately $1.34 million. The hacker exploited pools that were no longer supported by Raydium's current UI or SDK but remained fully functional and accessible on-chain. This incident highlights a critical, often overlooked category of risk in DeFi: inactive or legacy smart contracts that projects fail to properly decommission. Since March 2025, there have been at least 8 publicly reported attacks targeting such abandoned contracts, with total losses around $10.8 million. Including older pools and deprecated features, the count rises to 10 incidents with roughly $22.5 million in losses. These "zombie contracts" represent a lifecycle management failure rather than a code vulnerability, yet they are typically misclassified under general "code bug" categories in security reports, masking the true scale of the problem. The root cause is that projects often merely document a contract as "deprecated" without taking essential technical steps to secure it: withdrawing remaining assets, disabling external call functions, and implementing ongoing monitoring. These forgotten, under-monitored components become prime targets for attackers. To address this, the industry needs to recognize "zombie contracts" as a distinct risk category and establish standardized decommissioning protocols. Essential steps should include: 1) a formal retirement announcement, 2) removal of all front-end integrations, 3) withdrawal of locked assets, 4) disabling key contract functions, 5) ongoing security monitoring, 6) clear user communication, and 7) a post-mortem analysis. The value of a DeFi project lies not only in its current TVL but also in the security of its historical codebase, which has now become a new attack surface.

Foresight News1h ago

The Revelation from the Raydium Theft Incident: New DeFi Vulnerabilities Lurking in Forgotten Old Contracts

Foresight News1h ago

Robots Begin to 'Consume Data': The Hidden Production Chain from Indian Data Factories to Billion-Dollar Humanoid Robots

Robots have started to 'consume data,' driving the formation of a new industrial supply chain focused on producing training data for embodied AI. Unlike large language models, which are trained on vast internet text corpora, embodied AI models face a 'data desert' in the physical world. This has created a massive demand for first-person perspective video data (Ego Data), captured by workers wearing cameras in places like Indian garment factories. Companies like Neocambrian AI are establishing 'data factories' where workers perform standardized tasks (e.g., sorting clothes, kitchen organization) to generate thousands of hours of video. Research, such as NVIDIA's EgoScale, demonstrates that scaling this human demonstration data predictably improves robot performance, particularly for dexterous manipulation. This has validated a training path combining large-scale human data for pre-training with smaller amounts of robot-specific data for fine-tuning. The value of different data types varies significantly, forming a 'data pyramid.' The base consists of low-cost, large-scale internet and Ego Data. Higher layers include more expensive motion-capture data (e.g., from data gloves), simulation/synthetic data, and the most costly and scarce layer: real robot teleoperation data. This demand has spawned a layered ecosystem of data suppliers: low-cost data factories, motion capture and alignment specialists, robot-native teleoperation service providers, simulation data companies, and platforms aiming for data standardization. Robot companies themselves are adopting a 'layered procurement' strategy: outsourcing generic Ego Data while building in-house capabilities for robot-specific adaptation data and the critical deployment/failure data generated in real-world applications. The industry is shifting focus from hardware and basic mobility to the data pipelines required for general-purpose capability. While parallels exist to data labeling companies like Scale AI in the LLM boom, the physical complexity of robot data—involving action success ambiguity and sim-to-real gaps—requires more integrated solutions for data collection, annotation, and a continuous feedback loop. The race is on to build the data engines that will teach robots to operate reliably in the unstructured real world.

marsbit4h ago

Robots Begin to 'Consume Data': The Hidden Production Chain from Indian Data Factories to Billion-Dollar Humanoid Robots

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片