以太坊单月暴涨70%的背后,究竟发生了什么?

Odaily星球日报Published on 2025-07-21Last updated on 2026-06-23

Abstract

推动加密货币上涨的核心逻辑将引发重大宏观经济变革,这正在重新定义金融市场的运作范式。

以太坊正在创造历史:

我们正在见证加密货币史上最大规模的空头挤压之一。自 7 月 1 日以来,以太坊市值暴涨 1500 亿美元——就在几天前,净空头头寸刚刚创下历史新高。

究竟发生了什么?本文为您解读。

以太坊单月暴涨70%的背后,究竟发生了什么?

请看下方图表:

据 Zerohedge 数据显示,进入七月时,以太坊的净杠杆空头仓位达到历史峰值。实际上,净空头敞口比 2025 年 2 月的水平高出约 25%。这直接导致以太坊在不到一个月内暴涨 70%。

但故事远未结束。

以太坊单月暴涨70%的背后,究竟发生了什么?

特朗普总统的 World Liberty Financial 机构一直在增持以太坊。最新交易记录显示,就在 24 小时前,该机构刚完成一笔 500 万美元的购入。这给本就猛烈的空头挤压烈火再添了一把柴。

值得注意的是,这些空头仓位多来自机构资本。

以太坊单月暴涨70%的背后,究竟发生了什么?

更耐人寻味的是:

Zerohedge 报告显示,在 7 月 1 日前 30 天内,贝莱德 ETF 有 29 天都在增持以太坊。但正如前文所述,由于杠杆空头敞口突然激增,价格反而持续走低。显然有"聪明钱"预判了这场风暴。

以太坊单月暴涨70%的背后,究竟发生了什么?

现在我们正目睹:数十亿美元的空头仓位被连环清算。如果以太坊再上涨 10%,将另有 10 亿美元空头仓位被清算。

此外,由于这些空头头寸大多带有杠杆,市场正面临更强劲的轧空压力。

以太坊可能很快触及 4000 美元。

以太坊单月暴涨70%的背后,究竟发生了什么?

我们在瑞波币(Ripple)上也观察到类似效应,比特币则持续展现相对强势。比特币正式重返 12 万美元关口,自 4 月低点以来市值已增加 9000 亿美元。在经历数月低迷后,以太坊和瑞波币终于开始追赶比特币的涨幅。

以太坊单月暴涨70%的背后,究竟发生了什么?

我们提前预判了这一趋势。以下是我们为高级会员提供的部分预警提示:我们在 8 万、 9 万、 10 万美元价位分批抄底,并精准预测 11.5 万美元目标位。上周我们将目标位上调至 12 万美元+,此刻这一目标刚刚达成。

以太坊单月暴涨70%的背后,究竟发生了什么?

更重要的是,市场正在消化今日 FT 发布的重磅报告。特朗普总统最快将于本周签署行政命令,允许 401k 养老金计划投资加密货币。这将成为加密史上最具里程碑意义的利好之一。

以太坊单月暴涨70%的背后,究竟发生了什么?

截至 2025 年第一季度,美国 401k 养老金规模高达 8.7 万亿美元。而当前加密货币总市值仅为 3.8 万亿美元。这意味着相当于整个加密市场 2.3 倍规模的资金即将获得入场通道。这具有划时代意义。

以太坊单月暴涨70%的背后,究竟发生了什么?

更重磅的是,美国众议院通过了三项重要的比特币与加密货币法案:《Clarity 法案》、《Genius 法案》、《反央行数字货币法案》(Anti-CBDC Act)。

加密货币行业的最大胜利在于获得了跨党派支持。拒绝接纳加密货币的候选人已无法赢得选举。

正如我们一直强调的:机构资本再也无法忽视加密货币。过去 13 年间,比特币年复合增长率高达+90%,表现碾压全球几乎所有资产。

我们持续收到机构投资者反馈,其资产管理规模(AUM)正逐步配置加密资产。

以太坊单月暴涨70%的背后,究竟发生了什么?

展望未来,推动加密货币上涨的核心逻辑将引发重大宏观经济变革。这正在重新定义金融市场的运作范式。

最后别忘了加密货币最强劲的牛市引擎——美国赤字支出危机。不仅比特币自 4 月以来上涨了 55% ,美元指数年内更是下跌了 10% 。美元已陷入永恒的熊市。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Mid-Year Review of U.S. Crypto Policy: CLARITY Gains Momentum for a Comeback, Who Will Lead the Second Half?

Mid-Point Review of U.S. Crypto Policy: CLARITY Act Gains Momentum, Who Will Lead the Second Half? The U.S. crypto industry is hopeful for a breakthrough as the Senate advances the CLARITY Act, but securing the necessary 60 votes requires bipartisan compromise. With only about 40 legislative days left, the path is tight. The policy agenda is crowded. Alongside CLARITY, multiple crypto tax proposals spun off from the new PARITY Act seek attachment to larger bills. The Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act aims to codify developer protections, and key rules under GENUIS remain under negotiation. The CFTC operates with four vacant commissioner seats, creating uncertainty. A major unresolved battle is over which regulator—state authorities, the CFTC, or the SEC—will gain jurisdiction over prediction markets. The sector also faces the impending departure of two key advocates: SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce and Senator Cynthia Lummis. Industry leaders provided cautious perspectives. Sara K. Weed doubts CLARITY will pass this Congress, expecting agencies like the SEC to provide guidance instead. Sulolit "Raj" Mukherjee believes targeted crypto tax provisions have a real chance if attached to must-pass year-end legislation. Rashan Colbert highlights the CFTC's recent efforts to build a regulatory framework for the growing prediction markets sector, warning against an overly broad "gambling" classification that could stifle innovation. The second half of the policy year has begun. The window for action is narrow, but opportunities remain. Sustained bipartisan engagement is crucial for achieving substantive results.

Foresight News4m ago

Mid-Year Review of U.S. Crypto Policy: CLARITY Gains Momentum for a Comeback, Who Will Lead the Second Half?

Foresight News4m ago

Will the STRC Issue Price Determined by ChatGPT Lead to a Death Spiral?

A "death spiral" concerns surround the "STRC" preferred shares from MicroStrategy, a financial instrument designed by CEO Michael Saylor with significant AI consultation to trade near a $100 face value. Since its July 2025 launch alongside a ~40% Bitcoin (BTC) decline, STRC has traded at a discount, hitting a low of $82.53 and pushing its effective dividend yield above 12.9%. The debate centers on whether STRC's structure—which relies on MicroStrategy issuing more shares to fund Bitcoin purchases and dividends—is sustainable or a "centralized Ponzi scheme," as economist Peter Schiff claims. Skepticism grew after Saylor revealed the product's design involved extensive AI dialogue to create a legally viable, monthly-dividend, price-stable preferred share—a novel concept. MicroStrategy's recent sale of 32 BTC to cover dividends, coupled with a sharp slowdown in its weekly Bitcoin buys (from billions to ~$100 million in June), has intensified fears. The "at-the-market" equity issuance, a key funding mechanism, is paused while STRC trades below par. This raises the "death spiral" risk: a lower STRC price triggers automatic dividend rate hikes, increasing cash obligations and potentially forcing more share sales or Bitcoin divestments. Bullish analysts like Jesse Myers argue the sell-off stems from leveraged positions unwinding, not fundamental failure, noting the company can cover dividends for decades if BTC appreciates modestly. The shift to semi-monthly dividends and the high yield at discounted prices may attract new buyers. Major AI models (ChatGPT, Grok, Claude) suggest a return to $100 is possible but conditional on restored market confidence, sustainable dividend coverage without asset sales, and a Bitcoin price recovery. The critical test arrives as new dividend rules take effect June 30, likely raising rates again with STRC below $95. The central question remains: Can MicroStrategy fulfill its obligations without selling Bitcoin, or will the mechanism accelerate its own decline?

marsbit10m ago

Will the STRC Issue Price Determined by ChatGPT Lead to a Death Spiral?

marsbit10m ago

Why Did NVIDIA's Bond Issue Go Unnoticed While SpaceX's Caused a Plunge?

The article analyzes the contrasting market reactions to recent bond issuances by SpaceX and NVIDIA. While NVIDIA's $25 billion bond offering was met with strong demand and seen as securing long-term capital for its already profitable AI business, SpaceX's move to raise at least $20 billion in bonds (primarily to refinance bridge loans) triggered a sell-off in its stock (SPCX). The key difference lies in the stage of cash flow validation for their respective core narratives. For NVIDIA, the AI boom is generating substantial, visible revenue and profits, making debt a tool to amplify a proven growth curve. For SpaceX, despite a strong cash position post-IPO and a revenue-generating business in Starlink, its valuation is heavily tied to future, capital-intensive projects like Starship, global satellite networks, and potential AI infrastructure. The bond issuance acted as a trigger, shifting market focus from SpaceX's long-term vision to the pressing question of whether Starlink's profits can fund these ambitious, unproven ventures before they generate their own returns. Thus, the market penalizes not the act of borrowing itself, but the perceived gap between high capital expenditure and the speed of cash flow realization. SpaceX's valuation recovery hinges on demonstrating that Starlink's profitability can outpace the burn rate of its futuristic projects or that those projects (like Starship achieving reliable, low-cost reusability) can soon transition from costly visions to commercial realities.

marsbit16m ago

Why Did NVIDIA's Bond Issue Go Unnoticed While SpaceX's Caused a Plunge?

marsbit16m ago

Will the STRC Issue Price Determined by ChatGPT Really Fall into a Death Spiral?

"Strategy's" (STRC) preferred share, a financial instrument designed by CEO Michael Saylor in consultation with AI to trade steadily at $100, faces mounting pressure. Since its July 2025 launch alongside a ~40% Bitcoin price drop, STRC has traded at a steep discount, hitting a low of $82.53. This discount pushes its effective dividend yield above 12.9%. The core debate revolves around whether STRC's structure is sustainable or a "centralized Ponzi scheme," as economist Peter Schiff claims. The mechanism relies on issuing new shares ("at-the-market" offerings) to fund Bitcoin purchases and dividend payments. However, the deep discount has paused these ATM offerings, slowing Bitcoin accumulation and forcing a minor sale of 32 BTC to cover obligations. Proponents, like The Smarter Web Company's Jesse Myers, argue the sell-off is a leveraged unwinding, not a fundamental failure. They note Strategy has ample resources to cover dividends for years if Bitcoin appreciates modestly. The deep discount also makes STRC attractive for yield-seeking buyers, as dividends are calculated on the $100 face value. The key test is whether Strategy can maintain dividends without sustained Bitcoin sales. A critical watchpoint is June 30th, when STRC switches to semi-monthly dividends. An automatic rule will likely raise the dividend rate further because the price remains below $95$, potentially creating a "death spiral": lower prices trigger higher yields, increasing the cash burden and forcing more dilution or asset sales. The question of whether this AI-designed "flywheel" is a stable instrument or a flawed accelerator will be answered by its price action and Strategy's funding choices in the coming months.

链捕手16m ago

Will the STRC Issue Price Determined by ChatGPT Really Fall into a Death Spiral?

链捕手16m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片