“华尔街神算子”宣布最新豪赌:将爆买以太坊!

金十数据Published on 2025-07-21Last updated on 2026-06-23

Abstract

他们押注的是以太坊的未来升值,而不是以资产净值获得敞口。

华尔街最著名的加密货币多头刚刚押下了他迄今为止最大的一笔赌注,而且赌的不是比特币。


有“华尔街神算子”之称的Fundstrat策略师Tom Lee已被任命为一家名不见经传的公司BitMine Immersion Technologies的董事长,该公司正将自己定位为“以太坊版的MicroStrategy”。


在最近一次的采访中,Lee阐述了为何以太坊可能成为下一个万亿美元的机会,同时他也为英伟达和特斯拉等人工智能领导者在市场中的集中度进行了辩护。他的见解为在当今这个以科技为主、人工智能驱动的市场中航行的投资者提供了一份路线图。


“以太坊再发现”


Lee对以太坊的热情,集中在他所谓的随着机构采用的加速而出现的“以太坊的再发现”,催化剂正是稳定币。


Lee将像Circle这样的公司开发的稳定币描述为“加密货币的ChatGPT时刻”,它正驱动着华尔街对在以太坊区块链上进行建设产生前所未有的兴趣。


数据支持了他的论点。目前,以太坊30%的网络使用量来自稳定币,摩根大通的稳定币和Robinhood的代币化业务都选择以太坊作为其基础。超过60%的代币化现实世界资产现在都建立在以太坊上,使其成为华尔街区块链基础设施的“首选”。


Lee引用了前财政部长耶伦的预测,即稳定币市场规模可能增长到超过2万亿美元,他认为这将是“以太坊和以太坊代币的指数级使用”。这种机构采用的故事,呼应了推动比特币价格暴涨的企业财资采用的叙事。


BitMine的2.5亿美元以太坊策略


通过BitMine Immersion Technologies,Lee正在执行一项大胆的资本市场策略。该公司最近完成了一项上市后私募投资(PIPE)交易,以每股约4.50美元的价格出售了5500万股,筹集了2.5亿美元。


Lee证实,这笔钱主要被用来购买以太坊,利用“任何存在的相对溢价,实际地使用资本市场来增加他们的以太坊持有量。


然而,投资者应理解其估值动态。随着PIPE交易使总流通股数达到至少6100万股——远高于通常报道的600万股——即使在较低的股价下,该公司的市值也达到了数十亿美元。这意味着投资者正在支付“你所购买的以太币价值的好几倍”,他们押注的是以太坊的未来升值,而不是以资产净值获得敞口。


为市场集中度辩护


Lee的市场观点超越了加密货币,延伸到了更广泛的人工智能革命。他在采访中辩称,像英伟达这样的公司——他称之为“比达芬奇的作品还稀缺”——理应享有其溢价估值。以约30倍的市盈率交易,英伟达的估值倍数“考虑到它们在人工智能生态系统中的重要性,并没有那么高。”


他对市场集中度的辩护,回应了投资者一个普遍的担忧:排名前10的公司占据了40%的市值,仅英伟达就占了近8%。Lee反驳说,这些公司也代表了“盈利增长的巨大份额”,特别是在标普500指数受益于处于“人工智能中心”地位的情况下。


他指出了一个反直觉的估值论点:尽管市场在过去五年里经历了“基本上六次黑天鹅事件”并在盈利方面蓬勃发展,但标普等权重指数的平均市盈率(约16倍)甚至低于新冠疫情前夜的17.9倍。Lee表示,像Palantir、英伟达和特斯拉这样能产生“持久、可持续的盈利增长”的公司,理应获得更高的估值倍数。


投资启示


Lee的双重论点——在为人工智能领导者辩护的同时大举押注以太坊——反映了机构投资者看待技术基础设施方式的更广泛转变。他认为包括Circle和其他加密货币在内的金融创新,为标普500指数贡献了显著的盈利增长,这表明加密货币的应用已超越投机性交易,成为一个合法的盈利驱动因素。


对投资者而言,Lee的策略提供了一个模板:识别那些将从大规模资本支出趋势中受益的基础设施投资标的,无论是用于人工智能计算的英伟达,还是用于金融代币化的以太坊。然而,他通过BitMine的操作也说明了,投资者为通过公开市场获得这些主题的敞口所支付的溢价。


对投资者来说,问题不在于这些大趋势是否会持续,而是在于从英伟达30倍的市盈率到BitMine对其以太坊持有量的显著溢价,当前的估值是已经反映了这些机会,还是仍然提供了增长空间。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Mid-Year Review of U.S. Crypto Policy: CLARITY Gains Momentum for a Comeback, Who Will Lead the Second Half?

Mid-Point Review of U.S. Crypto Policy: CLARITY Act Gains Momentum, Who Will Lead the Second Half? The U.S. crypto industry is hopeful for a breakthrough as the Senate advances the CLARITY Act, but securing the necessary 60 votes requires bipartisan compromise. With only about 40 legislative days left, the path is tight. The policy agenda is crowded. Alongside CLARITY, multiple crypto tax proposals spun off from the new PARITY Act seek attachment to larger bills. The Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act aims to codify developer protections, and key rules under GENUIS remain under negotiation. The CFTC operates with four vacant commissioner seats, creating uncertainty. A major unresolved battle is over which regulator—state authorities, the CFTC, or the SEC—will gain jurisdiction over prediction markets. The sector also faces the impending departure of two key advocates: SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce and Senator Cynthia Lummis. Industry leaders provided cautious perspectives. Sara K. Weed doubts CLARITY will pass this Congress, expecting agencies like the SEC to provide guidance instead. Sulolit "Raj" Mukherjee believes targeted crypto tax provisions have a real chance if attached to must-pass year-end legislation. Rashan Colbert highlights the CFTC's recent efforts to build a regulatory framework for the growing prediction markets sector, warning against an overly broad "gambling" classification that could stifle innovation. The second half of the policy year has begun. The window for action is narrow, but opportunities remain. Sustained bipartisan engagement is crucial for achieving substantive results.

Foresight News3m ago

Mid-Year Review of U.S. Crypto Policy: CLARITY Gains Momentum for a Comeback, Who Will Lead the Second Half?

Foresight News3m ago

Will the STRC Issue Price Determined by ChatGPT Lead to a Death Spiral?

A "death spiral" concerns surround the "STRC" preferred shares from MicroStrategy, a financial instrument designed by CEO Michael Saylor with significant AI consultation to trade near a $100 face value. Since its July 2025 launch alongside a ~40% Bitcoin (BTC) decline, STRC has traded at a discount, hitting a low of $82.53 and pushing its effective dividend yield above 12.9%. The debate centers on whether STRC's structure—which relies on MicroStrategy issuing more shares to fund Bitcoin purchases and dividends—is sustainable or a "centralized Ponzi scheme," as economist Peter Schiff claims. Skepticism grew after Saylor revealed the product's design involved extensive AI dialogue to create a legally viable, monthly-dividend, price-stable preferred share—a novel concept. MicroStrategy's recent sale of 32 BTC to cover dividends, coupled with a sharp slowdown in its weekly Bitcoin buys (from billions to ~$100 million in June), has intensified fears. The "at-the-market" equity issuance, a key funding mechanism, is paused while STRC trades below par. This raises the "death spiral" risk: a lower STRC price triggers automatic dividend rate hikes, increasing cash obligations and potentially forcing more share sales or Bitcoin divestments. Bullish analysts like Jesse Myers argue the sell-off stems from leveraged positions unwinding, not fundamental failure, noting the company can cover dividends for decades if BTC appreciates modestly. The shift to semi-monthly dividends and the high yield at discounted prices may attract new buyers. Major AI models (ChatGPT, Grok, Claude) suggest a return to $100 is possible but conditional on restored market confidence, sustainable dividend coverage without asset sales, and a Bitcoin price recovery. The critical test arrives as new dividend rules take effect June 30, likely raising rates again with STRC below $95. The central question remains: Can MicroStrategy fulfill its obligations without selling Bitcoin, or will the mechanism accelerate its own decline?

marsbit10m ago

Will the STRC Issue Price Determined by ChatGPT Lead to a Death Spiral?

marsbit10m ago

Why Did NVIDIA's Bond Issue Go Unnoticed While SpaceX's Caused a Plunge?

The article analyzes the contrasting market reactions to recent bond issuances by SpaceX and NVIDIA. While NVIDIA's $25 billion bond offering was met with strong demand and seen as securing long-term capital for its already profitable AI business, SpaceX's move to raise at least $20 billion in bonds (primarily to refinance bridge loans) triggered a sell-off in its stock (SPCX). The key difference lies in the stage of cash flow validation for their respective core narratives. For NVIDIA, the AI boom is generating substantial, visible revenue and profits, making debt a tool to amplify a proven growth curve. For SpaceX, despite a strong cash position post-IPO and a revenue-generating business in Starlink, its valuation is heavily tied to future, capital-intensive projects like Starship, global satellite networks, and potential AI infrastructure. The bond issuance acted as a trigger, shifting market focus from SpaceX's long-term vision to the pressing question of whether Starlink's profits can fund these ambitious, unproven ventures before they generate their own returns. Thus, the market penalizes not the act of borrowing itself, but the perceived gap between high capital expenditure and the speed of cash flow realization. SpaceX's valuation recovery hinges on demonstrating that Starlink's profitability can outpace the burn rate of its futuristic projects or that those projects (like Starship achieving reliable, low-cost reusability) can soon transition from costly visions to commercial realities.

marsbit15m ago

Why Did NVIDIA's Bond Issue Go Unnoticed While SpaceX's Caused a Plunge?

marsbit15m ago

Will the STRC Issue Price Determined by ChatGPT Really Fall into a Death Spiral?

"Strategy's" (STRC) preferred share, a financial instrument designed by CEO Michael Saylor in consultation with AI to trade steadily at $100, faces mounting pressure. Since its July 2025 launch alongside a ~40% Bitcoin price drop, STRC has traded at a steep discount, hitting a low of $82.53. This discount pushes its effective dividend yield above 12.9%. The core debate revolves around whether STRC's structure is sustainable or a "centralized Ponzi scheme," as economist Peter Schiff claims. The mechanism relies on issuing new shares ("at-the-market" offerings) to fund Bitcoin purchases and dividend payments. However, the deep discount has paused these ATM offerings, slowing Bitcoin accumulation and forcing a minor sale of 32 BTC to cover obligations. Proponents, like The Smarter Web Company's Jesse Myers, argue the sell-off is a leveraged unwinding, not a fundamental failure. They note Strategy has ample resources to cover dividends for years if Bitcoin appreciates modestly. The deep discount also makes STRC attractive for yield-seeking buyers, as dividends are calculated on the $100 face value. The key test is whether Strategy can maintain dividends without sustained Bitcoin sales. A critical watchpoint is June 30th, when STRC switches to semi-monthly dividends. An automatic rule will likely raise the dividend rate further because the price remains below $95$, potentially creating a "death spiral": lower prices trigger higher yields, increasing the cash burden and forcing more dilution or asset sales. The question of whether this AI-designed "flywheel" is a stable instrument or a flawed accelerator will be answered by its price action and Strategy's funding choices in the coming months.

链捕手15m ago

Will the STRC Issue Price Determined by ChatGPT Really Fall into a Death Spiral?

链捕手15m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片