索拉纳(SOL)期货资金费率转负,有望冲击180美元?

Cointelegraph中文Published on 2025-07-09Last updated on 2025-07-09

Abstract

区块链竞争对手和机构投资者的近期决策正在削弱Solana的市场份额。这会影响SOL的价格吗?

关键要点:

  • SOL的永续期货资金费率转为负值,突显出交易者信心不足。
  • 尽管基本面强劲,机构投资者因MEV问题继续回避Solana。
  • Solana的原生代币SOL自5月底以来未能达到180美元水平,这让交易者对2025年是否还能出现牛市产生怀疑。对SOL杠杆多头头寸的需求急剧下降,负面影响了市场情绪。

周一(7月7日),SOL永续期货资金费率转为负值,表明空头(卖出)头寸需求更高。鉴于加密货币交易者通常对价格走势持乐观态度,这种转变相对罕见,表明看涨投资者普遍缺乏信心。

Solana面临日益激烈的L2竞争

一些分析师认为,SOL的竞争优势已被以太坊二层生态系统的快速扩张所削弱。其他人则强调Solana更为集成的用户体验仍然是其优势。尽管SOL在memecoin热潮后有所下滑,但新的用例已经出现。

目前Solana最大的去中心化应用(DApp)Jito持有1792万枚SOL的总锁定价值(TVL),自一月以来增长了12%。通过提供最大可提取价值(MEV)优化的质押和集成的去中心化金融服务,Jito展示了Solana继续创新,并不依赖于代币发行平台。

Solana还拥有66.5%的质押率,这意味着在交易所上可供出售的SOL代币较少。相比之下,少于30%的以太坊(ETH)在以太坊上被质押,而Cardano的ADA质押率为58%。SOL当前年化质押收益率为7.3%,为代币持有者提供了强烈的质押激励。

Solana的第二季度收入超过以太坊和Tron

根据SolanaFloor在X上的一篇帖子,索拉纳连续第三个季度在网络收入方面领先所有区块链。

在2025年第二季度,Solana创造了2.718亿美元的收入,据报道比Tron高出64%,是以太坊1.291亿美元的两倍多。Solana的主导地位也体现在其DApp活动中,用户在30天内支付了4.6亿美元的费用。这反映了一个健康的生态系统,并激励开发者在该平台上构建。

尽管关于交易失败和高活动集中度的批评不断,这些都是有意的设计决策结果,代表了优化的机会而非结构性弱点。如果仅仅是机器人活动在推高交易量,那么6月份支付的6260万美元网络费用就没有多少理由。

据报道,Robinhood的CEO Vlad Tenet表示,由于MEV问题,构建在Solana上被放弃,并补充说他们希望“完全控制验证者”。X用户Conduit的forrestnorwood指出,Coinbase和Robinhood都“选择了最大控制,偏好于他们自己的L2上的交易排序保证。”

如果这些说法属实,且主要机构继续绕过Solana,这可能会限制SOL的上涨空间。这些担忧有助于解释对杠杆看涨SOL头寸兴趣的减退,并最终与以太坊通过极低的数据费用激励rollup的策略有关。

SOL持有者面临的关键问题是,以太坊是否最终会放弃其掠夺性定价模式,并被迫在平等的基础上竞争。目前,SOL重回180美元水平的可能性仍然很小。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手45m ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手45m ago

a16z: In the AI Era, Company Competition for Talent Starts with Job Title Naming

The article discusses how companies in the AI era are competing for talent through strategic "title arbitrage," or the renaming of key roles to reflect and attract new, high-value capabilities. It uses Palantir's creation of the "Forward-Deployed Engineer" (FDE) as a prime example. This title reframed client-facing technical work from a peripheral "implementation" role into a core, high-status engineering function. The move was strategic, allowing Palantir to attract talent that blended technical skill with business acumen and to dominate the market's perception of this capability. The piece argues that job titles are an organizational language that signals the value and authority of certain work. Effective new titles, like "Data Scientist" or "Site Reliability Engineer," emerge when a role's strategic importance genuinely outgrows its old name. Conversely, mere title inflation without substantive change is ineffective. For AI companies, particularly in B2B, this is a crucial strategy. AI transformation creates new high-leverage roles (e.g., "Legal Engineer," "GTM Engineer") that combine domain expertise with technical automation. By naming these roles, a company can help clients internally legitimize these change-makers. This, in turn, builds market mindshare, associating the company with the new capability. In conclusion, as AI blurs the lines between product and service, the ability to accurately name and organize the critical, client-adjacent work that defines product learning will be a key competitive advantage. The first to define this new organizational language plants a flag in the market's mind.

marsbit2h ago

a16z: In the AI Era, Company Competition for Talent Starts with Job Title Naming

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片