半年营收过亿,解析 Solana 链上机器人黑马 Axiom

比推Published on 2025-07-08Last updated on 2025-07-08

Axiom,这家主打自动交易机器人的平台,仅用 5 个月时间就实现了超过 1.5 亿美元的手续费收入。

据@TheOneandOmsy分析称,Axiom成为 Y Combinator(YC)历史上最快实现 1 亿美元收入的公司,打破了 2023 年 AI 编程工具 Cursor 创下的 12 个月纪录。

image.png


Axiom 没有大肆宣传、没有知名背书,其创始人在 X(原推特)上极少发文,却在没有发币的情况下收获了超 65 万用户和 150 亿美元的交易量。它是如何做到的?

收入、份额双爆发

根据 DefiLlama 数据,截至 7 月 7 日,Axiom 单日手续费收入达 189 万美元,超过了当日Solana 主网自身的费用收入,进入全网 DeFi 协议前十。

截屏2025-07-08 下午2.59.04.png

Dune Analytics 显示,Axiom 占据了 Solana Bot 交易总量的 72%,而在 2 月初,该比例仅为 2%。

这意味着短短数月内,它甩掉了 Photon、BullX等竞争对手,其中,Photon 自 2024 年 1 月上线以来累计收入超 4 亿美元;BullX 自 2024 年 4 月上线,累计收入约 2 亿美元;而 Axiom 自 2025 年 2 月上线,仅半年便达 1.5 亿美元+。

截屏2025-07-08 下午3.01.27.png

    规则机制拆解:高返佣 + 空投积分,打造用户增长飞轮

    Axiom 并不是传统意义上的抢币打狗工具。其平台以自动化交易为核心,构建了强粘性的激励结构,根据其官方说明文档,规则机制主要为:

    1. 手续费结构

    每笔交易收取 0.75% – 1% 的手续费;

    用户按交易量获得手续费返现,返还比例可达 30%;

    所有返现以 SOL 实时到账,按周/实时计算。

    2. 邀请返佣制度

    推荐他人注册,可获得对方交易手续费的分成;

    一级推荐:返 10%;二级推荐:返 3%;三级推荐:返 2%;

    被推荐人也可获得手续费折扣(最多 10%)。

    3. 积分系统(Points)

    每完成一笔交易、邀请一个用户、完成一次任务,都会积累 XP;

    XP 将决定用户在未来可能的空投份额与额外福利(如测试权限、费率提升);

    当前阶段 XP 无法交易,但页面已明确注明“将作为未来福利标准”;

    积分与钱包绑定,链上可查,防止作弊刷号。

    这套规则使得平台形成了一种 “交易-返现-邀请-积分-空投预期” 的闭环,极具裂变效应。即使没有显性 Token,也能调动用户积极性和忠诚度。

    产品结构清晰,用户体验对标 Robinhood

    Axiom 的成功,很大程度上得益于产品本身的结构化和高效:

    • 交易机器人(Bots):支持 memecoin 抢跑、套利、自动挂单,适配 pump.fun 等平台;

    • 永续合约(Perps):通过集成 Hyperliquid,实现 BTC、SOL、ETH 等杠杆交易;

    • 钱包和 X 数据跟踪:可订阅指定地址与 KOL 动向,抢占交易先机;

    • 非托管安全设计:所有交易通过用户钱包发起,避免资产被平台控制;

    • 交易返现与积分激励:用户可获得最高达 30% 的手续费返还,完成任务与邀请还可累计积分,换取未来空投资格。

    这套产品体系,既满足了散户“抢热度”的诉求,又能吸引量化用户批量挂单做策略,满足高频用户的实用需求。

      据社区 KOL @DefiIgnas 统计,Axiom 注册用户中有大量活跃钱包反复交易,部分用户疑似存在刷量行为博取积分,但不可否认的是,它的增长确实扎实,@DefiIgnas表示:“我错过了 $HYPE 空投,这次不能错过 $AXIOM。”

      这也是为何即便市场部分怀疑 Axiom 是否存在部分刷量或营销数据泡沫,它依旧是当前 Solana 上最有交易粘性的工具类产品之一

      Solana 的 Robinhood,还是又一个短周期现象?

      Axiom 当前的营收模型中,大量交易用户是出于空投预期而非纯粹使用价值,这种结构的最大隐患在于:

      • 一旦未能如预期发放 Token 或空投价值偏低,活跃用户或将大幅流失;

      • 在无牌照的情况下提供杠杆交易、收益工具,可能被监管机构盯上;

      • 当前手续费返现比例较高,若未来下调,用户活跃度可能快速回落。

      但反过来说,Axiom 如果能顺利完成 Token 上线,并扩展至以太坊、Base 等其他主流链,其“自动交易+收益工具”的平台能力,也许真能走出 DeFi 的 Robinhood 模式。

      Axiom 并非一时昙花。它踩中了 memecoin 热点、Solana 交易繁荣和自动化策略普及三重趋势,就目前而言,Axiom 是 Solana 上最赚钱的自动交易平台,也极有可能是下一个改变链上交易方式的“加密 Robinhood”。它能否穿越激励红利期,构建真正可持续的长期生态,还需要时间检验。但从当前的产品完成度、交易数据与用户口碑来看,Axiom 已成为 2025 年 Solana 上最重要的交易基础设施之一。


      Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

      比推 TG 交流群:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

      比推 TG 订阅: https://t.me/bitpush

      说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点,不构成投资建议

      Trending Cryptos

      Related Reads

      The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

      This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

      marsbit43m ago

      The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

      marsbit43m ago

      The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

      This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

      链捕手2h ago

      The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

      链捕手2h ago

      Trading

      Spot
      Futures

      Hot Articles

      Discussions

      Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

      活动图片