加密行业又到低谷期了吗,我们该如何面对?

Foresight NewsPublished on 2025-06-30Last updated on 2025-06-30

Abstract

现在整个加密圈面临着和 2018 年或者 2022 年类似的低谷期,不仅仅是因为价格问题,还因为人们对这个行业的怀疑和动摇。

撰文:区块链骑士

最近浏览各大社交媒体,看到了不少关于批评或者嘲讽目前加密行业现状的评述,其中不乏一些在这个行业获得了「功名利禄」之人,笔者暂不去评述对错。

但站在一个从业者角度来看,大可不必因为目前行业处于又一低谷期而站在制高点当圣人一般谩骂,或许他们忘记了——如果不是这个行业的存在和发展,他们不会有今天的成就,正所谓不忘初心大致就是表达此意。

借着这些调侃,笔者想和大家聊聊当前加密行业面临的挑战和机遇。

当然,在此之前我们不得不承认一个现状:现在整个加密圈面临着和 2018 年或者 2022 年类似的低谷期,不仅仅是因为价格问题,还因为人们对这个行业的怀疑和动摇。

如果说过去 2 年是希望之年,那么到了现在大部分人已经对这种希望嗤之以鼻,而很大程度上是因为大家期待已久的「山寨季」并未到来,加之行业似乎在过去 2 年中并未沉淀什么新的叙事,或者一些新叙事成为了炮灰,所以两者叠加,成为了压在参与者头上的大山。

但真正击垮行业的可能还不是来自于行业本身,还有一个外在因素——最近几年 AI 的发展实在迅猛,抢夺了大部分投资者的视野,加密行业也不例外,过去一年笔者了解到有不少从业者转身去了 AI 圈,尤其是开发者,而这成为了压死骆驼的最后一根稻草。

时至今日,当山寨季消失踪影,当「毫无新叙事」的评述涌现,又当 AI 疯狂抢占市场,留给加密圈的只剩从业者的一声声叹息。

对了,还有最近风生水起的「币股」赛道,直接名正言顺的抢夺了最后一点流动性。

所以,面对这些主观或客观的问题汇聚成河,摆在加密圈面前的便是又一低谷期,但正言道,没有低谷,何来高潮?那么这个行业当下或未来的机会又在哪里?

首先关于山寨季问题,我们且不去预测到底还有没有如 2017 或者 2021 一般疯狂的山寨季,但如果只是看价格和倍数,其实过去 2 年依然有不少造富神话。

只是不再是大水漫灌的「全军出击」,仅仅是部分或者某些板块的起舞,但依然对得起具备某些认知的参与者,所以这种趋势很大概率会继续延续,需要我们调整心态和预期。

类比互联网时期,像亚马逊在互联网泡沫破灭之时,股价跌了 90%,而在随后的 20 年里,又上涨了 600 多倍,也是当时高峰期的 40 多倍,那么找到加密行业的亚马逊成为了行业的一种新机遇。

其次,关于新叙事,看看最近火热的稳定币,不管是西方还是东方,大家都在谈论,而在前不久举办的上海陆家嘴论坛上,央行行长潘功胜首次提到了稳定币,可见一斑,同时周末新华网也罕见发文介绍了稳定币。

如果说稳定币只是一个行业的小应用,那可低估了其影响力,笔者以为它的成功出圈,不亚于当年支付宝的推出,解决了在线支付安全问题,才有了后来电商和各种线上交易活动的发展,或许 10 年后回看,原来改变就在那一年发生。

同时,稳定币的繁荣会极大扩展加密圈的用户,也才能真正打开市场,如此才能带来大家期待已久的新用户和迎来行业的「iPhone 时刻」,但目前还只是起步,可能还需要 1-2 年沉淀。

最后关于 AI,笔者多年前便一直觉得区块链并不是完全用来服务于人的技术,很大程度上它会是 AI 的原生工具,解决机器之间的信息传递和机器与人之间的真实互动,目前看来这一方向正在应验。

随着 Agent 的发展,如何保证机器之间的通信安全可靠,且能被人类验证,除了借助区块链,似乎并无他法,除非我们希望未来的 Agent 不受掌控,脱离于现实之外。

而目前这个方向对区块链来说也还非常早期,当然,这里说的 Agent 结合区块链并不是今年 1 月爆炒的那种,大部分炒炒就算了,别当真。

所以,当一些改变已经发生,或者悄然临近之时,我们能做不是抗拒,而是欣然接受,并顺应潮流。

不过,笔者以为谩骂并不是一种顺应,而是无法接受的挣扎,表达完情绪后我们依然要向前,因为理性始终会战胜感性,而加密行业不会一直处于低谷期,何不再次迎风而上?

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Standard Chartered Bank’s 50-Fold Fantasy: Predicting AAVE to Reach $3,500

Standard Chartered Bank has issued an optimistic research report predicting that the AAVE token could surge 50-fold to $3,500 by 2030. This forecast is based on the projection that the total value locked (TVL) in DeFi will grow 37x to approximately $2.7 trillion, driven by stablecoin expansion and the tokenization of real-world assets (RWA). The bank's model links Aave's potential valuation directly to its protocol revenue, which is primarily driven by net interest margins. The report highlights Aave's current dominant position, noting it captures over 80% of the net earnings ("protocol retained earnings") in the lending sector while holding only about half of its TVL. It also points to the recent launch of the Aave V4 architecture and a healthy revenue stream of $142 million in 2025 as positive fundamentals. Grayscale's separate analysis, applying traditional valuation metrics like DCF, concluded AAVE is currently undervalued. However, the article notes significant challenges. Aave's peer-to-pool lending model suffers from inherent capital inefficiency, with an estimated $52 million annual "deadweight loss" due to idle funds needed for liquidity buffers. This structural flaw was exposed during the April KelpDAO exploit, which locked a WETH pool at 100% utilization for days. Emerging protocols like Morpho, with more efficient point-to-point models, are cited as growing competitive threats. In summary, while institutional forecasts paint a macro picture of massive growth fueled by RWA adoption, Aave's path forward hinges on addressing its core structural limitations and competitive pressures within the evolving DeFi lending landscape.

链捕手47m ago

Standard Chartered Bank’s 50-Fold Fantasy: Predicting AAVE to Reach $3,500

链捕手47m ago

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

Tidal Investment remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market narrative has changed. While recent large-scale IPOs (e.g., SpaceX) and major fundraising plans by tech giants like Alphabet and Meta have caused some nervousness, this isn't a sign of an AI peak. The focus has moved from the initial question of AI's viability to the sustainability of massive investment cycles. The key players—primarily the major cloud providers—are not slowing down; their capital expenditure (Capex) guidance for 2026 has been increased across the board (e.g., Alphabet to $180B, Amazon to $200B). This investment cycle is proving resilient and difficult to stop. Unlike traditional hardware cycles, current AI Capex is distributed across multiple physical layers—computing, memory, networking, and critically, power infrastructure. Bottlenecks are shifting from chips to elements like electricity, transformers, and cooling systems, which have much longer lead times and cannot be easily pre-built like fiber optics during the dot-com bubble. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's 240% YoY data center orders) confirms this broad-based, project-driven expansion. Market concerns are acknowledged but viewed differently. First, while Capex growth currently outpaces revenue growth, raising ROI questions, this mirrors the early scaling phase of cloud computing itself. A change in view would require concrete signals like downward Capex revisions or missed AI product targets, which haven't materialized by mid-2026. Second, comparisons to the 2000 dot-com bust are flawed. That crash was driven by a massive, parallel oversupply of cheap capacity (fiber). The current cycle faces *supply constraints* in critical, capital-intensive physical infrastructure that cannot be overbuilt as easily. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the next, more complex act of the AI story. Physical bottlenecks and sustained high Capex plans suggest this is not the finale but an ongoing, capital-intensive build-out phase. The script has changed, but the play is far from over.

marsbit1h ago

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

marsbit1h ago

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But for Different Reasons Now

Tidal Investments remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market is concerned about massive concurrent fundraising by tech giants like SpaceX, OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta, fearing an AI peak. However, the authors argue this signals the next act of AI development, not its end. Capital expenditure (Capex) from major cloud providers (Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, Oracle) continues to surge aggressively into 2026. This investment cycle is more resilient than past hardware cycles due to its scale and complexity. Bottlenecks have shifted from chips to critical physical infrastructure like power grids, transformers, cooling, and data center construction—areas with long lead times and limited capacity for rapid expansion. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's orders) confirms substantial, tangible progress. Key market concerns are addressed: 1. **ROI vs. Capex Growth**: While Capex growth outpaces revenue, the authors note cloud giants have historically overcome similar phases through scale. The cycle will only be in danger if Capex guidance is cut, orders are canceled, or AI product demand falters—none of which are currently observed. 2. **Comparison to the 2000 Dot-com Bubble**: Unlike the telecom bubble, where cheap, oversupplied fiber crashed prices, AI infrastructure (especially power) is constrained, customized, and subject to lengthy approvals, making a similar supply glut and crash unlikely. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the immense, ongoing capital needs for AI's next phase, constrained by slow-moving physical bottlenecks. The AI cycle is not over; the script has simply changed.

链捕手1h ago

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But for Different Reasons Now

链捕手1h ago

Grayscale: These 15 Profitable Crypto Protocols Are Severely Undervalued

Grayscale Research identifies 15 top-revenue crypto protocols trading at significant valuation discounts, with many at single-digit or even 1x revenue multiples. Protocols like Pump.fun, PancakeSwap, and Meteora have market capitalizations roughly equal to their annual revenue. The report argues these financially-focused protocols (DEXs, lending, staking) are fundamentally undervalued and could benefit from the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, expected as soon as next month. This legislation aims to clarify digital asset regulation, potentially reducing institutional barriers and driving on-chain activity. The analysis breaks down the protocols into three groups: the "1x Club" (market cap ≈ revenue), mid-tier protocols with 3-9x multiples (e.g., Aave, Lido, Jupiter), and high-multiple protocols like Hyperliquid (15x) and Uniswap (37x), where valuation reflects future potential rather than current cash flows. Grayscale applies a traditional DCF model to Aave, suggesting a one-year price target of ~$175, representing ~130% upside from current levels. The report notes a risk-off macro environment since the Iran conflict has further compressed valuations, creating a potential entry window. The conclusion highlights that while the valuation data presents an intriguing opportunity, the investment thesis is contingent on the CLARITY Act's passage and subsequent institutional capital flows. Investors are cautioned to consider Grayscale's inherent conflict of interest as a crypto asset manager with products tied to these assets.

marsbit2h ago

Grayscale: These 15 Profitable Crypto Protocols Are Severely Undervalued

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片