Polkadot рассматривает возможность покупки Bitcoin за 500,000 DOT

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2024-03-13Last updated on 2025-06-13

В то время как правительства и крупные корпорации спешат добавить биткоин (BTC) в свои балансы, сообщество Polkadot изучает свой собственный стратегический резерв, внедряя децентрализованные протоколы.

Новое предложение на форумах по управлению Polkadot обсуждается предложение конвертировать 500 000 DOT в tBTC, привязанный к биткоину токен на Ethereum, в течение года.

Идея заключается в создании резерва в BTC, который, по мнению сторонников, укрепит позиции Polkadot и диверсифицирует активы компании.

Аргументы «за» создание BTC-резерва

  • Диверсификация активов: Инвестирование части баланса Polkadot в Bitcoin, рассматриваемый многими как «цифровое золото», позволит снизить риски, связанные с волатильностью рынка криптовалют.
  • Укрепление позиций Polkadot: Наличие BTC-резерва может повысить доверие к Polkadot со стороны инвесторов и партнеров, демонстрируя финансовую устойчивость и дальновидность.
  • Инвестиция в «самый сильный актив»: Сторонники инициативы считают Bitcoin наиболее перспективным активом последнего десятилетия, способным принести значительную прибыль в долгосрочной перспективе.
  • Привлечение внимания: Такой шаг может привлечь внимание к Polkadot со стороны Bitcoin-сообщества и новых инвесторов.

Возможные риски и контраргументы

Несмотря на потенциальные преимущества, предложение вызывает и опасения:

  • Волатильность Bitcoin: Курс Bitcoin подвержен значительным колебаниям, что может привести к убыткам для Polkadot.
  • Упущенная выгода от DOT: Продажа DOT может лишить Polkadot потенциальной прибыли от роста стоимости собственного токена.
  • Централизация: Критики опасаются, что создание крупного BTC-резерва может привести к большей централизации управления активами Polkadot.
  • Альтернативные стратегии: Существуют и другие способы диверсификации активов и укрепления позиций Polkadot, которые могут быть более эффективными и менее рискованными.

От DOT к tBTC — по одному блоку за раз

План предусматривает использование системы Hydration для конвертации DOT в tBTC посредством повторяющихся покупок.

В отличие от традиционных настроек DCA, функция обновления Hydration автоматизирует процесс: пользователи просто пополняют счет прокси-сервера, и система самостоятельно обновляет расписание DCA.

Согласно этому предложению, небольшая сумма — 0,005 tBTC — будет добавлена ​​в Hydration Omnipool с использованием некастодиального биткоин-моста Threshold Network.

По предлагаемому курсу 1 DOT будет равен примерно 0,000041 tBTC.

Помимо увеличения доли BTC в казначействе, этот шаг также увеличит ликвидность в блокчейне и усилит стимулы для экосистемы DeFi Polkadot.

Предложение все еще находится на стадии обсуждения в сообществе и еще не достигло стадии голосования.

Различные точки зрения в сообществе

Предложение о создании BTC-резерва находится на стадии обсуждения в сообществе Polkadot. Окончательное решение будет принято путем голосования держателей DOT. Результаты голосования определят дальнейшую стратегию развития Polkadot и ее отношение к Bitcoin.

Обсуждение в сообществе Polkadot разделилось на несколько лагерей. Есть ярые сторонники, уверенные в необходимости диверсификации и потенциальной выгоде от владения BTC. Они подчеркивают, что это стратегический шаг, который укрепит позиции Polkadot в долгосрочной перспективе. Другие, напротив, выражают серьезные опасения. Они считают, что Polkadot должен сосредоточиться на развитии собственной экосистемы и не рисковать значительной частью своих активов в волатильном активе, пусть и таком известном, как Bitcoin.

Некоторые предлагают компромиссные варианты. Например, вместо продажи 500,000 DOT, можно выделить меньшую сумму или использовать часть доходов от казначейства Polkadot для покупки BTC. Также обсуждается возможность использования децентрализованных финансовых (DeFi) протоколов для получения дохода от BTC-резерва, что позволит компенсировать потенциальную упущенную выгоду от DOT.

Trending Cryptos

ctr
CitreaCTR
wstusdt
wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT
apr
aPrioriAPR
ctx
Cryptex FinanceCTX
audio
AudiusAUDIO
mantra
MantraMANTRA
xvs
VenusXVS
waxl
AxelarWAXL
bill
Billions NetworkBILL
pyth
PYTH (Pyth)PYTH
rune
THORChainRUNE
velodrome
Velodrome FinanceVELODROME
brev
BrevisBREV
zrx
ZRX（0X）ZRX
cake
PancakeSwapCAKE

Related Reads

TRON Nile Testnet Deploys Quantum-Resistant Signature Cryptography

TRON's Nile testnet has deployed an upgrade implementing quantum-resistant signature cryptography, a proactive step to secure its ledger against potential future decryption threats from quantum computing. This development, confirmed via official sources like nileex.io and github.com, represents a notable Layer 1 security enhancement. The report emphasizes its relevance within the current market focus on stablecoins. Crucially, the upgrade is currently active only on the testnet, not the TRON mainnet. While providing a verified data point for the market to weigh, the article cautions that this single development should be considered alongside broader market factors and does not guarantee any specific price action. It stands as a snapshot of ongoing protocol development.

bitcoinist20m ago

TRON Nile Testnet Deploys Quantum-Resistant Signature Cryptography

bitcoinist20m ago

BIS Report Compliance Observations: The True Risks of Stablecoins Go Beyond 'De-pegging'

The BIS report, "Anchoring trust in money: innovation beyond stablecoins," highlights that the primary risks of stablecoins extend beyond potential de-pegging. It argues that the core challenge is whether stablecoins can be integrated into a financial system that is identifiable, monitorable, accountable, and regulatable. While acknowledging efficiency gains like faster payments and programmability, BIS emphasizes that money requires an institutional framework—including legal certainty, liquidity support, and financial integrity controls—which many stablecoins currently lack. The report details compliance risks, noting that while blockchain transactions are transparent, address visibility does not equate to identity or purpose clarity. This creates a systemic risk as pseudonymity, non-custodial wallets, and cross-chain bridges can undermine AML/CFT controls. Furthermore, these risks can spill over into the traditional financial system through on- and off-ramps. The future direction, per BIS, is not to prohibit innovation but to embed regulatory rules—such as identity verification and transaction screening—directly into the technological infrastructure of tokenized finance. The key takeaway for compliance is that any new financial instrument must clearly address questions of customer identification, transaction monitoring, accountability, and cross-border rule consistency to be viable as a mainstream payment tool.

marsbit49m ago

BIS Report Compliance Observations: The True Risks of Stablecoins Go Beyond 'De-pegging'

marsbit49m ago

When US Giants Collectively "Defect" to Chinese AI Models

When Silicon Valley Giants Turn to Chinese AI Models to Cut Costs A surprising trend is emerging: major U.S. tech companies are significantly reducing AI costs by switching to Chinese models. Coinbase, the largest U.S. cryptocurrency exchange, reportedly halved its AI spending after migrating to China's GLM-5.2 and Kimi 2.7 models, despite increasing usage. They achieved this through a sophisticated three-part strategy: implementing an automatic routing system to select the most cost-effective model per task, boosting cache hit rates from 5% to 60% to reuse computations, and employing "context engineering" to provide AI with more precise, less cluttered information. They are not alone. AI startup Lindy switched from Claude to DeepSeek, saving millions, while Snowflake's tests found GLM-5.2 solved 66% of coding tasks compared to Claude Opus's 67%—but at a fraction of the cost (output pricing is 5-7 times lower). While the top Western models may offer slightly better stability, the massive price differential is leading many businesses to reconsider their value proposition. This shift signals a deeper change in the AI industry, moving beyond pure performance benchmarks to a fierce cost competition. As pressure mounts, even OpenAI and Anthropic have begun slashing prices. For users, this means more choices, lower costs, and a crucial lesson: using multiple models based on task complexity, optimizing with caching, and keeping contexts lean are now key to leveraging AI efficiently and affordably.

marsbit55m ago

When US Giants Collectively "Defect" to Chinese AI Models

marsbit55m ago

BIS Report Compliance Watch: The Real Risks of Stablecoins Are Not Just 'De-pegging'

BIS Report Compliance Observations: The real risks of stablecoins go beyond "depegging" The BIS report "Anchoring trust in money: innovation beyond stablecoins" argues that while stablecoins and tokenization offer efficiency gains, their primary risk lies in fitting into an identifiable, monitorable, accountable, and regulatable financial system. Money's trust stems not just from technology but from institutional arrangements: a common unit of account, guaranteed redemption at par, liquidity support, regulatory frameworks, and financial integrity requirements. Stablecoins, operating on permissionless blockchains with pseudo-anonymity and non-custodial wallets, create systemic compliance gaps: unclear customer identity, incomplete fund origins, unexplained transaction purposes, fragmented cross-chain paths, and ambiguous liability. On-chain transparency does not equal compliance transparency. Public addresses don't reveal identity or intent. While blockchain analytics aid law enforcement, they cannot replace routine, large-scale AML/CFT controls. Effective compliance requires a closed-loop process encompassing customer onboarding, transaction monitoring, investigation, reporting, and audit. Stablecoin risks are not confined to the blockchain; they re-enter the traditional financial system via on/off-ramps, exchanges, and payment institutions. This forces banks to monitor client accounts for activity linked to virtual assets. The future direction is not to prohibit innovation but to embed rules into the technology. Tokenized finance should integrate with the existing two-tier monetary system, embedding compliance—like customer identification, pre-transaction screening, and auditable data trails—directly into the transaction flow. For compliance professionals, the key takeaway is that any new financial instrument must answer core questions: Who identifies the customer? Who monitors transactions? Who handles exceptions? Who is liable? Compliance is not the antithesis of innovation but the essential infrastructure for its sustainable growth.

链捕手56m ago

BIS Report Compliance Watch: The Real Risks of Stablecoins Are Not Just 'De-pegging'

链捕手56m ago

When American Giants 'Defect' to Chinese AI Models

Summary: The trend of major U.S. technology firms adopting more cost-effective Chinese AI models is gaining momentum. A prime example is Coinbase, the largest U.S. cryptocurrency exchange, which reportedly halved its AI expenditure by switching to Chinese models GLM-5.2 and Kimi 2.7, while its usage volume increased. This was achieved through a sophisticated cost-saving system featuring intelligent model routing (selecting the most suitable model per task), dramatically improving cache hit rates from 5% to 60%, and implementing "Context Engineering" to streamline prompts. This shift is not isolated. Other companies like the AI startup Lindy and data cloud firm Snowflake are making similar moves, drawn by the significant price disparity. For instance, GLM-5.2 costs $1.40/$4.40 per million tokens (input/output), compared to $5/$25 for Claude Opus 4.7. While top Western models may offer slightly higher stability or speed in complex tasks, the performance gap is narrowing, making the price difference harder to justify for many enterprise use cases. The implications are significant for both businesses and individual users. It highlights the importance of a multi-model strategy based on task requirements, the value of caching and reusing outputs, and the effectiveness of providing concise context. Ultimately, this migration signals a potential reshaping of the AI industry's pricing model, moving competition from pure performance benchmarks to practical cost-effectiveness, with increased choice and downward price pressure benefiting end-users.

链捕手1h ago

When American Giants 'Defect' to Chinese AI Models

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

575 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions