暴跌 70% 后仍溢价 100%?SharpLink 的 ETH 豪赌悬念未了

链捕手Published on 2025-06-13Last updated on 2025-06-13

作者:Fairy,ChainCatcher

编辑:TB,ChainCatcher

 

SharpLink Gaming,被市场捧为“以太坊版微策略”的明星小盘股,原本正踩在 ETH 国库叙事的风口上,一份 SEC 文件,却让其股价在盘后暴跌近 70%。

热捧变质疑,信仰跳水为恐慌。本文将拆解这场突如其来的“信任危机”,并讨论其背后隐藏的图景。

暴跌背后的市场误读

5月底,SharpLink Gaming 完成4.25 亿美元的公开公司私募融资(PIPE),投资者包括 ConsenSys、Galaxy 和 Pantera Capital 等一众重仓以太坊的老牌机构,资金用于收购 ETH 作为储备资产。这一操作让 SharpLink 股价最高飙升至124美元,较融资消息公布前上涨逾40倍。

而昨日,SharpLink Gaming 向美国 SEC 提交了S-3ASR 注册声明文件,授权最多转售 58,699,760 股 PIPE 融资相关股份。这意味着超过 100 位 PIPE 投资者可择机出售其持股。

一时间,市场误读为“PIPE 投资者已开始申请出货”,恐慌情绪迅速蔓延。

市场误读

SharpLink 盘后股价一度跌至 8.75 美元,跌幅高达 73%,后小幅反弹至 10 美元区间。

图源:yahoo!finance

随后,SharpLink 董事会主席、Consensys CEO Joseph Lubin 发声澄清:这份文件只是 PIPE 后的常规注册流程,作用是“为潜在转售预先登记股份”,并不代表任何实际卖出。他强调:“文件中‘发行后持股数量’是假设性数据,Consensys 和我本人并未出售任何股份。”

虽然此次风波暂告平息,但市场对 SharpLink 的动向依然充满猜测。BTCS Inc 首席执行官Charles Allen 表示:“根据我的经验,鉴于部分参与交易投资者的背景,他们确实可能正在悄然抛售。此外,‘预融资认股权证’(prefunded warrants)实际上是一种规避持仓披露和避免成为关联方的安排。”

他进一步指出,SharpLink 自5月30日获得 WKSI 资格后,立刻提交了10亿美元的 ATM 计划(按市价发行股票),他们可能已通过持续交易悄悄完成融资,且无须即时披露。如若运作顺利,明天有可能就发布斥资10亿美元购入 ETH 的公告,然后再次点燃市场热情。

SBET 目前溢价100%?

SharpLink(SBET)目前的股价表现及溢价情况,也透露出投资者对其未来走势的复杂预期。据前沿科技投资人郑迪分析,SBET目前的溢价约为100%。

根据提交给SEC的文件,公司全面摊薄后的总股本为77,526,682股,结合盘后约10美元的股价计算,公司总市值约为8亿美元。此次注册的股份数量为75,319,345股(假设顾问及投行的认股权证已全部转股认购),加上原始股本69万股,郑迪由此推断,先前价值10亿美元的ATM(按市价发行股票)实际仅执行了约1,517,337股,说明ATM绝大部分额度可能尚未动用,未来仍存在摊薄风险。

其表示,此次PIPE融资总额为4.25亿美元,考虑到Consensys作为公司以太坊战略顾问,且有消息称Consensys相关地址已购入约3亿美元ETH,有理由相信,大部分甚至全部融资资金已用于购入ETH。鉴于ETH近期价格波动有限,公司现有ETH持仓市值应维持在约4亿美元水平。

因此,综合以上因素,郑迪推测SBET目前的市场溢价约为100%。

SBET的溢价在一定程度上反映了市场对其资产价值的认可,特别是其以太坊储备的潜在价值。但溢价过高也带来了市场风险,未来随着更多ATM(按市价发行股票)额度的释放和潜在股本摊薄,股价波动或将加剧。

SharpLink 的这场大戏仍在上演。如果如郑迪所分析,未来仍有股本摊薄的空间,那么短期内或将带来波动压力;而若如 Charles Allen 所言,购入 10 亿美元 ETH 的消息或在近期披露,则可能再次点燃市场情绪,推高股价。

这种“不透明”与“可能性”叠加,让 SharpLink 既充满争议,也充满想象空间。真正的高潮,或许还在前方。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

"Why DeFi Insurance Remains Unpurchased" explores the paradox of decentralized finance insurance. While DeFi insurance promises automatic, unbiased payouts via smart contracts—eliminating traditional insurers' denial practices—it struggles to attract users. The core issue is economic viability. Premiums are prohibitively high relative to the yields from DeFi protocols. For example, insuring a deposit on Aave or Maple Finance can consume most or even all of the annual yield, leaving returns comparable to or worse than traditional savings. Only the safest protocols, like MakerDAO, offer affordable premiums. Furthermore, the DeFi insurance model is structurally fragile. Unlike traditional insurance where risks are uncorrelated, DeFi risks are highly interconnected (e.g., oracle failures, bridge hacks). A single major exploit can simultaneously threaten multiple protocols, potentially bankrupting the entire insurance pool, which holds only millions against billions in total value locked. The governance model also creates a conflict of interest. In platforms like Nexus Mutual, token holders who vote on claims risk their own capital if payouts are approved, incentivizing denials. Consequently, the market is tiny and shrinking. Nexus Mutual dominates with $81.56 million in assets, but the industry lacks the capacity to cover a catastrophic event like the $292M Kelp DAO hack. Other providers have dwindled or shut down. The article concludes that DeFi insurance faces a "tragedy of the commons": its stability requires widespread adoption, but individual users have no incentive to pay for it, as premiums destroy their yields. Current solutions involve preventative measures like bug bounties and seeking external capital from traditional reinsurance, acknowledging that on-chain capital alone is insufficient to cover on-chain risks.

marsbit4m ago

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

marsbit4m ago

Kraken Sets Its Sights on Aave: Why is CeFi Starting to 'Buy the Dip' in Core DeFi Assets?

Recent market rumors suggest Kraken is planning a strategic investment in Aave, sparking widespread interest. Although Aave's co-founder clarified some inaccurate details in the reports, this event highlights a significant trend: centralized exchanges are accelerating their entry into the core areas of on-chain finance. Kraken's interest in Aave reflects its strategic expansion beyond simple trading into more profitable, higher-barrier financial services like DeFi asset management. Aave, a leading DeFi lending protocol, offers a mature lending model, deep liquidity, and a growing ecosystem, making it a key gateway to future on-chain finance. Despite a major security incident in April that caused significant withdrawals, Aave's core architecture, governance, and market trust remained intact. The protocol's strong fundamentals are underscored by its $134 million in annual revenue, suggesting its valuation may be undervalued. Aave is also designing a new tokenomics model (Aavenomics 3.0) featuring an automated token buyback mechanism to better capture value for token holders, signaling DeFi's evolution towards sustainable value models. Ultimately, this potential move signals accelerated convergence between CeFi and DeFi. Kraken's target is not just an asset but a strategic position in the future of on-chain financial infrastructure, while Aave aims to prove DeFi can evolve into a cash-flow-generating, global financial system.

marsbit1h ago

Kraken Sets Its Sights on Aave: Why is CeFi Starting to 'Buy the Dip' in Core DeFi Assets?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片