Meme币狂飙123%!中美握手+降息预期引爆「山寨币第二春」?

MarsBitPublished on 2025-05-11Last updated on 2025-05-13

Abstract

这波随着 BTC、ETH、SOL 而来的上涨让不少钻石手一边高呼“回来了,都回来了”

随着市场政策面利好频频传来,加密市场大盘终于逐步回暖,山寨币也迎来了自己的“第二春”,其中尤以 Meme 币表现亮眼:OKX 行情显示,MOODENG、GOAT、WIF、BOME、MEW 24 小时涨幅分别高达 123.09、 57.36% 、 26.24% 、 24.84% 、 22.64% 。这波随着 BTC、ETH、SOL 而来的上涨让不少钻石手一边高呼“回来了,都回来了”;另外一边看着自己回撤不小的仓位又在心头滴血。关于后市行情走向如何,Odaily星球日报将于本文梳理总结近期市场上涨驱动因素及行业代表性观点,供读者参考。


宏观直接利好:中美握手言和,美联储放出降息预期


近几日的大盘暴涨,最为直接的诱因无疑是中美双方的关税及商务谈判。此外,得益于特朗普此前的一系列骚操作,面对经济衰退的潜在可能,美联储也不再保持一贯的强硬姿态,口风松动之下,今年的降息预期陡然增高,政策面的利好让市场纷纷转而看多,买盘力量迅速压过砸盘力量。


中美双方“达成实质性进展”


北京时间今日上午,白宫方面发文宣布,美国在日内瓦宣布与中国达成贸易协议。美国财政部长斯科特·贝森特(Scott Bessent)和美国贸易代表大使贾米森(Jamieson)表示,谈判在瑞士日内瓦举行,历时两天,取得了“实质性进展”。双方对谈判成果感到满意,认为分歧没有想象中大,协议达成速度较快。美国官员对协议的达成表示乐观,认为这将有助于解决贸易赤字问题。中美经贸中方牵头人、国务院副总理何立峰也在参与新闻发布会时表示,此次中美经贸高层会谈坦诚、深入、具有建设性,达成重要共识,并取得实质性进展。双方一致同意建立中美经贸磋商机制。


在经历了此前“ 154% 高额关税”的闹剧风波之后,中美两国终于再次坐下来平心静气地谈判且达成阶段性共识,无疑为两国经济以及加密货币市场吃了一颗定心丸。


美联储口风松动,今年有望降息


5 月 8 日,美联储主席鲍威尔表示,在某些情况下今年降息是合适的,在某些情况下降息是不合适的,我不能自信地说我知道合适的利率路径。彼时,根据期货价格,到 7 月降息的可能性约为 75% 


与此同时,美联储理事库格勒此前表示,通胀和失业率都存在上行风险,短期内经济可能会出现放缓;另外一边,“美联储传声筒” Nick Timiraos 分析指出,美联储主席鲍威尔淡化了通过降息缓解特朗普关税可能带来的经济疲软的预期,后者暗示美联储只有在看到经济增长显著放缓的证据后才会考虑降息,且可能是快速降息。


综合来看,美联储在今年下半年降息的可能性大增,由此进一步修复了此前超卖下跌的市场情绪。


机构持续买入 BTC:上市公司成囤币主力,贝莱德一骑绝尘


作为本轮周期最为显眼的 BTC 买入群体,上市公司已经成为加密市场上持币数量增长最快速的群体之一;资管机构及 ETF 指数基金也处于快速增长阶段。


Metaplanet 今日增持 1241 枚 BTC,价值约 1.82 亿美元


日本上市公司 Metaplanet 增持 1241 枚 BTC,价值约 1.82 亿美元。截止目前,该公司共持有 6796 枚 BTC,价值约 7.04 亿美元。


Strategy 持续买入,年度收益率已超 14% 


Strategy 创始人 Michael Saylor 于昨日晚间再次发布比特币 Tracker 相关信息。根据此前规律,Strategy 总是在相关消息发布之后的第二天披露增持比特币信息。


5 月 5 日消息,Strategy 在 4 月 28 日至 5 月 4 日之间以 95, 167 美元的价格购买了 1, 895 枚比特币(总计: 1.803 亿美元)。同时其表示,截至 2025 年迄今,比特币收益率已达 14.0% 。截至 2025 年 5 月 4 日,其持有 555, 450 个比特币 BTC,平均成本为 68, 550 美元,总价值 380.8 亿美元。


印度上市公司 Jetking 入局 BTC,目标 2030 年持仓达 1.8 万枚


印度上市公司 Jetking 首席执行官 Harsh Bharwani 此前表示,公司计划通过多种融资工具逐步增持 BTC,目标在 2030 年实现持仓 1.8 万枚。他透露,未来六个月内将筹集资金扩展至约 180 枚 BTC,接下来一年内目标达 1800 枚 BTC,并在 2030 年前完成最终持仓计划。


贝莱德近期增持 5613 枚 BTC,比特币总持仓量已超 62 万枚


据 Lookonchain 监测, 5 月 6 日,贝莱德增持 5613 枚 BTC,价值 5.295 亿美元,目前比特币总持仓量已超 62 万枚,达到 620, 252 枚 BTC,价值 585.1 亿美元。自 4 月 21 日以来,贝莱德已买入总计 47064 枚 BTC。


5 月 7 日消息,贝莱德现货比特币 ETF(IBIT)仍以 69.6 亿美元净流入位列全美 ETF 资金榜第六,反超全球最大黄金 ETF(GLD)的 65 亿美元。


新增量:富途开放 BTC、ETH、USDT 充币功能,传统金融应用接入加密体系


除了以上老生常谈的买盘力量以外,近期加密市场最为引人注目的新变量无疑是“作为传统金融应用的富途 APP 开放 BTC、ETH、USDT 充币功能”一事。


富途推出 BTC、ETH、USDT 充币功能


上周,富途证券国际(香港)有限公司宣布,正式上线比特币(BTC)、以太币(ETH)、泰达币(USDT)充币服务。合资格投资者通过一站式交易平台富途牛牛完成充币、交易加密货币(“Crypto”)获取资金后,便可投资更多资产类别或安全提现。投资者透过一个 App 即可玩转 Crypto+TradFi 资产(传统金融资产,包括港、美及日股、期权、ETF、基金、债券等多元资产),在虚拟及传统资产市场间快速转换。


山寨季还是山寨 G?市场分歧较大,仍处于超跌修复阶段


随着 BTC、ETH、SOL 经历了近期的大幅上涨之后的小幅震荡下跌,加密市场对山寨季的热情重燃起来。而关于目前是否即将进入山寨季,行业代表性人物的观点呈现较大分歧,有人认为山寨币还将如同以往吸引 BTC、ETH 等主流币溢出的流动性进而迎来上涨;但也有分析师认为山寨币目前相较今年 1 月及以前的高点已跌出 80% -90% 的跌幅,近几日表现仅为“死猫跳式”反弹。


看涨派:交易员 Eugene 预计山寨币会出现强劲反弹


上周六,交易员 Eugene Ng Ah Sio 发文表示,自己尽管这次上涨方向判断正确,但因提前被震荡止损,实际收益不佳。展望后市,这次涨到 10 万美元确认了之前 9 万美元的支撑反转,现在市场很可能再次冲击历史新高,这原本不是预期的情况,但来自微策略和 ETF 的资金似乎源源不断。


相比之下,直到昨天大多数币圈老玩家都还在观望(甚至做空),随着历史新高预期让市场重新燃起热情,预计山寨币总市值会出现强劲的反弹上涨。


看涨派:分析师称市场主流人群为短线交易员,山寨季已来


分析师 2 Lambroz 认为山寨币的旺季可能已经到来,但他表示,市场动态已经发生了变化。“人们想买入,但对任何强有力的叙事都缺乏信心。”他指出,与 2021 年不同,目前没有散户投资者入市的迹象。交易员的资金周转速度更快,几乎没有动力持有长期仓位。技术交易员 Moustache 的观点更为乐观。他分享了一张图表,显示山寨币反复经历积累阶段,随后迎来爆发式增长。据其分析,当前的结构与 2016 年和 2020 年的情况相似。“ 2025 年山寨币季已正式开始”。


中立派:CryptoQuant 创始人称此前判断错误,应关注机构增量资金


CryptoQuant 创始人 Ki Young Ju 发文表示,自己两个月前对 BTC 牛市结束的判断是错误的。当前链上数据显示 BTC 抛压正在减轻,同时 ETF 等机构资金大规模流入,推动市场结构发生变化。他指出,过去比特币市场主要由老牌鲸鱼、矿工和散户构成,周期顶部较易判断;而现在随着 ETF、MicroStrategy、机构与政府实体的参与,传统“鲸鱼出货引发顶部”的逻辑正在失效。Ki 强调,在新环境下,更应关注流入的机构增量资金,而非旧有抛压信号。


看跌派:山寨币下跌 90% ,黄金时代为时尚早


与此同时,持怀疑态度的人依然存在。评论员 Rekt Fencer 指出,自去年 12 月以来,大多数山寨币都下跌了 90% 。本周 10% 的小幅反弹引发了过度的乐观情绪,促使他嘲笑这波反弹。“这就是我们期待已久的山寨币黄金时代。”


总结:Meme 币小幅反弹并不意味着山寨季来临


据 Coingecko 数据,BTC 目前市占率仍保持在近 60% ,整体来看我们仍然很难说现在已经进入山寨季,反而是此前的“山寨 G”形容更贴切一些,目前涨势不错的币种也多为“局部牛市”表现。


正如 Arthur Hayes 于 5 月初表示,“最近我被问到最多的问题是,山寨季什么时候来?而答案是有时它就在你的眼前。HYPE。”

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

You Use Claude and Codex Every Day, but Meta Has Restricted Internal Use

In May, Meta imposed internal restrictions on its engineers regarding the use of Claude Code and Codex, two widely used AI programming tools. Despite being a major client, Meta's guidelines, still in effect, prohibit these external models from being used for specific tasks to prevent potential "escalations with partners." The core concern is "distillation"—the risk that outputs from Claude or Codex could inadvertently contaminate the training data and evaluation processes for Meta's in-house AI coding assistant, MetaCode. If MetaCode is trained or evaluated using data generated by these external models, it risks learning their capabilities rather than developing its own, blurring the line of intellectual origin. The restrictions are precise: engineers cannot use the external models to generate test questions, debug source code, or suggest test cases. AI-generated content is also barred from environments accessible to MetaCode. However, AI can still assist with peripheral tasks like workflow setup and code organization, provided all outputs are manually reviewed. This caution reflects a broader industry dilemma. While distillation is a common technique, using a competitor's model output for training raises legal and ethical questions about the ownership of derived capabilities. Contractual terms from companies like OpenAI and Anthropic explicitly forbid using their outputs to build competing products, putting enforcement power in the hands of rivals. The move is also financially motivated, as Meta seeks to reduce its hefty internal AI spending, estimated in the billions this year. Meta's policy illustrates the delicate balance companies must strike: leveraging powerful external AI tools while safeguarding the integrity and independence of their own AI development. As AI systems increasingly help build other AIs, distinguishing the origin of capabilities becomes a fundamental challenge for the entire industry.

marsbit59m ago

You Use Claude and Codex Every Day, but Meta Has Restricted Internal Use

marsbit59m ago

Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?

The article "Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?" explores the complex and often contentious integration of AI into the cultural and creative industries, particularly film and television. It begins with the cancellation of Amazon's AI-generated animation "Punky Duck," highlighting the ethical debates surrounding AI content. AI's rapid advancement is transforming video production, enabling cost-effective, full-length AI films (e.g., "RAPHAEL," "Dreams of Violets") while sparking industry resistance over issues like "synthetic actors." The core debate has shifted from whether to use AI to how to use it responsibly. The article analyzes why AI's entry into film is uniquely unsettling. It distinguishes between "cultural fast food" (short-form, fast-paced content like micro-dramas) and "cultural main courses" (traditional, long-form film/TV). AI currently excels at the former, matching its fragmented narratives, shallow emotional needs, and free-to-consumer models. However, venturing into the latter challenges the human-centric essence of storytelling—creativity, emotional depth, and the unique value of human labor and experience. While AI can generate massive volumes of content and lower costs, it risks devaluing human creativity, leading to homogenized output, and creating unfair competition through potential intellectual property infringement. Its efficiency also amplifies content safety risks, making preemptive governance crucial. To counter these risks, the article proposes establishing clear boundaries guided by a human-centered AI content perspective. It outlines four principles: 1) Amplify, rather than displace, human creative space; 2) Respect and protect human creative output; 3) Ensure human creative control and responsibility remain paramount; and 4) Guarantee transparency and traceability in AI creation. The conclusion emphasizes that humans must act as the "helmsmen" of technology, steering AI development to enhance, not replace, the core human values at the heart of cultural expression.

marsbit1h ago

Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?

marsbit1h ago

Planck Retracted? The Father of Quantum Tripped by an Algorithm

The recent discovery that two articles (published in 1940 and 1942) by Max Planck, the Nobel laureate and founder of quantum theory, are marked as "retracted" on Springer's digital platform highlights a curious clash between historical publishing practices and modern automated systems. An investigation suggests these retractions are algorithmic errors, not due to fraud or misconduct. The papers, philosophical reflections on science published in *Die Naturwissenschaften*, were likely flagged by the platform's systems. One article, a republished lecture, may have been mistaken for duplicate publication. Another, sharing a title with a prior article by a different author (a common practice for continuing debates at the time), may have triggered a similar automated check. The digital versions have even been replaced with blank pages, contrary to normal practice of preserving retracted texts. This incident underscores how contemporary digital infrastructure, built around concepts like "self-plagiarism" and strict copyright, can misclassify and obscure legitimate historical scholarly communication. It serves as a warning that digital archives are not neutral mirrors of the past but are filtered by platform rules, potentially distorting the scientific record. As AI systems increasingly rely on such databases, such erroneous metadata could propagate, affecting how future tools interpret and access historical knowledge.

marsbit1h ago

Planck Retracted? The Father of Quantum Tripped by an Algorithm

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

529 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片