BitMart市场行情周报:BTC ETF实现连续三周净流入

Odaily星球日报Published on 2025-05-12Last updated on 2025-05-12

Abstract

过去一周BTC最高触及105, 000美元,BTC有望在5月份创下历史新高。

据 BitMart 5 月 12 日市场行情报告,过去一周 BTC 最高触及 105, 000 美元,BTC 有望在 5 月份创下历史新高。

BitMart市场行情周报:BTC ETF实现连续三周净流入

本周加密市场动态

上周 BTC ETF 净流入 9.2 亿美元,实现连续三周净流入,前两周资金流入分别为 30.3 亿美元和 18.1 亿美元,连续的资金流入表明后市乐观。过去一周 BTC 最高触及 105, 000 美元,BTC 有望在 5 月份创下历史新高。过去一周市场贪婪恐慌指数持续攀升,市场情绪进入贪婪阶段。

上周 ETH ETF 净流出 3, 800 万美元,但 ETH 从 1, 800 美元区间大幅上涨至 2, 600 美元,甚至出现单日 25% 的涨幅。ETH/BTC 汇率大幅上涨,暂报 0.024 ;同时 ETH 市占率也从 7% 左右大幅回升至 9% 。从 ETF 的资金流入流出情况来看,过去一周 ETH 的上涨与 ETF 并无太大关联;甚至有部分社区观点认为,当前 ETH 的上涨仅是因为各项指标处于历史底部,可能只是短时的反弹。

BitMart市场行情周报:BTC ETF实现连续三周净流入

本周热门币种

热门币种方面,MOODENG, GOAT, PNUT, PI 和 KAITO 都有着不俗的表现。MOODENG 本周价格上涨 566.53% ,最高价格 0.2889 USDT,目前市值 2.6 亿美金。GOAT 价格上涨 212.9% , 最高价格为 0.2503 USDT,PNUT 价格上涨 167.6% 。

BitMart市场行情周报:BTC ETF实现连续三周净流入

美国市场大盘及热点新闻

美股表现不一,标普 500 指数下跌 0.8% ,道琼斯工业平均指数下跌 1.2% ,纳斯达克指数下跌 1.5% ,主要受关税不确定性和财报表现不一的影响。市场波动持续,关税豁免引发短暂反弹,但中美贸易紧张局势和更严格的芯片出口限制重创科技股。英特尔令人失望的财报拖累纳斯达克指数,而特斯拉强劲的季度业绩为标普 500 指数提供了一些支撑。

周一:美联储理事库格勒等发表讲话;

周二:美国 4 月 CPI 数据;

周四:美国当周初请失业金人数;美国 4 月 PPI 数据;2027 年 FOMC 票委、旧金山联储主席戴利参加一场炉边谈话、美联储主席鲍威尔在一场活动上致开幕词、美联储召开第二届 Thomas Laubach 研究会议;

周五:美国 5 月一年期通胀率预期初值;

周六:美联储巴尔金、戴利发表讲话;

热门板块及项目解锁

Meme 板块 MOODENG、GOAT、CHILLGUY 等纷纷大涨,在反弹行情中市场资金更青睐全流通的热门 Meme 币;MOODENG 日内大涨超 130% ,领涨全市场山寨币,在过去一周该代币涨幅超 6 倍,同样也是同期市场表现最好的 Meme 币,过去一周多个主流交易平台宣布上架 MOODENG,刺激了代币的购买需求;

AI agent 板块 PIPPIN、SWARMS、GRIFFAIN 等上涨,AI agent 赛道的明星代币较价格底部大幅上涨,表明 AI agent 仍然是市场资金最关注的赛道之一;但 AI agent 板块代币距离历史高点仍然相距甚远,同时也表示出市场对当前的 AI agent 项目存在质疑,或许还会有新的 AI agent 项目出现。

APT 将于 5 月 12 日 8 时解锁约 1131 万枚代币,价值约 5847 万美元;

Avalanche 计划于 2025 年 5 月 17 日解锁约 954 万枚 AVAX 代币,约占总供应量的 2.49% ,按当前价格计算,价值约为 3.29 亿美元。这些代币将分配给团队、基金会、战略合作伙伴等,此外还有约 113 万枚 AVAX(约合 3881 万美元)将通过空投方式发放;

风险提示:

使用 BitMart 服务的风险完全由您自行承担。所有加密货币投资(包括收益)本质上都具有高度投机性,并且涉及巨大的损失风险。过去、假设或模拟的表现并不一定代表未来的结果。

数字货币的价值可能会上涨或下跌,购买、出售、持有或交易数字货币可能存在很大的风险。您应根据您的个人投资目标、财务状况和风险承受能力,仔细考虑交易或持有数字货币是否适合您。 BitMart 不提供任何投资、法律或税务建议。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?

The article "Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?" explores the complex and often contentious integration of AI into the cultural and creative industries, particularly film and television. It begins with the cancellation of Amazon's AI-generated animation "Punky Duck," highlighting the ethical debates surrounding AI content. AI's rapid advancement is transforming video production, enabling cost-effective, full-length AI films (e.g., "RAPHAEL," "Dreams of Violets") while sparking industry resistance over issues like "synthetic actors." The core debate has shifted from whether to use AI to how to use it responsibly. The article analyzes why AI's entry into film is uniquely unsettling. It distinguishes between "cultural fast food" (short-form, fast-paced content like micro-dramas) and "cultural main courses" (traditional, long-form film/TV). AI currently excels at the former, matching its fragmented narratives, shallow emotional needs, and free-to-consumer models. However, venturing into the latter challenges the human-centric essence of storytelling—creativity, emotional depth, and the unique value of human labor and experience. While AI can generate massive volumes of content and lower costs, it risks devaluing human creativity, leading to homogenized output, and creating unfair competition through potential intellectual property infringement. Its efficiency also amplifies content safety risks, making preemptive governance crucial. To counter these risks, the article proposes establishing clear boundaries guided by a human-centered AI content perspective. It outlines four principles: 1) Amplify, rather than displace, human creative space; 2) Respect and protect human creative output; 3) Ensure human creative control and responsibility remain paramount; and 4) Guarantee transparency and traceability in AI creation. The conclusion emphasizes that humans must act as the "helmsmen" of technology, steering AI development to enhance, not replace, the core human values at the heart of cultural expression.

marsbit23m ago

Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?

marsbit23m ago

Planck Retracted? The Father of Quantum Tripped by an Algorithm

The recent discovery that two articles (published in 1940 and 1942) by Max Planck, the Nobel laureate and founder of quantum theory, are marked as "retracted" on Springer's digital platform highlights a curious clash between historical publishing practices and modern automated systems. An investigation suggests these retractions are algorithmic errors, not due to fraud or misconduct. The papers, philosophical reflections on science published in *Die Naturwissenschaften*, were likely flagged by the platform's systems. One article, a republished lecture, may have been mistaken for duplicate publication. Another, sharing a title with a prior article by a different author (a common practice for continuing debates at the time), may have triggered a similar automated check. The digital versions have even been replaced with blank pages, contrary to normal practice of preserving retracted texts. This incident underscores how contemporary digital infrastructure, built around concepts like "self-plagiarism" and strict copyright, can misclassify and obscure legitimate historical scholarly communication. It serves as a warning that digital archives are not neutral mirrors of the past but are filtered by platform rules, potentially distorting the scientific record. As AI systems increasingly rely on such databases, such erroneous metadata could propagate, affecting how future tools interpret and access historical knowledge.

marsbit27m ago

Planck Retracted? The Father of Quantum Tripped by an Algorithm

marsbit27m ago

Refunds! Claude 4.8 Sees Overnight Major 'Dumb-Down', GPT-5.6's Computational Power Reportedly 'Halved'

The AI community is currently alarmed by widespread reports of significant performance degradation in two leading models. This article details a "mass self-testing frenzy" triggered by a mysterious prompt designed to detect a hidden "Juice" value, representing a model's reasoning compute budget. On OpenAI's side, users suspect a covert, limited test of a "GPT-5.6-sol" model is underway. When using a specific XML prompt on the Codex platform, a normal "gpt-5.5 xhigh" model reportedly returns a Juice value of 768. However, some users routed to the suspected GPT-5.6 test receive a drastically reduced value of 128—a six-fold decrease. This has sparked debate on whether it signifies a major efficiency leap or a "watered-down, low-cost version" achieved by slashing reasoning depth to save computational expenses. Simultaneously, Anthropic's Claude models, particularly the flagship Opus 4.8 Max, are facing intense user backlash for a perceived "physical brain cut." Users on platforms like Reddit report a dramatic decline in the model's once-impressive reasoning, with complaints of it becoming "absurdly" weakened, performing worse than older, lighter models like Haiku. Specific criticisms include: losing long-context memory, refusing to think deeply even in high-reasoning modes, providing instant incorrect answers, and engaging in unhelpful, argumentative, or "gaslighting" behavior where it contradicts users unnecessarily. The article speculates these "stealth downgrades" might be a calculated corporate strategy. Companies could initially release models with temporarily boosted compute to create an illusion of a major breakthrough, then silently scale back parameters later to manage unsustainable inference costs. A proposed underlying cause is a tightened funding environment, potentially exacerbated by SpaceX's massive IPO soaking up market liquidity, which could delay AI company IPOs and force cost-cutting measures like model "nerfing." The core issue highlighted is the asymmetry of information: subscribers pay for a service that can be silently and fundamentally altered without notification or explanation. The viral "Juice test" resonates because it represents users' desire for transparency about what they are actually paying for.

marsbit1h ago

Refunds! Claude 4.8 Sees Overnight Major 'Dumb-Down', GPT-5.6's Computational Power Reportedly 'Halved'

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

528 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片