【美元危机】美国国债崩跌,黄金 历史新高!美元不妙,BTC当如何?

投研日志Published on 2025-04-11Last updated on 2025-04-11

Abstract

现在很多传统投资人依然把比特币划入到跟股票等高波动权益类资产一类的范畴。

作者:Vito

在前几天由于股票市场崩盘而引发了短暂流动性危机,带动避险资产黄金也出现了回调,短期流动性危机结束之后,黄金连续暴涨两天,直接反包,再次创下历史新高。反观美国国债在短暂反抽后则继续大跌,美元指数暴跌,跌穿100关口,创下阶段新低。

这基本上兑现了我之前的宏观预判。最近几个月很多反贼在评论跟我犟,犟能改变事实吗?如果投资的话,你们只会为脱离客观的立场付出代价。

美元处境非常不妙。

是不是特朗普把所有的事情都推翻,回到加关税之前,一切也能回到最初的位置?不好意思,事实并非如此。

因为伤害已经造成。

美元目前有三大共识的支柱。

首先的支柱是美国实际的经济能力,这是美元共识的底座。然而就像我之前说的那样,目前美国的实际经济能力是支撑不了当前美元的估值水平的。

美元的第二大支柱是美国作为全球最大经济体,全球金融霸主的神话。为什么说是神话呢?因为它不是事实。因为实际上,以货币实际购买力平价(PPP)测算的中国经济规模在2014年已经超过了美国,要知道这已经是11年前的事了。现在是2025年了,如今中国经济体量已经达到了美国的1.3倍规模,按PPP测算的实际制造业产能更是达到了美国的4倍。

但是美西方媒体很好地掩盖着这个事实,维系着美国经济神话。的这也是为什么这么多老外,包括最近大火的甲亢哥Speed,在来到中国后完全不敢相信自己的眼睛,发现中国经济和科技发达程度大超预期的原因。

这次主要出问题,就是出现在这根支柱上,川普在这个问题没有很深刻的认知或者是没有预料到中国会且可以能够如此强硬。

其实可以理解,在川普的整个成长阶段,美国都是世界第一,战无不胜,白人就是这个世界的统治者,世界观已经根深蒂固。而川普的很多决策又是基于直觉而非数据,特别是躲过暗杀之后更强化了天命之人的内在人格信念,更加依赖于自身直觉和信念了。

当他悍然对全世界发动贸易战的时候,其实是主动将自身的软肋暴露了出来而不自知,当然如果中国配合的话,这个神话还可以维系一阵,但是中国凭什么要配合?川普没搞清楚状况,如果中美好好谈,G2共治,其实对美国是最有利的。但是川普着急啊,还是习惯玩他擅长的极限施压的那套,要强行实现美国的利益最大化。但是他已经没有资格那样做了。

为什么一个实际经济规模要大于美国,制造业能力要远超美国的中国要无条件地接受川普的苛刻条件?其实没有理由的。很多人看不明白为什么中国可以这么硬气,可以这么强势,主要的认知差就在这里。这并不是什么意识形态的对抗,这是客观经济实力所决定的。这也是外网搞意识形态的那帮人,永远也不敢正视的客观事实。中国这次反击,老外自己都普遍支持叫好,而海外中文圈却一片谩骂,华人酸华人,真也是一面照妖镜了。

很简单,合作的态度,我就继续配合你演,维系你的神话。对抗的话,剧本也早就已经设定好了,会把你拉到我的伏击圈,给你迎头痛击,撕开你的遮羞布,打破你的神话,把美元拉下神坛。现在美国已经被迫快速撤销了对全球所谓的对等关税,经济实力不济已经被暴露无疑。现在美国对中国在关税还在继续犟,然而犟得越久,代价越大。这个点川普不知道什么时候才能醒悟过来。

美元的第三大支柱是美军的全球战争实力。这个支柱目前还没有受到挑战,美军在全球的军事实力冠绝全球,这个一点都不虚,这个不是神话。但是如果在西太平洋某岛上,却有可能会构成另外一个战略陷阱。在这个中国家门口的位置上,中国占据着绝对优势。哪怕再远个一千公里,目前都没人可以有优势能力挑战美国。这个中国也得弄清楚情况,不要离开自己的战略军力能力圈而行动,否则会落入美国的战略地盘。

当然了,时间似乎在中国的一边,空军六代机,高超音速武器这些就不说了,战力如何没实战用过,谁也不知道。我们还是用数据说话,根据美国国防部发布的文件显示,中国目前的整体造船业规模是美国的200倍,背靠中国强大的造船业实力,中国海军目前每年下水的主力战舰吨位规模相当于一个法国海军,而且已经持续多年,中国海军主力战舰总吨位在快速与美军缩小。

而如果在中国家门口,西太平洋战场上,美军如果吃了败仗,那么将会动摇美元三根支柱里面的最后一根。所以如果美国在这个位置上下重注,可能同样关乎国运,美军需要三思而行。当然如果淡化这个位置的战略重要性,战略性后撤一点,就不会在这个位置上落入战略陷阱。美军的战略容错度要比美国经济高很多,唯独在这个位置上,不能犯错。

对于BTC我之前有说过,我重新po出来一遍。

某种程度上说,比特币价格也是人类犯错的计数器,我之前说过,有人的地方就有江湖,有只要是人,就会犯错,而只要犯错最容易采取的补救方式就是印钱,斗争越激烈,就越不能输,错得越离谱,需要印的钱就做多。

你们只管犯错

BTC则静静数着你们印出来的钱。

过去几千年,是黄金在承担这个工作(刚创历史新高),目前黄金依然还是主流,不过对于未来要进入的人工智能科技时代,比特币会接过这个接力棒。现在很多传统投资人依然把比特币划入到跟股票等高波动权益类资产一类的范畴。经过这次宏观考验后,未来它的数字黄金属性会被彰显和更多人认知,这将会是最大的预期差之一。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

BIS Report Compliance Observations: The True Risks of Stablecoins Go Beyond 'De-pegging'

The BIS report, "Anchoring trust in money: innovation beyond stablecoins," highlights that the primary risks of stablecoins extend beyond potential de-pegging. It argues that the core challenge is whether stablecoins can be integrated into a financial system that is identifiable, monitorable, accountable, and regulatable. While acknowledging efficiency gains like faster payments and programmability, BIS emphasizes that money requires an institutional framework—including legal certainty, liquidity support, and financial integrity controls—which many stablecoins currently lack. The report details compliance risks, noting that while blockchain transactions are transparent, address visibility does not equate to identity or purpose clarity. This creates a systemic risk as pseudonymity, non-custodial wallets, and cross-chain bridges can undermine AML/CFT controls. Furthermore, these risks can spill over into the traditional financial system through on- and off-ramps. The future direction, per BIS, is not to prohibit innovation but to embed regulatory rules—such as identity verification and transaction screening—directly into the technological infrastructure of tokenized finance. The key takeaway for compliance is that any new financial instrument must clearly address questions of customer identification, transaction monitoring, accountability, and cross-border rule consistency to be viable as a mainstream payment tool.

marsbit1m ago

BIS Report Compliance Observations: The True Risks of Stablecoins Go Beyond 'De-pegging'

marsbit1m ago

When US Giants Collectively "Defect" to Chinese AI Models

When Silicon Valley Giants Turn to Chinese AI Models to Cut Costs A surprising trend is emerging: major U.S. tech companies are significantly reducing AI costs by switching to Chinese models. Coinbase, the largest U.S. cryptocurrency exchange, reportedly halved its AI spending after migrating to China's GLM-5.2 and Kimi 2.7 models, despite increasing usage. They achieved this through a sophisticated three-part strategy: implementing an automatic routing system to select the most cost-effective model per task, boosting cache hit rates from 5% to 60% to reuse computations, and employing "context engineering" to provide AI with more precise, less cluttered information. They are not alone. AI startup Lindy switched from Claude to DeepSeek, saving millions, while Snowflake's tests found GLM-5.2 solved 66% of coding tasks compared to Claude Opus's 67%—but at a fraction of the cost (output pricing is 5-7 times lower). While the top Western models may offer slightly better stability, the massive price differential is leading many businesses to reconsider their value proposition. This shift signals a deeper change in the AI industry, moving beyond pure performance benchmarks to a fierce cost competition. As pressure mounts, even OpenAI and Anthropic have begun slashing prices. For users, this means more choices, lower costs, and a crucial lesson: using multiple models based on task complexity, optimizing with caching, and keeping contexts lean are now key to leveraging AI efficiently and affordably.

marsbit8m ago

When US Giants Collectively "Defect" to Chinese AI Models

marsbit8m ago

BIS Report Compliance Watch: The Real Risks of Stablecoins Are Not Just 'De-pegging'

BIS Report Compliance Observations: The real risks of stablecoins go beyond "depegging" The BIS report "Anchoring trust in money: innovation beyond stablecoins" argues that while stablecoins and tokenization offer efficiency gains, their primary risk lies in fitting into an identifiable, monitorable, accountable, and regulatable financial system. Money's trust stems not just from technology but from institutional arrangements: a common unit of account, guaranteed redemption at par, liquidity support, regulatory frameworks, and financial integrity requirements. Stablecoins, operating on permissionless blockchains with pseudo-anonymity and non-custodial wallets, create systemic compliance gaps: unclear customer identity, incomplete fund origins, unexplained transaction purposes, fragmented cross-chain paths, and ambiguous liability. On-chain transparency does not equal compliance transparency. Public addresses don't reveal identity or intent. While blockchain analytics aid law enforcement, they cannot replace routine, large-scale AML/CFT controls. Effective compliance requires a closed-loop process encompassing customer onboarding, transaction monitoring, investigation, reporting, and audit. Stablecoin risks are not confined to the blockchain; they re-enter the traditional financial system via on/off-ramps, exchanges, and payment institutions. This forces banks to monitor client accounts for activity linked to virtual assets. The future direction is not to prohibit innovation but to embed rules into the technology. Tokenized finance should integrate with the existing two-tier monetary system, embedding compliance—like customer identification, pre-transaction screening, and auditable data trails—directly into the transaction flow. For compliance professionals, the key takeaway is that any new financial instrument must answer core questions: Who identifies the customer? Who monitors transactions? Who handles exceptions? Who is liable? Compliance is not the antithesis of innovation but the essential infrastructure for its sustainable growth.

链捕手9m ago

BIS Report Compliance Watch: The Real Risks of Stablecoins Are Not Just 'De-pegging'

链捕手9m ago

When American Giants 'Defect' to Chinese AI Models

Summary: The trend of major U.S. technology firms adopting more cost-effective Chinese AI models is gaining momentum. A prime example is Coinbase, the largest U.S. cryptocurrency exchange, which reportedly halved its AI expenditure by switching to Chinese models GLM-5.2 and Kimi 2.7, while its usage volume increased. This was achieved through a sophisticated cost-saving system featuring intelligent model routing (selecting the most suitable model per task), dramatically improving cache hit rates from 5% to 60%, and implementing "Context Engineering" to streamline prompts. This shift is not isolated. Other companies like the AI startup Lindy and data cloud firm Snowflake are making similar moves, drawn by the significant price disparity. For instance, GLM-5.2 costs $1.40/$4.40 per million tokens (input/output), compared to $5/$25 for Claude Opus 4.7. While top Western models may offer slightly higher stability or speed in complex tasks, the performance gap is narrowing, making the price difference harder to justify for many enterprise use cases. The implications are significant for both businesses and individual users. It highlights the importance of a multi-model strategy based on task requirements, the value of caching and reusing outputs, and the effectiveness of providing concise context. Ultimately, this migration signals a potential reshaping of the AI industry's pricing model, moving competition from pure performance benchmarks to practical cost-effectiveness, with increased choice and downward price pressure benefiting end-users.

链捕手15m ago

When American Giants 'Defect' to Chinese AI Models

链捕手15m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

575 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片