JPMorgan sees yield-bearing stablecoins growing from 6% to 50% of market share

THE BLOCKPublished on 2025-03-28Last updated on 2025-03-28

Abstract

JPMorgan analysts forecast that yield-bearing stablecoins could rise from the current 6% to as much as 50% of the stablecoin market cap in the future.

JPMorgan analysts forecast that yield-bearing stablecoins could rise from the current 6% to as much as 50% of the stablecoin market cap in the future.

Yield-bearing stablecoins are attracting investors similarly to traditional money market funds, particularly in today’s high-interest-rate environment, the analysts said.

Yield-bearing stablecoins, including tokenized Treasurys, which offer interest returns similar to traditional financial products, could experience massive growth ahead, according to JPMorgan analysts.

Yield-bearing stablecoins currently make up just 6% of the total stablecoin market cap but could expand significantly, potentially capturing up to 50% of the market unless regulatory changes intervene, JPMorgan analysts led by managing director Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou wrote in a report released Wednesday.

The top five yield-bearing stablecoins — Ethena's USDe, Sky Dollar's USDS, BlackRock's BUIDL, Usual Protocol's USD0 and Ondo Finance's USDY— have seen rapid growth since the U.S. election in November, rising from around $4 billion to over $13 billion in combined market cap, Panigirtzoglou told The Block.

According to analysts, this growth is expected to continue. They added that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's recent approval of Figure Markets' application for a yield-bearing stablecoin, YLDS, which is registered as a security, provides further momentum to this segment.

Traditional stablecoins, such as Tether's USDT and Circle's USDC, do not share reserve yields with their users because doing so would classify these assets as securities, according to the analysts. Such a classification would also impose additional compliance requirements, hindering their current seamless use as collateral within the crypto ecosystem, they said.

Why yield-bearing stablecoins are on the rise

The JPMorgan analysts identified several factors driving the rapid growth of yield-bearing stablecoins.

First, investors prefer these assets because they offer interest without requiring holders to engage in risky trading or lending activities or give up custody of their assets.

Second, major crypto trading platforms such as Deribit and FalconX now accept tokenized Treasurys as collateral, enabling traders to earn yield on posted collateral.

Additionally, crypto investors are increasingly turning to tokenized Treasurys in decentralized finance (DeFi) to obtain higher yields, as typical DeFi yields have significantly decreased from their peak levels of 2022. Projects like Frax Finance are also adopting tokenized Treasurys as underlying assets, further fueling this growth.

Despite this positive outlook, the JPMorgan analysts noted barriers. Yield-bearing stablecoins are classified as securities, subjecting them to regulatory restrictions that limit their adoption, especially among retail investors. Moreover, traditional non-yield-bearing stablecoins continue to hold a notable liquidity advantage.

With a combined market cap of around $220 billion across multiple blockchains and centralized exchanges, traditional stablecoins offer efficient, fast and low-cost transactions, even at large volumes. In contrast, yield-bearing stablecoins are newer, smaller and comparatively less liquid.

However, "This liquidity disadvantage could potentially be lessened over time as yield-bearing stablecoins gain further traction in the future in crypto derivative trading as source of collateral, in DAO treasuries, liquidity pools, and idle cash with crypto venture funds," according to the analysts.

As a result, over time, yield-bearing stablecoins could attract much of the idle cash currently sitting in traditional stablecoins, the analysts said. While the exact amount of this idle cash is difficult to estimate, it's unlikely to represent the majority of the stablecoin market, according to the analysts.

Related Reads

Retail Investors' 'Lead Brother' Serenity vs. Newly Minted Stock God Leopold: How Are the Two Top Hunters Mining AI's 'Physical Limits'?

The article profiles two prominent figures, Serenity and Leopold Aschenbrenner, who are gaining attention for their unconventional investment strategies focused on the physical constraints of the AI boom, moving beyond mainstream software narratives. Serenity, an anonymous online trader, advocates a "shiso leaf" theory. He targets small-cap companies with monopolies on critical, overlooked components in the AI hardware supply chain, such as specific semiconductor materials. His deep, technical analysis of bottlenecks in areas like co-packaged optics (CPO) has reportedly yielded massive returns, though his anonymity and focus on illiquid micro-cap stocks pose significant risks for followers. Leopold Aschenbrenner, a former OpenAI researcher, founded a multi-billion dollar hedge fund. His macro thesis argues that physical infrastructure—power grids, land, data centers—is the true bottleneck for AI growth, lagging far behind chip production. Consequently, his fund employs an infrastructure arbitrage strategy: heavily investing in storage and compute infrastructure companies while placing massive bearish bets (put options) against major semiconductor stocks, betting their valuations will correct as physical constraints become apparent. While their methods differ—Serenity drills into microscopic supply chain details, while Leopold takes a macroscopic, infrastructure-focused view—both share a core belief: the real power and investment alpha in the AI era lie in controlling scarce physical resources, not just software. The article concludes by noting the inherent risks in both approaches, such as liquidity issues for micro-caps and timing risks for macro bets, but suggests they signal a broader market re-evaluation of AI's foundational assets.

marsbit2m ago

Retail Investors' 'Lead Brother' Serenity vs. Newly Minted Stock God Leopold: How Are the Two Top Hunters Mining AI's 'Physical Limits'?

marsbit2m ago

Who Will Make Money in the Age of Agents?

In the Agents era of blockchain, traditional value capture theories face challenges. The "Fat Protocol" theory, dominant since 2016, suggested protocols capture most value as their tokens are essential for network use. However, the proliferation of interchangeable L1s, L2s, and modular layers has eroded protocol scarcity and pricing power. Conversely, the "Fat App" theory posits that applications capturing user relationships (like wallets and exchanges) become the primary value layer by controlling distribution and transaction flows. This aligns with the current "Great Repricing" cycle. Agents disrupt this logic. As software users, they lack brand loyalty, prioritize cost and efficiency, and switch between platforms seamlessly. This undermines the front-end UX moats that "Fat Apps" rely on. The article explores several potential futures: 1. **Headless Applications:** Current leading apps could strip their front-ends and become backend API infrastructure for Agents, preserving their role. 2. **Protocol Resurgence:** If integration becomes trivial, Agents might bypass aggregators and interact directly with protocols, reviving "Fat Protocol" dynamics. 3. **Pricing Power Collapse:** Agents' rational, frictionless routing could commoditize the entire stack, compressing margins toward cost and leaving little profit for intermediaries. 4. **Unprecedented Activity:** Agents may enable new, high-frequency, machine-to-machine economic activities, expanding the total value pie even if margins are thin. 5. **A New, Unnamed Model:** Historically, major tech shifts (like the internet's attention economy) create unforeseen business models. The Agents era may spawn entirely new ways to capture value. The most likely outcome is a coexistence where "Fat Apps" continue to serve human users valuing UX, while a separate, Agent-driven economy emerges governed by different rules—where loyalty is based on factors like liquidity, latency, and settlement guarantees rather than brand.

marsbit1h ago

Who Will Make Money in the Age of Agents?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy ONDO

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing OndoFinance (ONDO) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy OndoFinance (ONDO) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your OndoFinance (ONDO)After purchasing your OndoFinance (ONDO), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade OndoFinance (ONDO)Easily trade OndoFinance (ONDO) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

4.9k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2025.03.21

How to Buy ONDO

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ONDO (ONDO) are presented below.

活动图片