以太坊基金会换帅,各方人士怎么看?

Odaily星球日报Published on 2025-02-27Last updated on 2025-02-27

Abstract

以太坊的问题太复杂了

原文作者:Fairy,ChainCatcher

原文编辑:TB,ChainCatcher

2 月 25 日,以太坊基金会(EF)迎来了一项重大人事变动:Aya Miyaguchi 将从执行董事晋升为主席,同时基金会的领导层结构也将迎来变革。

据 Onchain 基金会主席 MAX KORDEK 披露,作为新任主席,Aya 将负责准备、主持、领导并最终签署所有基金会委员会会议的决议。

这些会议涵盖基金会的所有重要事务,包括:

  • 由主席、副主席和执行董事的总体工作汇报

  • 风险评估(审查和更新基金会的风险评估图表)

  • 财务事务(当前持仓和支出情况、代币变现计划、投资策略等)

  • 法律事务(主要是法律合同和协议的审批)

作为以太坊基金会的重要人物,Aya Miyaguchi 能否帮以太坊重拾市场信心?成为行业关心的话题。

ChainCatcher 整理了加密 KOL 的多方观点,并收集了 Aya 同事们对她晋升的评价,供读者参考。

一、各方看法

1、不看好的声音:

CoinMamba@coinmamba:

Aya Miyaguchi 受雇做一份不适合的工作,没干实质性工作,还能拿到 7 年的薪水(指担任执行董事期间)。她可以继续无所事事,充当象征性的角色。新任执行董事是谁?

陈剑 Jason @jason_chen 998:

Aya 的晋升并不令人意外,因为 Vitalik 具有“倔强”的个性,越是受到质疑和压力,他越是坚持自己的选择。Aya 晋升为主席这一过程没有明确的投票或述职报告,更多是由 Vitalik 一言而定。

Mindao@mindaoyang:

这个主席像开辟了一个新职位,负责机构关系、政府公关,更像是“党史研究院院长”。调岗思路有着浓厚的中国特色社会主义的调性。

2、持积极态度的声音:

Onchain 基金会(前 Lisk 基金会)主席 MAX KORDEK @maxkordek:

整体来看,这对以太坊基金会是个积极的调整。如果 Ayako 值得信赖(我对她不太了解),这对 Vitalik 可能是件好事,因为他可以减少 FC 会议的行政工作(如准备会议、签署文件等),将更多精力投入到他最擅长的领域——区块链研究。

以太坊投资者 DCinvestor@iamDCinvestor:

Vitalik 和以太坊基金会倾听了社区的声音,并在过去几周内做出了许多积极的改变,值得肯定。

我相信 Aya 一直是基于她所接受的方向在真诚地履职,并且在她的领导下,以太坊基金会的专业化程度相比她刚接手时有了显著提升。感谢她的贡献。

但现在,我更加期待新的领导和新的想法,推动以太坊在创新和实际应用上重回主导地位。

小巴|Web3 & AI@web3 xiaoba:

在以太坊社区中,不少人认为是 Aya 的“失职和无能”导致近 4 年来 ETH 价格处于横盘状态,而鲜有人知道,Aya 是 2013 年就进入 Crypto 市场的 OG,她加入以太坊基金会的时间是 2018 年 2 月份,处于临危受命的状态。

Ebunayo.eth @Ebunayo 08 :

在关于以太坊及以太坊基金会(EF)的讨论持续进行时,我曾担心,以太坊的文化和哲学会在变革的过程中受到影响。正如许多人所指出的,确实有许多需要改进的地方。Aya 本人也在几次会议上提到,还有许多事情需要推进和优化,但变革需要循序渐进地进行。

Aya 出任主席意味着以太坊的文化有很大概率能够得以延续,同时其他需要调整的领域也将得到改进。这也表明 Vitalik 对她的领导能力充满信任。

3.中立的声音:

XinGPT@xingpt:

Aya 这次任免不是“中央已经决定了,你来当总书记”,而是“你办事,我放心”。

  • 这并不是一时心血来潮,从现任执行董事到转任主席,这一过渡已计划了一年。 

  • 作为以太坊基金会执行董事,Aya 采取了一种独特的领导方式,她称之为"减法原则"——主动削弱自己的权力,避免集中决策,同时维护以太坊的开放文化和去中心化精神。 

  •  Aya 的领导风格深受禅宗哲学的影响。有点类似于道家提倡的“无为而治”,与传统的自上而下的管理方式形成鲜明对比。 

  • 2025 年 2 月 26 日,Aya Miyaguchi 宣布从执行董事转为主席,她也写下了文章 《无限花园的新篇章》, 视为她的未来宣言。Aya 强调要以“哲学”为指导,维护以太坊的价值观。

以太坊早期开发者 Eric Conner@econoar:

我无法完全判断 Aya 和以太坊基金会(EF)领导层变动是利好还是利空。没人知道“主席”这个职位具体意味着什么;没人知道新的领导架构是什么;没人知道谁是新的执行董事;只能拭目以待了。

4、同事的声音:

EF 以太坊对外关系负责人 Joseph Schweitzer @JBSchweitzer:

Aya 的目标是为 EF 创建有效的运作流程,使其成功;即使是在风暴面前依然做出维护以太坊灵魂核心价值和精神的决定——激励生态系统增长、社区拥有权和去中心化。感谢 Aya 。

以太坊基金会成员 Nathan Sexer @NathanSexer :

在我与 Aya 合作 Deva the Devcon Unicorn 期间的短暂接触中,我可以证明,她一直是维持和加强以太坊文化和价值观的指引力量,这也是 devcon/nect 成功的关键部分。

Aya 是 EF 内备受尊敬的权威声音,她与社区的互动方式——充满希望、清晰且毫无怨言,充分展示了她的智慧与人格魅力。我们常常关注不足之处,但更应关注已取得的成就。Aya 已经做出了卓越的贡献。继续向上,继续向前。

未来不可知,但以太坊面临的问题仍然严峻

不同的观点背后对应不同的立场,Aya 的晋升能否为以太坊带来转机尚不可知,但以太坊目前确实面临一系列严峻挑战:整体创新停滞不前、管理层被指“固步自封”、生态应用的竞争力逐渐减弱,用户增长也远未达到预期目标。

此外,从数据上看,以太坊现货 ETF 资金流向也不容乐观,已经连续 3 天遭遇资金净流出。数据显示, 9 只以太坊现货 ETF 合计流出 1.37 亿美元。

以太坊基金会换帅,各方人士怎么看?

图源:Farside Investors

合约市场多头惨遭血洗。2 月 24 日至 25 日,两日以太坊合约爆仓金额达到 3.8 亿美元,其中多单爆仓 3.3 亿美元,空单爆仓 5099 万美元,ETH 价格下跌引发了大量杠杆交易清算。

合约持仓从 2 月 24 日的 255 亿美元减少至 26 日的 218 亿美元,表明交易者在关闭杠杆头寸,降低风险。

以太坊基金会换帅,各方人士怎么看?

图源:Coinglass

盈利地址减少。据 IntoTheBlock 数据,ETH 价格下跌后,目前仅有 55% 的以太坊地址处于盈利状态,而 40% 的地址已陷入亏损。这与 2024 年 5 月的高点形成鲜明对比,当时以太坊盈利地址比例一度高达近 90% 。过去几天下跌,让许多持有者重新回到亏损区间,市场情绪进一步恶化。

以太坊基金会换帅,各方人士怎么看?

近期两次黑客事件叠加整体市场的暴跌,ETH 价格一度下跌 16% 。以太坊正处于多重压力之下,未来能否突破当前困境,重新激发市场信心,仍有待观察。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Ethereum Sheds Its Load? What Ethereum Supporters Think About the Lean Ethereum Upgrade and the Future Market

Ethereum is back in focus with the announcement of the "Lean Ethereum" upgrade roadmap, described by Vitalik Buterin as Ethereum's third major update. This proposal aims to fundamentally redesign the consensus, data, and execution layers from first principles, striving to make Ethereum **simpler, more secure (quantum-resistant), more verifiable, and more scalable.** The announcement comes amidst a broader restructuring within the ecosystem, including a 20% staff reduction at the Ethereum Foundation and the emergence of new organizations like EthLabs. This has sparked a debate among Ethereum supporters ("E-bizens"). **Optimists** view Lean Ethereum as a critical refocusing on core protocol fundamentals: * **sassal.eth** calls it the ultimate bullish catalyst, envisioning a future where running a node is so lightweight it could be done on a smartwatch, greatly enhancing decentralization. * **Ryan Sean Adams** sees it as Ethereum moving from "narrative expansion" to "protocol hardening," addressing long-term foundational issues like security and scalability. * Analysts like **BITWU** and **蓝狐 (Blue Fox)** frame it as a third-phase evolution towards a "minimal, durable, and credible base layer" designed for the next decade. * **gigi发财猪** interprets the organizational changes as Ethereum "shedding old baggage and forming new teams" for a lighter, more agile approach. * **Xiyu** notes that the roadmap itself provides a much-needed new narrative for market sentiment recovery. **Cautious voices** acknowledge the vision but emphasize execution and market timing: * **Ignas** warns that while the roadmap addresses key community requests, it overlooks tokenomics, and competitors are gaining ground in areas like RWA. Timely delivery is crucial; delays could be bearish. * **Dankrad Feist**, a former Ethereum Foundation researcher, agrees on direction but criticizes the proposed 3-4 year timeline as too slow for the current market pace, especially with AI-aided development available. **In summary,** optimists believe Lean Ethereum reaffirms Ethereum's long-term value proposition as a decentralized world computer, while the cautious argue that its success hinges on faster delivery and tangible results to maintain market relevance. Despite ongoing criticism, the move signals Ethereum's effort to regroup and reclaim initiative at the protocol level.

marsbit30m ago

Ethereum Sheds Its Load? What Ethereum Supporters Think About the Lean Ethereum Upgrade and the Future Market

marsbit30m ago

AI Folding: Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Are Becoming the Privilege of a Few

【AI Accessibility Gap Widens: Elite Tools Like Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Are Becoming Privileged】 We are witnessing a growing "AI divide." A stark reality is emerging: a tiny fraction of elites, primarily in tech, are using powerful next-generation models like Fable 5 or the upcoming GPT-5.6, while the vast majority of the public only has access to "toys" - free, limited models equivalent to ChatGPT's basic versions (8B to 30B parameters). This creates a massive experiential chasm and cognitive dissonance. Industry outsiders see AI as overhyped and ineffective, unable to grasp its transformative potential, while insiders leverage these advanced models for a decisive competitive edge. The gap isn't just about model quality but product functionality. Free users get a simple chatbot. Paying elites get integrated workflow systems—capable of creating specialized agents, processing complex data, and handling real-world tasks like management, coding, and planning. Demos showcasing AI planning weddings or building apps feel disconnected from everyday needs like managing bills, groceries, or health. The cost barrier is immense, with reports of engineers spending $1000 daily on Fable 5 inference. Elite users employ sophisticated multi-model workflows, combining different AIs for ideation, architecture, execution, and review, completing complex projects in minutes instead of weeks. This divide extends to critical areas like healthcare, where free models are dangerously unreliable for medical queries. However, some argue that for 90% of common business tasks, mid-tier models like GPT-5.5 are sufficient; the perceived limitation often stems from poor integration and lack of context, not model intelligence. Ultimately, unequal access to cutting-edge AI is creating a new form of social stratification, where the most powerful tools are becoming the exclusive privilege of a few.

marsbit1h ago

AI Folding: Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Are Becoming the Privilege of a Few

marsbit1h ago

Cathie Wood's June $77M Investment: Are Crypto Stocks a True 'Substitute' for Bitcoin?

In June, Cathie Wood's ARK Invest purchased $77 million worth of publicly traded crypto-related stocks, including Coinbase, Circle, and Bullish, during Bitcoin's worst monthly performance in four years. This aligns with the investment thesis that such stocks offer a compliant way to gain exposure to the crypto cycle without directly holding Bitcoin. However, data analysis reveals significant drawbacks. A group of nine U.S.-listed crypto companies showed 30-day annualized realized volatility between 68% and 90%, nearly double Bitcoin's 37.6%. Over 90 days, Circle's volatility reached 103.6% versus Bitcoin's 37.8%. Drawdowns were also more severe for stocks like Circle (-51.4%) and MicroStrategy (-48.6%) compared to Bitcoin's -36.4% from its January high. Correlation analysis shows most stocks share only a moderate link to Bitcoin. For example, Circle, Robinhood, and Bullish have a 90-day correlation coefficient of just 0.55–0.58 with BTC, meaning only about one-third of their price movement is explained by Bitcoin's action. The rest stems from company-specific risks: earnings, competition, fundraising, and equity dilution. MicroStrategy (MSTR) is the notable exception, acting as a leveraged Bitcoin proxy with a beta of 1.59 and 0.85 correlation. Coinbase offers relatively balanced exposure. Circle exemplifies "crypto-wrapped" corporate risk, with its recent crash tied to stablecoin competition, not Bitcoin. Robinhood's diversified business insulates it from crypto downturns but also limits upside. Bitcoin miners like RIOT and MARA have posted significant gains year-to-date, driven primarily by their pivot to AI compute services, not Bitcoin's price. The article highlights that investing in crypto stocks often means accepting amplified volatility or layering on business-specific risks absent from direct Bitcoin ownership. For instance, MicroStrategy's recent challenges—its market value falling below its Bitcoin holdings (mNAV <1) and facing potential Bitcoin sales for liquidity—demonstrate equity-specific hazards like dilution and financing pressures not faced by a direct Bitcoin holder. ARK's buying spree represents a bet on a basket of different business models with varying crypto exposure, not a simple, lower-risk substitute for holding Bitcoin.

marsbit1h ago

Cathie Wood's June $77M Investment: Are Crypto Stocks a True 'Substitute' for Bitcoin?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片