四面楚歌的以太坊基金会,要如何自救?

coinvoicePublished on 2025-01-21Last updated on 2025-01-21

撰文:Texture

编译:Luffy,Foresight News

以太坊基金会是一个矛盾体。尽管它致力于去中心化,但运作模式却类似一个中心化实体,设有理事长、资金库、有偿开发者,还有一个核心圈子。这样的架构虽然对于协调工作必不可少,但却与以太坊的去中心化理念产生了冲突。

基金会的现状

很多人可能并不了解,当前的以太坊基金会组建方式并不理想。前任负责人 Ming 是被一群身份从未公开、也未为此事负责的人联手赶下台的。在 Ming 被免职的前几天,我与她交谈过,她透露自己并无离开的打算。后来有人告诉我是谁主导了她的免职,但却没有说明原因。我听说 Ming 有些事必躬亲,而且她的强势作风让一些人不太舒服。我相信这其中有一定的真实性,但这些说法往往只是表面原因,背后可能隐藏着更深层次的真相。

基于该组织在过去七年的运营方式,我能推断出一些善意的理由。该组织的一个重要职责是防止内部权力斗争以及外部势力的控制。这些目标很崇高,而且他们似乎也有效地实现了这些目标。

另一个主要关注点似乎是尽量减少该组织在公众面前的曝光度,并以一种不会在政治风向转变时,招致政府愤怒并追究责任的方式来构建自身。但随着政治风向的转变,以及市场出现了其他替代方案,该组织本身必须在形式和功能上进行调整。

以太坊从诞生之初就是一个极具远见的项目,其意义不仅仅局限于技术层面。它通过赋予个人力量,让人们能够实现以前需要数十亿美元、数千人或数百万工时才能完成的事情,从而指向了一个此前难以想象的未来可能性。

而目前的以太坊基金会,为了将内外部威胁降至最低,已经失去了那种愿景。

以愿景为引领

以太坊的下一阶段需要的不仅仅是技术研究和协调。它需要有远见卓识的领导者,这个人不仅要理解技术,还要明白其更广泛的社会、哲学和政治影响。这位领导者必须激励新一代的建设者,将技术与人类需求相联系,并在不违背以太坊理念的前提下,应对复杂的政治局面。

以太坊白皮书不仅仅是一份技术文档,它更像一座灯塔,让志同道合的人能在共同愿景下汇聚在一起。在面对混乱、不确定性和频繁冲突时,它起到了指引方向的作用。确保我们共同取得成功的,并非是没有挑战,而是我们清晰地知道自己努力要攀登的山峰在何处。这种共同愿景让我们即使在出现分歧和挫折时,也能保持一致。

这是一个应运而生的理念,一份超越了背后个体的蓝图,它激励着一个社区坚持不懈、勇于创新,并最终将这一愿景变为现实。没有它,这个项目很可能会因自身野心带来的重负而轻易瓦解。

保持透明,更加关注社区

透明度同样至关重要。在过去几年里,基金会逐渐退居幕后,这让社区感觉与它脱节了。但如果没有社区,以太坊将一事无成;要是失去社区,以太坊也将毫无意义。一个社区需要有人管理、培育和呵护。它需要吸引新人加入,注入新的活力和想法,并且都要受到共同愿景的约束。这其中也包括在以太坊上进行开发的团队。

抓住监管红利

从法律角度来看,以太坊必须抓住与立法者接触的机会。当前美国的政治环境格外有利,现在不采取行动,就有可能失去发展优势。美国选出的总统特朗普不仅持有以太坊,还在以太坊上推出了一个借贷协议。就在一年前,民主党公开对加密货币宣战,未来看起来还充满不确定性,而如今我们所处的政治局面在当时简直难以想象。现在是确保加密货币实现其承诺的最佳时机。

在保持政治中立的同时,基金会可以创建或推广鼓励合规与创新的框架。没有这些框架,加密货币领域就会充斥着各种投机项目:首次代币发行(ICO)、去中心化自治组织(DAO)、非同质化代币(NFT)等,这些项目都在规避监管,而不是在监管范围内构建可持续的应用场景。

以身作则,用技术自我管理

以太坊基金会还应考虑利用自身技术来协调运营,展示去中心化系统的变革潜力。通过采用基于以太坊的工具和协议,基金会有可能管理治理、资金库支出、决策流程以及社区参与等事务。

这种做法不仅能展示以太坊的能力,还能通过践行该项目所倡导的去中心化和透明度原则,增强社区内的信任。此外,利用以太坊生态系统进行协调,可以作为一个真实案例,激励开发者和其他组织探索类似的解决方案。通过将自身技术融入运营,基金会既能突出该平台在现实世界中的实用性,又能为去中心化系统如何有效管理复杂组织树立先例。

承担责任,构建未来

最后,财务问责必须成为重中之重。

基金会每年支出 1 亿美元,理应交付可衡量的成果。尽管在技术研究上投入巨大,但加密货币的用户体验却停滞不前。改善用户体验、用户界面、密钥管理以及其他安全和可用性问题并非无法克服,但却一直被严重忽视。这种疏忽反映出一个必须解决的盲点,否则以太坊难以实现更广泛的应用。

以太坊从一开始就不仅仅是一个技术项目,它是一场旨在赋予个人力量、让人们实现曾经需要大量资源才能达成之事的有远见的运动。而如今,这种愿景正面临着消失的风险。为了重新点燃这一愿景,基金会必须秉持透明原则,注重领导力培养,积极与社区互动,并在法律和政治层面崭露头角。

以太坊的故事是战胜混乱的胜利篇章,也是集体愿景力量的有力证明。为确保它的未来,以太坊基金会必须从一个被动应对的机构,转变为一个积极主动、富有远见的推动力量。为了以太坊,为了社区,为了更大的利益,为了未来。


声明:本内容为作者独立观点,不代表 CoinVoice 立场,且不构成投资建议,请谨慎对待,如需报道或加入交流群,请联系微信:VOICE-V。

来源:Foresight News

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Dialogue with Multicoin Partner: The Crypto Market Has Bottomed Out, Favoring Three Cryptocurrencies in This Cycle

In a recent interview, Multicoin Capital managing partner Tushar Jain shared his views on the crypto market. He believes the market has bottomed and is at an inflection point, citing that negative news no longer causes significant price declines and application adoption continues to grow. Jain remains highly bullish on Solana, viewing it as the correct architectural choice for internet capital markets, particularly for spot and tokenized security trading. He is also positive on Hyperliquid, noting its leadership in decentralized derivatives trading. His investment approach focuses on concentrating capital in top convictions rather than equal allocation. A distinct opportunity he highlights is Zcash (ZEC), which he sees as a return to the industry's cypherpunk ethos and a potential top-five asset by market cap. For assets like Zcash without cash flows, his valuation framework is based on relative market cap ranking. Regarding investment strategy, Jain employs a "three-part" entry method to avoid timing pitfalls and emphasizes long-term "active management" over "active trading." He outlines four sources of investment edge: informational, analytical, behavioral/psychological, and structural. On portfolio management, the fund uses Bitcoin as its "cash," selling assets into Bitcoin during market euphoria to reduce beta risk and using Bitcoin to buy dips. Sales occur only if a better opportunity arises, the investment thesis breaks, or valuations become excessively overheated. While respectful of Ethereum's resilience, he questions its unclear scaling roadmap. Finally, Jain reaffirms his commitment to the thesis that blockchains will form the foundational architecture for future capital markets.

marsbit3m ago

Dialogue with Multicoin Partner: The Crypto Market Has Bottomed Out, Favoring Three Cryptocurrencies in This Cycle

marsbit3m ago

Behind Robinhood's Chain Launch and Tokenized Stocks: No Equity Rights, How Far Can This Packaging Game Go?

Robinhood is launching its own Layer 2 blockchain (Robinhood Chain) and "tokenized stocks," but these are not actual equity shares. The tokens are legally structured as debt securities or derivatives, offering economic exposure to a reference stock without granting voting rights or direct ownership. This move represents Robinhood's strategy to expand from a traditional brokerage into a "financial super app," building a user-friendly, programmable financial interface on top of complex, legally compliant, and jurisdiction-specific backend structures. The company's existing business remains strong, driven by options, event contracts, and stock trading. The new blockchain and tokenization efforts are an ambitious layer of infrastructure built atop this core, aiming to make financial products more portable and globally accessible via crypto rails. Key components include the Robinhood Wallet, Bitstamp acquisition (for institutional reach), the Lighter perpetual contracts platform, and Robinhood Earn (DeFi yield). The central challenge is the "brokerage chain paradox": maintaining a simple, intuitive user experience while the underlying assets are highly structured, regulated, and legally distinct from direct ownership. The success of this strategy depends on users, developers, and regulators accepting this model. If the complexity is misunderstood or deemed misleading, it could create product liability issues and stall expansion. The initiative is a significant infrastructure play, but its long-term viability hinges on navigating this fundamental tension between simplicity and legal reality.

marsbit1h ago

Behind Robinhood's Chain Launch and Tokenized Stocks: No Equity Rights, How Far Can This Packaging Game Go?

marsbit1h ago

Zhipu, Afraid of Becoming the Next MiniMax

Title: Zhipu, Fearing to Become the Next MiniMax In July 2026, amid the success of its coding-focused AI, Zhipu's founder, Tang Jie, issued an internal letter titled "The Giant Wave Has Come." It notably avoided celebrating recent triumphs, such as Zhipu's trillion-HKD market cap and booming MaaS revenue driven by its GLM-5.2 model in coding applications. Instead, the letter pivoted the narrative to future-oriented concepts like Long Horizon Task, Autonomous Agents, Self-Evolving systems, and AGI. This strategic shift in messaging followed the sharp devaluation of its competitor, MiniMax. After its lock-up period expired, MiniMax's stock plummeted as the market began evaluating it with traditional SaaS metrics like ARR and user growth, rather than as a frontier AI pioneer. Seeing this, Tang Jie aimed to preempt a similar revaluation of Zhipu. He fears that if the market starts viewing Zhipu primarily as a profitable "AI coding company," its valuation would become anchored to conventional financial metrics, losing the premium associated with AGI potential. Therefore, the letter reframed Zhipu's mission. While acknowledging that coding was the current commercial driver, Tang positioned Zhipu on the "infrastructure path," akin to OpenAI and Anthropic. The new focus is on developing agents capable of complex, long-term planning and autonomous operation—moving from assisting individuals (OPC: One Person Company) to automating entire organizations (NPC: No People Company). This "Touch High" plan explicitly prioritizes long-term AGI research over short-term monetization. The article frames this as a critical divergence in China's AI landscape: the "commercialization path" (exemplified by MiniMax) versus the "infrastructure path" (chosen by Zhipu). The former risks being judged harshly by internet-era metrics once growth slows, while the latter risks failing if technological breakthroughs stall. Tang Jie's letter is thus a calculated move to secure Zhipu's identity as an AGI contender, buying time before the inevitable market demand for commercial proof. The core question remains: can Zhipu's "mo gao" (reach high) plan achieve genuine technological leaps fast enough to outpace the market's diminishing patience for stories over substance?

marsbit1h ago

Zhipu, Afraid of Becoming the Next MiniMax

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片