10张图,带你看懂属于Solana的超级周末

marsbitPublished on 2025-01-20Last updated on 2025-01-21

上周末被称为加密货币领域最疯狂的周末之一。去中心化交易所 (DEX) 的交易量创下历史新高,Solana 在多个维度上表现突出,同时资金流向也显示了市场的显著变化。

以下通过 10 张图表带你快速了解这一现象背后的数据和趋势。

1. DEX 交易量创下历史新高

Solana 的去中心化交易所 (DEX) 交易量达到了 270 亿美元,远远超过以太坊的 50 亿美元。

交易量


2. Solana DEX 交易量暴增

Solana 的 DEX 交易量从平均约 50 亿美元飙升至 270 亿美元,实现了 5.4 倍的增长。

交易量


3. DEX 与 CEX 的交易量比达到历史新高

由于这一现象,DEX 与中心化交易所 (CEX) 的交易量比例达到了 19% 的历史最高点。

交易量


4. 资金从 Arbitrum 流向 Solana、ETH 和 Base

数据显示,Solana 在一周内实现了净流入 1.53 亿美元,而 Arbitrum 则损失了 4.05 亿美元。

(这个情况这是否与 Hyperliquid 的跨链桥有关?)

交易量


5. 资金流向 Solana 的可视化分析

根据 DeBridge 的数据分析,Solana 在一周内的资金流入达到约 3 亿美元,主要来自 Ethereum、Base 和 Arbitrum。

同时,Solana 的资金流出约为 1.4 亿美元。

交易量


6. Phantom 活跃度激增

Phantom 报告显示,其每分钟请求量超过 800 万次。用户通过 Phantom 交易的总量达到 12.5 亿美元,涉及 1000 万笔交易。

按照当前 0.85% 的手续费计算,Phantom 在这一期间的手续费收入达到约 1060 万美元。

@phantom:“交易现在已经恢复顺畅,所有系统运行正常。

尽管面临重重挑战,我们的用户今天依然达成了超过 12.5 亿美元的交易量,并完成了 1000 万笔交易,表现令人瞩目!”

交易量


7. $TRUMP 推出当天 SOL 表现亮眼

$TRUMP 代币上线当天,SOL 对 $ETH 的汇率出现自 2021 年以来的最大单日涨幅,高达 25%。

这一重新定价进一步打击了 Ethereum 社区的士气,并加剧了对 Ethereum Foundation 改革的呼声。

SOL 超越 ETH 的可能性已经成为热议话题。

交易量


8. Solana 的挑战:手续费飙升

尽管表现强劲,但 Solana 的手续费在此期间平均飙升了 20 倍,许多用户无法成功完成交易。

交易量


9. 高手续费对 SOL Staker 的利好

高手续费为 SOL 的质押者带来了收益,总手续费收入达到 5700 万美元。其中,优先手续费 (Priority Fees) 占 3300 万美元,Jito Tips 占 2350 万美元。

交易量


10. 此外,$SOL 的销毁量达到了创纪录的 1670 万美元。

不过,别急着宣传所谓的“超稳健货币 (ultra-sound money)”理论,因为即使是这一天的销毁量,也仅相当于 SOL 当日发行量的 81%。

交易量


总结:Solana 的周末

这一周末毫无疑问是属于 Solana 的:$TRUMP、MELANIA 和 $SOL 占据了市场的主要关注点。而与此同时,ETH 的市场情绪再次转为负面。

交易量

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Behind Robinhood's Chain Launch and Tokenized Stocks: No Equity Rights, How Far Can This Packaging Game Go?

Robinhood is launching its own Layer 2 blockchain (Robinhood Chain) and "tokenized stocks," but these are not actual equity shares. The tokens are legally structured as debt securities or derivatives, offering economic exposure to a reference stock without granting voting rights or direct ownership. This move represents Robinhood's strategy to expand from a traditional brokerage into a "financial super app," building a user-friendly, programmable financial interface on top of complex, legally compliant, and jurisdiction-specific backend structures. The company's existing business remains strong, driven by options, event contracts, and stock trading. The new blockchain and tokenization efforts are an ambitious layer of infrastructure built atop this core, aiming to make financial products more portable and globally accessible via crypto rails. Key components include the Robinhood Wallet, Bitstamp acquisition (for institutional reach), the Lighter perpetual contracts platform, and Robinhood Earn (DeFi yield). The central challenge is the "brokerage chain paradox": maintaining a simple, intuitive user experience while the underlying assets are highly structured, regulated, and legally distinct from direct ownership. The success of this strategy depends on users, developers, and regulators accepting this model. If the complexity is misunderstood or deemed misleading, it could create product liability issues and stall expansion. The initiative is a significant infrastructure play, but its long-term viability hinges on navigating this fundamental tension between simplicity and legal reality.

marsbit18m ago

Behind Robinhood's Chain Launch and Tokenized Stocks: No Equity Rights, How Far Can This Packaging Game Go?

marsbit18m ago

Zhipu, Afraid of Becoming the Next MiniMax

Title: Zhipu, Fearing to Become the Next MiniMax In July 2026, amid the success of its coding-focused AI, Zhipu's founder, Tang Jie, issued an internal letter titled "The Giant Wave Has Come." It notably avoided celebrating recent triumphs, such as Zhipu's trillion-HKD market cap and booming MaaS revenue driven by its GLM-5.2 model in coding applications. Instead, the letter pivoted the narrative to future-oriented concepts like Long Horizon Task, Autonomous Agents, Self-Evolving systems, and AGI. This strategic shift in messaging followed the sharp devaluation of its competitor, MiniMax. After its lock-up period expired, MiniMax's stock plummeted as the market began evaluating it with traditional SaaS metrics like ARR and user growth, rather than as a frontier AI pioneer. Seeing this, Tang Jie aimed to preempt a similar revaluation of Zhipu. He fears that if the market starts viewing Zhipu primarily as a profitable "AI coding company," its valuation would become anchored to conventional financial metrics, losing the premium associated with AGI potential. Therefore, the letter reframed Zhipu's mission. While acknowledging that coding was the current commercial driver, Tang positioned Zhipu on the "infrastructure path," akin to OpenAI and Anthropic. The new focus is on developing agents capable of complex, long-term planning and autonomous operation—moving from assisting individuals (OPC: One Person Company) to automating entire organizations (NPC: No People Company). This "Touch High" plan explicitly prioritizes long-term AGI research over short-term monetization. The article frames this as a critical divergence in China's AI landscape: the "commercialization path" (exemplified by MiniMax) versus the "infrastructure path" (chosen by Zhipu). The former risks being judged harshly by internet-era metrics once growth slows, while the latter risks failing if technological breakthroughs stall. Tang Jie's letter is thus a calculated move to secure Zhipu's identity as an AGI contender, buying time before the inevitable market demand for commercial proof. The core question remains: can Zhipu's "mo gao" (reach high) plan achieve genuine technological leaps fast enough to outpace the market's diminishing patience for stories over substance?

marsbit18m ago

Zhipu, Afraid of Becoming the Next MiniMax

marsbit18m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片