疯狂周末:10张图解析加密市场的Solana时刻

Odaily星球日报Published on 2025-01-21Last updated on 2025-01-21

Abstract

Solana网络DEX交易量从平均约50亿美元跃升至270亿美元,增长了5.4倍。

原文作者:Ignas, 加密 KOL

原文编译:Felix, PANews

上周末可能是加密领域最疯狂的周末。以下 10 张图表可供直观了解:

创纪录的 DEX 交易量:

Solana 网络 DEX 交易量达 270 亿美元,远远超过 ETH 的 50 亿美元。

疯狂周末:10张图解析加密市场的Solana时刻

Solana 上的 DEX 交易量从平均约 50 亿美元跃升至 270 亿美元,增长了 5.4 倍。

疯狂周末:10张图解析加密市场的Solana时刻

因此,DEX 相对 CEX 现货交易量占比达到 19% 的历史最高水平。

价格发现发生在 DEX 上,而不是 CEX 上。

疯狂周末:10张图解析加密市场的Solana时刻

资金从 Arbitrum 流向 Solana、ETH 和 Base。

Solana 网络净流入 1.53 亿美元,而 Arbitrum 在一周内流失了 4.05 亿美元。

疯狂周末:10张图解析加密市场的Solana时刻

下图为另一种可视化 Solana 流量的方式。

DeBridge 分析显示,每周流向 Solana 的资金约为 3 亿美元。主要来自以太坊、Base 和 Arbitrum。

Solana 的流出量达到约 1.4 亿美元。

疯狂周末:10张图解析加密市场的Solana时刻

Phantom 报告称,每分钟有 800 多万个请求。

Phantom 用户的交易量为 12.5 亿美元,交易笔数达 1000 万笔。

假设 Phantom 当前费率为 0.85% ,那么 Swap 费用为 1060 万美元。

TRUMP 币推出当天,SOL 兑 ETH 创下了 2021 年以来的最大单日涨幅, 25% 的涨幅进一步打击了以太坊社区的士气,加大了以太坊基金会内部改革的压力。疯狂周末:10张图解析加密市场的Solana时刻

但是,Solana 并非一切利好:

  • 平均费用上涨了 20 倍

  • 许多人根本无法完成交易

疯狂周末:10张图解析加密市场的Solana时刻

高费用对 SOL 质押者而言非常有利。

总共支付了 5700 万美元的费用,但大部分是 3300 万美元的优先费和 2350 万美元的 Jito Tips(Jito 验证小费)。

疯狂周末:10张图解析加密市场的Solana时刻

重要的是,SOL 创纪录地销毁了约 1670 万美元。

不要以“超稳健货币”(ultra-sound money)为借口,因为周末销毁量占了 SOL 发行量的 81% ,远高于日常。

下图为 Solana 销毁率:

疯狂周末:10张图解析加密市场的Solana时刻

总体而言,这是属于 Solana 的疯狂周末,TRUMP、MELANIA 和 SOL 占据市场主导地位。与此同时,关于 ETH 的市场情绪再次转为负面。

疯狂周末:10张图解析加密市场的Solana时刻

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Behind Robinhood's Chain Launch and Tokenized Stocks: No Equity Rights, How Far Can This Packaging Game Go?

Robinhood is launching its own Layer 2 blockchain (Robinhood Chain) and "tokenized stocks," but these are not actual equity shares. The tokens are legally structured as debt securities or derivatives, offering economic exposure to a reference stock without granting voting rights or direct ownership. This move represents Robinhood's strategy to expand from a traditional brokerage into a "financial super app," building a user-friendly, programmable financial interface on top of complex, legally compliant, and jurisdiction-specific backend structures. The company's existing business remains strong, driven by options, event contracts, and stock trading. The new blockchain and tokenization efforts are an ambitious layer of infrastructure built atop this core, aiming to make financial products more portable and globally accessible via crypto rails. Key components include the Robinhood Wallet, Bitstamp acquisition (for institutional reach), the Lighter perpetual contracts platform, and Robinhood Earn (DeFi yield). The central challenge is the "brokerage chain paradox": maintaining a simple, intuitive user experience while the underlying assets are highly structured, regulated, and legally distinct from direct ownership. The success of this strategy depends on users, developers, and regulators accepting this model. If the complexity is misunderstood or deemed misleading, it could create product liability issues and stall expansion. The initiative is a significant infrastructure play, but its long-term viability hinges on navigating this fundamental tension between simplicity and legal reality.

marsbit28m ago

Behind Robinhood's Chain Launch and Tokenized Stocks: No Equity Rights, How Far Can This Packaging Game Go?

marsbit28m ago

Zhipu, Afraid of Becoming the Next MiniMax

Title: Zhipu, Fearing to Become the Next MiniMax In July 2026, amid the success of its coding-focused AI, Zhipu's founder, Tang Jie, issued an internal letter titled "The Giant Wave Has Come." It notably avoided celebrating recent triumphs, such as Zhipu's trillion-HKD market cap and booming MaaS revenue driven by its GLM-5.2 model in coding applications. Instead, the letter pivoted the narrative to future-oriented concepts like Long Horizon Task, Autonomous Agents, Self-Evolving systems, and AGI. This strategic shift in messaging followed the sharp devaluation of its competitor, MiniMax. After its lock-up period expired, MiniMax's stock plummeted as the market began evaluating it with traditional SaaS metrics like ARR and user growth, rather than as a frontier AI pioneer. Seeing this, Tang Jie aimed to preempt a similar revaluation of Zhipu. He fears that if the market starts viewing Zhipu primarily as a profitable "AI coding company," its valuation would become anchored to conventional financial metrics, losing the premium associated with AGI potential. Therefore, the letter reframed Zhipu's mission. While acknowledging that coding was the current commercial driver, Tang positioned Zhipu on the "infrastructure path," akin to OpenAI and Anthropic. The new focus is on developing agents capable of complex, long-term planning and autonomous operation—moving from assisting individuals (OPC: One Person Company) to automating entire organizations (NPC: No People Company). This "Touch High" plan explicitly prioritizes long-term AGI research over short-term monetization. The article frames this as a critical divergence in China's AI landscape: the "commercialization path" (exemplified by MiniMax) versus the "infrastructure path" (chosen by Zhipu). The former risks being judged harshly by internet-era metrics once growth slows, while the latter risks failing if technological breakthroughs stall. Tang Jie's letter is thus a calculated move to secure Zhipu's identity as an AGI contender, buying time before the inevitable market demand for commercial proof. The core question remains: can Zhipu's "mo gao" (reach high) plan achieve genuine technological leaps fast enough to outpace the market's diminishing patience for stories over substance?

marsbit28m ago

Zhipu, Afraid of Becoming the Next MiniMax

marsbit28m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片